Sensory and autonomic nerve changes in the monosodium glutamate-treated rat: a model of type II diabetes.

Rats that had been injected with monosodium glutamate (MSG) neonatally were studied for up to 70 weeks and compared with age-matched control rats to study changes in glucose tolerance and in sympathetic and sensory nerves. At 61 and 65 weeks of age, there were significant differences in glucose tolerance between the MSG and control groups, and the MSG group had raised fasting blood glucose. These changes were not associated with changes in the number of beta-cells in the islets of Langerhans. In addition, the diabetic MSG-treated rats had central obesity and cataracts. Hypoalgesia to thermal stimuli was present in MSG-treated rats as early as 6 weeks and persisted at 70 weeks. However, no differences were observed in the distribution of substance P, the neurokinin-1 receptor or calcitonin gene-related peptide in the dorsal horn of L3-L5 at this age (70 weeks). Diabetic MSG-treated animals at 65 and 70 weeks of age had significantly reduced noradrenaline concentrations in the heart, tail artery and ileum, while concentrations in the adrenal gland and corpus cavernosum were significantly increased. There was also a significant increase in adrenal adrenaline, dopamine and serotonin, largely attributable to changes in weight of the adrenal gland in the MSG-treated animals. The results indicate that MSG-treated animals develop a form of type II diabetes by about 60 weeks of age, and that there are significant changes in amine levels in various tissues associated with these developments.

The effect of streptozotocin-induced diabetes on the rat seminal vesicle: A possible pathophysiological basis for disorders of ejaculation.

In the streptozotocin (STZ)-diabetic rat major increases in noradrenaline concentration and content of the seminal vesicles were evident as early as 7 weeks following induction of hyperglycemia and returned toward normal after 34 weeks of hyperglycemia. There were significant reductions in the concentration and content of dopamine at 19-42 weeks of diabetes, and small occasionally significant reductions in the content of serotonin and adrenaline, particularly around 19-26 weeks after STZ treatment. The uptake of tritiated noradrenaline in the diabetics was increased at 12 weeks compared to the controls, and decreased to control levels with increasing age. Release of tritiated noradrenline was increased in response to electrical field stimulation and high potassium solutions, and raising calcium concentration caused increased release at rest and during electrical stimulation. Immunohistochemical demonstration of tyrosine hydroxylase was increased during the period when the noradrenaline concentration and content were elevated. It is concluded that there are significant changes in the sympathetic innervation of the seminal vesicle during the course of STZ diabetes, and that alterations in the reuptake, release, and synthesis of the neurotransmitter noradrenaline may contribute to changes in the concentration of the amine in the tissue. It is possible that the changes observed are related to the remodeling and regrowth of sympathetic nerve endings damaged in the early stages of hyperglycemia. These changes may also contribute to disorders of ejaculation in diabetes.

Ranitidine in acute high-dose organophosphate exposure in rats: effect of the time-point of administration and comparison with pyridostigmine.

Weak and reversible inhibitors of cholinesterase, when co-administered in large doses, can act in a protective manner against more potent inhibitors such as organophosphates. The clinically widely used histamine type 2 (H2) receptor blocker ranitidine is among H2 blockers the most potent inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase but roughly three to four orders of magnitude less potent than paraoxon (an irreversible organophosphate esterase inhibitor) or pyridostigmine (a reversible carbamate esterase inhibitor). We have previously shown that in vitro ranitidine confers some protection against inhibition of cholinesterases by paraoxon and that in vivo it both increases the number of rats surviving an acute paraoxon exposure and also protects to some degree the cholinesterases from organophosphate inhibition. The purpose of the study was to compare in a prospective non-blinded study, in a rat model of acute high-dose paraoxon exposure, ranitidine with pyridostigmine either administered simultaneously or 30 min. before exposure. There were 36 rats in each of the 5 groups. All substances were applied intraperitoneally. Additional analysis included data from a similar experiment carried out in 2005, in which 54 rats were exposed to paraoxon only (G1) and 54 to paraoxon+ranitidine simultaneously (G2). All groups (except controls; G6 & G7) received 1 micro Mol paraoxon (approximately LD75); groups 2-5 received in addition to paraoxon: G2: 50 micro Mol ranitidine within 1 min. of paraoxon, G3: 1 micro Mol pyridostigmine within 1 min. of paraoxon, G4: 50 micro Mol ranitidine 30 min. before paraoxon, G5: 1 micro Mol pyridostigmine 30 min. before paraoxon. Groups 6 & 7 received only ranitidine and pyridostigmine respectively, group G1 received only paraoxon. Mortality was recorded at 30 min., 1, 2, 3, 4, 24 and 48 hr. Mortality data were compared using Kaplan-Meier plots and logrank tests. No Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was applied and an alpha < or = 0.05 was considered significant. All statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS 12.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Simultaneous administration of ranitidine or pyridostigmine with paraoxon does not significantly affect mortality. Pretreatment (30 min. before) with both ranitidine or pyridostigmine statistically and significantly reduced mortality. When administered before paraoxon, pyridostigmine is statistically significantly superior to ranitidine. Both ranitidine and pyridostigmine are protective against acute paraoxon toxicity provided they are administered before paraoxon. Pyridostigmine results are statistically significantly superior to ranitidine (< or =0.05).

Protective drugs in acute large-dose exposure to organophosphates: a comparison of metoclopramide and tiapride with pralidoxime in rats.

Weak and reversible inhibitors of cholinesterase(s), when coadministered in excess with a more potent inhibitor such as organophosphates, can act in a protective manner. The benzamide compound, metoclopramide, confers some protection (putatively via this mechanism) for cholinesterases against inhibition by paraoxon both in vitro and in vivo, after chronic small-dose exposure. Tiapride is a related benzamide. In this study, we compared the protection by metoclopramide and tiapride in rats acutely exposed to large doses of paraoxon with the therapeutic "gold standard," pralidoxime. Group 1 received 1 micromol paraoxon (approximately 75% lethal dose), Group 2 received 50 micromol metoclopramide, Group 3 received 50 micromol tiapride, Group 4 received 50 micromol pralidoxime, Group 5 received 1 micromol paraoxon + 50 micromol metoclopramide, Group 6 1 micromol paraoxon + 50 micromol tiapride, and Group 7 1 micromol paraoxon + 50 micromol pralidoxime. All substances were administered intraperitoneally. The animals were monitored for 48 h and mortality was recorded at 30 min, 1, 2, 3, 4, 24, and 48 h. Blood was taken for red blood cell acetylcholinesterase measurements at baseline, 30 min, 24, and 48 h. With the exception of Group 7, in which some late mortality was observed, mortality occurred mainly in the first 30 min after paraoxon administration with minimal changes occurring thereafter. Mortality at 30 min was 0% in the metoclopramide, tiapride, and pralidoxime groups and 73 +/- 20 (paraoxon), 65 +/- 15 (paraoxon + metoclopramide), 38 +/- 14 (paraoxon + tiapride), and 13 +/- 19 (paraoxon + pralidoxime). Mortality at 48 h was 75 +/- 18 (paraoxon), 67 +/- 17 (paraoxon + metoclopramide), 42 +/- 16 (paraoxon + tiapride), and 27 +/- 24 (paraoxon + pralidoxime). Metoclopramide does not significantly influence mortality after acute large-dose paraoxon exposure. Both tiapride and pralidoxime significantly decreased mortality in our model. The protection conferred by tiapride was significantly less than that conferred by pralidoxime at 30 min, but was not significantly different at 24 and 48 h.