Associations between attachment, therapeutic alliance, and engagement in black people with psychosis living in the UK.

BACKGROUND: Compared to other ethnic groups in the UK, Black people have the highest rates of psychosis. This may partly be explained by both assessment bias and structural racism. Mental health services often find it difficult to develop therapeutic relationships with Black people with psychosis. Attachment theory posits that the quality of previous caregiving experiences influence current interpersonal functioning and emotional regulation. In this study, we applied the theory to improve the understanding of therapeutic relationships with people with psychosis. AIMS: This is the first study to examine associations between attachment difficulties, therapeutic alliance, and service engagement in a Black sample with psychosis. METHOD: Fifty-one participants completed self-report measures of attachment and alliance. Staff completed measures of alliance and service engagement. RESULTS: Higher attachment avoidance was related to poorer alliance ratings. These significant findings were not upheld in a regression model controlling for total symptom scores and perceived ethnic/racial discrimination in services. Attachment anxiety was generally not associated with alliance ratings. Neither attachment anxiety nor attachment avoidance was significantly associated with service engagement. CONCLUSIONS: Staff should be supported to better understand the needs of service users with avoidant attachment behaviours and to develop mutually-agreed treatment goals and therapeutic bonds.

Therapeutic alliance in psychological therapy for people with schizophrenia and related psychoses: A systematic review.

Therapeutic alliance is a key predictor of therapy outcomes. Alliance may be particularly pertinent for people with schizophrenia as this group often have a history of interpersonal trauma and relationship difficulties including difficult relationships with mental health staff. This review aimed to determine (a) the quality of therapeutic alliance between people with schizophrenia and their therapists; (b) whether alliance predicts therapeutic outcomes; and (c) variables associated with alliance. Databases were searched from inception up to April 2015. The search yielded 4,586 articles, resulting in 26 eligible studies, involving 18 independent samples. Weighted average client and therapist Working Alliance Inventory-Short Form total scores were 64.51 and 61.26, respectively. There was evidence that alliance predicts overall psychotic symptomatic outcomes and preliminary evidence for alliance predicting rehospitalization, medication use, and self-esteem outcomes. There was evidence for specific client-related factors being linked to different perspectives of alliance. For example, poorer insight and previous sexual abuse were associated with worse client-rated alliance, whereas baseline negative symptoms were associated with worse therapist-rated alliance. Therapist and therapy-related factors, including therapists' genuineness, trustworthiness, and empathy were associated with better client-rated alliance, whereas suitability for therapy, homework compliance, and attendance were associated with better therapist-rated alliance. Key clinical implications include the need to consider alliance from both client and therapist perspectives during therapy and training and supervision to enhance therapist qualities that foster good alliance. Future research requires longitudinal studies with larger samples that include pan-theoretical, well-validated alliance measures to determine causal predictor variables.

'They've just got symptoms without science': Medical trainees' acquisition of negative attitudes towards patients with medically unexplained symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: Doctors find patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) challenging to manage and some hold negative attitudes towards these patients. It is unknown when and how these views form. This study examines medical trainees' beliefs and influences about MUS. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 43 medical trainees. Using an iterative approach, initial emergent themes were explored in subsequent interviews. Data generation continued until thematic saturation was achieved. RESULTS: Participants had received no training in MUS but had developed views about causes and management. They struggled with the concept of 'diagnosis by exclusion'. Attitudes towards patients had developed through informal clinical observation and interactions with doctors. Many welcomed formal training but identified a need to integrate theoretical learning with clinical application. CONCLUSION: Despite limited teaching, medical trainees are aware of the challenges in diagnosing and managing patients with MUS, acquiring attitudes through a hidden curriculum. To be welcomed, training must be evidence-based, theoretically informed, but clinically applicable. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Current medical training fails to equip doctors to engage with MUS and potentially fosters the development of unhelpful views of these patients. Informed teaching on diagnosis and management of MUS is necessary at a trainee level to limit the development of negative attitudes.