RESUMEN
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder that impacts the lives of many individuals worldwide. We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess both the effectiveness of rifaximin in alleviating IBS symptoms and its potential adverse effects. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched from inception until August 20, 2023, for studies comparing rifaximin with placebo in the resolution of symptoms among IBS patients. Risk ratios (RRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived for all the outcomes of interest. Six RCTs were pooled in this analysis. The results showed improved abdominal distension with rifaximin over the control group. Overall symptom relief at the end of the treatment period and follow-up period was also observed in the patients receiving rifaximin. However, no significant differences were found between the rifaximin group and the control group for the outcomes of abdominal pain, nausea, headache, vomiting, diarrhea, sinusitis, bronchitis, and upper respiratory tract infection. The results of our meta-analysis support the use of rifaximin in the treatment of IBS, owing to its safety and effectiveness. Future RCTs should be conducted to assess this topic of interest more extensively.
RESUMEN
Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a complex disorder of cardiac electrophysiology. It is characterized by delayed myocardial polarization leading to QT prolongation and alterations on the ST segment and T wave visible on electrocardiogram (ECG). Syncope is a common manifestation, and torsade de pointes (TdP) can lead to sudden cardiac death. Three major LQTS genes (KCI31, KCNH2, and SCN5) lead to most of the cases of LQTS. Lifestyle modifications, beta blockers, and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) placement are the main treatments for LQTS. Polypharmacy, including QT-prolonging drugs, has been shown to worsen LQTS. The impact on potassium channels and the human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG) is the mechanism behind the QT interval prolongation caused by these medications. There is an increased incidence of LQTS among African-American men and women as compared to Caucasians. Women with LQTS tend to have a higher mortality rate from the condition, especially during menstruation and shortly after giving birth. Genetic testing is reserved to those patientswho exhibit either a strong clinical index of suspicion or experience persistent QT prolongation despite their lack of symptoms. Knowing the genetics, racial, and gender discrepancies can help improve patient management and a better comprehension on each case. Proper understanding of how ion channels function and their interaction with medications will lead to a better comprehension and to develop effective forms to treat those patients.
RESUMEN
This meta-analysis has been conducted to compare the clinical outcomes between culture-positive and culture-negative sepsis or septic patients. The present meta-analysis is reported as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Electronic databases, including PubMed and EMBASE, were searched by two authors independently from the inception to January 25, 2023, using the following key terms: "culture positive," "culture negative," "sepsis," and "septic shock." The primary outcome assessed in the present meta-analysis was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included the need for mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, length of ICU stay in days, and length of hospital stay in days. Total 10 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis involving 23,973 patients. No statistically significant difference was found between culture-positive and culture-negative patients in terms of all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR]: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.95-1.24, p-value: 0.23), the need for mechanical ventilation (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.93-1.05, p-value: 0.79), renal replacement therapy requirements (RR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.95-1.31, p-value: 0.19), and ICU length of stay (mean difference [MD]: 1.70 days, 95% CI: -1.10, 4.49, p-value: 0.23). However, The mean hospital length of stay in days was significantly longer in patients in a culture-positive group compared to the culture-negative group (MD: 3.04, 95% CI: 2.25-3.82, p-value<0.001). In conclusion, the present meta-analysis of 10 studies, including 23,973 patients, found no significant differences in all-cause mortality, need for mechanical ventilation, need for renal replacement therapy, and length of ICU stay between culture-positive and culture-negative sepsis or septic patients. However, a significant difference was found in hospital length of stay, with culture-positive patients having a longer stay.