Asunto(s)
Melatonina , Humanos , Melatonina/farmacología , Pirimidinas , Acrilamidas , Compuestos de AnilinaRESUMEN
PURPOSES/BACKGROUND: The goals of this preliminary study were to survey psychiatrists and to examine the impact of advertisements on their prescription of psychotropic medications. The study specifically looked at psychiatrists in Massachusetts and Michigan, as the authors were able to readily contact the members of their respective state psychiatric societies. METHODS/PROCEDURES: We used the survey software, Quatrics, to create an online survey that was sent via email link to the members of the Massachusetts Psychiatric Society (1400 estimated members), and the Michigan Psychiatric Society (700 estimated members). Details were obtained about how challenging it was for the psychiatrist to convince the patient that a medication was not indicated. Information regarding how the psychiatrist first heard about new medications and where they go to learn more about these medications was included in the survey. FINDINGS/RESULTS: We received 162 partial or full responses to our survey, representing a response rate of 8%. Those who were less than 10 years out of training were less likely to find it "easy" to change the minds of these patients, when compared with those more than 10 years out of training (Fisher exact test, P = 0.0396). The most frequent medication named as a response to "which medications do patients request" was Rexulti (brexpiprazole), followed by Vraylar (cariprazine), Caplyta (lumateperone), and aripiprazole. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: This survey points to the prevalence of psychiatrists getting requests for these advertised medications and illustrates that those with fewer years out of training may have a more difficult time redirecting patients from medications that are not indicated for their illness.
Asunto(s)
Publicidad Directa al Consumidor , Humanos , Michigan , Publicidad , MassachusettsAsunto(s)
Analgésicos no Narcóticos , COVID-19 , Acetaminofén/efectos adversos , Humanos , Asunción de Riesgos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Age-related changes in disposition of diazepam and its principal active metabolite, desmethyldiazepam (DMDZ), during and after extended dosage with diazepam were studied in healthy volunteers. Eight elderly subjects (ages 61-78 years) and 7 young subjects (21-33 years) received 2.5 mg of diazepam twice daily for 15 days. Predose (trough) concentrations of diazepam and DMDZ were measured during the 15 days of dosing, and in the postdosage washout period. Kinetic properties were determined by nonlinear regression using a sequential drug-to-metabolite pharmacokinetic model. Steady-state plasma concentrations of diazepam and DMDZ were 30% to 35% higher in elderly subjects compared to young volunteers, and steady-state clearances correspondingly lower, though differences did not reach significance. Large and significant differences were found between young and elderly groups in mean half-life of diazepam (31 vs 86 hours; P < .005) and DMDZ (40 vs 80 hours; P < .02). Half-life values from the multiple-dose study were closely correlated with values from previous single-dose studies of diazepam (R2 = 0.85) and DMDZ (R2 = 0.94) in the same subjects. With extended dosing of diazepam in the elderly, slow accumulation and delayed washout of diazepam and DMDZ is probable. After discontinuation, withdrawal or rebound effects are reduced in likelihood, but delayed recovery from sedative effects is possible due to slow elimination of active compounds. Safe treatment of elderly patients with diazepam is supported by understanding of age-related changes in pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic properties.
Asunto(s)
Envejecimiento/fisiología , Ansiolíticos/farmacocinética , Diazepam/farmacocinética , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Semivida , Humanos , Masculino , Tasa de Depuración Metabólica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Biológicos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
SUMMARY: We propose that discussions of benzodiazepines in the current psychiatric literature have become negatively biased and have strayed from the scientific evidence base. We advocate returning to the evidence in discussing benzodiazepines and adhering to clear definitions and conceptual rigour in commentary about them.