Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 77(2): 157-171, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33341315

RESUMEN

The recently published 2020 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) practice recommendations regarding prescription of high-quality goal-directed peritoneal dialysis differ fundamentally from previous guidelines that focused on "adequacy" of dialysis. The new ISPD publication emphasizes the need for a person-centered approach with shared decision making between the individual performing peritoneal dialysis and the clinical care team while taking a broader view of the various issues faced by that individual. Cognizant of the lack of strong evidence for the recommendations made, they are labeled as "practice points" rather than being graded numerically. This commentary presents the views of a work group convened by the National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) to assess these recommendations and assist clinical providers in the United States in interpreting and implementing them. This will require changes to the current clinical paradigm, including greater resource allocation to allow for enhanced services that provide a more holistic and person-centered assessment of the quality of dialysis delivered.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Diálisis Peritoneal , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Humanos , Estado Nutricional , Estado de Hidratación del Organismo , Cuidados Paliativos , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Estados Unidos
2.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 15(1): 101-108, 2020 01 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31857376

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the United States mortality rates for patients treated with dialysis differ by racial and/or ethnic (racial/ethnic) group. Mortality outcomes for patients undergoing maintenance dialysis in the United States territories may differ from patients in the United States 50 states. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This retrospective cohort study of using US Renal Data System data included 1,547,438 adults with no prior transplantation and first dialysis treatment between April 1, 1995 and September 28, 2012. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) of death for the territories versus 50 states for each racial/ethnic group using the whole cohort and covariate-matched samples. Covariates included demographics, year of dialysis initiation, cause of kidney failure, comorbid conditions, dialysis modality, and many others. RESULTS: Of 22,828 patients treated in the territories (American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands), 321 were white, 666 were black, 20,299 were Hispanic, and 1542 were Asian. Of 1,524,610 patients in the 50 states, 838,736 were white, 444,066 were black, 182,994 were Hispanic, and 58,814 were Asian. The crude mortality rate (deaths per 100 patient-years) was lower for whites in the territories than the 50 states (14 and 29, respectively), similar for blacks (18 and 17, respectively), higher for Hispanics (27 and 16, respectively), and higher for Asians (22 and 15). In matched analyses, greater risks of death remained for Hispanics (HR, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.60 to 1.70; P<0.001) and Asians (HR, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.78 to 2.27; P<0.001) living in the territories versus their matched 50 states counterparts. There were no significant differences in mortality among white or black patients in the territories versus the 50 states. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality rates for patients undergoing dialysis in the United States territories differ substantially by race/ethnicity compared with the 50 states. After matched analyses for comparable age and risk factors, mortality risk no longer differed for whites or blacks, but remained much greater for territory-dwelling Hispanics and Asians.


Asunto(s)
Asiático , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Hispánicos o Latinos , Enfermedades Renales , Diálisis Renal/mortalidad , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades Renales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Renales/etnología , Enfermedades Renales/mortalidad , Enfermedades Renales/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Islas del Pacífico/epidemiología , Puerto Rico/epidemiología , Factores Raciales , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Población Blanca
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA