Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 40
Filtrar
1.
J Anal Toxicol ; 24(4): 296-9, 2000.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10872578

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to develop an immunoassay that would be capable of detecting flunitrazepam and/or cross-reacting metabolites in urine and comparing the results with those obtained by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Doses of Rohypnol varying between 0.5 and 4 mg were given to volunteers, and urine was collected for up to two weeks postingestion. These samples were analyzed by an ELISA that was developed using an antibody raised to flunitrazepam and a drug-enzyme conjugate prepared by attaching 7-aminoflunitrazepam to horseradish peroxidase. Significant levels of flunitrazepam and/or cross-reacting metabolites were detected in urine for up to one week after ingestion. The immunoassay is selective with only diazepam cross-reacting at a level of 1000 microg/L.


Asunto(s)
Ansiolíticos/orina , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/métodos , Flunitrazepam/orina , Flunitrazepam/metabolismo , Cromatografía de Gases y Espectrometría de Masas , Peroxidasa de Rábano Silvestre/metabolismo , Humanos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Detección de Abuso de Sustancias/métodos
2.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 95(1): 223-6, 2000 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10638588

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the most cost-effective prevention strategy against hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection for healthcare workers and the general population at risk in Ireland. METHODS: Four prevention strategies were compared: active immunization with Havrix Monodose (1440E.U); screening for anti-HAV antibody and then vaccinating; passive immunization; screening for anti-HAV antibody and then passive immunization. The cost-effective ratio was calculated for each prevention strategy. Threshold analysis, sensitivity analysis, and model extension to include indirect cost from work days lost and secondary attack rates through horizontal transmission were also derived. RESULTS: The medical costs were lowest and the infection rate highest when no preventive action was taken. Vaccination was most cost effective when the prevalence of immunity was 45% or less, reducing the infection rate by 98% when compared to nonprevention. Screening before vaccination was most cost effective when the prevalence of immunity was greater than 45%. Passive immunization and screening before passive immunization were not comparable to the other strategies in cost effectiveness. Sensitivity analysis showed that the cost-effective ratio for vaccination was dependent on vaccine price, incidence of HAV, and prevalence of immunity in the target group. Extending the model to include indirect costs further increased the cost effectiveness of vaccination. CONCLUSION: The best cost-effective strategy relates to target group immunity. Where HAV immunity is 45% or less, vaccination is the strategy of choice and when immunity is greater than 45%, then screening followed by vaccination should be used. This study can be used to provide a framework within which choices can be made to achieve better health for less cost.


Asunto(s)
Hepatitis A/economía , Hepatitis A/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Hepatitis A/diagnóstico , Anticuerpos de Hepatitis A , Vacunas contra la Hepatitis A , Virus de la Hepatitis A Humana/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antihepatitis/análisis , Humanos , Inmunización Pasiva/economía , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Irlanda , Vacunación/economía , Vacunas contra Hepatitis Viral/economía
3.
Addict Biol ; 4(1): 81-7, 1999 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20575774

RESUMEN

Five commercially available immunoassay test kits (SYVA EMIT(R) d.a.u(TM), SYVA EMIT(R) II assay, Abbott FPIA, Cozart Auto-Lyte(R) and Roche Abuscreen(R) Online(TM), all used for the benzodiazepine group of drugs) were evaluated for their ability to detect flunitrazepam, its major urinary metabolite, 7-aminoflunitrazepam, and several other benzodiazepines at serial dilutions (final concentration 25-1000 ng/ml) in drug-free urine and in urines following oral administration of flunitrazepam (1-3 mg). For comparison, gas chromatography/mass spectrometry was used to measure urinary levels of 7-aminoflunitrazepam. Levels of drug detected in the study were compared with the cross-reactivities presented by the manufacturers for each individual kit. One to three mg doses of flunitrazepam were taken by volunteers and levels excreted in urine analysed over several hours. A positive response was obtained in several samples from volunteers who had taken 2 mg or 3 mg doses, but not a 1 mg dose. Thirty-five clinical samples from the individuals suspected of benzodiazepine abuse were also examined. The results were not consistent among the kits evaluated.We conclude that the test kits evaluated in this study do not detect flunitrazepam reliably, due primarily to their poor sensitivities.

4.
Ir J Med Sci ; 167(4): 231-3, 1998.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9868861

RESUMEN

AIMS: To determine the prevalence of immunity to hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection in urban Ireland and to categorize the region into low, intermediate or high HAV endemicity, and to analyse the significance of certain commonly associated risk factors. METHODS: Two hundred and thirty three volunteers were recruited from 6 general practices in Dublin, Ireland. There were 44 volunteers in the 10 to 19 yr age group, 40 in the 20 to 29, 42 in the 30 to 39, 43 in the 40 to 49 and 64 in the over 50 age groups. Each participant completed a detailed questionnaire and was tested for anti-HAV total antibody (primarily IgG) using a competitive ELISA assay. Urban Ireland was classified into the appropriate area of HAV endemicity according to the prevalence of immunity by age group. Risk factor differences were analysed for significance using the chi square test and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty seven (67 per cent) volunteers were immune, of whom 20 (45 per cent) were in the 10 to 19 yr age group, 17 (43 per cent) in the 20 to 29, 30 (71 per cent) in the 30 to 39, 34 (79 per cent) in the 40 to 49 and 59 (92 per cent) in the over 50 age groups. Fifty-five per cent of the individuals studied below the age of 20 yr were non-immune. The immune rates over the age of 30 were significantly greater (p < 0.01) than those in the 10 to 29 age groups. Socioeconomic pattern in the total and 10 to 19 yr age group was a significant (p < 0.0002, p < 0.004 respectively) risk factor for infection. CONCLUSION: This study concludes that urban Ireland is an area of low HAV endemicity with age and socioeconomic status as the significant influences on seropositivity. This survey provides an insight into the changing epidemiology of HAV infection in Ireland and serves as a guide for immunisation of at risk population groups.


Asunto(s)
Hepatitis A/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Irlanda/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Población Urbana
5.
Hepatology ; 26(3): 743-6, 1997 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9303507

RESUMEN

The pre-core variant, A1896, which switches off hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) production, is common in hepatitis B e antigen antibody (anti-HBe)-positive chronic hepatitis patients. It has been observed in occasional case reports of acute hepatitis. However, transmission in the absence of HBeAg-producing strains, leading to acute nonfulminant hepatitis and clearance in adults, has not been reported. Here, we show that this event can occur, further confirming that A1896 strains are "wild-type" and can lead to all the same outcomes as G1896 strains. This is in keeping with phylogenetic evidence that A1896 is transmitted independently on a large scale in the population and explains anti-HBe- positive persons who have not had an HBeAg-positive phase documented.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos contra la Hepatitis B/sangre , Antígenos e de la Hepatitis B/inmunología , Virus de la Hepatitis B/genética , Hepatitis B/transmisión , Cartilla de ADN , Hepatitis B/inmunología , Hepatitis B/virología , Antígenos e de la Hepatitis B/sangre , Virus de la Hepatitis B/inmunología , Virus de la Hepatitis B/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina M/sangre , Pruebas de Función Hepática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Esposos
6.
Clin Diagn Virol ; 7(3): 153-7, 1997 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9126684

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Saliva is increasingly being investigated as an alternative to serum for diagnostic and epidemiological testing even though antibody levels are substantially lower in buccal cavity fluids. However, there has been little study on whether buccal cavity activity and/or the timing of saliva sampling affects the diagnostic outcome, particularly in seropositive subjects. The absence of influence by these factors may be critical to the use of saliva for pre-vaccination screening for example. OBJECTIVES: The effects of eating, brushing of teeth and circadian rhythm on the measureable salivary immune status of 42 healthy individuals known to be serum and saliva anti-HAV positive were examined. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 141 saliva samples obtained from the 42 healthy subjects, before and after meals, before and after brushing of teeth and at various timepoints throughout the day, were assayed for total anti-HAV using an in-house saliva based enzyme-immunoassay, previously shown to have a 100% correlation in terms of sensitivity and specificity with a serum based assay. RESULTS: The results indicated that total anti-HAV titres varied according to the time of day and that eating had no significant effect on the total anti-HAV titre, but brushing of teeth did. Titres never varied to the extent that a result was falsely negative at any timepoint. CONCLUSION: These results confirm the usefulness of saliva as a diagnostic sample for the detection of hepatitis A antibody, regardless of sampling times, eating or tooth-brushing.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/química , Hepatitis A/diagnóstico , Hepatitis A/inmunología , Saliva/química , Saliva/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina A/análisis , Inmunoglobulina G/análisis , Inmunoglobulina M/análisis , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sesgo de Selección , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factores de Tiempo
7.
Vaccine ; 14(15): 1439-41, 1996 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8994319

RESUMEN

This was a randomized, controlled, double-blind study assessing the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of newly produced vs 2 year old hepatitis A vaccine. Overall 215 non-immune volunteers, 18-39 years old were divided into four groups and administered vaccine at months 0, 1 and 6. Three groups each received a different vaccine lot which had been stored at 4 degrees C for 2 years, and one group received recently produced vaccine as control. The mean local and general adverse reaction rates were 59.1% and 17.4%, respectively, and all vaccinees had seroconverted by month 2. There were no significant differences in geometric mean anti-hepatitis A virus (HAV) antibody titres between the four groups. In conclusion 2 year old HAV vaccine is safe and equally immunogenic as newly produced vaccine.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Hepatovirus , Vacunas contra Hepatitis Viral/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Estabilidad de Medicamentos , Femenino , Vacunas contra la Hepatitis A , Humanos , Masculino , Dolor/etiología , Vacunas contra Hepatitis Viral/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra Hepatitis Viral/uso terapéutico
9.
J Intellect Disabil Res ; 37 ( Pt 6): 553-60, 1993 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8124001

RESUMEN

This study describes seroprevalence and risk factors for hepatitis B in seven centres caring for non-residential mentally handicapped individuals. Overall, 11% were hepatitis B marker seropositive and 4% had the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Male sex and increasing age were associated with seropositive status, and Down's syndrome was associated with the presence of HBsAg. Immediate family members of those with hepatitis B markers were screened and 22% had evidence of hepatitis B markers. Forty-one family members were identified when the mentally handicapped individual was HBsAg positive and of these 13 (32%) were seropositive. This study demonstrates that hepatitis B is a problem for the non-residential mentally handicapped population and confirms the risk of infection to their immediate families.


Asunto(s)
Hepatitis B/epidemiología , Discapacidad Intelectual/complicaciones , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Biomarcadores , Femenino , Hepatitis B/inmunología , Antígenos de la Hepatitis B/inmunología , Virus de la Hepatitis B/inmunología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA