Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Vasc Surg ; 74(6): 2047-2053, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34171423

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: With increased collaboration between surgeons and industry, there has been a push towards improving transparency of conflicts of interest (COIs). This study aims to determine the accuracy of reporting of COIs among studies in major vascular surgery journals. METHODS: A literature search identified all comparative studies published from January 2018 through December 2018 from three major United States vascular surgery journals (Journal of Vascular Surgery, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, and Annals of Vascular Surgery). Industry payments were collected using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments database. COI discrepancies were identified by comparing author declaration statements with payments found for the year of publication and year prior. RESULTS: A total of 239 studies (1642 authors) were identified. Two hundred twenty-one studies (92%) and 669 authors (63%) received undisclosed payments when utilizing a cut-off payment amount of $250. In 2018, 10,778 payments (totaling $22,174,578) were made by 145 companies. Food and beverage payments were the most commonly reported transaction (42%), but accounted for only 3% of total reported monetary values. Authors who accurately disclosed payments received significantly higher median general payments compared with authors who did not accurately disclose payments ($56,581 [interquartile range, $2441-$100,551] vs $2361 [interquartile range, $525-$9,699]; P < .001). When stratifying by dollar-amount discrepancy, the proportions of authors receiving undisclosed payments decreased with increasing payment thresholds. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that first and senior authors were both significantly more likely to have undisclosed payments (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.6 and odds ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-5.2, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant discordance between self-reported COI in vascular surgery studies compared with payments received in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments database. This study highlights the need for increased efforts to both improve definitions of what constitutes a relevant COI and encourage a standardized reporting process for vascular surgery studies.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/economía , Conflicto de Intereses/economía , Sector de Atención de Salud/economía , Investigadores/economía , Autoinforme , Cirujanos/economía , Revelación de la Verdad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/economía , Autoria , Investigación Biomédica/ética , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Bases de Datos Factuales , Sector de Atención de Salud/ética , Humanos , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/economía , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/ética , Investigadores/ética , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cirujanos/ética , Revelación de la Verdad/ética , Estados Unidos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/ética
2.
J Vasc Surg ; 73(2): 542-547, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32682062

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: A simultaneous operative approach to patients with significant carotid and coronary disease has been suggested as a safe, lower cost, and more convenient alternative to a staged approach. During the last three decades, spanning the career of our senior author, our group has pursued simultaneous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in limited circumstances. We previously reported on our results in series from 1984 to 1994 and 1994 to 1999. Based on these prior results and the current literature, we liberalized our inclusion criteria. We are now reporting on a contemporary cohort of 91 patients operated on from 2006 to 2018. METHODS: All patients who underwent combined CEA/CABG in 2006 to 2018 were entered into the Vascular Quality Initiative database. We compared the current series of 91 patients (group 3) with the 74 patients (group 2) from 1994 to 1999 and the 100 patients (group 1) from 1984 to 1994 who also underwent combined CEA/CABG. We examined demographic and comorbid factors, presence of cerebrovascular symptoms, degree of contralateral carotid stenosis, perioperative stroke, and death. Statistical comparison was made with χ2 analysis. RESULTS: The groups had similar demographics and comorbidities. Significant differences were noted in the preoperative diagnosis of hyperlipidemia (42%, 51%, 75%; P = .005) and the proportion of patients requiring urgent operations (24%, 47%, 56%; P = .002) during successive time periods. Patients in group 3 were much less likely to have preoperative symptoms from carotid stenosis before operation (55%, 31%, 4.4%; P < .001). Correspondingly, patients in group 3 were more likely to have asymptomatic unilateral carotid stenosis (20%, 55%, 78%; P < .001). The 30-day mortality rate remained stable compared with the first interval (8%, 3%, 2.2%; P = .11). Likewise, the overall stroke rate decreased in the later periods compared with the first series (9%, 1.4%, 2.2%; P = .016). Of the two perioperative strokes recorded for group 3, only one event was ipsilateral to the carotid artery operated on compared with the four ipsilateral strokes of nine total reported in group 1 and no ipsilateral stroke reported in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the favorable results of the previously reported series of CEA/CABG from our group, we continued to liberalize selection criteria for the combined procedure to essentially mirror the standard recommendations for CEA in patients without coronary disease. The current series using this treatment algorithm demonstrates the safety of this approach, with stroke and death rates equivalent to those of CABG alone. These excellent results were achieved in the face of increasingly urgent cardiac procedures. The fact that the majority of the perioperative strokes were contralateral to the carotid artery operated on reinforces the safety of our approach but underscores the significant burden of atherosclerosis in these patients.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Anciano , Estenosis Carotídea/complicaciones , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Carotídea/mortalidad , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Endarterectomía Carotidea/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech ; 5(1): 45-48, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30734008

RESUMEN

Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome is a rare disorder consisting of the triad of vascular and/or lymphatic malformations, capillary malformations, and soft tissue or bony hypertrophy. Symptom control is the mainstay of treatment for these patients, with many of the symptoms never fully being relieved. In this case report, we present the case of a 46-year-old man with chronic lower extremity ulcerations unresponsive to wound care therapy. Owing to the chronic nature of his wounds and associated pain, reconstruction of his iliac vein was performed using polytetrafluoroethylene graft and an arteriovenous fistula.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA