Sagittal plane knee kinematics can be measured during activities of daily living following total knee arthroplasty with two IMU.

Knee function is rarely measured objectively during functional tasks following total knee arthroplasty. Inertial measurement units (IMU) can measure knee kinematics and range of motion (ROM) during dynamic activities and offer an easy-to-use system for knee function assessment post total knee arthroplasty. However, IMU must be validated against gold standard three-dimensional optical motion capture systems (OMC) across a range of tasks if they are to see widespread uptake. We computed knee rotations and ROM from commercial IMU sensor measurements during walking, squatting, sit-to-stand, stair ascent, and stair descent in 21 patients one-year post total knee arthroplasty using two methods: direct computation using segment orientations (r_IMU), and an IMU-driven iCloud-based interactive lower limb model (m_IMU). This cross-sectional study compared computed knee angles and ROM to a gold-standard OMC and inverse kinematics method using Pearson's correlation coefficient (R) and root-mean-square-differences (RMSD). The r_IMU and m_IMU methods estimated sagittal plane knee angles with excellent correlation (>0.95) compared to OMC for walking, squatting, sit-to-stand, and stair-ascent, and very good correlation (>0.90) for stair descent. For squatting, sit-to-stand, and walking, the mean RMSD for r_IMU and m_IMU compared to OMC were <4 degrees, < 5 degrees, and <6 degrees, respectively but higher for stair ascent and descent (~12 degrees). Frontal and transverse plane knee kinematics estimated using r_IMU and m_IMU showed poor to moderate correlation compared to OMC. There were no differences in ROM measurements during squatting, sit-to-stand, and walking across the two methods. Thus, IMUs can measure sagittal plane knee angles and ROM with high accuracy for a variety of tasks and may be a useful in-clinic tool for objective assessment of knee function following total knee arthroplasty.

Development of predictive statistical shape models for paediatric lower limb bones.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Accurate representation of bone shape is important for subject-specific musculoskeletal models as it may influence modelling of joint kinematics, kinetics, and muscle dynamics. Statistical shape modelling is a method to estimate bone shape from minimal information, such as anatomical landmarks, and to avoid the time and cost associated with reconstructing bone shapes from comprehensive medical imaging. Statistical shape models (SSM) of lower limb bones have been developed and validated for adult populations but are not applicable to paediatric populations. This study aimed to develop SSM for paediatric lower limb bones and evaluate their reconstruction accuracy using sparse anatomical landmarks. METHODS: We created three-dimensional models of 56 femurs, 29 pelves, 56 tibias, 56 fibulas, and 56 patellae through segmentation of magnetic resonance images taken from 29 typically developing children (15 females; 13 ± 3.5 years). The SSM for femur, pelvis, tibia, fibula, patella, haunch (i.e., combined femur and pelvis), and shank (i.e., combined tibia and fibula) were generated from manual segmentation of comprehensive magnetic resonance images to describe the shape variance of the cohort. We implemented a leave-one-out cross-validation method wherein SSM were used to reconstruct novel bones (i.e., those not included in SSM generation) using full- (i.e., full segmentation) and sparse- (i.e., anatomical landmarks) input, and then compared these reconstructions against bones segmented from magnetic resonance imaging. Reconstruction performance was evaluated using root mean squared errors (RMSE, mm), Jaccard index (0-1), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) (0-1), and Hausdorff distance (mm). All results reported in this abstract are mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: Femurs, pelves, tibias, fibulas, and patellae reconstructed via SSM using full-input had RMSE between 0.89 ± 0.10 mm (patella) and 1.98 ± 0.38 mm (pelvis), Jaccard indices between 0.77 ± 0.03 (pelvis) and 0.90 ± 0.02 (tibia), DSC between 0.87 ± 0.02 (pelvis) and 0.95 ± 0.01 (tibia), and Hausdorff distances between 2.45 ± 0.57 mm (patella) and 9.01 ± 2.36 mm (pelvis). Reconstruction using sparse-input had RMSE ranging from 1.33 ± 0.61 mm (patella) to 3.60 ± 1.05 mm (pelvis), Jaccard indices ranging from 0.59 ± 0.10 (pelvis) to 0.83 ± 0.03 (tibia), DSC ranging from 0.74 ± 0.08 (pelvis) to 0.90 ± 0.02 (tibia), and Hausdorff distances ranging from 3.21 ± 1.19 mm (patella) to 12.85 ± 3.24 mm (pelvis). CONCLUSIONS: The SSM of paediatric lower limb bones showed reconstruction accuracy consistent with previously developed SSM and outperformed adult-based SSM when used to reconstruct paediatric bones.