Current Trends in Compensation for Fellowship in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Graduates: A 6-Year Follow-Up.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To present updated information regarding compensation patterns for Fellowship in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery (FMIGS)-graduated physicians in the United States beginning practice during the last 10 years, focusing on the variables that have an impact on differences in salary, including gender, fellowship duration, geographic region, practice setting, and practice mix. DESIGN: An online survey was sent to FMIGS graduates between March 15, 2019 and April 12, 2019. Information on physicians' demographics, compensation (on the basis of location, practice model, productivity benchmarks, academic rank, and years in practice), and attitudes toward fairness in compensation was collected. SETTING: Online survey. PARTICIPANTS: FMIGS graduates practicing in the United States. INTERVENTION: E-mail survey. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We surveyed 298 US FMIGS surgeons who had graduated during the last 10 years (2009-2018). The response rate was 48.7%. Most of the respondents were women (69%). Most of the graduates (84.8%) completed 2- or 3-year fellowship programs. After adjustment for inflation, the median starting salary for the first postfellowship job was $252 074 ($223 986-$279 983) (Table 1). The median time spent in the first job was 2.6 years, and the median total salary at the current year rose to $278 379.4 ($241 437-$350 976). The median salary for respondents entering a second postfellowship job started at $280 945 ($261 409-$329 603). Significantly lower compensation was reported for female FMIGS graduates in their initial postfellowship jobs and was consistently lower than for that of men over time. Most FMIGS graduates (59.7%) reported feeling inadequately compensated for their level of specialization. CONCLUSION: A trend toward higher self-reported salaries is noted for FMIGS graduates in recent years, with significant differences in compensation between men and women. Among obstetrics and gynecology subspecialists, FMIGS graduates earn significantly less than other fellowship-trained physicians, with median salaries that are lower than those of generalist obstetrics and gynecology physicians.

Comparison of Industry-Leading Energy Devices for Use in Gynecologic Laparoscopy: Articulating ENSEAL versus LigaSure Energy Devices.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 laparoscopic bipolar electrosurgical devices used in total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). An articulating advanced bipolar device (ENSEAL G2; Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH) and an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (LigaSure; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) were analyzed for differences in surgeon perception of ease of instrument use and workload using the NASA Raw Task Load Index (RTLX) scale. A second objective was to examine differences in operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and perioperative complication rates between the 2 devices. DESIGN: Single-institution, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification I). SETTING: Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery in a university hospital. PATIENTS: Eligibility required planned TLH, over age 18 years, and able to give informed consent; exclusions were stage III or IV endometriosis, known gynecologic malignancy, and early decision for conversion to laparotomy. One hundred seventy-eight patients screened, 142 enrolled, 2 withdrew, and 140 completed the study. Patients were followed 1 month postoperatively. INTERVENTIONS: Preoperative randomization to articulating advanced bipolar device or electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer to be used during TLH. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At the end of each hysterectomy the primary surgeon completed an ergonomic assessment tool, the RTLX. Results were analyzed to detect differences in workload between the 2 devices. For each case the time to ligation of the bilateral uterine arteries, EBL, and complications (including device failure, blood transfusion, or other injury) were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using the t test for normally distributed data, χ2 test for categorical data, and Mann-Whitney U-test for nonparametric data. There were no differences in age, body mass index, parity, prior surgery, uterine weight, race, indication, pathology, and comorbidities between the 2 groups. A statistically significant increase in RTLX scores (p < .0001), device failures (p = .0031), and time to ligation of bilateral uterine arteries (p = .0281) was noted in the articulating device group. No significant differences in EBL or complication rates were noted between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The articulating advanced bipolar device was shown to have a statistically significant increase in surgeon-perceived workload and rate of device failure when used in TLH; however, clinical and surgical outcomes were equivalent.

Adnexal masses requiring reoperation in women with previous hysterectomy with or without adnexectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the etiologies of adnexal masses requiring reoperation in women with prior hysterectomy and to compare incidence and pathology of these masses based upon whether total, partial or no adnexectomy was performed at time of hysterectomy. In addition, the average time interval between hysterectomy and reoperation for a pelvic mass is ascertained. STUDY DESIGN: A single-institution, retrospective review spanning 10 years. Using pertinent ICD-9 and CPT codes, women with a history of hysterectomy who underwent a subsequent surgery for an adnexal or pelvic mass were identified. RESULTS: Over ten years, 250 women returned for gynecologic surgery due to a pelvic mass after prior hysterectomy. Most had undergone hysterectomy only (76%). 64.8% of these women had masses of ovarian origin, 12.4% were tubal in origin, 20% of masses involved both the ovary and tube and a small proportion arose from non-gynecologic processes. 18% of these women had a malignancy; 80% were ovarian and 6.7% originated from the fallopian tube. Patients having had a prior hysterectomy and bilateral salpingectomy returned soonest (p<0.0001) and patients with malignant masses returned after the longest time intervals (HR 0.41, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of adnexal masses requiring reoperation after hysterectomy are gynecologic in origin, benign, and arise from the ovary. Women returning with malignant masses after hysterectomy present after longer time intervals.

Identifying the Rate-Limiting Step in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in a Training Hospital.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify the lengthiest step of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) in a teaching hospital and to determine which clinical factors affect the duration of this step. SETTING: The University of Louisville Hospital. DESIGN: Single institution retrospective case series. METHODS AND MAIN RESULTS: This is a retrospective chart and video review that included 135 benign, elective TLHs performed at The University of Louisville. TLH was divided into 5 steps: (1) insertion of laparoscopic ports and adhesiolysis to restore normal anatomy; (2) identification of the ureter and resection of adnexal structures to transection of the round ligament; (3) transection of the round ligament to transection of the uterine artery; (4) lateralization of the uterine vessel pedicle to completion of colpotomy; and (5) completion of vaginal cuff closure. The random intercept and slope model was used to identify the lengthiest step of TLH, and the backward elimination procedure was used to evaluate which clinical factors affected this step. Mean ± SD total length of TLH was 81 ± 30 min. The lengthiest step was colpotomy, with a mean duration of 24 ± 13 min. Uterine weight significantly increased the length of time required for colpotomy (p = .001). The primary energy source (ultrasonic scalpel vs monopolar hook) used to perform colpotomy did not influence the length of time (p = .539 vs p = .583). Uterine weight (p < .001) and adhesiolysis (p = .003) significantly increased the total time of TLH. CONCLUSIONS: At a teaching institution where surgeries are performed by residents and fellows, colpotomy is the lengthiest step of TLH and is influenced by uterine weight. This finding may reflect the training levels of the surgeons performing these cases and the learning curve associated with a challenging surgical skill. Further research should focus on simulation models and/or tools for colpotomy that may result in greater efficiency in the operating room.