In search of the best method to detect carriage of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in humans: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Detection of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CR-PA) in humans is important to prevent transmission. However, the most optimal culture method to detect CR-PA is unknown. This systematic review aims to determine which culture method is most sensitive and which culture methods are used to detect CR-PA in humans. Second, to establish the most feasible culture method taking into account the turnaround time (TAT), and third, to provide an overview of the sampling sites used to detect carriage. METHODS: We systematically searched the electronic databases Embase, Medline Ovid, Cochrane, Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science until January 27, 2023. All diagnostic accuracy studies comparing two or more culture methods to detect CR-PA and recent outbreak or surveillance reports on CR-PA carriage or infection in humans, which describe culture methods and their results, were eligible for inclusion. We used QUADAS-2 guideline for diagnostic accuracy studies and the STROBE or ORION guideline for outbreak-surveillance studies to assess the risk of bias. RESULTS: Six diagnostic accuracy studies were included. An enrichment broth was found to increase the detection of CR-PA. Using an enrichment broth extended the TAT by 18-24 h, yet selective media could reduce the TAT by 24 h compared to routine media. In total, 124 outbreak-surveillance studies were included, of which 17 studies with surveillance samples and 116 studies with clinical samples. In outbreak-surveillance studies with surveillance samples, perianal, rectal swabs or stools were the most common sampling site/specimen (13/17, 76%). A large variety was observed in whether and which kind of enrichment broth and selective media were used. CONCLUSIONS: We found a benefit of using an enrichment step prior to inoculation of the material onto selective media for the detection of CR-PA. More research is needed to determine the most sensitive sampling site and culture method. TRAIL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews (registration number: CRD42020207390, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42020207390 ).

Outbreak investigations after identifying carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) are a serious cause of healthcare-associated infections. Part of the infection prevention and control measures are outbreak investigations (OI) of patients, healthcare workers (HCW), and the environment after identifying a CRPA in order to identify carriers and environmental reservoirs, so that targeted actions can be taken to prevent further transmission. However, little is known on when and how to perform such OI. Therefore, this systematic review aims to summarize OI performed after detection of CRPA in the endemic and epidemic hospital setting. MAIN TEXT: Articles related to our research question were identified through a literature research in multiple databases (Embase, Medline Ovid, Cochrane, Scopus, Cinahl, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) until January 12, 2022 (Prospero registration number CRD42020194165). Hundred-twenty-six studies were included. In both the endemic and the epidemic setting, a median number of two out of seven predefined components of OI were identified. In the endemic setting, the most frequent component of OI was screening of the environment (28 studies, 62.2%). In the epidemic setting, screening of the environment (72 studies, 88.9%), and screening of patients during hospitalization (30 studies, 37%) were most frequently performed. Only 19 out of 126 studies (15.1%) reported screening of contact patients, and 37 studies reported screening of healthcare workers (HCW, 29.4%). CONCLUSION: Due to probable underreporting of OI in the literature, the available evidence for the usefulness of the individual components of OI is scarce. This could lead to inhomogeneous performance of OI after detection of CRPA in the healthcare setting, and with this, potential under- or overscreening. While we could show evidence for the usefulness for environmental screening in order to identify the mode of transmission, evidence for HCW screening is scarce and might not lead to the identification of modes of transmission. Further studies are needed to better understand CI in different settings and, finally, develop guidance on when and how to best perform OI.