Endovascular treatment to improve outcomes for medium vessel occlusions: The ESCAPE-MeVO trial.

RATIONALE: Clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke due to medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) are often poor when treated with best medical management. Data from non-randomized studies suggest that endovascular treatment (EVT) may improve outcomes in MeVO stroke, but randomized data on potential benefits and risks are hitherto lacking. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to guide EVT decision-making in MeVO stroke. AIMS: The primary aim of the ESCAPE-MeVO trial is to demonstrate that acute, rapid EVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to MeVO results in better clinical outcomes compared to best medical management. Secondary outcomes are to demonstrate the safety of EVT, its impact on self-reported health-related quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. SAMPLE SIZE ESTIMATES: Based on previously published data, we estimate a sample size of 500 subjects to achieve a power of 85% with a two-sided alpha of 0.05. To account for potential loss to follow-up, 530 subjects will be recruited. METHODS AND DESIGN: ESCAPE-MeVO is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label study with blinded endpoint evaluation (PROBE design), clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05151172. Subjects with acute ischemic stroke due to MeVO meeting the trial eligibility criteria will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to best medical care plus EVT versus best medical care only. Patients will be screened only at comprehensive stroke centers to determine if they are eligible for the trial, regardless of whether they were previously treated at a primary care center. Key eligibility criteria are (1) acute ischemic stroke due to MeVO that is clinically and technically eligible for EVT, (2) last-known well within the last 12 h, (3) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale > 5 or 3-5 with disabling deficit, (4) high likelihood of salvageable tissue on non-invasive neuroimaging. STUDY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is the modified Rankin scale 90 days after randomization (shift analysis), whereby modified Rankin Score 5 and 6 will be collapsed into one category. Secondary outcomes include dichotomizations of the modified Rankin Score at 90 days, 24 h National Institutes of Health Stroke Score, difference between 24 h and baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Score, mortality at 90 days, health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5 L), Lawton scale of instrumental activities of daily living score, reperfusion quality (MeVO expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction Score) and infarct volume at 24 h, and cost-effectiveness of endovascular recanalization. Safety outcomes include symptomatic and asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and procedural complications. DISCUSSION: The ESCAPE-MeVO trial will demonstrate the effect of endovascular thrombectomy in addition to best medical management vis-à-vis best medical management in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to MeVO and provide data for evidence-based treatment decision-making in acute MeVO stroke. DATA ACCESS STATEMENT: The raw data discussed in this mansucript will be made available by the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Effect of Time to Thrombolysis on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated With Tenecteplase Compared to Alteplase: Analysis From the AcT Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The AcT (Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase) randomized controlled trial showed that tenecteplase is noninferior to alteplase in treating patients with acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. The effect of time to treatment on clinical outcomes with alteplase is well known; however, the nature of this relationship is yet to be described with tenecteplase. We assessed whether the association of time to thrombolysis treatment with clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke differs by whether they receive intravenous tenecteplase versus alteplase. METHODS: Patients included were from AcT, a pragmatic, registry-linked, phase 3 randomized controlled trial comparing intravenous tenecteplase to alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Eligible patients were >18 years old, with disabling neurological deficits, presenting within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, and eligible for thrombolysis. Primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 1 at 90 days. Safety outcomes included 24-hour symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and 90-day mortality rates. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to assess the following: (a) the association of stroke symptom onset to needle time; (b) door (hospital arrival) to needle time with outcomes; and (c) if these associations were modified by type of thrombolytic administered (tenecteplase versus alteplase), after adjusting for age, sex, baseline stroke severity, and site of intracranial occlusion. RESULTS: Of the 1538 patients included in this analysis, 1146 (74.5%; 591 tenecteplase and 555 alteplase) presented within 3 hours versus 392 (25.5%; 196: TNK and 196 alteplase) who presented within 3 to 4.5 hours of symptom onset. Baseline patient characteristics in the 0 to 3 hours versus 3- to 4.5-hour time window were similar, except patients in the 3- to 4.5-hour window had lower median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Severity Scale (10 versus 7, respectively) and lower proportion of patients with large vessel occlusion on baseline CT angiography (26.9% versus 18.7%, respectively). Type of thrombolytic agent (tenecteplase versus alteplase) did not modify the association between continuous onset to needle time (Pinteraction=0.161) or door-to-needle time (Pinteraction=0.972) and primary clinical outcome. Irrespective of the thrombolytic agent used, each 30-minute reduction in onset to needle time was associated with a 1.8% increase while every 10 minutes reduction in door-to-needle time was associated with a 0.2% increase in the probability of achieving 90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 1, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of time to tenecteplase administration on clinical outcomes is like that of alteplase, with faster administration resulting in better clinical outcomes. REGISTRATION: URL: https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT03889249.

Safety and Efficacy of Tenecteplase Compared With Alteplase in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of the ACT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: It is unknown whether intravenous thrombolysis using tenecteplase is noninferior or preferable compared with alteplase for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Objective: To examine the safety and efficacy of tenecteplase compared to alteplase among patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a prespecified analysis of the Intravenous Tenecteplase Compared With Alteplase for Acute Ischaemic Stroke in Canada (ACT) randomized clinical trial that enrolled patients from 22 primary and comprehensive stroke centers across Canada between December 10, 2019, and January 25, 2022. Patients 18 years and older with a disabling ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours of symptom onset were randomly assigned (1:1) to either intravenous tenecteplase or alteplase and were monitored for up to 120 days. Patients with baseline intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA), M1-middle cerebral artery (MCA), M2-MCA, and basilar occlusions were included in this analysis. A total of 1600 patients were enrolled, and 23 withdrew consent. Exposures: Intravenous tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) vs intravenous alteplase (0.9 mg/kg). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of modified Rankin scale (mRS) score 0-1 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were an mRS score from 0 to 2, mortality, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Angiographic outcomes were successful reperfusion (extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale score 2b-3) on first and final angiographic acquisitions. Multivariable analyses (adjusting for age, sex, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score, onset-to-needle time, and occlusion location) were carried out. Results: Among 1577 patients, 520 (33.0%) had LVO (median [IQR] age, 74 [64-83] years; 283 [54.4%] women): 135 (26.0%) with ICA occlusion, 237 (45.6%) with M1-MCA, 117 (22.5%) with M2-MCA, and 31 (6.0%) with basilar occlusions. The primary outcome (mRS score 0-1) was achieved in 86 participants (32.7%) in the tenecteplase group vs 76 (29.6%) in the alteplase group. Rates of mRS 0-2 (129 [49.0%] vs 131 [51.0%]), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (16 [6.1%] vs 11 [4.3%]), and mortality (19.9% vs 18.1%) were similar in the tenecteplase and alteplase groups, respectively. No difference was noted in successful reperfusion rates in the first (19 [9.2%] vs 21 [10.5%]) and final angiogram (174 [84.5%] vs 177 [88.9%]) among 405 patients who underwent thrombectomy. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings in this study indicate that intravenous tenecteplase conferred similar reperfusion, safety, and functional outcomes compared to alteplase among patients with LVO.

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Trauma CT Imaging.

Purpose: The goal of this study was to understand the impact of COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdown measures on the volume, rate, and type of trauma presenting to the emergency department (ED) by using trauma-initiated CT studies to capture patient data. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study comparing patients undergoing CT scans for trauma during the 1st and 2nd lockdown periods compared to corresponding prepandemic months. During two lockdown periods, public places such as restaurants, libraries, parks, and shops across the province were shut down. Government-led messaging advised that people should stay at home and practice social distancing. The rate of trauma-initiated CT scans and the proportion of different types of traumas were compared between time periods. Results: There was no significant difference in overall trauma-initiated CT scans between the prepandemic and pandemic levels. Motor vehicle collision (MVC) cases decreased from 18.2% to 15.6% during the first lockdown period (p = 0.049) and also reduced from 29.1% to 25.2% during the second lockdown period (p = 0.013). Trauma from falls increased from 19.1% to 27.5% (p = 0.036) during the first lockdown, despite no significant change during the 2nd lockdown. Furthermore, the percentage of stab injuries increased from 25.0% to 38.9% while blunt trauma decreased from 68.5% to 54.3% during two lockdowns (p = 0.015). Conclusion: The total number of trauma-initiated CT scans did not significantly decrease during the lockdown periods. Stabbings and falls increased during lockdown periods while MVCs and blunt trauma decreased.

Imaging for Predicting Hemorrhagic Transformation of Acute Ischemic Stroke-A Narrative Review.

Hemorrhagic transformation is caused by extravasation of blood products from vessels after acute ischemic stroke. It is an undesirable and potentially devastating complication, which occurs in 10%-40% of clinical cases. Hemorrhagic transformation is classified into four subtypes based on European cooperative acute stroke study II. Predicting hemorrhagic complications at presentation can be useful life saving/altering decisions for the patient. Also, understanding the mechanisms of hemorrhagic transformation can lead to new treatments and intervention measures. We highlighted various imaging techniques that have been used to predict hemorrhagic transformation. Specifically, we looked at the usefulness of perfusion and permeability imaging for hemorrhagic transformation. Use of imaging to predict hemorrhagic transformation could change patient management that may lead to the prevention of hemorrhagic transformation before it occurs. We concluded that the current evidence is not strong enough to rely on these imaging parameters for predicting hemorrhagic transformation and more studies are required.

Variation in CT perfusion protocol has implications on defining irreversibly damaged ischemic brain parenchyma.

KEY POINTS: • Computed tomographic perfusion (CTP) is increasingly being used in the characterization of brain ischemia.• Variations in post-processing protocols continue to be a challenge, resulting in a slight variation of CTP results.• We need to adopt a universal acquisition protocol to help optimize output of CTP.

Early diagnosis of mortality using admission CT perfusion in severe traumatic brain injury patients (ACT-TBI): protocol for a prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a catastrophic neurological condition with significant economic burden. Early in-hospital mortality (<48 hours) with severe TBI is estimated at 50%. Several clinical examinations exist to determine brain death; however, most are difficult to elicit in the acute setting in patients with severe TBI. Having a definitive assessment tool would help predict early in-hospital mortality in this population. CT perfusion (CTP) has shown promise diagnosing early in-hospital mortality in patients with severe TBI and other populations. The purpose of this study is to validate admission CTP features of brain death relative to the clinical examination outcome for characterizing early in-hospital mortality in patients with severe TBI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Early Diagnosis of Mortality using Admission CT Perfusion in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients study, is a prospective cohort study in patients with severe TBI funded by a grant from the Canadian Institute of Health Research. Adults aged 18 or older, with evidence of a severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤8 before initial resuscitation) and, on mechanical ventilation at the time of imaging are eligible. Patients will undergo CTP at the time of first imaging on their hospital admission. Admission CTP compares with the reference standard of an accepted bedside clinical assessment for brainstem function. Deferred consent will be used. The primary outcome is a binary outcome of mortality (dead) or survival (not dead) in the first 48 hours of admission. The planned sample size for achieving a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 95% with a CI of ±5% is 200 patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the University of Manitoba Health Research Ethics Board. The findings from our study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and presentations at local rounds, national and international conferences. The public will be informed through forums at the end of the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04318665.

Bleomycin for orbital and peri-orbital veno-lymphatic malformations - A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Orbital and peri-orbital venolymphatic malformations (VLM) are low flow vascular malformations. Intralesional bleomycin is now commonly being used to treat such malformations. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review is to synthesize evidence on the safety and efficacy of bleomycin/pingyangmycin sclerotherapy for the treatment of orbital and peri-orbital VLM. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane database for studies reporting outcomes of bleomycin/pingyangmycin sclerotherapy for orbital and peri-orbital VLM between 1974 to April 5th, 2019. Nine retrospective cohort studies enrolling 132 patients were included. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. Predefined outcome measures were subjective and objective reduction of the lesion and associated complications. RESULTS: Subjective reduction of the lesions was seen in 96.2% of the studies. Objective reduction of the lesion and symptomatic improvement were reported in 91.6 and 95% of the studies respectively. Non responders were 9.0%. Minor adverse events were reported in 18.1% of the studies. Major complications like pulmonary toxicity or pulmonary fibrosis was not encountered in any of the included studies. Quality of evidence was generally low. CONCLUSION: Bleomycin/pingyangmycin sclerotherapy is very effective and relatively safe for the treatment of orbital and periorbital VLM and is not associated with any major side effects including pulmonary fibrosis.Limitations: The systematic review is limited mainly due to low quality of the included studies with retrospective design.

Bleomycin for Head and Neck Venolymphatic Malformations: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Venolymphatic malformations are rare benign vascular lesions of the head and neck. Sclerotherapy has become the first-line therapy of these lesions with bleomycin being a sclerosing agent commonly used. PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review of the published literature to synthesize evidence on the safety and efficacy of bleomycin for the treatment of head and neck venolymphatic malformations. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review of the literature (January 1995-May 2019) was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies on sclerotherapy of venolymphatic malformations of the head and neck. STUDY SELECTION: A total of 32 studies with participants met the inclusion criteria among which 1121 patients were included in the systematic review. DATA ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The primary outcome was the subjective or objective reduction of lesion size as well as minor and major complications. DATA SYNTHESIS: The bleomycin/pingyangmycin sclerotherapy achieved subjective or objective lesion size reduction in 96.3% (95% CI 94.1%-98.5%) of patients. Minor complications were observed in 16.2% and major complications in 1.1%. CONCLUSION: Bleomycin is a highly effective treatment of venolymphatic malformations of the head and neck with a low rate of major adverse events. This study represents an update on the "available" evidence, but only low-to-moderate quality studies were available. LIMITATIONS: This study reviewed 32 studies performed in different parts of the world, but there was heterogeneity of the study designs and interventions.

Comprehensive Aneurysm Management (CAM): An All-Inclusive Care Trial for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: In the absence of randomized evidence, the optimal management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) remains uncertain. METHODS: Comprehensive Aneurysm Management (CAM) is an all-inclusive care trial combined with a registry. Any patient with a UIA (no history of intracranial hemorrhage within the previous 30 days) can be recruited, and treatment allocation will follow an algorithm combining clinical judgment and randomization. Patients eligible for at least 2 management options will be randomly allocated 1:1 to conservative or curative treatment. Minimization will be used to balance risk factors, using aneurysm size (≥7 mm), location (anterior or posterior circulation), and age <60 years. RESULTS: The CAM primary outcome is survival without neurologic dependency (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score <3) at 10 years. Secondary outcome measures include the incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage during follow-up and related morbidity and mortality; morbidity and mortality related to endovascular treatment or surgical treatment of the UIA at 1 year; overall morbidity and mortality at 1, 5, and 10 years; when relevant, duration of hospitalization; and, when relevant, discharge to a location other than home. The primary hypothesis for patients randomly allocated to at least 2 options, 1 of which is conservative management, is that active UIA treatment will reduce the 10-year combined neurologic morbidity and mortality (mRS score >2) from 24% to 16%. At least 961 patients recruited from at least 20 centers over 4 years will be needed for the randomized portion of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms can be comprehensively managed within the context of an all-inclusive care trial.

Diagnostic Yield of MRI for Sensorineural Hearing Loss - An Audit.

PURPOSE: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) of the head is frequently employed in investigations of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). The yield of these studies is perceptibly low and seemingly at odds with the aims of wise resource allocation and risk reduction within the Canadian healthcare system. The purpose of our study was to audit the use and diagnostic yield of CEMRI for the clinical indication of SNHL in our institution and to identify characteristics that may be leveraged to improve yield and optimize resource utilization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The charts of 500 consecutive patients who underwent CEMRI of internal auditory canal for SNHL were categorized as cases with relevant positive findings on CEMRI and those without relevant findings. Demographics, presenting symptoms, interventions and responses, ordering physicians, and investigations performed prior to CEMRI testing were recorded. Chi-squared test and t-test were used to compare proportions and means, respectively. RESULTS: CEMRI studies revealed relevant findings in 20 (6.2%) of 324 subjects meeting the inclusion criteria. Pre-CEMRI testing beyond audiometry was conducted in 35% of those with relevant positive findings compared to 7.3% of those without (p < 0.001). Auditory brainstem response/vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials were abnormal in 35% of those with relevant CEMRI findings compared to 6.3% of those without (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: CEMRI is a valuable tool for assessing potential causes of SNHL, but small diagnostic yield at present needs justification for contrast injection for this indication. Our findings suggest preferred referral from otolaryngologists exclusively, and implementation of a non-contrast MRI for SNHL may be a better diagnostic tool.

Endovascular Thrombectomy for Stroke Effectiveness Study-An Audit From a Small Tertiary Care Center.

PURPOSE: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) treatment for acute ischemic stroke is now recommended as a standard of care. However, implementing EVT in routine clinical practice poses many challenges, even in countries with advanced health-care systems. The aim of the current study is to delineate if EVT at our institution is an effective treatment for acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: All patients who underwent EVT at our institution between December 2011 and July 2017 were retrospectively assessed from our prospective registry. Clinical and imaging (including the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT [ASPECT] score, single-phase computed tomography angiography, and computed tomography perfusion) criteria were utilized to determine EVT suitability. Primary outcomes included modified Rankin score (mRS) at 90 days and recanalization determined by the modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction score. Effectiveness was assessed by comparing our cohort with patients receiving EVT in the ESCAPE (Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Proximal Occlusion Ischemic Stroke) trial. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients presented to our hospital after a median of 87 minutes last seen normal. Of these, median ASPECT score was 9. A majority (72%) also received intravenous alteplase. Successful recanalization (≥TICI 2b) was achieved in 79%. At 90 days, 48% (36/75) were functionally independent (mRS score of 0-2) and 28% (21/75) were disabled (mRS score of 3-5); 24% (18/75) died (mRS of 6) within 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: An audit of our initial experience with EVT for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke in a small tertiary care center yielded similar results compared to the ESCAPE trial, which is encouraging for implementing this treatment in routine clinical practice.

Admission Perfusion CT for Classifying Early In-Hospital Mortality of Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE. The purposes of this study were to assess the feasibility and safety of perfusion CT of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) at hospital admission and to examine whether early in-hospital mortality could be characterized with perfusion CT (PCT). The hypothesis was that PCT can be used to characterize brain death, when present, in patients with severe TBI at hospital admission. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. In this prospective cohort pilot study, PCT was performed on patients with severe TBI at first imaging workup at hospital admission. PCT images were processed at the end of the study and assessed for features of brain death. The PCT features were then compared with the clinical outcome of in-hospital mortality. RESULTS. A total of 19 patients (13 men [68.4%]; six women [31.6%]; mean age, 36.4 years; median, 27.5 years) had a mean hospital stay longer than 1 month. No complications of PCT were found. In the first 48 hours after admission, four patients (21%) died. Admission PCT changes suggesting brainstem death were sensitive (75%) and specific (100%) and had high positive (100%) and negative (93.75%) predictive value for correct classification early in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION. Admission PCT of patients with severe TBI was feasible and safe. Admission PCT findings helped in correctly classifying early in-hospital mortality in the first 48 hours of hospital admission.

Clinico-radiological correlation of magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

PURPOSE: Although several studies have reported imaging findings associated with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), less is known about the correlation between imaging findings and IIH-related symptoms or signs. Our study aimed to determine if clinical features of IIH are correlated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on consecutive patients presenting at the neuro-ophthalmology department over the last 15 years. All patients diagnosed with IIH were identified and those with available MRI were included in the final analysis. All MRI images were reviewed by a neuroradiologist blinded to the presenting symptoms and signs. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the correlation between the MRI findings with each clinical symptom or sign. RESULTS: Thirty-one out of 88 patients with the initial diagnosis of IIH had MRI available and were included in the study. Significant correlations were observed between colour vision and amount of perineural fluid around the optic nerve on MRI (r = - 0.382; p = 0.004), disc assessment and intraocular optic nerve protrusion (r = 0.364; p = 0.004), disc assessment and perineural fluid around the optic nerve (r = 0.276; p = 0.033) and disc assessment and venous sinus stenosis (r = 0.351; p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Our study highlights correlations between imaging and clinical findings of IIH. MRI findings in IIH may be useful in ruling out ominous causes of intracranial pressure and risk stratifying ophthalmologic intervention and management of patients with headaches possibly due to IIH.

T2 Hypointensity Aids in the Diagnosis of Intracranial Metastatic Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The T2 hypointensity has been suggested to be associated with intracranial metastatic adenocarcinomas (IMA). The purpose of our study was to determine the association of T2 hypointensity with IMA. METHODS: All patients with pathologically confirmed metastatic brain tumors who had a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at our institution in the last 10 years were retrospectively assessed. Qualitative assessment of the lesions on MRI was done by two separate readers who were blinded to the pathological diagnosis. For qualitative assessment, the T2 hypointensity in the lesion was compared with the contralateral normal appearing white matter. Odds ratio, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. RESULTS: Of 107 patients with intracranial metastasis, only 73 (40 females; 33 males; mean age 61 years) had MRI available for review. Of these, only 46 (25 females; 21 males; mean age 61 years) had pathologically proven IMA. T2 hypointensity was seen in 20% of IMA. The odds ratio of T2 hypointensity in IMA was 3 compared to nonadenocarcinomas but was not statistically significant (p = 0.16). Intralesional hemorrhage was seen in 20. When controlled for hemorrhage, the odds ratio for T2 hypointensity in IMA was 4.7. The specificity, sensitivity, PPV, and NPV for T2 hypointensity to diagnose IMA were 92%, 19%, 81%, and 40%, respectively. CONCLUSION: T2 hypointensity was seen only in 20% of IMA with an odds ratio of 4.7. T2 hypointensity showed a high specificity and PPV for diagnosis of IMA.

Imaging Improves Efficacy of Vertebroplasty - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials with percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) for intractable pain from vertebral compression fractures (VCF) have shown variable results. Variation in the outcomes may be related to poor patient selection on imaging. OBJECTIVE: To assess if PVA augmentation for osteoporotic VCF results in better improvement in pain when patients were selected based on clinical examination plus imaging vs clinical examination only. RESULTS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched from 2000 to May 2018. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data to identify randomised control trials (RCTs) on PVA for osteoporotic VCF and assessed the risk of bias. Standard systematic review and meta-analysis methods were advocated by the Cochrane Collaboration and PRISMA Statement. A total of 12 RCTs with 1110 participants met the inclusion criteria. Eight of the 10 studies (938 participants) that used imaging to confirm oedema in the target vertebral bodies showed PVA (compared to nonsurgical treatment) was effective in reducing pain (immediate term: mean difference (MD) of -1.89; 95% confidence interval -1.93 to -1.85, p < 0.001; short term: MD of -1.68; 95% CI -1.82 to -1.54, p < 0.001; intermediate term: MD of -2.04; 95% CI -2.15 to -1.94, p < 0.001 and long term: MD of -1.88; 95% CI -1.95 to -1.80, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: RCTs using imaging to confirm marrow oedema in the index vertebra showed an improved size effect compared to RCTs using no imaging. This benefit was observed in the immediate, short, intermediate and long term.

Améliorer l'efficacité de la vertébroplastie au moyen de l'imagerie médicale : une revue systématique et une méta-analyse.Contexte: Des essais cliniques au cours desquels on a fait appel aux techniques percutanées de la vertébroplastie (vertebral augmentation) pour soulager des douleurs réfractaires produites par des fractures vertébrales par compression (FVC) ont donné à voir des résultats variables. Cette variabilité pourrait être liée à une mauvaise sélection des participants au moyen d'examens d'IRM. Objectif: Évaluer dans quelle mesure la vertébroplastie entraîne un soulagement accru de la douleur dans le cas de patients aux prises avec des FVC d'origine ostéoporotique. On a ainsi voulu comparer des patients choisis en fonction d'un examen clinique et d'un examen d'IRM avec d'autres patients choisis en fonction d'un seul examen clinique. Résultats: Nous avons mené une revue systématique ainsi qu'une méta-analyse. Pour ce faire, nous avons effectué des recherches dans les bases de données suivantes : PubMed, Embase et Cochrane, et ce, de l'année 2000 au mois de mai 2018. Deux examinateurs indépendants ont ensuite extrait et passé au crible des données afin d'identifier les essais cliniques randomisés (ECR) portant sur la vertébroplastie dans le cas de FVC d'origine ostéoporotique et d'évaluer les risques de biais. À noter que notre revue systématique et notre méta-analyse ont été effectuées en tenant compte des méthodes recommandées par Cochrane et PRISMA. Au total, douze ECR incluant 1110 participants ont satisfait à nos critères de sélection. Sur 10 ECR (938 participants) dans lesquels on a recouru à un examen d'IRM pour confirmer la présence d'un œdème dans les corps vertébraux ciblés, 8 d'entre eux ont révélé que le recours à la vertébroplastie était plus efficace qu'un traitement non-chirurgical dans le soulagement de la douleur (sur le champ : écart moyen de -1,89 ; IC 95 % -1,93 à -1,85 ; p < 0,001 ; à court terme : écart moyen de -1,68 ; IC 95 % -1,82 à -1,54 ; p < 0,001 ; à moyen terme : écart moyen de -2,04 ; IC 95 % -2,15 à -1,94 ; p < 0,001 ; et à long terme : écart moyen de -1,88 ; IC 95% -1,95 à -1,80 ; p < 0,001). Conclusions: En somme, les ECR utilisant des examens d'IRM pour confirmer la présence d'œdèmes de la moelle épinière dans une vertèbre de référence (index vertebra) ont révélé une taille d'effet améliorée si on les compare à des ECR n'utilisant pas ces examens. Cet avantage a été observé sur le champ mais aussi à court, moyen et long terme.

Are Anterior Communicating Aneurysms Truly Anterior Communicating Aneurysms? An Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: The term anterior communicating (ACom) aneurysm is often broadly used to classify any aneurysm formed on the A1-A2 junction, A1, A2, or ACom arteries. Aneurysm location has been associated with rupture risk, so whether an aneurysm is truly formed on the ACom artery can critically affect treatment decisions. The aim of this study was to reclassify broadly termed ACom aneurysms into 4 subgroups (A1, A2, true ACom, and A1-A2 junction) based on their location. METHODS: A retrospective, pilot study was conducted to identify all consecutive patients with ACom aneurysm managed over the past 4 years in a single center. Using computed tomography angiography, aneurysms were classified into 1 of the 4 subgroups. Additional information was collected on patient demographics, subarachnoid hemorrhages, projections of aneurysm dome, and aneurysm diameter. RESULTS: A total of 48 aneurysms with available computed tomography angiography imaging were included in the final analysis. The reclassification of ACom aneurysms into subgroups resulted in 40 A1-A2 junction, 6 true ACom, 2 A2, and zero A1 aneurysms. A total of 100% versus 80% of true ACom and A1-A2 junction aneurysms ruptured, respectively. All elective coiling procedures were performed on unruptured A1-A2 junction aneurysms. CONCLUSIONS: We found only 13% of the aneurysms initially referred to as ACom to be true ACom aneurysms. A more nuanced approach to ACom aneurysm classification may better guide management strategies.