A 10-year update: national survey questionnaire of obstetric anesthesia units in Israel.

BACKGROUND: This nationwide survey was conducted to provide data about the obstetric anesthesia services in Israeli labor and delivery units in 2016. METHODS: Prospective survey questionnaire was emailed to obstetric anesthesia unit directors/chairperson of all 25 labor and delivery services units within the jurisdiction of the Israeli Ministry of Health. RESULTS: The response rate was 100%. Nineteen (76%) units have dedicated anesthesiologist cover. Fifteen (60%) units offered nitrous oxide, four units (16%) offered patient-controlled intravenous fentanyl and six units (24%) offered patient-controlled intravenous remifentanil for alternative labor analgesia. The median (range) epidural rate was 60% (22-85%). The median (range) cesarean delivery rate was 20% (10-26%). Overall, general anesthesia was performed for median (range) 10% (1-25%) of cesarean deliveries. Neuraxial anesthesia was performed for 95% (40-99%) of elective and 60% (0-90%) of urgent cesarean deliveries. Intrathecal morphine was administered routinely for spinal anesthesia for post-cesarean delivery analgesia in 11 (44%) units. Nineteen (72%) units had a written aspiration prophylaxis protocol; 20 (80%) had a written labor analgesia protocol; 19 (76%) had a postdural puncture headache management protocol; 20 (80%) had a local anesthetic toxicity protocol; 24 units had Intralipid available in the unit. CONCLUSION: No new labor units have opened since 2005, despite huge increases in delivery volume in many units. These units manage increased numbers of epidurals and cesarean deliveries. Use of intrathecal morphine for spinal anesthesia has become more widespread. Future efforts should focus on availability of emergency equipment, separate obstetric anesthesia staffing, and establishing emergency protocols.

Israeli survey of anesthesia practice related to placenta previa and accreta.

BACKGROUND: Anesthesia practices for placenta previa (PP) and accreta (PA) impact hemorrhage management and other supportive strategies. We conducted a survey to assess reported management of PP and PA in all Israeli labor and delivery units. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board waiver, we surveyed all 26 Israeli hospitals with a labor and delivery unit by directly contacting the representatives of obstetric anesthesiology services in every department (unit director or department chair). Each director surveyed provided information about the anesthetic and transfusion management in their labor and delivery units for three types of abnormal placentation based on antenatal placental imaging: PP, low suspicion for PA, and high suspicion for PA. The primary outcome was use of neuraxial or general anesthesia for PP and PA Cesarean delivery. Univariate statistics were used for survey responses using counts and percentages. RESULTS: The response rate was 100%. Spinal anesthesia is the preferred anesthetic mode for PP cases, used in 17/26 (65.4%) of labor and delivery units. By comparison, most representatives reported that they perform general anesthesia for patients with PA: 18/26 (69.2%) for all low suspicion cases of PA and 25/26 (96.2%) for all high suspicion cases of PA. Although a massive transfusion protocol was available in the majority of hospitals (84.6%), the availability of thromboelastography and cell salvage was much lower (53.8% and 19.2% hospitals respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In our survey, representatives of anesthesia labor and delivery services in Israel are almost exclusively using general anesthesia for women with high suspicion for PA; however, almost two-thirds use spinal anesthesia for PP without suspicion of PA. Among representatives, we found wide variations in anesthesia practice patterns with regard to anesthesia mode, multidisciplinary management, and hemorrhage anticipation strategies.