The efficacy of unilateral laparoscopic nephrectomy in the pediatric hypertensive patient.

BACKGROUND: Secondary hypertension due to a poorly functioning or non-functional kidney may be refractory to medical management. In such cases, nephrectomy can improve or cure hypertension. With the routine use of laparoscopy, nephrectomy can be performed in a minimally invasive manner, but surgery still carries inherent risks and complications. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic nephrectomy performed for secondary hypertension and identify potential predictors of postoperative hypertension resolution. METHODS: After obtaining approval from institutional review board, patients from January 2002 to March 2018 who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy were identified using Current Procedural Technology codes. All charts were then manually reviewed to isolate those patients with secondary hypertension present preoperatively. Patient demographics, urologic history, and laboratory and imaging findings were recorded for all patients. Serial blood pressures were recorded at all renal visits along with any antihypertensive medication changes. Postoperative outcomes and complications were also noted for all patients. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients (7 girls, 13 boys) underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy to treat hypertension at an average age of 10.6 years (range 1.7-17.0 years). Etiology of a solitary non-functional kidney was vesicoureteral reflux in 10 of 20 patients, multicystic dysplastic kidney in 5 of 20, ureteropelvic junction obstruction in 2 of 20, ureteral obstruction in 1 of 20, and renal artery stenosis in 2 of 20 patients. At time of surgery, 3 of 20 patients were on two antihypertensives, 10 of 20 were on one antihypertensive, and 7 of 20 proceeded to surgery with no medical management. In the 30-day postoperative period, no complications were noted. Hypertension improved in 10 of 20 (50%) patients, all of whom were not on any antihypertensive medications after surgery. Hypertension persisted in 4 of 20 (20%) patients, requiring the same antihypertensive regimen and worsened in 6 of 20 (30%) patients, requiring increased doses and/or additional antihypertensives. Average follow-up time was 2.7 years. No significant predictors of postoperative hypertension result were identified when comparing the groups of responders and non-responders. DISCUSSION: While laparoscopic nephrectomy for a non-functioning kidney in the setting of hypertension is a safe procedure, the cure rate for hypertension in the cohort appears to be on the low side of what was previously reported. While the small sample size is a main limitation, it is among the largest sample sizes for pediatric hypertensive patients. Previously shown predictors were not predictive in the similar-sized cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Patients should be carefully counseled on the risks and benefits of nephrectomy to treat hypertension, the importance of continued follow-up after nephrectomy, and the possible need for chronic medical management with antihypertensives.

Do pediatricians routinely perform genitourinary examinations during well-child visits? A review from a large tertiary pediatric hospital.

BACKGROUND: The male genital examination is a common source of discomfort for the patient and medical provider. Performance of male genital examination is imperative; however, as many treatable diagnoses can be made. Undescended testicles (UDTs), hernias, testicular tumors, and urethral abnormalities are all potentially concerning findings which can be discovered on routine examination. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study are to determine the rate at which general pediatricians perform routine genitourinary (GU) examinations in the pediatric population and to determine the rate at which UDT are diagnosed or documented in the patient's history. The authors hypothesize the rate of pediatric GU examination during routine well-child visits to be in line with the previously reported rates in the adult literature. STUDY DESIGN: Nine hundred ninety-six consecutive male well-child visits conducted by general pediatricians at the study institution were reviewed. These visits were evaluated for documentation of a detailed GU examination as well as the presence of UDT from these examinations. In addition, past medical and surgical histories were reviewed to determine if a diagnosis of UDT was noted. RESULTS: Pediatricians at the study institution documented GU examinations 99.1% of the time during male well-child visits. Only 1.1% of the cohort had a documentation of UDT at any time point. Of the 11 patients with UDT, 6 boys (54.5%) had spontaneous descent with no referral to urology, whereas 5 (45.5%) required orchidopexy. DISCUSSION: Prior reports suggest 70-75% of routine office visits include a genital examination. None of these reports reviewed the pediatric population, thus making this review novel in this respect. In addition, the results are vastly different from these prior studies as the authors demonstrated over 99% of male well-child examinations included documentation of a thorough genital examination. A limitation of the study is its retrospective nature, which creates a lack of standardization across the data set. In addition, without being physically present in the examination room, one cannot discern whether an examination is simply being documented without actual performance because of the template format of the electronic medical record (EMR). Furthermore, the study was not designed to best evaluate the true rate of UDTs; therefore, the reported rate of 1.1% cannot be accurately associated with a particular age at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatricians do, in fact, document GU examinations on a routine basis. This finding cannot be taken with complete certainty as verification of actual examination performance is impractical. While the data demonstrated a lower than expected rate of UDT, depending upon age at diagnosis, this could indicate that although examinations are being documented, their accuracy may be diminished because of various factors at play in the healthcare system as a whole, including improper exam performance and EMR templates. Follow-up studies are required to verify these potentially changing rates of UDT and to determine if there is discordance between documentation and performance of GU examinations.

Comparing treatment modalities for transplant kidney vesicoureteral reflux in the pediatric population.

INTRODUCTION: Non-refluxing ureteral reimplantation is favored in pediatric renal transplantation to prevent complications, such as vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in the transplant ureter. VUR resulting in febrile urinary tract infections remains a problem in this population, leading to repeated hospitalizations and increased morbidity. Revision of the vesicoureteral anastomosis can be a surgical challenge due to scar tissue and tenuous vascularity of the transplant ureter. Therefore, alternative options such as endoscopic injection of Deflux at the neo-orifice and surveillance with prophylactic antibiotics have emerged as potential treatment modalities for transplant ureter VUR. OBJECTIVE: The authors reviewed their experience of the management of VUR in the transplant ureter, comparing outcomes of various modalities. STUDY DESIGN: With Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective chart review of all renal transplant patients from January 2002 to January 2017 was conducted. All patients with VUR on voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) after surgery were identified. Indications for end-stage renal disease, urologic comorbidities, pretransplant VCUG, and operative details were recorded. After transplantation, febrile urinary tract infections, ultrasound findings, and any further interventions-surveillance, subureteral endoscopic injection of Deflux, or ureteral reimplantation-were documented along with their outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, VUR was identified in 35/285 (12.3%) transplant patients after a non-refluxing ureteroneocystostomy. VUR was managed with surveillance in 17/35 (49%), intravesical Deflux injection in 11/35 (31%), and immediate redo ureteral reimplantation in 7/35 (20%). Ten out of 11 patients undergoing Deflux injection had a postoperative VCUG. All patients developed VUR recurrence; the majority showed immediate failure and only 1/10 showed late recurrence. Of the immediate failures, 3/9 patients were maintained on prophylactic antibiotics, and 6/9 patients underwent ureteral reimplantation. In these six patients undergoing reimplantation after failed Deflux, 3/6 (50%) patients required additional surgeries: One patient developed recurrence of reflux and two patients developed ureterovesical junction obstruction. In contrast, no complications were seen in patients undergoing primary ureteral reimplantation. DISCUSSION: The study is limited by low numbers and a retrospective design. However, the results of this study differ significantly from the published Deflux series showing a success rate of more than 50% in the treatment of transplant kidney VUR. In fact, post-Deflux redo ureteral reimplantation was associated with an increased risk of postoperative complication. CONCLUSION: The use of Deflux in the post-transplant setting has poor results. In the study series, 11/11 patients demonstrated clinical and radiographic failure. Therefore, as an institution the authors do not recommend Deflux as first-line treatment of VUR in the transplant patient.

Protein kinase C inhibition abrogates hepatic ischemic preconditioning responses.

INTRODUCTION: A transient period of warm ischemia prior to a longer ischemic episode (ischemic preconditioning) protects the hepatic graft from cold ischemia. The mechanism for this protection is unknown, as is the role of protein kinase C in ischemic preconditioning responses. METHODS: Livers from 40 kg Yorkshire pigs were harvested and subjected to 2 h of cold ischemia (n = 6) (control). Another group of harvested livers was pretreated with a 15-min ischemic period followed by 15 min of in situ perfusion with (n = 5) or without (n = 5) a protein kinase C inhibitor, chelerythrine. Following cold ischemia, all grafts were reperfused on a perfusion circuit and the following variables evaluated: (1) hepatic graft function, (2) graft circulatory impairment, (3) hepatocellular damage, and (4) endothelial cell damage. Protein kinase C levels were also evaluated by Western blot in the cytoplasm of all grafts. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Ischemic preconditioned grafts demonstrate improved graft function, reduced graft circulatory impairment, and reduced endothelial cell damage as compared to cold ischemia controls. When preconditioned grafts were pretreated with chelerythrine, graft function, graft circulatory impairment, and endothelial cell damage were no different than cold ischemia controls. Ischemic preconditioned grafts demonstrated decreased levels of protein kinase C prior to cold ischemia. There was no change in protein kinase C levels in cold ischemia controls or chelerythrine-pretreated grafts prior to cold ischemia. These data indicate that modulation of protein kinase C is essential for ischemic preconditioning responses in the cold preserved hepatic graft.