Treatment and Management of the Clinical Manifestations of Advanced Breast Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: People with advanced breast cancer (ABC) experience complex and debilitating physical symptoms of their disease that can have a profound effect on quality of life. This report provides an overview of the clinical manifestations related to different metastatic sites in ABC and potential oncologic emergencies. DATA SOURCES: Date sources include peer-reviewed papers sourced in electronic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, Google Scholar) and national and international best practice guidelines. CONCLUSION: People living with ABC experience multiple symptoms of disease that can impact on quality of life and physical functioning. The most common sites of metastatic disease are bone, lung, liver and brain. Clinical manifestations of ABC include pain, pathologic fractures, pleural effusions, and ascites. Potential oncologic emergencies related to these metastatic sites include hypercalcemia, malignant spinal cord compression, superior vena cava obstruction, and raised intracranial pressure. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: It is important for nurses to have informed knowledge and understanding of these clinical manifestations. This will enable them to be vigilant and perform targeted patient evaluation to assess signs and symptoms with a view to identifying potentially life-threatening emergencies and initiating interventions or appropriate referral or follow-up accordingly.

Development and Implementation of an Online Education Program on Advanced Breast Cancer for European Cancer Nurses: ABC4Nurses Project: a Brief Report.

Breast cancer is now the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. Approximately 30% of those who present with early breast cancer later develop advanced breast cancer (ABC). Additionally, approximately 6% have advanced breast cancer at diagnosis. New treatment options result in an extended lifespan dominated by cycles of deterioration and stable disease. Specialist nurse knowledge is key to multidisciplinary care of people with ABC; however, access to education on ABC for nurses is not universally available in Europe. This paper describes the development and implementation of an online bespoke program on ABC care for specialist and generalist nurses in Europe. The project team is affiliated with the European Oncology Nurses Society (EONS) and comprises specialist breast cancer nurses, oncology nurse academics and breast cancer advocates associated with EUROPA DONNA Turkey, an independent non-profit European breast cancer organisation. The program development involved (1) a systematic review of ABC educational resources for cancer nurses; (2) a modified four-round Delphi study to seek agreement on curriculum content and (3) curriculum development, conversion to an interactive online platform and translation into four European languages. The program evaluation will be guided by Kirkpatrick's framework. The phases described in this short report could guide others involved in developing bespoke cancer education programs.

Consensus views on an advanced breast cancer education curriculum for cancer nurses: A Delphi study.

BACKGROUND: Specialist nursing care is a core indicator of quality care for people living with advanced breast cancer. However, access to and quality of nurse education programmes in advanced breast cancer is variable. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to define the topics for inclusion in an international curriculum for an advanced breast cancer education programme. METHODS: A modified four-round Delphi study was undertaken with experts by profession and experience in advanced breast cancer. Thirty-four topics related to advanced breast cancer and six online teaching and learning methods were pre-selected following a systematic review. Between September 2021 and March 2022, the expert panel determined the importance of topics for inclusion in the education programme. Consensus was defined by at least 80 % agreement on the highest three points on a 9-point Likert scale. RESULTS: A total of 31 experts participated in rounds 1-3 of this study, and 156 experts by profession and experience participated in an additional fourth round, including people living with advanced breast cancer (n = 72, 46 %), healthcare professionals (n = 46, 29 %), family members or caregivers of a person diagnosed with advanced breast cancer (n = 30, 19 %) and advocacy professionals working in the area of advanced breast cancer (n = 8, 5 %). In round 4, 36 topics and five of six learning methods reached consensus. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provide a framework to develop education programmes in advanced breast cancer, defining the essential elements of curriculum content for such programmes. The results highlight the need for advanced breast cancer education programmes to use multiple teaching and learning methods to promote nurses' understanding of person-centred supportive care and the physical, psychosocial and spiritual issues experienced by people living with advanced breast cancer.

Planned and unplanned pregnancies in breast cancer survivors.

BACKGROUND: Nearly 20% of women presenting with breast cancer in the UK are of reproductive age. The aim of our study was to assess fertility outcome in relation to intent to conceive in patients who had completed breast cancer treatment. METHODS: Between July 2011 and December 2013, women, aged less than 43 years at the time of diagnosis, were asked during their follow-up in breast cancer clinic, to complete a questionnaire on intentions to conceive and pregnancy outcome. RESULTS: A total of 175 women completed the questionnaire at a median time of 6 years from time of diagnosis. Their median age at the time of diagnosis was 37 years and at the time of the survey was 43 years. At the time of the survey, 42% (72/175) had completed their family, 41% (72/175) reported that they would like to have children and 4% (7/175) did not wish to have children. Twenty-seven respondents had actively tried to conceive, and of those 13 (48%) had a live birth. There were 12 unintended pregnancies; the majority of which were terminated (58% (7/12)) with only 3 live births. Among those who did not wish to conceive, only 32% (36/111) reported using contraception. CONCLUSION: This is a retrospective study investigating menstrual function, contraceptive methods and fertility outcomes of young breast cancer survivors. This study highlights the need for healthcare professionals to provide long-term contraceptive advice to women who do not wish to conceive.

Exploring patient perception of success and benefit in self-management of breast cancer-related arm lymphoedema.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify factors influencing patient perception of success and benefit with self-management of breast cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL) and explore how patients decide whether their swollen limb has improved or deteriorated. METHODS: This qualitative study used a Grounded Theory approach. Twenty-one women in the BCRL self-management phase participated in one in-depth interview exploring their experience and perspective on self-managing their BCRL. FINDINGS: Seven enablers and blocks to self-management were identified: routine, recognising benefit of self-management and consequences of non-treatment, owning treatment, knowledge and understanding, problem-solving, time required for treatment and aesthetics of hosiery. Women determined treatment outcome by monitoring size, appearance, texture and internal sensations within the affected arm. CONCLUSIONS: Women who participated in this study showed varying degrees of acceptance and adjustment to life with lymphoedema. This appears to directly impact their ability to self-manage lymphoedema. Lymphoedema practitioners and oncology nurses have a valuable role providing knowledge and support to patients transitioning to independent self-care. A better understanding of factors facilitating patients to become experts in their condition may improve longer term outcomes and reduce cost pressures on lymphoedema services.

Benefits of multidisciplinary teamwork in the management of breast cancer.

The widespread introduction of multidisciplinary team (MDT)-work for breast cancer management has in part evolved due to the increasing complexity of diagnostic and treatment decision-making. An MDT approach aims to bring together the range of specialists required to discuss and agree treatment recommendations and ongoing management for individual patients. MDTs are resource-intensive yet we lack strong (randomized controlled trial) evidence of their effectiveness. Clinical consensus is generally favorable on the benefits of effective specialist MDT-work. Many studies have shown the benefits of receiving treatment from a specialist center, and evidence continues to accrue from comparative studies of clinical benefits of an MDT approach, including improved survival. Patients' views of the MDT model of decision-making (and in particular its impact on involvement in decisions about their care) have been under-researched. Barriers to effective teamwork and poor decision-making include excessive caseload, low attendance at meetings, lack of leadership, poor communication, role ambiguity, and failure to consider patients' holistic needs. Breast cancer nurses have a key role in relation to assessing holistic needs, and their specialist contribution has also been associated with improved patient experience and quality of life. This paper examines the evidence for the benefits of MDT-work, in particular for breast cancer. Evidence is considered within a context of growing cancer incidence at a time of increased financial restraint, and it may now be important to reevaluate the structure and models of MDT-work to ensure that MDTs are an efficient use of resources.