Rationale and design of phase II clinical trial of dual inhibition with ramucirumab and erlotinib in EGFR exon 19 deletion-positive treatment-naïve non-small cell lung cancer with high PD-L1 expression (SPIRAL-3D study).

Background: Osimertinib is a standard treatment option for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, osimertinib monotherapy yields poor clinical outcomes in some patients, necessitating the development of novel treatment strategies. In addition, several studies have suggested that high programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is associated with poor progression-free survival (PFS) for osimertinib monotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations. Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of erlotinib plus ramucirumab for EGFR exon 19 deletion-positive treatment-naïve NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression. Design: A single-arm, prospective, open-label, phase II study. Methods and Analysis: Patients with treatment-naïve EGFR exon 19 deletion-positive NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression and a performance status of 0-2 will receive combination therapy with erlotinib plus ramucirumab until evidence of disease progression or development of unacceptable toxicity. High PD-L1 expression is defined as a tumor proportion score of 50% or higher, as determined by PD-L1 immunohistochemistry 22C3 pharmDx testing. The Kaplan-Meier method and the Brookmeyer and Crowley method with the arcsine square-root transformation will be used with PFS as the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints include overall response rate, disease control rate, overall survival, and safety. A total of 25 patients will be enrolled. Ethics: The study has been approved by the Clinical Research Review Board, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan, and written informed consent will be obtained from all patients. Discussion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first clinical trial to focus on PD-L1 expression in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. If the primary end point is met, combination therapy with erlotinib and ramucirumab could become a potential treatment option for this clinical population. Trial Registration: This trial was registered with the Japan Registry for Clinical Trials on 12 January 2023 (jRCTs 051220149).

Phase II study of durvalumab (MEDI 4736) plus carboplatin and etoposide in elderly patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer: Study protocol of turtle study (LOGIK 2003).

BACKGROUND: Recently, the addition of antiprogrammed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibodies, including durvalumab and atezolizumab to platinum-based chemotherapy, has demonstrated clinical benefits in patients with untreated advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, these clinical trials comprised small populations of elderly patients with SCLC. Therefore, the safety of anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy plus platinum and etoposide in elderly patients remains unclear. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, single-arm study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of durvalumab plus carboplatin and etoposide in untreated elderly patients (aged > 75) with extensive stage (ES) SCLC. A total of 40 patients were recruited. Patients received up to four cycles of durvalumab 1500 mg and carboplatin at a dose equivalent to an area under the curve of 5 on day 1, and etoposide 80 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 every 3 weeks as induction treatment, followed by durvalumab maintenance treatment every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety as measured by adverse events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0, laboratory analyses, vital signs, and physical examination. Key secondary endpoints were objective response rate, median progression-free survival, 12-month overall survival rate, and the completion rate for four cycles of induction chemotherapy. DISCUSSION: The present study was designed to evaluate the safety of durvalumab plus carboplatin and etoposide in elderly patients with ES-SCLC.

Forthcoming Phase II Study of Durvalumab (MEDI4736) Plus Chemotherapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer with Brain Metastases.

Background: The standard of care for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combined with platinum-etoposide (PE) chemotherapy. At initial diagnosis, about 25% of ES-SCLC patients have brain metastases, which are associated with a poor prognosis. The decision as to whether to treat brain metastases with local therapies such as surgery or radiotherapy before initiation of systemic chemoimmunotherapy is based on symptoms due to the brain lesions and the general condition of the patient. Subset analysis of the CASPIAN study showed that combination therapy with PE plus durvalumab (MEDI4736) is promising for ES-SCLC with brain metastases. However, data required in daily clinical practice, such as intracranial response rate and duration of intracranial response, are insufficient for such patients. Patients and Methods: We have designed a single-arm phase II trial of durvalumab plus PE for patients aged ≥20 years with chemotherapy-naïve ES-SCLC and at least one brain metastasis ≥5 mm in size that has not been previously treated. Patients receive durvalumab intravenously combined with four cycles of PE. Enrollment of 50 patients over 2 years at 25 oncology facilities in Japan is planned. The primary endpoint is intracranial response rate. Conclusion: This is the first prospective study to evaluate the effects of an ICI with PE specifically in ES-SCLC patients with brain metastases. If it demonstrates intracranial efficacy, this regimen will be a potential treatment option for such individuals, and radiation therapy or surgery for brain metastases can be avoided or postponed.

A Phase II Trial on Osimertinib as a First-Line Treatment for EGFR Mutation-Positive Advanced NSCLC in Elderly Patients: The SPIRAL-0 Study.

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib is one of the standard first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, because it achieves significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than conventional first-line treatments (hazard ratio: 0.46). However, the efficacy and safety of osimertinib as a first-line treatment for patients aged ≥75 years remain unclear. METHODS: This phase II study was performed to prospectively investigate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib for elderly patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The primary endpoint was 1-year PFS rate; secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included in the analysis. The 1-year PFS rate was 59.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.1%-72.7%), which did not meet the primary endpoint (the threshold 1-year PFS rate of 50% predicted using data from the NEJ003 study). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were rash/dermatitis acneiform/ALT increased/hypokalemia (2 patients, 5%). Seven patients developed pneumonitis (17.5%). There were no other cases of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events other than pneumonitis. CONCLUSION: Although this study did not meet the primary endpoint, osimertinib was tolerable for elderly patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer. (Japan Registry of Clinical Trials [JRCT] ID number: jRCTs071180007).

Phase II study of carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel/atezolizumab combination therapy for advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer patients with impaired renal function: RESTART trial.

BACKGROUND: First-line treatment of nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has undergone a paradigm shift to platinum combination therapy together with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, phase III studies of combinations of cytotoxic chemotherapy and ICIs have included only patients with maintained organ function, not those with renal impairment. METHODS: Cytotoxic chemotherapy-naïve advanced nonsquamous NSCLC patients aged 20 years or older with impaired renal function (creatinine clearance of 15 to 45 mL/min) are prospectively registered in this single-arm phase II study and receive combination therapy with carboplatin, nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab-) paclitaxel, and atezolizumab. Individuals with known genetic driver alterations including those affecting EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, MET, RET, and NTRK are excluded. We plan to enroll 40 patients over 2 years at 32 oncology facilities in Japan. The primary end point is confirmed objective response rate. DISCUSSION: If the study demonstrates efficacy and safety of carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel/atezolizumab, then this combination regimen may become a treatment option even for nonsquamous NSCLC patients with impaired renal function. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with Japan Registry for Clinical Trials on 25 February 2021 (jRCTs071200102).

Effects of pericapsular soft tissue and realignment exercises for patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and Harris Hip Score below 60 points.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of pericapsular soft tissue and realignment (PSTR) exercises for patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip and Harris Hip Score (HHS) below 60 points. Most previous studies of hip exercise have not been applied for patients with moderate to severe hip OA, especially those with an HHS below 60 points. Most studies of hip exercise in OA have involved muscle strength training, stretching, functional training and aerobic fitness programs, and have not included pelvic realignment exercise. We investigated the effect of pelvic realignment exercise for patients with hip OA and HHS below 60 points. METHODS: Design: multicenter, prospective, observational, single-arm study. Setting: clinical examination on an outpatient basis. Participants: 193 patients with hip OA and HHS below 60 points. Interventions: patient education and supervised PSTR exercises. Outcome measures: primary outcome: HHS; secondary outcomes: changes in numerical rating scale (NRS) scores, abduction of range of motion, Timed Up and Go (TUG) test within 30 min after PSTR exercises at baseline and other six items, full analysis set (FAS, all participants who performed PSTR exercises) and subgroup analysis (participants with minimal joint space (MJS) of 0 mm at baseline). RESULTS: FAS analysis (N = 193): significant differences in HHS were found between baseline and 3 month follow-up, and between baseline and 6 month follow-up in the Unilateral and Bilateral OA groups (p < .001). All mean differences were within the 95% confidence interval. Significant improvement in NRS scores, abduction of range of motion, and TUG test within 30 min after PSTR exercises were found at baseline (p < .001). Subgroup analysis (N = 130): the results revealed significant differences (p < .001) in HHS and NRS, abduction of range of motion and TUG test within 30 min after PSTR exercises at baseline, as in the FAS analysis. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggested that PSTR exercises were effective for patients with HHS below 60 points, even those with MJS of 0 mm. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY: 20 July 2017 (UMIN000028277).

A phase I/II study of S-1 and irinotecan (IRIS) combined with cetuximab in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (KSCC1401).

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the tolerability, efficacy, and safety of tri-weekly irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS) and weekly cetuximab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: The main eligibility criteria were RAS wild-type mCRC with no prior chemotherapy. S-1 was given orally at a dose of 40 mg/m2 (40-60 mg) twice for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week rest. Irinotecan was given on day 1 of each cycle at a dose of 150 mg/m2. Cetuximab was administered on days 1 (400 mg/m2), 8 (250 mg/m2), and 15 (250 mg/m2), and then once weekly (250 mg/m2) thereafter. A standard 3 + 3 phase I dose de-escalation design was used to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended dose (RD) of irinotecan. The primary end point of the Phase II study was overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Between December 2014 and September 2017, 4 and 54 patients were enrolled in phase I and phase II studies, respectively. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed in the phase I study, and the RD of irinotecan was 150 mg/m2. In the phase II study, the ORR was 56.9% (90% confidence interval 44.4%-68.7%). The safety profile revealed that the most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (31.4%), appetite loss (27.5%), hypokalemia (11.8%), and diarrhea (11.8%). Grade 3/4 hand-foot skin syndrome occurred in nine patients (9.8%). CONCLUSION: This study showed that the efficacy and safety of IRIS combined with cetuximab were comparable to those for other first-line treatments. This regimen is a good candidate for first-line treatment of RAS wild-type mCRC.

Erlotinib for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Leptomeningeal Metastases: A Phase II Study (LOGIK1101).

LESSONS LEARNED: This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy of erlotinib for patients with non-small cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastasis. The 17 cerebrospinal fluid specimens that were available for epidermal growth factor receptor mutation analysis were all negative for the resistance-conferring T790M mutation. The cytological objective clearance rate was 30.0% (95% confidence interval: 11.9%-54.3%). The median time to progression was 2.2 months. The rate of cerebrospinal fluid penetration among these patients was equivalent to those in previous reports regarding leptomeningeal metastasis. BACKGROUND: Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) occur in approximately 5% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are associated with a poor prognosis. However, no prospective study has identified an active chemotherapeutic drug in this setting. METHODS: Patients were considered eligible to receive erlotinib if they had NSCLC with cytologically confirmed LM. The objective cytological clearance rate, time to LM progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), quality of life outcomes, and pharmacokinetics were analyzed. This study was closed because of slow accrual at 21 of the intended 32 patients (66%). RESULTS: Between December 2011 and May 2015, 21 patients (17 with activating epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] mutations) were enrolled. The 17 cerebrospinal fluid specimens available were all negative for the T790M mutation, which confers erlotinib resistance. The clearance rate was 30.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.9%-54.3%), the median TTP was 2.2 months, and the median OS was 3.4 months. Significantly longer TTP and OS times were observed in patients with mutant EGFR (p = .0113 and p < .0054, respectively). The mean cerebrospinal fluid penetration rate was 3.31% ± 0.77%. There was a good correlation between plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations, although there was no clear correlation between pharmacokinetic parameters and clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: Erlotinib was active for LM and may be a treatment option for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and LM.

Survival Analysis for Patients with ALK Rearrangement-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and a Poor Performance Status Treated with Alectinib: Updated Results of Lung Oncology Group in Kyushu 1401.

LESSONS LEARNED: Alectinib confers a pronounced survival benefit in patients with ALK rearrangement-positive non-small cell lung cancer and a poor performance status. Survival benefit of alectinib for patients with a poor performance status was consistent regardless of the presence of central nervous system metastases. BACKGROUND: We previously reported a marked objective response rate (ORR) and safety for alectinib treatment in patients with ALK rearrangement-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a poor performance status (PS) in the Lung Oncology Group in Kyushu (LOGiK) 1401 study. It remained unclear, however, whether alectinib might also confer a long-term survival benefit in such patients. METHODS: Eighteen patients with ALK rearrangement-positive advanced NSCLC and a PS of 2, 3, or 4 (n = 12, 5, and 1, respectively) were enrolled in LOGiK1401 between September 2014 and December 2015 and received alectinib. We have now updated the survival data for the study. RESULTS: The median follow-up time for all patients was 27.3 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.1-30.8 months), and the median survival time (MST) and the 3-year overall survival rate were 30.3 months (95% CI, 11.5 months to not reached) and 43.8% (95% CI, 20.8-64.7%), respectively. This survival benefit was similarly manifest in patients with a PS of 2 (MST, 20.5 months) and those with a PS of ≥3 (MST, not reached). PFS did not differ between patients with or without central nervous system (CNS) metastases at baseline (median of 17.5 and 16.2 months, respectively, p = .886). CONCLUSION: Alectinib showed a pronounced survival benefit for patients with ALK rearrangement-positive NSCLC and a poor PS regardless of the presence of CNS metastases, a patient population for which chemotherapy is not indicated.

Longitudinal monitoring of somatic genetic alterations in circulating cell-free DNA during treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of liquid biopsy for prediction of the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment and for assessment of the changes in genetic alterations during such treatment. METHODS: Plasma samples were prospectively collected from non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR-activating mutations during EGFR-TKI treatment until disease progression and were analyzed for such mutations with droplet digital polymerase chain reaction and for other somatic alterations with next-generation sequencing. RESULTS: One hundred patients, including 87 who were EGFR-TKI naïve, were enrolled. Median progression-free survival was significantly shorter for EGFR-TKI-naïve patients with EGFR-activating mutations detected in plasma at baseline than for those without them (7.9 vs 19.0 months; P < .001), with the values being significantly longer for initially positive patients who became negative for these mutations at 12 or 24 weeks than for those who remained positive. An increase in the number of alleles positive for EGFR-activating mutations in plasma during treatment was associated with disease progression, with a hazard ratio of 4.72 (95% CI, 2.07-10.79; P < .001) for EGFR-TKI-naïve patients showing an increase within 36 weeks. For 55 patients with available samples, the total number of somatic alterations (other than activating mutations or T790M of EGFR) in plasma was higher at disease progression than at baseline (33 vs 19; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Liquid biopsy shows potential for prediction of EGFR-TKI efficacy and elucidation of clonal tumor evolution during targeted therapy.

Cessation of nilotinib in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia who have maintained deep molecular responses for 2 years: a multicenter phase 2 trial, stop nilotinib (NILSt).

The aim of this multicenter phase 2 trial, Stop Nilotinib (NILSt), was to examine the safety and efficacy of discontinuation of nilotinib in patients with chronic phase (CP)-chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Patients with CP-CML who had achieved molecular response (MR4.5) after initiation of imatinib or nilotinib therapy received consolidation therapy with nilotinib 300-400 mg twice daily for up to 24 months. Patients who maintained MR4.5 at 24 months of consolidation therapy proceeded to discontinuation of nilotinib. The study enrolled 149 patients; 112 patients proceeded to consolidation therapy with nilotinib; 90 patients maintained MR4.5 with consolidation therapy, and 87 proceeded to discontinuation of nilotinib. The treatment-free remission (TFR) (MR4.5) rate at both 1 and 3 years after discontinuation of nilotinib was the same, at 60.9% (90% CI 51.6-69.7). Among 34 patients with molecular relapse, nilotinib was resumed in 33 patients; all of them attained MR4.5. There was no significant association between molecular relapse and age, sex, Sokal score, previous interferon-α exposure, duration of tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment, or trough concentration of nilotinib. With nilotinib, it might be possible to avoid prognostic factors for TFR that exist with imatinib discontinuation. Cessation of nilotinib after two years of consolidation was safe and feasible.Trial registration UMIN000007141.

Comparison of computed tomography imaging analyses for evaluation after chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer: a retrospective pooled analysis of six phase II clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: There are several methods for analyzing computed tomography (CT) images to evaluate chemotherapy efficacy in clinical studies. However, the optimal analysis method for each drug is still under debate. We conducted a pooled analysis using data from six phase II studies to evaluate four analysis methods in colorectal cancers (CRCs): morphological responses (MRs), early tumor shrinkage (ETS), depth of response (DpR), and response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) ver.1.1. METHODS: We included 249 patients in this analysis. Pretreatments and findings of subsequent CT imaging were analyzed based on the MR, ETS, DpR, and RECIST ver.1.1. Differences in overall survival (OS) between the responders and non-responders according to each method were evaluated using survival analysis. RESULTS: The responders had significantly better hazard ratios (HRs) for OS, in terms of DpR (≥ median), ETS, objective response rate (ORR) [complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)], and disease control rate [CR + PR + stable disease (SD)]. Patients with right-sided colon cancers showed better HRs for DpR, but not for ETS and ORR. Contrastingly, patients with left-sided CRCs had better HRs for ETS, DpR, and ORR. MR was not associated with outcomes in this study, even in cases where bevacizumab was used. In patients with liver metastasis, ETS, DpR, and ORR showed better HRs, but not in those with lung metastasis. CONCLUSION: Early tumor shrinkage and DpR might be predictive markers only in left-sided CRCs with liver metastasis. Each imaging analysis has a different value based on the primary and metastatic sites.

Skeletal muscle loss during systemic chemotherapy for colorectal cancer indicates treatment response: a pooled analysis of a multicenter clinical trial (KSCC 1605-A).

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia or degenerative loss of skeletal muscle mass is related to poor prognosis in patients with cancer. This study aimed to clarify the clinical significance of skeletal muscle loss (SML) during chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: A total of 249 patients who were secondarily registered in a pooled database of mCRC patients with the first-line systemic chemotherapy and prospectively enrolled in six clinical trials of Kyushu Study Group of Clinical Cancer were included in this study. Skeletal muscle area was calculated from computed tomography images before and 3 and 6 months after treatment. Baseline sarcopenia and SML (cut-off value = 9%) were evaluated. RESULTS: Baseline sarcopenia was observed in 135 of 219 patients who were evaluated before treatment. They tended to be male; older; and have lower body mass index, lower visceral and subcutaneous fat contents, and a lower waist circumference (P < 0.01); however, baseline sarcopenia was not associated with prognosis. SML at 3 months was associated with an incidence of adverse events (P = 0.01), poor objective response rate (ORR) (P < 0.01), and poor progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.03), and it was an independent predictive factor for poor ORR (P < 0.01) and PFS (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: SML at 3 months after systemic chemotherapy for mCRC was associated with poor treatment response. Thus, clarifying the importance of SML prevention guarantees a more effective chemotherapy.

Exploration of resistance mechanisms for epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors based on plasma analysis by digital polymerase chain reaction and next-generation sequencing.

Liquid biopsy offers a potential alternative to tissue biopsy for detection of genetic alterations in cancer, and it has been introduced into clinical practice to detect the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance-conferring T790M mutation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We prospectively collected tumor and plasma samples from 25 NSCLC patients who harbored activating mutations of EGFR and experienced failure of treatment with afatinib. The samples were analyzed by digital PCR (dPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS). T790M was detected in plasma with a respective sensitivity and specificity of 83.3% and 70.0% by dPCR and 50.0% and 70.0% by NGS relative to analysis of corresponding tumor samples. Quantitation of T790M based on the ratio of the number of T790M alleles to that of activating mutation alleles (T/A ratio) improved the specificity of plasma analysis to 100% for both dPCR and NGS without a reduction in sensitivity. Although several afatinib resistance mechanisms other than T790M-including copy number gain of NRAS or MET-were identified in tumor samples, the corresponding genetic alterations were not detected in plasma. TP53 mutations were frequently identified in plasma and tumor samples, with most such mutations also having been detected before afatinib treatment. The presence of de novo TP53 mutations was associated with reduced progression-free survival. Quantitation of T790M in plasma is thus a clinically relevant approach to determine the T790M status of tumors. In addition, genetic alterations coexisting with EGFR mutations can affect the efficacy of EGFR-TKI treatment.

Prophylactic Effect of Dexamethasone on Regorafenib-Related Fatigue and/or Malaise: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Study in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (KSCC1402/HGCSG1402).

BACKGROUND: Regorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor with a proven survival benefit for metastatic colorectal cancer patients. The KSCC1402/HGCSG1402 study investigated the prophylactic effect of oral dexamethasone (DEX) on regorafenib-related fatigue and/or malaise. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who progressed after standard chemotherapy were randomized 1: 1 to a DEX group (2 mg/day; days 1-28) with regorafenib or a placebo group with regorafenib. The primary endpoint was the incidence of fatigue and/or malaise, based on version 4.0 of the National Cancer Institute's CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events). One of the secondary endpoints was the in-cidence of fatigue and/or malaise based on the CTCAE assessed by patient-reported outcome (PRO). RESULTS: The incidence of any grade of fatigue and/or malaise assessed by the investigators was 58.8% in the DEX group and 61.1% in the placebo group (p = 0.8101), and that assessed by PRO was 47.2 and 58.3%, respectively (p = 0.3450). The incidence of grade ≥2 fatigue and/or malaise, as assessed by the investigators, was 19.4% for the DEX group and 38.9% for the placebo group (p = 0.0695), and that assessed by PRO was 27.8 and 52.8%, respectively (p = 0.0306). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that prophylactic oral DEX is clinically effective in improving regorafenib-related fatigue and/or malaise.

Efficacy and safety of switching to nilotinib in patients with CML-CP in major molecular response to imatinib: results of a multicenter phase II trial (NILSw trial).

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of switching to nilotinib in CML-CP patients who had achieved MMR with continuous detectable BCR-ABL1 transcript levels after long-term imatinib treatment. Patients who had achieved MMR, but not deep molecular response (DMR), after > 18 months from the initiation of imatinib received nilotinib 400 mg twice daily for up to 24 months. BCR-ABL1 transcript levels were assessed every 3 months. Thirty-eight patients with a median age of 57.5 years (range 22-76 years) were evaluated. Twenty-seven patients completed 24 months of nilotinib treatment; 11 discontinued nilotinib due to retraction of consent (three patients), loss of MMR (1), intolerance (3) or AEs (5). Twenty patients [52.6%, (90% CI 38.2-66.7%)] achieved DMR. The cumulative incidence of achieving DMR by the time of 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 21 months was 22.9, 37.7, 47.0, 53.7, 53.7, 53.7, and 53.7%, respectively. Adverse events were consistent with those reported in other nilotinib studies. Patients experienced each of the following cardiovascular complications: atrial fibrillation (G2), chest tightness and dyspnea (G1), myocardial infarction (G2) and heart failure (G3) (n = 1 for each complication). This study indicates nilotinib achieves strong, rapid induction of DMR for patients who achieved MMR after long-term imatinib therapy.

Current state of yusho and prospects for therapeutic strategies.

The mass food poisoning incident yusho occurred in Japan in 1968. It was caused by the ingestion of rice bran oil contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls and various dioxins and dioxin-like compounds including polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs). Notably, PCDFs were found to contribute to approximately 65% of the total toxicity equivalent in the blood of yusho patients. Lipophilic dioxins are retained in the body for a longer period than previously estimated. Victims suffered from characteristic skin manifestations associated with non-specific systemic symptoms, neurological symptoms, and respiratory symptoms. The severe symptoms seen in the initial phase subsequently faded, but recently, improvements have scarcely been observed. The Yusho Group has been researching treatments for this condition. Several clinical trials with chelating agents or dietary fibers aimed at accelerating the excretion of compounds. While some treatments increased dioxin excretion, none provided satisfactory symptom relief. Concurrently, various phytochemicals and herbal extracts have been found to possess biological activities that suppress dioxin-induced toxicity via aryl hydrocarbon receptor or activate the antioxidant nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor-2 (NRF2) signal pathway, making them promising therapeutic candidates. Here, we summarize the current status of yusho and findings of clinical trials for yusho patients and discuss the treatment prospects.

Clarithromycin Plus Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy Can Reduce the Relapse Rate of Kawasaki Disease: A Phase 2, Open-Label, Randomized Control Study.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported that biofilms and innate immunity contribute to the pathogenesis of Kawasaki disease. Therefore, we aimed to assess the efficacy of clarithromycin, an antibiofilm agent, in patients with Kawasaki disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted an open-label, multicenter, randomized, phase 2 trial at 8 hospitals in Japan. Eligible patients included children aged between 4 months and 5 years who were enrolled between days 4 and 8 of illness. Participants were randomly allocated to receive either intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or IVIG plus clarithromycin. The primary end point was the duration of fever after the initiation of IVIG treatment. Eighty-one eligible patients were randomized. The duration of the fever did not differ between the 2 groups (mean±SD, 34.3±32.4 and 31.1±31.1 hours in the IVIG plus clarithromycin group and the IVIG group, respectively [P=0.66]). The relapse rate of patients in the IVIG plus clarithromycin group was significantly lower than that in the IVIG group (12.5% versus 30.8%, P=0.046). No serious adverse events occurred during the study period. In a post hoc analysis, the patients in the IVIG plus clarithromycin group required significantly shorter mean lengths of hospital stays than those in the IVIG group (8.9 days versus 10.3 days, P=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Although IVIG plus clarithromycin therapy failed to shorten the duration of fever, it reduced the relapse rate and shortened the duration of hospitalization in patients with Kawasaki disease. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm. Unique identifier: UMIN000015437.

A prospective study of XELIRI plus bevacizumab as a first-line therapy in Japanese patients with unresectable or recurrent colorectal cancer (KSCC1101).

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of XELIRI plus bevacizumab for the treatment of Japanese patients with unresectable or recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: This was a multicenter, single-arm, open-label prospective study. The major inclusion criteria were previously untreated unresectable or recurrent CRC, presence of measurable lesions, ≥20 years of age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Patients received bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg on day 1) and XELIRI (irinotecan 200 mg/m2 on day 1 plus capecitabine 800 mg/m2 b.i.d. on days 1-14) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the objective tumor response rate. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients were enrolled in this study from July 2011 to September 2012. One patient did not fulfill the eligibility criteria and one patient withdrew their consent before the start of the treatment protocol. The confirmed objective response rate was 58.8% (95% CI 35.1-70.2%). The median progression-free survival was 9.6 months (95% CI 5.1-11.1 months) and the median overall survival was 23.1 months (95% CI 11.3-36.7 months). The grade ≥3 adverse events that were frequently encountered in this study were neutropenia (31.4%), leukopenia (22.9%), diarrhea (22.9%), anemia (20.0%), anorexia (20.0%) and febrile neutropenia (17.2%). The frequency of grade 3/4 adverse events, such as neutropenia and leukopenia, was much higher in patients with a UGT1A1 polymorphism. CONCLUSIONS: A first-line therapy comprising XELIRI plus bevacizumab yielded a promising response rate. However, careful attention should be given to adverse clinical events in Japanese patients receiving treatment with unresectable or recurrent CRC.

Alectinib for Patients with ALK Rearrangement-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and a Poor Performance Status (Lung Oncology Group in Kyushu 1401).

INTRODUCTION: Alectinib has shown marked efficacy and safety in patients with anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ALK) rearrangement-positive NSCLC and a good performance status (PS). It has remained unclear whether alectinib might also be beneficial for such patients with a poor PS. METHODS: Eligible patients with advanced ALK rearrangement-positive NSCLC and a PS of 2 to 4 received alectinib orally at 300 mg twice daily. The primary end point of the study was objective response rate (ORR), and the most informative secondary end point was rate of PS improvement. RESULTS: Between September 2014 and December 2015, 18 patients were enrolled in this phase II study. Of those patients, 12, five, and one had a PS of 2, 3, or 4, respectively, whereas four patients had received prior crizotinib treatment. The ORR was 72.2% (90% confidence interval: 52.9-85.8%). The ORR did not differ significantly between patients with a PS of 2 and those with a PS of 3 or higher (58.3% and 100%, respectively [p = 0.114]). The PS improvement rate was 83.3% (90% confidence interval: 64.8-93.1%, p < 0.0001), with the frequency of improvement to a PS of 0 or 1 being 72.2%. The median progression-free survival was 10.1 months. Toxicity was mild, with the frequency of adverse events of grade 3 or higher being low. Neither dose reduction nor withdrawal of alectinib because of toxicity was necessary. CONCLUSIONS: Alectinib is a treatment option for patients with ALK rearrangement-positive NSCLC and a poor PS.