Improved outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator in systolic heart failure: Analysis of the Japan cardiac device treatment registry database.

Background: Temporal change in outcomes of heart failure patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) is unknown. Methods: We assess outcomes and underlying heart diseases of patients receiving CRT-D with analyzing database of the Japan cardiac device treatment registry (JCDTR) at the implantation year 2011-2015 and New JCDTR at the implantation year 2018-2021. Results: Proportion of nonischemic heart diseases was about 70% in both the groups (JCDTR: 69%; New JCDTR: 72%). Cardiac sarcoidosis increased with the rate of 5% in the JCDTR to 9% in the New JCDTR group. During an average follow-up of 21 months, death from any cause occurred in 167 of 906 patients in the JCDTR group (18%) and 79 of 611 patients in the New JCDTR group (13%) (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] in the New JCDTR group, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.94; p = .017). The superiority was mainly driven by reduction in the risk of noncardiac death. With regard to appropriate and inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy, there was a significant reduction in the New JCDTR group versus the JCDTR group (aHR in the New JCDTR group, 0.76; 95% CI: 0.59-0.98; p = .032 for appropriate ICD therapy; aHR in the New JCDTR group, 0.24; 95% CI: 0.12-0.50; p < .0001 for inappropriate ICD therapy). Conclusions: All-cause mortality was reduced in CRT-D patients implanted during 2018-2021 compared to those during 2011-2015, with a significant reduction in noncardiac death.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator in non-ischemic and ischemic patients for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death: Analysis of the Japan cardiac device treatment registry database.

Background: Panoramic studies in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) focusing on the etiology and indication are scarce. Besides, a controversy exists regarding requirement of a defibrillator in non-ischemic patients for primary prevention with CRT. Methods: Annual trends of de novo CRT-D implantations from 2011 to 2020 and outcomes of those between January 2011 and August 2015 were analyzed from the Japan cardiac device treatment registry (JCDTR) and New JCDTR database. Results: From 2011 to 2020, 8062 CRT-D recipients were registered, whose dominant indication was primary prevention of sudden cardiac death with a steady rate of about 70%. There was no significant temporal change of the proportion of non-ischemic patients being about 70% and 65% for primary and secondary prevention, respectively. Non-ischemic patients for primary prevention were associated with increased odds of appropriate ICD therapy [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-2.75; p = .047] and reduced odds of any death (aHR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.44-0.99; p = .046) as compared to ischemic patients. Conclusions: Proportion of non-ischemic etiology was much higher than that of ischemic one in the CRT-D cohort. Based on the higher odds of appropriate ICD therapy, non-ischemic patients for primary prevention appear to be prudently selected in Japan.

Guidelines for the Management of Respiratory Infectious Diseases in Children in Japan 2022.

The members of the Japanese Society for Pediatric Infectious Diseases and the Japanese Society of Pediatric Pulmonology have developed Guidelines for the Management of Respiratory Infectious Diseases in Children with the objective of facilitating appropriate diagnosis, treatment and prevention of respiratory infections in children. The first edition was published in 2004 and the fifth edition was published in 2022. The Guideline 2022 consists of 2 parts, clinical questions and commentary, and includes general respiratory infections and specific infections in children with underlying diseases and severe infections. This executive summary outlines the clinical questions in the Guidelines 2022, with reference to the Japanese Medical Information Distribution Service Manual. All recommendations are supported by a systematic search for relevant evidence and are followed by the strength of the recommendation and the quality of the evidence statements.

Association between the atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence period and long-term major adverse clinical events following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Background: We previously demonstrated the clinical events in patients who underwent catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). Data on the association between the period of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) recurrence after CA and long-term major adverse clinical events (MACE) remain unclear. In this study, we evaluated this issue in patients with systolic impairment (left ventricular ejection fraction < 50%) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 81 patients with systolic impairment and 83 patients with HFpEF who underwent CA for AF at our institution (median follow-up: 4.9 [3.6, 6.6] years). In each group, we compared the cumulative incidence of long-term MACE (since 1 year after CA) between patients with and without ATA recurrence at three follow-up periods (3, 6 months, and 1 year after index CA). We evaluated the period of recurrence, which was the most beneficial predictor of MACE among the periods. Results: In the systolic impairment group, the cumulative long-term MACE incidence was significantly higher in patients with ATA recurrence than in those without it within 6 months and 1 year (P = 0.04 and P = 0.01, respectively). Recurrence within 1 year showed the highest feasibility for predicting long-term MACE (area under the curve with 95% confidence interval [CI]:0.73 [0.61-0.84]). However, there was no difference in the incidence of MACE between patients with and without recurrence in a group with HFpEF in each period. Conclusion: ATA recurrence within 1 year could predict long-term MACE in patients with systolic impairment, but not in patients with HFpEF.

Dupilumab Leads to Clinical Improvements including the Acquisition of Tolerance to Causative Foods in Non-Eosinophilic Esophagitis Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders.

A recent report showed that most pediatric cases of non-eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) (non-EoE EGIDs) are persistent and severe compared with those of EoE, thus requiring further effective therapeutic approaches. In this study, we present the first case based on a systematic search of non-EoE EGID for which tolerance to causative foods and histological and symptomatic improvements were achieved following dupilumab administration, after elimination diets and omalizumab and mepolizumab treatments. Driven by this case, we investigated the efficacies of biological treatments in non-EoE EGID cases based on the patient studied herein, and other patients identified in the conducted systematic review. Seven articles, including five different biologics, were reviewed. Both clinical efficacies and impact differences among the targeted molecules are demonstrated in this study. Our findings show that dupilumab may affect mechanisms that can suppress symptoms induced by offending foods that are different from those induced by other biologics as identified in the conducted systematic review. Additional studies are required to address the unmet needs of non-EoE EGID treatments.

Nosocomial transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from infected children to uninfected caregivers: A retrospective cohort study in a Japanese tertiary children's hospital.

BACKGROUND: The transmission rate of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is unclear when caregivers accompany pediatric COVID-19 patients in the same isolation room in a hospital setting. AIM: We investigated SARS-CoV-2 transmission from infected children to caregivers at our hospital. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 34 discordant pairs of patients admitted between September 2020 and April 2022. FINDINGS: The median ages of the children and caregivers were 3.7 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.6-8.1) and 33.1 years (IQR: 28.3-43.4), respectively. Of the 34 caregivers, 31 were mothers, two were fathers, and one was a relative. Sixteen caregivers received at least two doses of the mRNA vaccine. The mean duration of the hospital stays was 7.7 ± 4.1 days (range: 3-19). Two unvaccinated caregivers developed COVID-19 after admission; the onset was within 48 h after admission. It is likely that they had been infected in their household prior to admission, since the incubation period for COVID-19 is usually >2 days. CONCLUSIONS: Nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 transmission from infected children to caregivers was not confirmed in this study. The combination of negative-pressure rooms, vaccinations, and infection-control bundles appears to be effective at preventing SARS-CoV-2 transmission. It is acceptable to allow caregivers to accompany pediatric COVID-19 patients in a hospital ward if they can comply with basic infection control measures.

Long-term events following catheter-ablation for atrial fibrillation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

AIMS: Data regarding prognostic events following catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are scarce. We conducted this study to compare the incidence of major adverse clinical events (MACE) following CA for AF between patients with HFpEF and those with systolic heart failure (HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: This single-centre observational study included 142 patients with HF who underwent CA for AF (median follow-up: 4.0 [2.6, 6.3] years). The patients were grouped based on the presence of HFpEF (n = 84) and systolic HF (left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, n = 58). We compared the cumulative incidence and incidence rate of MACE, comprising all-cause death, unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization (CVH), and HF hospitalization (HFH) between both groups and the number of HFH before and after CA in each group. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify the predictors of MACE in patients with HFpEF. The incidence of MACE was comparable between the groups (following the first procedure: HFpEF: 23%, 4.7/100 person-years, vs. systolic HF: 28%, 6.6/100 person-years, P = 0.18; last procedure: 20%, 4.8/100 person-years, vs. 24%, 6.9/100 person-years, P = 0.21). Although the incidence of HFH was lower in patients with HFpEF than in those with systolic HF (first procedure: 14%, 2.9/100 person-years, vs. 24%, 5.7/100 person-years, P = 0.07; last procedure: 11%, 2.5/100 person-years, vs. 24%, 6.9/100 person-years, P = 0.01), the incidence of CVH was higher (first procedure: 8%, 1.7/100 person-years, vs. 5%, 1.2/100 person-years, P = 0.74; last procedure: 6%, 1.4/100 person-years, vs. 2%, 0.5/100 person-years, P = 0.4). The number of HFH significantly decreased in both groups after CA (HFpEF: 1 hospitalization [the first and third quartiles: 0, 1] in pre-CA, vs. 0 hospitalizations [0, 0] in post-CA, P < 0.0001; systolic HF: 1 hospitalization [0, 1], vs. 0 hospitalizations [0, 0], P < 0.005). The proportion of HFH among total clinical events was significantly smaller in patients with HFpEF than in those with systolic HF (following the first procedure: 56% vs. 88%, P < 0.005; last procedure: 52% vs. 92%, P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: CA for AF could be beneficial for patients with HFpEF, similar to those with systolic HF. However, clinical events other than HFH should be considered cautiously in such patients.

The Differential Prognostic Impact of Long-Duration Atrial High-Rate Episodes Detected by Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices between Patients with and without a History of Atrial Fibrillation.

Long-duration atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) monitored using cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) can predict long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). This study aimed to compare the impact of long-duration AHRE on MACE development between patients with and without a history of atrial fibrillation (AF). This single-center observational study included 132 CIED-implanted patients with AHREs detected via remote monitoring. The population was dichotomized into groups: with (n = 69) and without (n = 63) AF. In each group, cumulative incidences of MACEs comprising all-cause deaths, heart failure hospitalizations, strokes, and acute coronary syndromes were compared between patients with AHRE durations of ≥24 h and <24 h. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of MACEs among patients without AF. MACE incidence was significantly higher in patients with AHRE ≥24 h than in those with <24 h in the group without AF (92% vs. 30%, p = 0.005). MACE incidence did not significantly differ between AHRE ≥24 h and <24 h in the group with AF (54% vs. 26%, p = 0.44). After a multivariate adjustment, AHRE duration of ≥24 h emerged as the only independent predictor of MACEs among patients without AF (p = 0.03). In conclusion, a long-duration AHRE was prognostic in patients without a history of AF but not in patients with a history of AHREs.

Impact of Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Recurrence on the Development of Long-Term Adverse Clinical Events Following Catheter Ablation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With Systolic Impairment: A Single-Center Observational Study.

Background Catheter ablation can improve long-term prognosis of patients with atrial fibrillation with systolic impairment. However, atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) recurrence increases during long-term follow-up. We aimed to investigate the impact of ATA recurrence on the development of long-term adverse clinical events following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation and to identify predictors for the development of adverse clinical events. Methods and Results This single-center observational study included 75 patients with systolic impairment (left ventricular ejection fraction <50%) who underwent the first catheter ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation at our institution (median follow-up period: 3.5 [range: 2.4-4.7] years). We compared the cumulative incidence of adverse clinical events (all-cause death, heart failure hospitalization, stroke, or acute myocardial infarction) between the groups with and without ATA recurrence following the first and last procedures. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors for developing adverse clinical events. Twenty-one patients (28%) developed adverse clinical events at a median of 2.2 (range: 0.64-2.8) years following the first procedure. The proportion of freedom from adverse clinical events following the first procedure was significantly lower in the ATA recurrence group than in the nonrecurrence group (41% [n=40] versus 95% [n=35], P<0.0005); the proportion following the last procedure also showed a similar tendency (35% [n=26] versus 57% [n=49], P<0.0001). ATA recurrence emerged as an independent predictor for adverse clinical events following both procedures after multivariable adjustment. Conclusions ATA recurrence following catheter ablation procedure could predict adverse clinical events in patients with atrial fibrillation with systolic impairment.

Mallory-Weiss syndrome complicated by severe aspiration pneumonitis in an infant.

A 1-month-old girl presented with hematemesis and dyspnea. A large amount of blood was aspirated through a nasogastric tube, and chest computed tomography showed bilateral centrilobular opacified lesions, which suggested aspiration pneumonitis due to upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Her respiratory condition exacerbated, and we initiated nitric oxide (NO) therapy. Bleeding stopped with conservative treatment. She was weaned off mechanical ventilation and extubated on Day 6 after admission. Afterward, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed a longitudinal linear scar indicative of Mallory-Weiss syndrome (MWS). MWS is rarely reported in early infancy since many of the risk factors are absent in infants. Patients with aspiration pneumonitis usually recover respiratory function within 24 h and severe respiratory failure is rare in aspiration pneumonitis. There are no pediatric case reports describing MWS with severe aspiration pneumonitis. Although MWS is a rare cause of neonatal hematemesis, patients can become severely ill and require multidisciplinary treatment.

An impact of superior vena cava isolation in non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients with low voltage areas.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the correlation between left atrial low-voltage areas (LVAs) and an arrhythmogenic superior vena cava (SVC) and the impact on the efficacy of an empiric SVC isolation (SVCI) along with a pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (non-PAF) with or without LVAs. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 153 consecutive patients with non-PAF who underwent a PVI alone (n = 51) or empiric PVI plus an SVCI (n = 102). Left atrial voltage maps were constructed during sinus rhythm to identify the LVAs (<0.5 mV). An arrhythmogenic SVC was defined as firing from the SVC and an SVC associated with the maintenance of AF-like rapid SVC activity. RESULTS: An arrhythmogenic SVC and LVAs were identified in 28% and 65% of patients with a PVI alone and 36% and 73% of patients with a PVI plus SVCI, respectively (P = .275 and P = .353). In the multivariate analysis a female gender, higher pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PAPs), and arrhythmogenic SVC were associated with the presence of LVAs. In the PVI plus SVCI strategy, there was no significant difference in the atrial tachyarrhythmia/AF-free survival between the patients with and without LVAs after initial and multiple sessions (50% vs. 61%; P = .386, 73% vs. 79%; P = .530), however, differences were observed in the PVI alone group (27% vs. 61%; P = .018, 49% vs. 78%; P = .046). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of LVAs was associated with an arrhythmogenic SVC. An SVCI may have the potential to compensate for an impaired outcome after a PVI in non-PAF patients with LVAs.

Association Between Atrial High-Rate Episodes and Ischemic/Major Bleeding Events in Patients With a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device　- A 10-Year, Single-Center Historical Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: An association between atrial high-rate episode (AHRE) and stroke has been reported, although data for the Asian population are limited. This study aimed to investigate the role of AHRE in ischemic and major bleeding events in patients who underwent a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedure.Methods and Results:This single-center historical cohort study included 710 patients (age: 78±11 years, 374 women) who underwent a CIED-related procedure between October 2009 and September 2019 at Shimane Prefectural Central Hospital (median follow-up period: 4.5 [2.5, 7] years, 3439 person-years). Based on the maximum AHRE burden, patients were divided into: (1) <6 min; (2) ≥6 min to 24-h; and (3) ≥24-h groups. The cumulative incidence of ischemic (ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, and transient ischemic attack) and major bleeding (≥3 Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding criteria) events after the procedure were compared. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with these events. The incidence of both events increased with the rising AHRE burden, being significantly higher in the ≥24-h group than in the <6 min group. Multivariate analysis found age ≥85 years to be the only independent factor associated with both events. CONCLUSIONS: Longer AHRE duration is associated with a high number of major bleeding and ischemic events. Monitoring these bleeding risks is mandatory when clinicians are considering anticoagulation therapy for such patients.

Current status and role of programmed ventricular stimulation in patients without sustained ventricular arrhythmias and reduced ejection fraction: Analysis of the Japan cardiac device treatment registry database.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to clarify the current status and role of programmed ventricular stimulation in patients without sustained ventricular arrhythmias and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS: The follow-up data of the Japan cardiac device treatment registry (JCDTR) was analyzed in 746 patients with LVEF ≦35% and no prior history of sustained ventricular arrhythmias who underwent de novo implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation between January 2011 and August 2015. RESULTS: Electrophysiological study (EPS) with programmed ventricular stimulation had been performed before the device implant in 118 patients (15.8%, EPS group). During the mean follow-up of 21 ± 12 months, the rate of freedom from any death and appropriate defibrillator therapy was not significantly different between EPS group (n = 118) and No EPS group (n = 628). NYHA class II-IV, and QRS duration were negatively associated with performing EPS. Among patients in the EPS group, the rate of ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) induction was 48%. The inducibility was not a predictor of appropriate defibrillator therapy, whereas BNP ≧535 pg/mL and no use of amiodarone were significantly associated with a risk of the appropriate therapy. CONCLUSION: EPS for induction of VT/VF had been performed in about 16% of patients with reduced LVEF before primary prevention ICD/CRT-D implantation. Elevated BNP levels and no use of amiodarone, but not inducibility of VT/VF, appeared to be associated with appropriate defibrillator therapy in these populations.

Prognosis of Japanese Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Who Underwent Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation　- The JID-CAD Study.

Background: There has been no large multicenter clinical trial on the prognosis of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) in Japanese patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of the present study was to compare differences in the prognoses of Japanese patients with CAD between primary and secondary prevention, and to identify potential predictors of prognosis. Methods and Results: We investigated 392 CAD patients (median age 69 years, 90% male) treated with ICD/CRT-D enrolled in the Japan Implantable Devices in CAD (JID-CAD) Registry. The primary endpoint was all-cause death, and the secondary endpoint was appropriate ICD therapies. Endpoints were assessed by dividing patients into primary prevention (n=165) and secondary prevention (n=227) groups. The mean (±SD) follow-up period was 2.1±0.9 years. The primary endpoint was similar in the 2 groups (P=0.350). Conclusions: The mortality rate in Japanese patients with CAD who underwent ICD/CRT-D implantation as primary prevention was not lower than that of patients who underwent ICD/CRT-D implantation as secondary prevention, despite the lower cardiac function in the patients undergoing ICD/CRT-D implantation as primary prevention.