Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Painful Delayed Union or Nonunion of Fractures of Interphalangeal Coalition.

Background: Interphalangeal coalition is characterized by fusion of interphalangeal joint between the middle and distal phalanges. Interphalangeal coalition fractures often result in delayed union or nonunion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for painful delayed union or nonunion of fractures of the interphalangeal coalition. Methods: The study group consisted of 9 patients (9 feet) diagnosed with painful delayed union or nonunion due to persistent pain and no tendency toward bony union for at least 3 months after the interphalangeal coalition fracture on plain radiographs between 2021 and 2023 were included. The mean age was 51.3 years (23-64). Focused ESWT was performed in all patients. The mean time from the date of injury to the start of ESWT was 16.1 weeks (12-15). ESWT was performed every 2 weeks, with each session consisting of 3000 impulses (0.15-0.25 mJ/mm2). Plain radiographs were used to confirm bone union, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were used for pain assessment. Results: Complete bony union was documented in all 9 patients. The application of focused ESWT was performed a mean of 2.7 times (2-4), and the mean duration from the initiation of treatment to the confirmation of bony union was 7.4 weeks (3.6-12.7). In all cases, the symptoms of swelling and pain were alleviated. The VAS scores exhibited significant improvement, with the mean VAS score decreasing from 3.8 (2-6) before ESWT to 0 after the achievement of union (P < .001). Conclusion: In this small cohort, all patients with painful delayed union or nonunion of fractures at the interphalangeal coalitions achieved complete bony fusion after focused ESWT. Moreover, bony union was observed within 2 months of ESWT initiation. These findings suggest that focused ESWT may be a valuable treatment option for painful delayed union or nonunion of interphalangeal coalition fractures. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

Effect of simultaneous bilateral surgery or simultaneous arthroscopic ankle lateral ligament repair in hindfoot endoscopic surgery for posterior ankle impingement syndrome in athletes.

BACKGROUND: Posterior ankle impingement syndrome (PAIS) is sometimes complicated by bilateral cases and lateral ankle ligament injuries. Reports on bilateral surgery for PAIS and simultaneous surgery for lateral ankle ligament injury are scarce in the literature. METHODS: We present a 2-year follow-up of 76 athletic patients who underwent endoscopic hindfoot surgery for PAIS. Patients were divided into those who underwent unilateral or simultaneous bilateral surgery and PAIS surgery alone or simultaneous bilateral PAIS surgery without arthroscopic ankle lateral ligament repair. RESULTS: All patients returned to full athletic activities postoperatively. There was no difference in all subscales of the SAFE-Q score between groups except for mean days after surgery for full return to athletic activities. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous bilateral surgery and simultaneous arthroscopic lateral ankle ligament repair had no negative effect on subjective clinical evaluation 2 years after surgery in hindfoot endoscopic surgery for PAIS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective case-control study.

Evidence-Based Update on the Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes of Retrograde Drilling: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Retrograde drilling is an established surgical technique to treat osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT). It involves non-trans-articular drilling to induce subchondral bone revascularization and bone formation without damaging the overlying articular cartilage. The present study aimed to elucidate the heterogeneity of clinical studies on retrograde drilling for OLT. DESIGN: A systematic search of the MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for studies published between January 1996 and August 27, 2022, was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines by two independent reviewers. The included studies were evaluated for their level of evidence (LoE) and quality of evidence (QoE) using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score. Variables reporting surgical and clinical outcomes and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Eleven studies with 207 ankles were included (mean follow-up period = 31.1 months). The mean LoE was 3.8 (LoE 3: two studies, LoE 4: nine studies), and the mean QoE was 50.8 (fair: three studies, poor: eight studies). Ten studies used the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, which improved from 57.9 preoperatively to 86.1 postoperatively. The period and protocol of conservative treatment, lesion character, surgical technique, and postoperative protocol were inconsistent or underreported. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review revealed that low LoE and poor QoE, coupled with heterogeneity among the included studies, impede definitive conclusions regarding the effectiveness of this technique. Consequently, well-designed clinical trials are essential to develop standardized clinical guidelines for using retrograde drilling in OLT.

Arthroscopic Modified Lasso-Loop Stitch Technique for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability in Skeletally Immature vs Mature Patients.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, arthroscopic lateral ankle ligament repair has become increasingly popular. However, reports on the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic ankle stabilization for skeletally immature patients remain scarce. This study investigated the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic lateral ankle ligaments repair in skeletally immature patients compared to skeletally mature patients. METHODS: Our retrospective analysis compared skeletally immature patients and skeletally mature adults who underwent arthroscopic repair of the ankle lateral ligaments with a modified lasso-loop stitch using a suture anchor. Skeletal immaturity was defined as patients whose epiphyseal line of the distal fibula remained open on plain radiography. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire (SAFE-Q) at 2 years after surgery. The time to postoperative walking, jogging, and return to full sports activities were also evaluated. RESULTS: Sixty-four skeletally immature patients (IM group) and 103 skeletally mature adults (M group) were included. No significant differences were observed during both walking and jogging after surgery between the groups; however, return to full athletic activities was significantly earlier in IM group (P = .05). The mean scores in all SAFE-Q subscales significantly improved in both groups after surgery (P < .001). There were also no statistically significant differences between the groups in the mean postoperative SAFE-Q scores for all subscales. All patients in the IM group returned to playing sports at their preinjury levels postoperatively. CONCLUSION: We found that skeletally immature patients with chronic lateral ankle instability had generally similar responses to arthroscopic lateral ankle as skeletally mature adult patients at minimally 2 years' follow-up with a high rate of successful return to sport. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case control study.

Back in Action: High Return to Pre-Injury Level of Sports after Arthroscopic Bone Marrow Stimulation for Osteochondral Lesions of the First Metatarsophalangeal (MTP-1) Joint.

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim was to assess the return to sports outcomes of patients with symptomatic osteochondral lesions (OCLs) to the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP-1) joint treated by arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation (BMS). Secondary aims were to present patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on pain scores as well as surgery-related complications or reoperations to the MTP-1 joint. DESIGN: All patients with MTP-1 OCLs treated by arthroscopic BMS with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were included. Outcomes included return to sports and work outcomes, satisfaction outcomes with the performed treatment, PROMs, as well as postoperative complications and reoperations. Medical records were screened by 2 independent reviewers and patients were contacted by phone to partake in an in-depth interview. Complications, reoperations, and revision surgeries were additionally assessed. RESULTS: Nine patients (median age: 22 years with interquartile range (IQR) 20-29 years) were included with a median follow-up time of 47 (IQR: 23-92) months. Six (86%) out of 7 patients who participated in sports preoperatively returned to sports at any level at a median of 4 (IQR: 2.6-5.8) months. Five patients (71%) returned to pre-injury level of sport and eventually returned to performance at a median of 4 (IQR 2.8-7.5) and 8 (IQR: 4.0-10.5) months, respectively. The median Numeric Rating Scale for pain during walking was 1 (IQR 0-2.5) and all (100%) patients were able to return to work at a median of 4 (IQR: 2-17) weeks. Eighty-nine percent of the patients were very or fairly satisfied with the result of their treatment. No complications, reoperations, or revision surgeries were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic BMS for patients with symptomatic OCLs to the MTP-1 joint can be considered safe and yields an 86% return to sport at any level and a 71% return to pre-injury and performance level, with good clinical, return to work, as well as satisfaction outcomes.

Current Lack of Evidence on Treatment Strategies and Clinical Outcomes for Osteochondral Lesions of the Subtalar, Talonavicular, and Calcaneocuboid Joints: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: In contrast to osteochondral lesion (OCL) of the ankle, OCLs in other joints of the foot, such as subtalar joint, talonavicular joint, calcaneocuboid joint, and the midfoot, are rare conditions, but they can also lead to significant morbidity. The objective of this systematic review was to summarize the clinical evidence for the treatment of OCLs of the subtalar, talonavicular, calcaneocuboid, and the other midfoot joints. DESIGN: A systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in January 2021 based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines by 2 independent reviewers. Included studies were evaluated with regard to LOE (level of evidence) and QOE (quality of evidence). Variable reporting outcome data, clinical outcomes, and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Seventeen studies with 21 patients were included, all of which were case reports (level 5) without any case series reporting greater than 3 patients. There were 5 patients with OCL in the subtalar joint, 15 patients in the talonavicular joint, and 1 patient in the calcaneocuboid joint. Thirteen case reports (4 subtalar joint, 8 talonavicular joint, and 1 calcaneocuboid joint) reported surgical treatment. Surgical procedures mainly included debridement, bone marrow stimulation, fixation, and bone grafting, through open or arthroscopy, all of which resulted in successful outcomes. Four case reports (1 subtalar joint, 3 talonavicular joint) reported successful conservative treatment. Other 13 case reports reported successful surgery after failed conservative treatment. No complications and reoperations were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The current systematic review revealed that there is no available evidence to ascertain clinical outcomes of both conservative and surgical treatments for cartilage lesions in the talonavicular joint, subtalar joint, and the midfoot joints, owing to the extreme paucity of literature. Both nonoperative and operative treatments can be considered, but no treatment strategies have been established.

Arthroscopic Hip Capsular Repair Improves Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Is Associated With a Decreased Risk of Revision Surgery and Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Purpose: To perform a systematic review to assess the effect of capsular repair compared with nonrepair on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) after hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Methods: We initially searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases, as well as ongoing clinical trials (https://clinicaltrials.gov), on December 15, 2022. The eligibility criteria were randomized controlled trials (Level Ⅰ) and prospective comparative studies (Level II) of patients who underwent capsular repair and nonrepair via hip arthroscopy with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. We registered this protocol a priori on PROSPERO (identification No. CRD42021239306). We assessed the risk of bias using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) appraisal tool. Results: This review included 5 studies with a total of 639 patients (270 with capsular repair [average age, 35.4 years; 41% female patients] and 369 with nonrepair [average age, 37.3 years; 38% female patients]). In the included studies, surgical procedures consisting of labral repair and pincer or cam osteoplasty were performed via hip arthroscopy. The modified Harris Hip Score was measured in all the included studies, and the standardized mean difference in PROMs for capsular repair versus nonrepair in the included studies was 0.42 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20 to 0.63). A sensitivity analysis of randomized controlled trials achieved consistent results (standardized mean difference in PROMs, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.60). Capsular repair was not associated with a reduction in revision surgery (risk difference, -0.02; 95% CI, -0.06 to 0.03; 26 of 270 patients with capsular repair vs 42 of 369 with nonrepair) but was associated with a reduction in conversion to THA (risk difference, -0.05; 95% CI -0.09 to -0.01; 12 of 270 patients with capsular repair vs 38 of 369 with nonrepair). The average Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) score in the included studies was 20. Conclusions: Patients who undergo capsular repair in conjunction with other arthroscopic hip preservation techniques have better PROMs and a lower incidence of THA conversion. Level of Evidence: Level II, systematic review of Level I and II investigations.

Paediatric ankle cartilage lesions: Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle.

BACKGROUND: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle are based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article is to report the consensus statements on "Pediatric Ankle Cartilage Lesions" developed at the 2019 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. METHODS: Forty-three international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 20 countries convened to participate in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within four working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed upon in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterised as follows: consensus: 51-74%; strong consensus: 75-99%; unanimous: 100%. RESULTS: A total of 12 statements on paediatric ankle cartilage lesions reached consensus during the 2019 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Five achieved unanimous support, and seven reached strong consensus (>75% agreement). All statements reached at least 84% agreement. CONCLUSIONS: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians with the management of paediatric ankle cartilage lesions.

Terminology for osteochondral lesions of the ankle: proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle.

BACKGROUND: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle is based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article is to report the consensus statements on "terminology for osteochondral lesions of the ankle" developed at the 2019 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. METHODS: Forty-three international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 20 countries were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within four working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed, and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed on in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterised as follows: consensus, 51%-74%; strong consensus, 75%-99%; unanimous, 100%. RESULTS: A total of 11 statements on terminology and classification reached consensus during the 2019 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Definitions are provided for osseous, chondral and osteochondral lesions, as well as bone marrow stimulation and injury chronicity, among others. An osteochondral lesion of the talus can be abbreviated as OLT. CONCLUSIONS: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians with the appropriate terminology for osteochondral lesions of the ankle.

Bilateral and concomitant pathology' surgeries do not affect the outcomes of mini-open distal linear metatarsal osteotomy (Bosch osteotomy) with manipulation for hallux valgus deformity.

BACKGROUND: Bosch osteotomy for hallux valgus (HV) deformity has advantages of reduction both the operating time and surgical dissection, and may be performed bilaterally and with fewer complications than other surgical procedures as well as early weight-bearing. However, there are few reports on the effects of bilateral simultaneous surgery, simultaneous surgery on concomitant pathologies, and the preoperative HV angle on the postoperative results. The present assessed the factors that might affect the improvement in clinical outcomes following mini-open Bosch osteotomy with manipulation to treat HV deformity. METHODS: Seventy patients with 110 feet were included. They were divided into groups as follows: unilateral and bilateral simultaneous surgery groups, Bosch osteotomy alone and simultaneous surgeries for concomitant pathologies groups, and preoperative HV angle< 40° and ≥ 40° groups. Subjective clinical outcome scores using the Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire (SAFE-Q) and the HV and intermetatarsal first and second metatarsal (M1M2) angles according to the anteroposterior (A-P) view of the weighted foot X-ray were assessed preoperatively and at 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: The mean HV angle, M1M2 angle and all subscales of the SAFE-Q score showed significant improvement at 12 months after surgery, regardless of simultaneous bilateral surgery, simultaneous surgery for concomitant pathologies, or the preoperative HV angle. On comparing the groups, there were no significant differences in the HV angle at 12 months after surgery. Significant inferiority at 12 months after surgery was found in the intermetatarsal angle in the simultaneous surgery for concomitant pathologies group and in all subscales of the SAFE-Q score in the HV angle ≥ 40° group. CONCLUSION: Mini-open Bosch osteotomy with manipulation for HV deformity demonstrated good results in both radiological assessments and subjective clinical scores at 12 months after surgery, even for simultaneous bilateral surgery, simultaneous concomitant pathologies' surgery, and severe HV deformity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Interpositional Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Hallux Rigidus: A Systematic Review.

Hallux rigidus is the most common arthritic condition of the foot. Interpositional arthroplasty (IPA) is indicated for advanced-stage hallux rigidus and attempts to maintain joint motion through insertion of a biologic spacer into the joint. However, the data evaluating the effectiveness of IPA are limited. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the outcomes of IPA in the treatment of hallux rigidus. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically reviewed based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. Outcomes collected and analyzed included: American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal (HMI) score, visual analogue scale score, short-form 36 score, range of motion (ROM), radiographic parameters, and postoperative complications. The level and quality of clinical evidence were recorded and assessed. Sixteen studies with a total of 428 patients met inclusion/exclusion criteria. The mean AOFAS-HMI score improved from 51.6 ± 10.1 (range 35.0-64.2) preoperatively to 86.0 ± 7.7 (range 71.6-95.4) postoperatively (p ≤ .001) at weighted mean follow-up of 58.0 ± 34.5 (range 16.5-135.6) months. The preoperative weighted mean total ROM was 39.3° ± 9.6° (range 24.2-49.9) and the postoperative weighted mean total ROM was 61.5° ± 4.8° (range 54.0-66.5) (p ≤ .001). The complication rate was 21.5% with metatarsalgia as the most commonly reported complication. One study was level 3 and 15 studies were level 4 clinical evidence. This systematic review demonstrates improvement in functional and ROM outcomes following IPA procedure at mid-term follow-up. The procedure however has a moderate complication rate. In addition, there is a low level and quality of evidence in the current literature with inconsistent reporting of data.

Incidence of Chondral and Osteochondral Lesions in Ankle Fracture Patients Identified With Ankle Arthroscopy Following Rotational Ankle Fracture: A Systematic Review.

A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analyses guidelines on May 20, 2019. The keywords used were: ankle, distal tibia, distal fibula, fracture, arthroscopic, cartilage, and chondral. The objective of this study is to systematically review the characterization of intra-articular chondral injuries of the talus, tibial plafond, medial malleolus, and lateral malleolus in patients who undergo ankle arthroscopy following ankle fracture. Studies evaluating the incidence of chondral lesions at the time of arthroscopy for ankle fractures within any timeframe were included. The incidence of intra-articular chondral lesions was recorded, the location within the ankle, ankle fracture type, time of arthroscopy, characterization of chondral injury, complications, and outcome if available. Fifteen studies with 1355 ankle fractures were included. About 738 demonstrated evidence of chondral or osteochondral lesion (54.5%). Statistical analyses were carried out with statistical software package SPSS 24.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). We compared incidence rates of chondral injury based on Weber classification, malleolar fracture type, and Lauge-Hansen classification, using Pearson chi-square test. For all analyses, p < .05 was considered statistically significant. We found a high incidence of intra-articular chondral lesion in the setting of ankle fractures as demonstrated by arthroscopy.

Osteochondral Lesions of the Tibial Plafond and Ankle Instability With Ankle Cartilage Lesions: Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle.

BACKGROUND: An international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article is to present the consensus statements on osteochondral lesions of the tibial plafond (OLTP) and on ankle instability with ankle cartilage lesions developed at the 2019 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. METHODS: Forty-three experts in cartilage repair of the ankle were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within 4 working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed on in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held. RESULTS: A total of 11 statements on OLTP reached consensus. Four achieved unanimous support and 7 reached strong consensus (greater than 75% agreement). A total of 8 statements on ankle instability with ankle cartilage lesions reached consensus during the 2019 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. One achieved unanimous support, and seven reached strong consensus (greater than 75% agreement). CONCLUSION: These consensus statements may assist clinicians in the management of these difficult clinical pathologies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, mechanism-based reasoning.

Concentrated Bone Marrow Aspirate Injection for Hallux Sesamoid Disorders.

Concentrated bone marrow aspirate (CBMA) offers an alternative to sesamoid resection in end stage sesamoid pathology. CBMA potentiates the anti-inflammatory effect, stimulates local tissue regeneration and osteogenesis, when injected into bone. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the functional outcomes in a cohort of athletes following CBMA injection for the treatment of hallux sesamoid disorders. A retrospective case series of consecutive patients treated with CBMA injection for hallux sesamoid disorders were identified. Radiographs, Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score were collected pre- and postinjections. Descriptive statistics were presented as the mean and standard deviation for continuous variables and frequency as percentages for categorical variables. Fifteen consecutive patients with were included with a mean follow-up time of 20.1 (range 12-34) months. Significant improvement in all scoring subscales of the FAOS and VAS score was noted preinjection compared to final follow-up postinjection (p < .001). Eight of 11 patients that were involved in sports prior to the CBMA injection returned to play, with 7 successfully returning to preinjury level status. Three patients required further treatment (20%). The case series suggests that CBMA injection is a safe and effective treatment option for hallux sesamoid disorders with a high rate of return to play.

Osteochondral Lesions of the Tibial Plafond: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data regarding osteochondral lesions of the tibial plafond (OLTPs), in part because they are far less common than osteochondral lesions of the talus. PURPOSE: To evaluate the topographical characteristics of OLTPs and outcomes after surgical intervention, while analyzing the level of evidence (LOE) and quality of evidence (QOE) of the included studies. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A systematic review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies reporting clinical data for OLTPs were included. The LOE and QOE of the included studies were evaluated using a 5-level grading system and the modified Coleman Methodology Score, respectively. RESULTS: Included were 20 studies with 426 OLTPs; 4 studies were LOE 2 and 16 studies were LOE 4. Overall, 86.7% of OLTPs were associated with a traumatic history and/or previous ankle sprain. OLTPs were most commonly located in the centromedial region of the tibial plafond (30.4%), with the fewest number of OLTPs found in the anteromedial region of the tibial plafond (3.9%). In 17 of the studies, a total of 46.9% of OLTPs were associated with coexisting osteochondral lesions of the talus. The most frequently used surgical technique to treat OLTPs was microfracture, which resulted in good clinical outcomes at midterm follow-up. CONCLUSION: The results of this systematic review indicated that OLTPs are frequently preceded by ankle trauma and are often associated with coexisting osteochondral lesions of the talus. Clinical outcomes after arthroscopic intervention appear to produce good results in the midterm, but the low LOE, poor QOE, marked heterogeneity, and underreporting of the data confound any recommendation based on this systematic review.

Evaluation of the Quality and Readability of Online Sources on the Diagnosis and Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Ankle.

OBJECTIVE: Patients frequently use the internet as a source to obtain health information. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality and readability of online resources on the diagnosis and treatment of ankle osteochondral lesions (OCLs). DESIGN: Three search terms ("ankle cartilage defect," "cartilage injury," "ankle cartilage damage") were entered into 3 search engines (Google, Yahoo, and Bing). The first 20 websites from each search was collected excluding websites intended for health care providers. The quality of the websites were evaluated using the DISCERN instrument, JAMA benchmark, and a Quality rating criteria specific to ankle OCL. The readability was assessed using Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL). Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: A total of 41 websites were reviewed. The mean quality ratings were poor across the assessment tools: DISCERN = 38.5 ± 9.0 (range, 23.7-56.7) out of 80; JAMA = 1.0 ± 1.1 (range, 0-3.3) out of 4; and Quality rating criteria = 11.3 ± 4.6 (range, 4-20.7) out of 24. The mean FRE and FKGL were 40.7 ± 32.0 (range, -152.3 to 60.2) and 13.5 ± 10.8 (range, 8.4-80.7), respectively; higher than the recommended reading level for patients (fifth grade). CONCLUSIONS: The quality and readability of credible sources for ankle OCL were poor, which could lead to misinformation. This study should guide the improvement of online information on ankle OCL.

Use of Extracellular Matrix Cartilage Allograft May Improve Infill of the Defects in Bone Marrow Stimulation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of extracellular matrix cartilage allograft (EMCA) as an adjuvant to bone marrow stimulation (BMS) compared with BMS alone in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study comparing patients treated with BMS with EMCA (BMS-EMCA group) and BMS alone (BMS group) between 2013 and 2019 was undertaken. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) preoperatively and postoperatively. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were evaluated using the modified Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue score. Comparisons between groups were made with the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and the Fisher exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients underwent BMS with EMCA (BMS-EMCA group), and 24 patients underwent BMS alone (BMS group). The mean age was 40.8 years (range, 19-60 years) in the BMS-EMCA group and 47.8 years (range, 24-60 years) in the BMS group (P = .060). The mean follow-up time was 20.0 months (range, 12-36 months) in the BMS-EMCA group and 26.9 months (range, 12-55 months) in the BMS group (P = .031). Both groups showed significant improvements in all FAOS subscales. No significant differences between groups were found in all postoperative FAOS values. The mean Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue score in the BMS-EMCA group was higher (76.3 vs 66.3) but not statistically significant (P = .176). The MRI analysis showed that 87.5% of the BMS-EMCA patients had complete infill of the defect with repair tissue; however, fewer than half of the BMS patients (46.5%) had complete infill (P = .015). CONCLUSIONS: BMS with EMCA is an effective treatment strategy for osteochondral lesions of the talus and provides better cartilage infill in the defect on MRI. However, this did not translate to improved functional outcomes compared with BMS alone in the short term. Additionally, according to analysis of the minimal clinically important difference, there was no significant difference in clinical function scoring between the 2 groups postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Evidence-based Treatment of Failed Primary Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review on Clinical Outcomes of Bone Marrow Stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to systematically review the literature and to evaluate the outcomes following bone marrow stimulation (BMS) for nonprimary osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT). DESIGN: A literature search was performed to identify studies published using PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, CDSR, DARE, and CENTRAL. The review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Two authors separately and independently screened the search results and conducted the quality assessment using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). Studies were pooled on clinical, sports, work, and imaging outcomes, as well as revision rates and complications. The primary outcome was clinical success rate. RESULTS: Five studies with 70 patients were included in whom nonprimary OLTs were treated with secondary BMS. The pooled clinical success rate was 61% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50-72). The rate of return to any level of sport was 83% (95% CI, 70-91), while the return to pre-injury level of sport was 55% (95% CI, 34-74). The rate of return to work was 92% (95% CI, 78-97), and the complication rate was assessed to be 10% (95% CI, 4-22). Imaging outcomes were heterogeneous in outcome assessment, though a depressed subchondral bone plate was observed in 91% of the patients. The revision rate was 27% (95% CI, 18-40). CONCLUSIONS: The overall success rate of arthroscopic BMS for nonprimary osteochondral lesions of the talus was 61%, including a revision rate of 27%. Return to sports, work, and complication outcomes yielded fair to good results.

Autologous osteochondral transplantation for osteochondral lesions of the talus: high rate of return to play in the athletic population.

PURPOSE: (1) To determine the rate of return to play following autologous osteochondral transplantation (AOT) for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) and (2) report subsequent rehabilitation protocols. METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library databases was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines based on specific eligibility criteria. Return to play data was meta-analysed and subsequent rehabilitation protocols were summarised. Level of evidence and quality of evidence (Zaman's criteria) were also evaluated. RESULTS: Nine studies that totalled 205 ankles were included for review. The mean follow-up was 44.4 ± 25.0 (range 16-84) months. The mean OLT size was 135.4 ± 56.4 mm2. The mean time to return to play was 5.8 ± 2.6 months. The mean rate of return to play was 86.3% (range 50-95.2%), with 81.8% of athletes returning to pre-injury status. Based on the fixed-effect model, the rate of return to play was 84.07%. Significant correlation was found between increase age and decrease rate of return to play (R2 = 0.362, p = 0.00056). There was no correlation between OLT sizes and rate of return to play (R2 = 0.140, p = 0.023). The most common time to ankle motion post-surgery was immediately and the most common time to full weight-bearing was 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review indicated a high rate of return to play following AOT in the athletic population. Size of OLT was not found to be a predictor of return to play, whereas advancing age was a predictor. Rehabilitation protocols were largely inconsistent and were primarily based on individual surgeon protocols. However, the included studies were of low level and quality of evidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Early Failures of Polyvinyl Alcohol Hydrogel Implant for the Treatment of Hallux Rigidus.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes following a polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel implant in the treatment of hallux rigidus. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study investigating patients treated with a polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel implant for hallux rigidus was performed. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with the Foot and Ankle Outcomes Score (FAOS) and visual analog scale (VAS) score at the final follow-up. Plain radiographs were assessed postoperatively. Eleven patients (11 feet) with a mean follow-up of 20.9 months (range, 14-27 months) were included. The mean age was 60.3 years. RESULTS: All FAOS subscales showed pre- to postoperative improvements, but there was no statistical significance in all subscales. The mean VAS score showed improvement from 4.1 to 3.0 (P = .012). On postoperative plain radiographs, implant subsidence was observed 60% (6/10) at 4 weeks after surgery and 90% (9/10) at the final follow-up. Fifty percent (5/10) showed radiologic lucency around the implant. Forty percent (4/10) had erosion of the proximal phalanx of the great toe. Four patients (36%) reported no improvement following surgery at the final follow-up, which were considered as failures. Three patients required additional surgery related to the implants. An additional patient is waiting to revise the implant. CONCLUSION: Our current cohort study demonstrated a high failure rate with the polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel implant in patients with hallux rigidus. Significant radiologic subsidence with lysis around the implant, erosion of the proximal phalanx countersurface, and implant wear are harbingers for concern in the long term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.