Anatomic Criterion for Clinically Relevant Apical Prolapse in Urogynecology Populations.

IMPORTANCE: Despite recognition of the critical role of the apex in vaginal support, there is no consensus on the anatomic criteria for clinically relevant apical prolapse. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to define an optimal anatomic criterion for clinically relevant apical prolapse. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study included 3,690 patients who had visited a tertiary hospital for ambulatory urogynecologic care. Vaginal bulge symptom was defined as a response of "somewhat," "moderately," or "quite a bit" to Question 3 on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated for a vaginal bulge symptom and apical support (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification point C and C/total vaginal length [TVL]). RESULTS: Both point C and the C-to-TVL ratio (C/TVL) had excellent performance for predicting vaginal bulge symptoms (area under the curve, 0.917 and 0.927, respectively). The optimal cutoffs were -3.0 for C and -0.50 for C/TVL. When we analyzed the data set according to the TVL, there was a significant difference in the cutoffs for C, whereas those for C/TVL had little difference. There was no difference in the cutoffs of C and C/TVL according to hysterectomy status. CONCLUSIONS: The C/TVL is more appropriate than point C as a measure to define an anatomic criterion for clinically relevant apical prolapse. Descent of the vaginal apex beyond the halfway point of the vagina could be considered as an anatomic threshold for clinically relevant apical prolapse. This finding needs to be validated in nonurogynecology populations.

Comparison of treatment outcomes for native tissue repair and sacrocolpopexy as apical suspension procedures at the time of hysterectomy for uterine prolapse.

Concomitant apical suspension should be performed at the time of hysterectomy for uterine prolapse to reduce the risk of recurrent prolapse. Native tissue repair (NTR) and sacrocolpopexy (SCP) are commonly used apical suspension procedures; however, it remains unclear which one is preferred. This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes of NTR and SCP in terms of surgical failure, complication and reoperation rates. Surgical failure was defined as the presence of vaginal bulge symptoms, any prolapse beyond the hymen, or retreatment for prolapse. This retrospective cohort study included 523 patients who had undergone NTR (n = 272) or SCP (n = 251) along with hysterectomy for uterine prolapse and who had at least 4-month follow-up visits. During the median 3-year follow-up period, the surgical failure rate was higher in the NTR group (21.3% vs 6.4%, P < 0.01), with a low rate of retreatment in both groups. Overall complication rates were similar, but complications requiring surgical correction under anesthesia were more common in the SCP group (7.2% vs 0.4%, P < 0.01). As a result, the total reoperation rate was significantly higher in the SCP group (8.0% vs 2.6%, P = 0.02). Taken together, NTR may be a preferred option for apical suspension when hysterectomy is performed for uterine prolapse.

Sagittal imbalance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and outcomes after simple decompression surgery.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is the most common lumbar degenerative disease, and sagittal imbalance is uncommon. Forward-bending posture, which is primarily caused by buckling of the ligamentum flavum, may be improved via simple decompression surgery. PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to identify the risk factors for sagittal imbalance and to describe the outcomes of simple decompression surgery. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective nested case-control study PATIENT SAMPLE: This was a retrospective study that included 83 consecutive patients (M:F=46:37; mean age, 68.5±7.7 years) who underwent decompression surgery and a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was normalization of sagittal imbalance after decompression surgery. METHODS: Sagittal imbalance was defined as a C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) ≥40 mm on a 36-inch-long lateral whole spine radiograph. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors for sagittal imbalance. Bilateral decompression was performed via a unilateral approach with a tubular retractor. The SVA was measured on serial radiographs performed 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The prognostic factors for sagittal balance recovery were determined based on various clinical and radiological parameters. RESULTS: Sagittal imbalance was observed in 54% (45/83) of patients, and its risk factors were old age and a large mismatch between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis. The 1-year normalization rate was 73% after decompression surgery, and the median time to normalization was 1 to 3 months. Patients who did not experience SVA normalization exhibited low thoracic kyphosis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.10) (p<.01) and spondylolisthesis (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.61) before surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Sagittal imbalance was observed in more than 50% of LSS patients, but this imbalance was correctable via simple decompression surgery in 70% of patients.