RESUMEN
The incidence of liver cancer, the third cause of cancer-associated death, has been growing, worldwide. The increasing trend of liver cancer incidence and mortality indicates the inefficiency of current therapeutic approaches, especially anticancer chemotherapy. Owing to the promising anticancer potential of Thiosemicarbazone (TSC) complexes, this work was conducted to synthesize titanium oxide nanoparticles conjugated with TSC through glutamine functionalization (TiO2@Gln-TSC NPs) and characterize their anticancer mechanism in HepG2 liver cancer cells. Physicochemical analyses of the synthesized particles, including FT-IR, XRD, SEM, TEM, Zeta potential and DLS, and EDS-mapping confirmed the proper synthesis and conjugation of TiO2@Gln-TSC NPs. The synthesized NPs were almost spherical, with a size range of 10-80 nm, a zeta potential of - 57.8 mV, a hydrodynamic size of 127 nm, and without impurities. Investigation of the cytotoxic effect of TiO2@Gln-TSC in HepG2 and HEK293 human normal cells indicated significantly higher toxicity in cancer cells (IC50 = 75 µg/mL) than normal cells (IC50 = 210 µg/mL). Flow cytometry analysis of TiO2@Gln-TSC treated and control cells showed that the population of apoptotic cells considerably increased from 2.8 to 27.3% after treatment with the NPs. Moreover, 34.1% of the TiO2@Gln-TSC treated cells were mainly arrested at the sub-G1 phase of the cell cycle, which was significantly greater than control cells (8.4%). The Hoechst staining assay showed considerable nuclear damage, including chromatin fragmentation and the appearance of apoptotic bodies. This work introduced TiO2@Gln-TSC NPs as a promising anticancer compound that could combat liver cancer cells through apoptosis induction.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We have investigated the efficacy of QF-PCR for the prenatal recognition of common aneuploidy and compared our findings with cytogenetic results in our laboratories. METHODS: A total of 4058 prenatal samples (4031 amniotic fluid and 27 chorionic villous samples) were analyzed by QF-PCR using several selected STR markers together with amelogenin. Results were compared to those obtained by conventional cytogenetic analysis. RESULTS: We detected 139 (3.42%) numerical abnormalities in our subjects by QF-PCR. Concordant QF-PCR and karyotype results were obtained in 4001 (98.59%) of the samples. An abnormal karyotype associated with adverse clinical outcome undetected by QF-PCR was found in 16.66% (n = 28) of samples. Using QF-PCR alone, we were able to detect abnormalities in 98.59% of all referred families; however the karyotyping results improved the detection rate to 99.85% of the referred cases. Individuals with neonatal screening result with 1:10 risk ratio showed 11.29% abnormal karyotype while this number was 2.16% in mothers with risk ratio of 1:250 or less. CONCLUSION: In countries where large scale conventional cytogenetic is hampered by its high cost and lack of technical expertise, QF-PCR may be used as the first line of screening for detection of chromosomal abnormalities. We also recommend QF-PCR for all the families that are seeking prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders aneuploidies screening to be added to their work up.