Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Neurosci ; 133(8): 901-907, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34906029

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We report two cases of optic nerve pathology after the administration of the Pfizer-BioNTech and AstraZeneca-Oxford COVID-19 vaccines, respectively, and describe the implications for management of post-vaccination central nervous system (CNS) inflammation. CASE REPORTS: A 69-year-old woman presented with bilateral optic nerve head oedema, 16 days after the second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. She was diagnosed with post-vaccination CNS inflammatory syndrome and was treated for five days with intravenous methylprednisolone at a dose of 1 gram per day. Her optic disc swelling improved, and her vision stabilised. A 32-year-old woman presented six days after her first dose of the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine with two days of sudden onset of progressive blurring of vision in her left eye. Posterior segment examination revealed left optic disc swelling, and an MRI of the brain, orbit, and cervical spine was significant for left optic nerve enhancement. The patient was diagnosed with a unilateral post-vaccination optic neuritis. She was treated with a three-day course of intravenous methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisone. Her optic disc swelling and visual field improved, and she recovered 6/6 vision. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians and patients should be aware of the potential for post-vaccination CNS inflammatory syndromes associated with COVID-19 vaccine administration. Neuroimaging and cerebrospinal fluid analysis may aid in the diagnosis of the cause of vision loss. Further studies are needed to evaluate the spectrum and frequency of optic nerve involvement associated with COVID-19 vaccination.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Enfermedades del Nervio Óptico , Papiledema , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Metilprednisolona/uso terapéutico , Nervio Óptico/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades del Nervio Óptico/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades del Nervio Óptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Vacunación/efectos adversos
2.
Int J Retina Vitreous ; 7(1): 26, 2021 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33795022

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite the good outcomes achieved with intravitreal angiogenic therapy, a subset of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients experience resistance to therapy after repeated injections. Switching drugs could offer benefit to this group of patients. PURPOSE: To determine visual and anatomical outcomes in a cohort of neovascular AMD patients resistant to repeated injections of bevacizumab/ranibizumab after switching to aflibercept therapy. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of patients who had a diagnosis of neovascular AMD and persistent intraretinal (IRF) and/or subretinal fluid (SRF) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) for at least 3 months despite monthly bevacizumab and/or ranibizumab injections prior to transition to aflibercept. We reviewed patients' records and OCT images obtained at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after transition to aflibercept. Data collected included demographics, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), number of injections received and the occurrence of any adverse events. Studied OCT parameters included central macular thickness (CMT) values and the presence or absence of SRF, IRF and/or pigment epithelial detachment (PED) at each visit. RESULTS: We included 53 eyes of 48 patients. Mean change in BCVA from baseline was 0.05 ± 0.13 (P = 0.01) at M1, 0.04 ± 0.16 (P = 0.08) at M3, 0.01 ± 0.22 (P = 0.9) at M6, and 0.02 ± 0.28 (P = 1) at M12, while the mean change in CMT from baseline was 64 ± 75 µm (P < 0.0001) at M1, 42 ± 85 µm (P = 0.002) at M3, 47 ± 69 µm (P < 0.0001) at M6, and 46 ± 99 µm (P = 0.001) at M12. The percentage of eyes with SRF decreased from 77.4% at baseline to 39.6% at M1, then increased to 47.2% at M3, then decreased to 43.4% at M6, and to 41.5% at M12 (All p < 0.001, compared to baseline). Compared to baseline, there was a statistically significant decrease in the percentage of eyes having IRF from 47.2 to 20.8% at M1 (p < 0.001), 30.2% at M3, 24.5% at M6 and 26.4% at M12 (p < 0.01, each). The number of bevacizumab and/or ranibizumab injections (7.36 ± 1.85) was significantly higher than that of aflibercept (6.47 ± 2.45, p = 0.001). A significant direct relationship between CMT reduction and BCVA improvement was demonstrated at M1 (p = 0.01, r = 0.36), M3 (p = 0.03, r = 0.30) and M12 (p = 0.03, r = 0.30). Eyes with IRF had significantly poorer BCVA than eyes without IRF at baseline (p = 0.02) and M3 (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Switching to intravitreal aflibercept therapy in a cohort of neovascular AMD patients resistant to chronic bevacizumab and/or ranibizumab injections can lead to significant visual improvement in the short term and sustained reduction of central macular thickness over 1 year of followup.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...