Prognostic impact of HER2-low positivity in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive early breast cancer.

Adjuvant therapy for patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, node-positive, early breast cancer (EBC) remains challenging. The prognostic significance of HER2-low positivity in these patients is not fully understood. In our retrospective study, we analyzed 647 patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive EBC, stratifying them into three cohorts based on axillary lymph node involvement, tumor size, and characteristics. Cohort 1 included patients with either ≥ 4 positive axillary lymph nodes or 1-3 positive nodes with histological grade 3 or tumor size ≥ 5 cm. Cohort 2 consisted of patients with 1-3 positive nodes, histological grade < 3, tumor size < 5 cm, and Ki-67 ≥ 20%. Cohort 3 comprised patients with 1-3 positive nodes, histological grade < 3, tumor size < 5 cm, and Ki-67 < 20%. We compared invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) between HER2-low (IHC1+ or IHC2+/FISH-) and HER2-zero (IHC0) groups in each cohort. In cohort 1, HER2-low patients exhibited significantly better 5-year IDFS (84.2% vs. 73.6%, p = 0.0213) and DRFS (88.2% vs. 79.8%, p = 0.0154). However, no significant differences were observed in cohorts 2 and 3. Our findings suggest HER2-low positivity as a prognostic factor in HR-positive, HER2-negative, and node-positive EBC.

Assessment of nuclear grade-based recurrence risk classification in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, node-positive high-risk early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Histological grade (HG) has been used in the MonrachE trial to select patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, node-positive high-risk early breast cancer (EBC). Although nuclear grade (NG) is widely used in Japan, it is still unclear whether replacing HG with NG can appropriately select high-risk patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 647 patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive EBC and classified them into the following four groups: group 1: ≥ 4 positive axillary lymph nodes (pALNs) or 1-3 pALNs and either grade 3 of both grading systems or tumors ≥ 5 cm; group 2: 1-3 pALNs, grade < 3, tumor < 5 cm, and Ki-67 ≥ 20%; group 3: 1-3 pALNs, grade < 3, tumor < 5 cm, and Ki-67 < 20%; and group 4: group 2 or 3 by HG classification but group 1 by NG classification. We compared invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) among the four groups using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test. RESULTS: Group 1 had a significantly worse 5-year IDFS and DRFS than groups 2 and 3 (IDFS 80.8% vs. 89.5%, P = 0.0319, 80.8% vs. 95.5%, P = 0.002; DRFS 85.2% vs. 95.3%, P = 0.0025, 85.2% vs. 98.4%, P < 0.001, respectively). Group 4 also had a significantly worse 5-year IDFS (78.0%) and DRFS (83.6%) than groups 2 and 3. CONCLUSIONS: NG was useful for stratifying the risk of recurrence in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive EBC and was the appropriate risk assessment for patient groups not considered high-risk by HG classification.