Comparison of lumbar muscle morphology in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain with and without clinical lumbar segmental instability.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of spinal muscle morphology may be critical because of its impact on segmental stability and control of the lumbar spine in the subset of patients with clinical lumbar segmental instability (LSI). The purpose of this study was to compare lumbar muscle morphology in CNLBP patients with clinical LSI, CNLBP patients without clinical LSI. METHODS: This case-control study included 30 patients with CNLBP (15 with clinical LSI and 15 without clinical LSI) and 15 subjects without LBP. Axial magnetic resonance images from the L2 to S1 lumbar levels were used to evaluate the morphology of the lumbar muscles. RESULTS: A significant increase in the muscle-to-fat infiltration index and a significant decrease in the relative muscle cross-sectional area (rmCSA) of the multifidus muscle at the L3-L4 to L5-S1 levels were observed in both CNLBP groups compared to the control group (p<0.05). The mean erector spinae mean rmCSA was significantly greater in the clinical LSI group compared to the control group (SMD = 0.853, 95% CI = 0.105 to -1.6, P = 0.044) and also compared to the CNLBP without clinical LSI (SMD = 0.894, 95% CI = -1.645 to -0.144, P = 0.030) at the L4-L5 level. CONCLUSIONS: The atrophic changes of the multifidus muscle, in CNLBP patients with or without clinical LSI was observed. However, hypertrophic changes of the erector spinae muscle at the L4-L5 lumbar level were observed only in the clinical LSI group. Psaos major did not show significant atrophic or hypertrophic changes.

Relationship between the morphology and composition of the lumbar paraspinal and psoas muscles and lumbar intervertebral motion in chronic low-back pain: An exploratory study.

Muscles of the lumbar spine play an important role in controlling segmental intervertebral motion. This study aimed to evaluate the association between lumbar intervertebral motion and changes in lumbar morphology/composition in people with chronic low-back pain (CLBP). A sample of 183 patients with CLBP participated in this cross-sectional study. Participants underwent lumbar flexion-extension X-rays to determine vertebral motion (translational and/or rotational motion) of lumbar levels (L1-L2 to L5-S1) and lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging to quantify total and functional cross-sectional areas (CSAs) and asymmetry of the multifidus (MF), lumbar erector spinae (LES), and psoas muscles. The relationship between morphology/composition of the muscles and lumbar intervertebral motion was investigated. Smaller total and functional CSAs of the MF and greater CSAs of the LES muscle were observed in participants with greater intervertebral motion. Muscle asymmetry was observed at different lumbar vertebral levels. The greatest amount of translational intervertebral motion was observed at the L3-L4 level, while the greatest amount of rotational translation occurred at the L4-L5. Associations were observed between the morphology of the paraspinal muscles at the vertebral levels adjacent to the L3-L4 level and the increased intervertebral motion at this level. Relationships between measures of muscle morphology/composition and increased segmental vertebral motion were observed. The results may provide a plausible biological reason for the effectiveness of rehabilitating deficient paraspinal muscles in a subset of people with CLBP.

Combining clinical exams can better predict lumbar spine radiographic instability.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Several clinical tests have been proposed to diagnose lumbar instability, but their accuracy is still in question. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the clinical lumbar instability tests. The secondary goal was to design a model to detect lumbar instability. DESIGN: A prospective diagnostic cross-sectional study. METHOD: A sample of 202 patients with chronic low back pain were participated in the study. Five lumbar instability tests including Aberrant movement, Passive lumbar extension, Prone segmental instability, H and I and pheasant tests were compared to flexion/extension radiography as the gold standard for diagnosing lumbar instability using two by two tables. Multiple Logistic Regression analysis was applied to develop a model using demographic information as well as the patients' pain intensity, disability level, lumbar lordosis and the clinical tests. RESULTS: Among the five examined tests, Prone segmental instability, H and I and pheasant tests showed very small likelihood ratios and diagnostic odd's ratio. The largest values were for H and I test with the positive likelihood ratio of 1.28 (95% CI: 0.72 to 2.29) and diagnostic odd's ratio of 1.37 (95% CI: 0.66 to 2.83); the diagnostic accuracy measures were smaller for the other studied clinical tests. The model was developed using weight (t = 1.15, p = 0.03) and lumbar lordosis (t = 3.04, p = 0.00) (which showed a significant relationship with lumbar instability) and prone segmental instability test. The final model has the positive likelihood ratio of 2.07 (95% CI: 1.41 to 3.05) and diagnostic odd's ratio of 3.77 (95% CI: 2.03 to 7.01). CONCLUSION: Each individual test had very small to no power in discriminating patients with lumbar instability. The developed model just slightly improved the accuracy of radiological instability detection.

Alteration of lumbar muscle morphology and composition in relation to low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Previous studies have proposed that there is a relationship between low back pain (LBP) and morphology and composition of paraspinal muscles. However, results have been conflicting, especially regarding fatty infiltration of muscles. PURPOSE: The primary goal of this study was to review and analyze results from imaging studies which investigated morphological and composition changes in the multifidus, erector spinae and psoas major muscles in people with LBP. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Systematic review with meta-analysis. PATIENT SAMPLE: A patient sample was not required OUTCOME MEASURES: This review did not have outcome measures. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Sciences, EMBASE and ProQuest were searched for eligible studies up to 31st July 2020 (all languages). A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted to identify studies investigating the association between the morphology and fat content of lumbar muscles in people with LBP compared with a (no LBP) control group. 13,795 articles were identified. Based on the screening for inclusion/ exclusion, 25 were included. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. From the 25 articles, 20 were included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Results showed that the total cross-sectional area of the multifidus was smaller in people with LBP (Standardized mean difference, SMD = -0.24, 95% CI = -0.5 to 0.03). Combined SMDs showed a medium effect of LBP on increasing multifidus muscle fat infiltration (SMD = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.30 to 0.91). There were no LBP related differences identified in the morphology or composition of the lumbar erector spine and psoas major muscles. CONCLUSIONS: People with LBP were found to have somewhat smaller multifidus muscles with a significant amount of intramuscular fat infiltration. Varying sample size, age and BMI of participants, quality of studies and the procedures used to measure fat infiltration are possible reasons for inconsistencies in results of previous studies.