Is more better? A multilevel analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention hospital openings and closures on patient volumes.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown how changes in the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) "built environment" have impacted PCI volumes at the community, hospital, and patient levels. This study sought to determine how PCI hospital openings and closures effect community- and hospital-level PCI volumes as well as the likelihood of receiving PCI at a low-volume hospital. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 3,966,025 Medicare Fee-For-Service patients in 37,451 zip codes and 2564 U.S. hospitals who underwent PCI from 2006 to 2017. We conducted community-, hospital-, and patient-level analyses using ordinary least squares regressions with fixed effects to determine changes in PCI volumes after PCI hospital openings or closures. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2017, a total of 17% and 7% of patients lived in communities that experienced PCI hospital openings and closures, respectively. Openings were associated with a 10% increase in community PCI volume, a 2% increase in the share of elective PCI, and a doubling in the likelihood of receiving PCI at a low-volume hospital. In communities with low baseline PCI capacity, openings were associated with a 12% increase in community PCI volume, and in high-capacity communities, an 8% increase. PCI closures were associated with a 9% decrease in community PCI volume in high-capacity communities but no measurable change in low-capacity communities. CONCLUSIONS: PCI service expansion is associated with increased PCI at low-volume hospitals and a greater number of elective procedures. Increased governmental oversight may be necessary to ensure that openings and closures of these specialized services yield the desired benefits.

Heterogeneity of State Stroke Center Certification and Designation Processes.

BACKGROUND: Stroke centers are critical for the timely diagnosis and treatment of acute stroke and have been associated with improved treatment and outcomes; however, variability exists in the definitions and processes used to certify and designate these centers. Our study categorizes state stroke center certification and designation processes and provides examples of state processes across the United States, specifically in states with independent designation processes that do not rely on national certification. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study from September 2022 to April 2023, we used peer-reviewed literature, primary source documents from states, and communication with state officials in all 50 states to capture each state's process for stroke center certification and designation. We categorized this information and outlined examples of processes in each category. RESULTS: Our cross-sectional study of state-level stroke center certification and designation processes across states reveals significant heterogeneity in the terminology used to describe state processes and the processes themselves. We identify 3 main categories of state processes: No State Certification or Designation Process (category A; n=12), State Designation Reliant on National Certification Only (category B; n=24), and State Has Option for Self-Certification or Independent Designation (category C; n=14). Furthermore, we describe 3 subcategories of self-certification or independent state designation processes: State Relies on Self-Certification or Independent Designation for Acute Stroke Ready Hospital or Equivalent (category C1; n=3), State Has Hybrid Model for Acute Stroke Ready Hospital or Equivalent (category C2; n=5), and State Has Hybrid Model for Primary Stroke Center and Above (category C3; n=6). CONCLUSIONS: Our study found significant heterogeneity in state-level processes. A better understanding of how these differences may impact the rigor of each process and clinical performance of stroke centers is worthy of further investigation.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Capable Facility Openings and Acute Myocardial Infarction Outcomes by Patient Race and Community Segregation.

This cohort study investigates differential changes in patient outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention­capable facility openings by patient race and community segregation.

Propensity of US Military Personnel to Seek Mental Health Care When Community Psychiatric Capacity Changes.

Importance: Understanding how the active duty military population's mental health care use is associated with local military and civilian psychiatrist capacity is critical in designing the optimal allocation of mental health resources from both sectors to improve the mental health of military personnel. Objective: To evaluate whether the probability of mental health care visits by military personnel changes when psychiatrist capacity changes in their communities, when capacity is measured separately for military treatment facilities and civilian sectors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study of active duty US military service members between January 1, 2016, and September 30, 2020, combines data from the Defense Health Agency, the National Plan and Provider Enumeration System, and the US Census. Data were collected and analyzed from June 2022 to July 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the probability of making at least 1 mental health care visit in a given quarter at military treatment facilities and in civilian settings. Linear probability models with 2-dimensional fixed effects at individual and community levels were implemented to estimate changes in individual outcomes when community psychiatrist capacity changed. Results: This study includes 1 958 421 US service members (83% men; mean [SD] age at baseline, 28.4 [8.0] years). Thirteen percent of service members did not have military treatment facility psychiatrists available within a 30-minute driving time, and 66% lived in communities with a psychiatrist shortage (<1 psychiatrist per 20 000 relevant population), while 9% lived in communities with high (>3 psychiatrists per 20 000 relevant population) military treatment facility psychiatrist capacity. Five percent of service members lived in communities with no civilian psychiatrists within a 30-minute driving time, while 66% lived in communities with high civilian psychiatrist capacity. The mean quarterly mental health care visit rates to military treatment facilities and civilian settings were 7% and 2%, respectively. The probability of a mental health care visit to a military treatment facility increased by 0.95 percentage points (95% CI, 0.79-1.10 percentage points; equivalent to 14%) when the individual experienced a change in military treatment facility capacity from no psychiatrist to high capacity. The probability of a mental health care visit to a civilian setting increased by 0.57 percentage points (95% CI, 0.38-0.76 percentage points; equivalent to 32%) when civilian capacity changed from no psychiatrist to high capacity. The magnitude of responses to military treatment facility capacity changes remained similar in communities that already had high civilian capacity. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study of the US military population suggests that active duty military personnel rely largely on military treatment facilities for their mental health care and that there are meaningful responses to military treatment facility psychiatrist capacity changes even in communities with high civilian psychiatric capacity. Realigning military treatment facility psychiatrists across communities with shortages and high-capacity military treatment facilities, as well as addressing nongeographical barriers in the civilian sector, remain critical to achieve the optimal balance between military and civilian care provision.

Differential Treatment and Outcomes for Patients With Heart Attacks in Advantaged and Disadvantaged Communities.

Background Racially and ethnically minoritized groups, people with lower income, and rural communities have worse access to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) than their counterparts, but PCI hospitals have preferentially opened in wealthier areas. Our study analyzed disparities in PCI access, treatment, and outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction based on the census-derived Area Deprivation Index. Methods and Results We obtained patient-level data on 629 419 patients with acute myocardial infarction in California between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2020. We linked patient data with population characteristics and geographic coordinates, and categorized communities into 5 groups based on the share of the population in low or high Area Deprivation Index neighborhoods to identify differences in PCI access, treatment, and outcomes based on community status. Risk-adjusted models showed that patients in the most advantaged communities had 20% and 15% greater likelihoods of receiving same-day PCI and PCI during the hospitalization, respectively, compared with patients in the most disadvantaged communities. Patients in the most advantaged communities also had 19% and 16% lower 30-day and 1-year mortality rates, respectively, compared with the most disadvantaged, and a 15% lower 30-day readmission rate. No statistically significant differences in admission to a PCI hospital were observed between communities. Conclusions Patients in disadvantaged communities had lower chances of receiving timely PCI and a greater risk of mortality and readmission compared with those in more advantaged communities. These findings suggest a need for targeted interventions to influence where cardiac services exist and who has access to them.

Do PCI Facility Openings and Closures Affect AMI Outcomes Differently in High- vs Average-Capacity Markets?

BACKGROUND: Disparities in access to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with acute myocardial infarction may result from openings and closures of PCI-providing hospitals, potentially leading to low hospital PCI volume, which is associated with poor outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to determine whether openings and closures of PCI hospitals have differentially impacted patient health outcomes in high- vs average-capacity PCI markets. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, the authors identified PCI hospital availability within a 15-minute driving time of zip code communities. The authors categorized communities by baseline PCI capacity and identified changes in outcomes associated with PCI-providing hospital openings and closures using community fixed-effects regression models. RESULTS: From 2006 to 2017, 20% and 16% of patients in average- and high-capacity markets, respectively, experienced a PCI hospital opening within a 15-minute drive. In average-capacity markets, openings were associated with a 2.6 percentage point decrease in admission to a high-volume PCI facility; high-capacity markets saw an 11.6 percentage point decrease. After an opening, patients in average-capacity markets experienced a 5.5% and 7.6% relative increase in likelihood of same-day and in-hospital revascularization, respectively, as well as a 2.5% decrease in mortality. PCI hospital closures were associated with a 10.4% relative increase in admission to high-volume PCI hospitals and a 1.4 percentage point decrease in receipt of same-day PCI. There was no change observed in high-capacity PCI markets. CONCLUSIONS: After openings, patients in average-capacity markets derived significant benefits, whereas those in high-capacity markets did not. This suggests that past a certain threshold, facility opening does not improve access and health outcomes.

Spatial Analysis of Access to Psychiatrists for US Military Personnel and Their Families.

Importance: Military service members and their families have greater mental health care needs compared with their civilian counterparts. Some communities have inadequate access to psychiatrists for this population. Objectives: To identify geographic variations in the availability of military and civilian psychiatrists within a 30-minute driving time of TRICARE (the US military's health care program) beneficiaries' communities and compare the likelihood of living in areas with inadequate access to psychiatrists for historically underserved and other communities. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study of all zip code communities in the continental US, Hawaii, and Alaska with at least one TRICARE beneficiary between January 1, 2016, and September 30, 2020, combines data from the Defense Health Agency, the National Plan and Provider Enumeration System, and the US Census to estimate a logistic regression to compare differences between communities with and without a psychiatrist shortage. Data were analyzed from September 2021 to November 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: A community's likelihood of having a shortage of military and civilian psychiatrists within a 30-minute driving time and a community's likelihood of having no psychiatrists. Odds ratios were calculated to estimate likelihood of the outcomes. Results: This study includes 39 487 unique communities where 13% of the population is Black and 14% of the population is Hispanic. During the study period, 35% of TRICARE beneficiaries lived in communities with a shortage of both military and civilian psychiatrists, and 6% lived in communities with no access to military or civilian psychiatrists. Low-income communities with high income inequality were 1.64 (95% CI, 1.30-2.07) times more likely to have inadequate access to psychiatrists and 2.59 (95% CI, 1.82-3.69) times more likely to have no access to psychiatrists, compared with reference communities (average income without high income inequality); low-income communities without high income inequality were 1.37 (95% CI, 1.05-1.78) times more likely to have inadequate access to psychiatrists and 1.93 (95% CI, 1.28-2.89) times more likely to have no access to psychiatrists. Rural communities were 6.65 (95% CI, 5.09-8.69) times more likely to have inadequate access to psychiatrists than urban communities. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of US communities, 35% of TRICARE beneficiaries lived in communities with inadequate access to psychiatrists. Psychiatric capacity was structurally inequitable along 2 separate dimensions: the income gradient and rurality. Developing targeted strategies for these shortage areas could alleviate disparities.

Structural Inequities for Historically Underserved Communities in the Adoption of Stroke Certification in the United States.

Importance: Stroke centers are associated with better outcomes. There is substantial literature surrounding disparities in stroke outcomes for underserved populations. However, the existing literature has focused primarily on discrimination at the individual or institutional level, and studies of structural discrimination in stroke care are scant. Objective: To examine differences in hospitals' likelihood of adopting stroke care certification between historically underserved and general communities. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study combined a data set of hospital stroke certification from all general acute nonfederal hospitals in the continental US from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2019, with national, hospital, and census data to define historically underserved communities by racial and ethnic composition, income distribution, and rurality. For all categories except rurality, communities were categorized by the composition and degree of segregation of each characteristic. Cox proportional hazard models were then estimated to compare the hazard of adopting stroke care certification between historically underserved and general communities, adjusting for population size and hospital bed capacity. Data were analyzed from June 2021 to April 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hospitals' likelihood of adopting stroke care certification. Results: A total of 4984 hospitals were included. From 2009 to 2019, the total number of hospitals with stroke certification grew from 961 to 1763. Hospitals serving Black, racially segregated communities had the highest hazard of adopting stroke care certification (hazard ratio [HR], 1.67; 95% CI, 1.41-1.97) in models not accounting for population size, but their hazard was 26% lower than among those serving non-Black, racially segregated communities (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.89) in models controlling for population and hospital size. Adoption hazard was lower in low-income communities compared with high-income communities, regardless of their level of economic segregation, and rural hospitals were much less likely to adopt any level of stroke care certification relative to urban hospitals (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.35-0.51). Conclusions and Relevance: In this analysis of stroke certification adoption across acute care hospitals in the US from 2009 to 2019, hospitals in low-income and rural communities had a lower likelihood of receiving stroke certification than hospitals in general communities. Hospitals operating in Black, racially segregated communities had the highest likelihood of adopting stroke care, but because these communities had the largest population, patients in these communities had the lowest likelihood of access to stroke-certified hospitals when the model controlled for population size. These findings provide empirical evidence that the provision of acute neurological services is structurally inequitable across historically underserved communities.

Trends in Inequities in the Treatment of and Outcomes for Women and Minorities with Myocardial Infarction.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To test whether the differences across sex and race in the treatment of and outcomes for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) have changed over a recent decade. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with a diagnosis of STEMI or NSTEMI in California from 2005 to 2015 using the Office of State Health Planning and Development dataset. Using multivariable linear regression with county-fixed effects, we measured the baseline and change over time in the proportions of patients with STEMI or NSTEMI who underwent appropriately-timed coronary angiography (day of admission and within 3 days of admission, respectively) and survived at 1 year according to sex and race (Asian, Black, Hispanic, and White) and adjusting for comorbidities, payor, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: We analyzed 159,068 STEMI and 294,068 NSTEMI presentations. In 2005, 50.0% of 12,329 men and 35.7% of 6,939 women with STEMI and 45.0% of 14,379 men and 33.1% of 10,674 women with NSTEMI underwent timely angiography. In 2015, 76.7% of 6,257 men and 66.8% of 2,808 women with STEMI underwent timely angiography and 56.3% of 13,889 men and 45.9% of 9,334 women with NSTEMI underwent timely angiography. In 2005, 1-year survival was 82.3% for men and 69.6% for women after STEMI; in 2013, 1-year survival was 88.1% for men and 79.1% for women. In the multivariable model, the baseline difference was 1.1 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2 to 1.9), and survival increased for women compared with men by 0.3 percentage points per year (95% CI 0.2 to 0.5). In 2005, 46.0% (5,878) of 12,789 White patients and 31.2% (330) of 1,057 Black patients with STEMI underwent timely angiography; in 2015 75.2% of 3,928 White patients and 69.2% of 522 Black patients underwent timely angiography for STEMI. In the multivariable model, this difference was 6.4 percentage points at baseline (95% CI 4.5 to 8.3), and the probability of undergoing timely angiography for Black patients increased by 0.3 percentage points per year (95% CI -0.1 to 0.6). CONCLUSION: Despite overall improvements in the treatment of and outcomes for STEMI and NSTEMI, disparities persist in the treatment of and outcomes for both the conditions, particularly for women.

Association of STEMI regionalization of care with de facto NSTEMI regionalization.

The regionalization of care for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) may unintentionally concentrate patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) into percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) capable hospitals. This could lead to benefits such as increased access to PCI-capable hospitals, but could cause harms such as crowding in some hospitals with decreased patient volume and revenue in others. We set out to assess whether STEMI regionalization programs concentrated patients with NSTEMI at STEMI-receiving hospitals.

Association of Cardiac Care Regionalization With Access, Treatment, and Mortality Among Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Regionalization of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) systems of care has been championed over the past decade. Although timely access to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to improve outcomes, no studies have determined how regionalization has affected the care and outcomes of patients. We sought to determine if STEMI regionalization is associated with changes in access, treatment, and outcomes. METHODS: Using a difference-in-differences approach, we analyzed a statewide, administrative database of 139 494 patients with STEMI in California from 2006 to 2015 using regionalization data based on a survey of all local Emergency Medical Services agencies in the state. RESULTS: For patients with STEMI, the base rate of admission to a hospital with PCI capability was 72.7%, and regionalization was associated with an increase of 5.34 percentage points (95% CI, 1.58-9.10), representing a 7.1% increase. Regionalization was also associated with a statistically significant increase of 3.54 (95% CI, 0.61-6.48) percentage points in the probability of same-day PCI, representing an increase of 7.1% from the 49.7% base rate and a 4.6% relative increase (2.97 percentage points [95% CI, 0.1-5.85]) in the probability of receiving PCI at any time during the hospitalization. There was a 1.84 percentage point decrease (95% CI, -3.31 to -0.37) in the probability of receiving fibrinolytics. For 7-day mortality, regionalization was associated with a 0.53 (95% CI, -1 to -0.06) percentage point greater reduction (representing 5.8% off the base rate of 9.1%) and a 1.75 percentage point decrease in the likelihood of all-cause 30-day readmission (95% CI, -3.39 to -0.11; representing 6.4% off the base rate of 27.4%). No differences were found in longer-term mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with STEMI in California from 2006 to 2015, STEMI regionalization was associated with increased access to a PCI-capable hospital, greater use of PCI, lower 7-day mortality, and lower 30-day readmissions.

Impact of ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Regionalization Programs on the Treatment and Outcomes of Patients Diagnosed With Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Background Many communities have implemented systems of regionalized care to improve access to timely care for patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. However, patients who are ultimately diagnosed with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarctions (NSTEMIs) may also be affected, and the impact of regionalization programs on NSTEMI treatment and outcomes is unknown. We set out to determine the effects of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction regionalization schemes on treatment and outcomes of patients diagnosed with NSTEMIs. Methods and Results The cohort included all patients receiving care in emergency departments diagnosed with an NSTEMI at all nonfederal hospitals in California from January 1, 2005 to September 30, 2015. Data were analyzed using a difference-in-differences approach. The main outcomes were 1-year mortality and angiography within 3 days of the index admission. A total of 293 589 patients with NSTEMIs received care in regionalized and nonregionalized communities. Over the study period, rates of early angiography increased by 0.5 and mortality decreased by 0.9 percentage points per year among the overall population (95% CI, 0.4-0.6 and -1.0 to -0.8, respectively). Regionalization was not associated with early angiography (-0.5%; 95% CI, -1.1 to 0.1) or death (0.2%; 95% CI, -0.3 to 0.8). Conclusions ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction regionalization programs were not statistically associated with changes in guideline-recommended early angiography or changes in risk of death for patients with NSTEMI. Increases in the proportion of patients with NSTEMI who underwent guideline-directed angiography and decreases in risk of mortality were accounted for by secular trends unrelated to regionalization policies.

Differential benefits of cardiac care regionalization based on driving time to percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) require timely reperfusion, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) decreases morbidity and mortality. Regionalization of STEMI care has increased timeliness and use of PCI, but it is unknown whether benefits to regionalization depend on a community's distance from its nearest PCI center. We sought to determine whether STEMI regionalization benefits, measured by access to PCI centers, timeliness of treatment (same-day or in-hospital PCI), and mortality, differ by baseline distance to nearest PCI center. METHODS: Using a difference-in-difference-in-differences model, we examined access to PCI-capable hospitals, receipt of PCI either on the day of admission or during the care episode, and health outcomes for patients hospitalized from January 1, 2006, to September 30, 2015. RESULTS: Of 139,408 patients (2006 to 2015), 51% could reach the nearest PCI center in <30 minutes, and 49% required ≥30 minutes driving time. For communities with baseline access ≥30 minutes, regionalization increased the probability of admission to a PCI-capable hospital by 9.4% and also increased the likelihood of receiving same-day PCI (by 11.2%) and PCI during the hospitalization (by 7.4%). Patients living within 30 minutes did not accrue significant benefits (measured by admission to a PCI-capable hospital or receipt of PCI) from regionalization initiatives. Regionalization more than halved access disparities and completely eliminated treatment disparities between communities ≥30 minutes and communities <30 minutes from the nearest PCI hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Measured by likelihood of admission to a PCI-capable facility and receipt of PCI, benefits of STEMI regionalization in California accrued only to patients whose nearest PCI center was ≥30 minutes away. We found no mortality benefits of regionalization based on distance from PCI center. Our results suggest that policymakers focus STEMI regionalization efforts in communities that are not already well serviced by PCI-capable hospitals.

Evaluation of STEMI Regionalization on Access, Treatment, and Outcomes Among Adults Living in Nonminority and Minority Communities.

Importance: Cardiac care regionalization, specifically for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), has been touted as a potential mechanism to reduce systematic disparities by protocolizing the treatment of these conditions. However, it is unknown whether such regionalization arrangements have widened or narrowed disparities in access, treatment, and outcomes for minority communities. Objective: To determine the extent to which disparities in access, treatment, and outcomes have changed for patients with STEMI living in zip codes that are in the top tertile of the Black or Hispanic population compared with patients in nonminority zip codes in regionalized vs nonregionalized counties. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used a quasi-experimental approach exploiting the different timing of regionalization across California. Nonpublic inpatient data for all patients with STEMI from January 1, 2006, to October 31, 2015, were analyzed using a difference-in-difference-in-differences estimation approach. Exposure: Exposure to the intervention was defined as on and after the year a patient's county was exposed to regionalization. Main Outcomes and Measures: Access to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-capable hospital, receipt of PCI on the same day and at any time during the hospitalization, and time-specific all-cause mortality. Results: This study included 139 494 patients with STEMI; 61.9% of patients were non-Hispanic White, 5.6% Black, 17.8% Hispanic, and 9.0% Asian; 32.8% were women. Access to PCI-capable hospitals improved by 6.3 percentage points (95% CI, 5.5 to 7.1 percentage points; P < .001) when patients in nonminority communities were exposed to regionalization. Patients in minority communities experienced a 1.8-percentage point smaller improvement in access (95% CI, -2.8 to -0.8 percentage points; P < .001), or 28.9% smaller, compared with those in nonminority communities when both were exposed to regionalization. Regionalization was associated with an improvement to same-day PCI and in-hospital PCI by 5.1 percentage points (95% CI, 4.2 to 6.1 percentage points; P < .001) and 5.0 percentage points (95% CI, 4.2 to 5.9 percentage points; P < .001), respectively, for patients in nonminority communities. Patients in minority communities experienced only 33.3% and 15.1% of that benefit. Only White patients in nonminority communities experienced mortality improvement from regionalization. Conclusions and Relevance: Although regionalization was associated with improved access to PCI hospitals and receipt of PCI treatment, patients in minority communities derived significantly smaller improvement relative to those in nonminority communities.

Emergency Department Closures And Openings: Spillover Effects On Patient Outcomes In Bystander Hospitals.

High-occupancy hospitals may be sensitive to neighboring emergency department (ED) closures and openings, as they already operate at or near capacity. We conducted a retrospective analysis using data for the period 2001-13 to examine outcomes of and treatment received by patients with acute myocardial infarction at so-called bystander EDs that had been exposed to nearby ED closures or openings. We used changes in driving time between an ED and the next-closest one as a proxy for a closure or opening: If driving time increased, for instance, it meant that a nearby ED had closed. When a high-occupancy ED was exposed to a closure that resulted in increased driving time of thirty minutes or more to the next-closest ED, one-year mortality and thirty-day readmission rates increased by 2.39 and 2.00 percentage points, respectively, while the likelihood of receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) declined by 2.06 percentage points. Exposure to ED openings that resulted in decreased driving times of thirty minutes or more was associated with reductions in thirty-day mortality at bystander hospitals and an increased likelihood of receiving PCI. Our findings suggest that limited resources at high-occupancy bystander hospitals make them sensitive to changes in the availability of emergency care in neighboring communities.

Community and Hospital Factors Associated With Stroke Center Certification in the United States, 2009 to 2017.

Importance: The increased number of stroke centers in the United States may not be equitably distributed across all populations. Anecdotal reports suggest there may be differential proliferation in wealthier and urban communities. Objective: To examine hospital characteristics and economic conditions of communities surrounding hospitals with and without stroke centers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included all general, short-term, acute hospitals in the continental United States and used merged data from the Joint Commission, Det Norske Veritas, Healthcare Facilities Accreditation Program, state health departments, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the American Hospital Association, the Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care, and the US Census Bureau from January 1, 2009, to September 30, 2017, to compare hospital and community characteristics of stroke-certified and non-stroke-certified hospitals and assessed characteristics of early and late adopters of stroke certification. Main Outcomes and Measures: Stroke center certification was the primary outcome. Risk factors were grouped into 3 categories: economic and financial, hospital, and community characteristics. Survival analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: The study included 4546 US hospitals. During the study period, 1689 hospitals (37.2%) were stroke certified (961 adopted certification on or before January 1, 2009, 728 afterward). After controlling for other area and hospital characteristics, hospitals in low-income hospital service areas and the lower tertile of profit-margin distribution were less likely to adopt stroke certification (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.52-0.74 and HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.98, respectively). Urban hospitals had a higher likelihood of stroke certification than rural hospitals (HR, 12.79; 95% CI, 10.64-15.37). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that stroke centers have proliferated unevenly across geographic localities, where hospitals in high-income hospital service areas and with higher profit margins have a greater likelihood of being stroke certified. These findings suggest that market-driven factors may be associated with stroke center certification.

Is Inpatient Volume Or Emergency Department Crowding A Greater Driver Of Ambulance Diversion?

Inpatient volume has long been believed to be a contributing factor to ambulance diversion, which can lead to delayed treatment and poorer outcomes. We examined the extent to which both daily inpatient and emergency department (ED) volumes at specified hospitals, and diversion levels (that is, the number of hours ambulances were diverted on a given day) at their nearest neighboring hospitals, were associated with diversion levels in the period 2005-12. We found that a 10 percent increase in patient volume was associated with a sevenfold greater increase in diversion hours when the volume increase occurred among inpatients (5 percent) versus ED visitors (0.7 percent). When the next-closest ED experienced mild, moderate, or severe diversion, the study hospital's diversion hours increased by 8 percent, 23 percent, and 44 percent, respectively. These findings suggest that efforts focused on managing inpatient volume and flow might reduce diversion more effectively than interventions focused only on ED dynamics.

Not All Insurance Is Equal: Differential Treatment and Health Outcomes by Insurance Coverage Among Nonelderly Adult Patients With Heart Attack.

BACKGROUND: The Affordable Care Act has provided health insurance to a large portion of the uninsured in the United States. However, different types of health insurance provide varying amounts of reimbursements to providers, which may lead to different types of treatment, potentially worsening health outcomes in patients covered by low-reimbursement insurance plans, such as Medicaid. The objective was to determine differences in access, treatment, and health outcomes by insurance type, using hospital fixed effects. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a multivariate regression analysis using patient-level data for nonelderly adult patients with acute myocardial infarction in California from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2014, as well as hospital-level information to control for differences between hospitals. The probability of Medicaid-insured and uninsured patients having access to catheterization laboratory was higher by 4.50 and 3.75 percentage points, respectively, relative to privately insured patients. When controlling for access to percutaneous coronary intervention facilities, however, Medicaid-insured and uninsured patients had a 4.24- and 0.85-percentage point lower probability, respectively, in receiving percutaneous coronary intervention treatment compared with privately insured patients. They also had higher mortality and readmission rates relative to privately insured patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although Medicaid-insured and uninsured patients with acute myocardial infarction had better access to catheterization laboratories, they had significantly lower probabilities of receiving percutaneous coronary intervention treatment and a higher likelihood of death and readmission compared with privately insured patients. This provides empirical evidence that treatment received and health outcomes strongly vary between Medicaid-insured, uninsured, and privately insured patients, with Medicaid-insured patients most disproportionately affected, despite having better access to cardiac technology.

Erratum: This Article Corrects: "Trends in Regionalization of Care for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction".

[This corrects the article on p. 1010 in vol. 18, PMID: 29085531.].

Trends in Regionalization of Care for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

INTRODUCTION: California has led successful regionalized efforts for several time-critical medical conditions, including ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but no specific mandated protocols exist to define regionalization of care. We aimed to study the trends in regionalization of care for STEMI patients in the state of California and to examine the differences in patient demographic, hospital, and county trends. METHODS: Using survey responses collected from all California emergency medical services (EMS) agencies, we developed four categories - no, partial, substantial, and complete regionalization - to capture prehospital and inter-hospital components of regionalization in each EMS agency's jurisdiction between 2005-2014. We linked the survey responses to 2006 California non-public hospital discharge data to study the patient distribution at baseline. RESULTS: STEMI regionalization-of-care networks steadily developed across California. Only 14% of counties were regionalized in 2006, accounting for 42% of California's STEMI patient population, but over half of these counties, representing 86% of California's STEMI patient population, reached complete regionalization in 2014. We did not find any dramatic differences in underlying patient characteristics based on regionalization status; however, differences in hospital characteristics were relatively substantial. CONCLUSION: Potential barriers to achieving regionalization included competition, hospital ownership, population density, and financial challenges. Minimal differences in patient characteristics can establish that patient differences unlikely played any role in influencing earlier or later regionalization and can provide a framework for future analyses evaluating the impact of regionalization on patient outcomes.