Survival Impact of Inflammation-based Prognostic Scores in Metastatic or Unresectable Esophageal Cancer Treated With Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy.

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy has been indicated as the first-line treatment for metastatic or unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, pretreatment biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes remain unclear. We investigated the predictive value of inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients treated with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy. The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were calculated before initial treatment in 65 eligible patients with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer receiving pembrolizumab plus CF therapy, and the relationship between these biomarkers and clinical outcomes was analyzed. The objective response rate (ORR) and progression disease (PD) were observed in 51% and 21% of all patients. Patients with PNI<39 have significantly worse treatment responses than those with PNI≥39 (ORR; 28% vs. 60%, PD; 44% vs. 13%, P=0.020). Progression-free survival (PFS) is significantly associated with the PNI and CAR (P<0.001 and P=0.004, respectively). Overall survival (OS) is associated with PNI, CAR, and PLR (P<0.001, P=0.008, and P=0.018, respectively). The PNI cutoff value of 39 is identified as an independent factor for PFS (odds ratio=0.27, 95% CI: 0.18-0.81, P=0.012) and OS (odds ratio=0.22, 95% CI: 0.08-0.59, P=0.003). Patients with PNI<39 have significantly worse 6-month PFS and 1-year OS than those with PNI≥39 (27.8% vs. 66.7%, 27.2% vs. 81.1%, respectively). In conclusion, inflammation-based prognostic scores are associated with survival in patients treated with pembrolizumab plus CF therapy. Pretreatment PNI is a promising candidate for predicting treatment response and survival.

Prognostic impact of nodal status and lymphovascular invasion in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Nodal status is well known to be the most important prognostic factor for esophageal cancer patients, even if they are treated with neoadjuvant therapy. To establish an optimal postoperative adjuvant strategy for patients, we aimed to more accurately predict the prognosis of patients and systemic recurrence by using clinicopathological factors, including nodal status, in patients with esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The clinicopathological factors associated with survival and systemic recurrence were investigated in 488 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Overall survival differed according to tumor depth, nodal status, tumor regression, and lymphovascular (LV) invasion. In the multivariate analysis, nodal status and LV invasion were identified as independent prognostic factors (P < 0.0001, P = 0.0008). Nodal status was also identified as an independent factor associated with systemic recurrence, although LV invasion was a borderline factor (P = 0.066). In each pN stage, patients with LV invasion showed significantly worse overall survival than those without LV invasion (pN0: P = 0.036, pN1: P = 0.0044, pN2: P = 0.0194, pN3: P = 0.0054). Patients with LV invasion were also more likely to have systemic, and any recurrence than those without LV invasion in each pN stage. Pathological nodal status and LV invasion were the most important predictors of survival and systemic recurrence in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. This finding could provide useful information about selecting candidates for adjuvant therapy among these patients. Our analysis showed that LV invasion was an independent prognostic factor in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and that combining LV invasion with pathological nodal status makes it possible to stratify the prognosis in those patients.

Significance of Comprehensive Analysis of Preoperative Sarcopenia Based on Muscle Mass, Muscle Strength, and Physical Function for the Prognosis of Patients with Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of muscle mass loss, muscle strength, and physical function has been recommended in diagnosing sarcopenia. However, only muscle mass has been assessed in previous studies. Therefore, this study investigated the effect of comprehensively diagnosed preoperative sarcopenia on the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer. METHODS: The study analyzed 115 patients with esophageal cancer (age ≥ 65 years) who underwent curative esophagectomy. Preoperative sarcopenia was analyzed using the skeletal mass index (SMI), handgrip strength, and gait speed based on the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 criteria. Clinicopathologic factors, incidence of postoperative complications, and overall survival (OS) were compared between the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups. The significance of the three individual parameters also was evaluated. RESULTS: The evaluation identified 47 (40.9%) patients with low SMI, 31 (27.0%) patients with low handgrip strength, and 6 (5.2%) patients with slow gait speed. Sarcopenia was diagnosed in 23 patients (20%) and associated with older age and advanced pT stage. The incidence of postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. Among the three parameters, only slow gait speed was associated with Clavien-Dindo grade 2 or greater complications. The sarcopenia group showed significantly worse OS than the non-sarcopenia group. Those with low handgrip strength tended to have worse OS, and those with slow gait speed had significantly worse OS than their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative sarcopenia diagnosed using skeletal muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical function may have an impact on the survival of patients with esophageal cancer.

Short-term Outcomes of Adjuvant Nivolumab After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Resected Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: CheckMate 577 evaluated adjuvant nivolumab therapy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for esophageal cancers. However, the efficacy of this treatment in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains unknown. This study investigated the short-term outcomes of adjuvant nivolumab therapy in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Out of 956 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent radical esophagectomy, 227 who exhibited ypN1-3 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery were included in this study. RESULTS: Among 227 patients, 30 received adjuvant nivolumab and 197 received non-nivolumab adjuvant therapy. The nivolumab group displayed a higher number of lymph node metastases compared to the control group. Patients with ypN1-2 tended to have longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the nivolumab group than in the non-nivolumab group (p=0.095). In the propensity score-matched cohort, no differences in patient characteristics were observed. Adjuvant nivolumab therapy significantly prolonged RFS in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.013). Patients with ypN1-2 in the nivolumab group had significantly longer RFS than their counterparts in the non-nivolumab group (p=0.001), but not in ypN3 (p=0.784). The 1-year postoperative recurrence rates were 59% for the non-nivolumab group and 24% for the nivolumab group (p=0.007). Nivolumab-related adverse events in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were mostly consistent across all grades, while the frequency of increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels was relatively higher compared to CheckMate577. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant nivolumab was more likely to prolong 1-year RFS in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, especially in those with ypN1-2, and had acceptable adverse events.

Clinical Impact of Early Tumour Shrinkage in Metastatic or Unresectable Oesophageal Cancer Treated with Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Metastatic or unresectable locally advanced oesophageal cancer remains a disease with high mortality. More recently, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy has been indicated as the first-line treatment for those patients, but the predictive factors for treatment efficacy remain controversial. This study investigated the clinical utility of early tumour shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) in metastatic or unresectable oesophageal cancer treated with pembrolizumab plus CF therapy. METHODS: ETS and DpR, defined as the percent decreases at the second evaluation and the percentage of the maximal tumour shrinkage during treatment, were measured in 53 eligible patients. The ETS and DpR cut-off values were 20% and 30%, respectively, based on survival outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (51%) were treatment-naïve, while 26 (49%) had received any treatment before initiating pembrolizumab plus CF therapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for ETS ≥20% and <20% were 12.7 and 5.5 months and 14.4 and 8.2 months, and 12.7 and 4.9 months and 14.4 and 8.0 months for DpR ≥30% and <30%, respectively. ETS <20% showed early tumour growth, whereas ETS ≥20% had a good response rate with sufficient longer response duration. In addition, an ETS cut-off of 20% predicted the best overall response and was not associated with prior treatment. In multivariable analysis, ETS ≥20% and DpR ≥30% were independent factors of longer PFS. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that an ETS is a promising on-treatment marker for early prediction of further sensitivity to pembrolizumab plus CF therapy.

Prognostic value of a novel index combining the prognostic nutritional index and D-dimer levels for gastric cancer after gastrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The prognostic nutritional index and D-dimer level are two useful measures for gastric cancer prognosis. Since they each comprise different factors, it is possible to employ a more useful combined indicator. This study therefore aimed to establish a prognostic nutritional index-D score-which combines the prognostic nutritional index and D-dimer level-and validate its usefulness as a prognostic marker. METHODS: We collected data from 1,218 patients with gastric cancer who had undergone radical gastrectomy (R0) between January 2004 and December 2015. Patients were divided into three prognostic nutritional index-D score groups based on the following criteria: score 2, low prognostic nutritional index (≤46) and high D-dimer levels (>1.0 µg/ml); score 1, either a low prognostic nutritional index or high D-dimer levels; and score 0, no abnormality. We then defined the PNI-D score as low (score 0 or 1) and high (score 2). RESULTS: The prognostic nutritional index-D score was significantly associated with overall, recurrence-free, and disease-specific survival (all log-rank P<0.0001). The 5-year overall survival rates of the patients with prognostic nutritional index-D scores of low and high were 88.1% and 64.7%, respectively; their 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 86.7% and 61.3%, respectively; and their 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 99.3% and 76.5%, respectively. Cox multivariate analysis revealed that a high prognostic nutritional index-D score was an independent, statistically significant prognostic factor for poor overall (P=0.01) survival in the patients with gastric cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic nutritional index-D is an independent prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy With S-1 Plus Docetaxel Versus S-1 Plus Oxaliplatin in Stage III Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines recommend doublet chemotherapy (S-1 plus another chemotherapy) over S-1 alone for patients with pStage III gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy. However, no consensus exists on adjuvant regimens for patients with pStage III gastric cancer. Therefore, we conducted a comparative study to evaluate the tolerability, safety, and survival outcomes of docetaxel plus S-1 (DS) and S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) therapies as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with pStage III gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from consecutive patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy and received DS or SOX therapies postoperatively at the Osaka International Cancer Institute between December 2016 and December 2021. We conducted a propensity score matching analysis to balance clinical backgrounds. RESULTS: Eighty patients who met the eligibility criteria were analyzed. After matching, 40 patients were included in the study (20 each in the DS and SOX groups). No significant adverse events were observed. The mean ratios of the delivered dose to the planned dose were 74.1% and 86.6% for S-1 and docetaxel in the DS group, respectively, and 75.8% and 76.9% for S-1 and oxaliplatin in the SOX group, respectively. No significant differences were found in recurrence-free and overall survival between the DS and SOX groups (p=0.688 and p=0.772, respectively). CONCLUSION: DS and SOX therapies as adjuvants were safe and manageable for patients with pStage III gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy. No significant differences were found in prognosis between the two therapies.

Clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who were intraoperatively diagnosed non-curative.

INTRODUCTION: Curative esophagectomy is not always possible in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, few studies have investigated patients who underwent non-curative surgery with intraoperative judgment. This study aimed to investigate patient characteristics and clinical outcomes for patients undergoing non-curative surgery and compare them between non-resectional and non-radical surgery. METHODS: Among 989 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who were preoperatively expected for curative esophagectomy, 66 who were eligible for non-curative surgery were included in this study. RESULTS: Intraoperative diagnosis of T4b accounted for 93% of the reasons for the failure of curative surgery. In those patients, esophageal cancer locally invaded into the aortobronchial constriction (70%), trachea (25%), or pulmonary vein (5%). LN metastasis mainly invaded into the trachea (50%), or bronchus (28%).The overall survival of patients with non-curative surgery was 51.5%, 25.7%, and 10.4% at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery, respectively. Although there were no differences in preoperative patient characteristics between non-resectional and non-radical surgery, distant metastasis, especially pleural dissemination, was significantly observed in T4b patients due to esophageal cancer with non-radical surgery than those with non-resectional surgery (35% vs. 15%, P=0.002). Even in patients with non-curative surgery, R1 resection and postoperative CRT were identified as independent factors for survival 1 year after surgery (P=0.047, and 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: T4b tumor located in aortobronchial constriction or trachea/bronchus makes it difficult to diagnose whether it is resectable or unresectable. Moreover, surgical procedures and perioperative treatment were deeply associated with the clinical outcomes.

Early detection of brain metastases and appropriate local therapy followed by systemic chemotherapy may improve the prognosis of gastric cancer.

Brain metastases develop in 0.5-0.7% of patients with gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer. Although rare, brain metastasis is often identified when the patient is already symptomatic; hence prognosis is poor. Given the therapeutic developments for G/GEJ cancer, overall survival is prolonged, thereby the incidence of brain metastases is predicted to increase. We retrospectively surveyed the rate of brain metastasis among 1257 patients diagnosed with G/GEJ cancer who received chemotherapy between January 2011 and April 2021. We investigated the time of onset of brain metastasis, treatments administered, and impact of the metastasis on the overall treatment course and prognosis. Of the 741 patients included in the analysis, brain metastasis was confirmed in 16 (2.2%). The median survival time (MST) from G/GEJ cancer diagnosis was 14.9 months in patients with brain metastasis detected during the treatment period, and the MST from the diagnosis of brain metastasis was 2.8 months. Patients who received chemotherapy exhibited prolonged survival compared with those who did not (12.4 months vs 1.0 months, p < 0.001). Our findings suggest that the early detection of brain metastases and local therapy for poor responders to chemotherapy enable the continuation of chemotherapy and prolong survival.

Clinical Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Esophagectomy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program is expected to improve perioperative outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. However, how ERAS impacts the postoperative body composition and factors related to compliance rate of ERAS have not been fully investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 252 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy. We compared the postoperative outcomes including body composition between the old perioperative program and the new one that aimed to shorten postoperative length of stay (LOS). Compliance-related clinical factors were also examined. RESULTS: From 252 patients, 129 underwent the old program and 123 the new program. Postoperative LOS, postoperative complications, and hospital costs were reduced with the new program. Body weight loss was significantly improved with the new program at discharge and 3-months after esophagectomy (94.9% vs. 96.6%, p=0.013, 89.5% vs. 91.1%, p=0.028, respectively). Patients in the new program had better body composition at discharge than those in the old program [body fat mass (91.6% vs. 94.1%), lean body mass (95.2% vs. 97.2), and skeletal muscle mass (95.3% vs. 97.0%)]. Major reasons for incompliance were dysphagia, pneumonia, and anastomotic leakage. Multivariate analysis revealed that age ≥70 years at surgery and sex (male) were independent risk factors for incompliance with the postoperative program. CONCLUSION: The new ERAS program aimed to shorten postoperative LOS had clinical benefits in body composition early after esophagectomy. Personalized ERAS programs based on age might lead to better postoperative outcomes because of low compliance rates for older patients.

Long-term changes in bone mineral density in postoperative patients with esophageal cancer.

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate long-term changes in bone mineral density (BMD) after esophagectomy, identify the risk factors for postoperative osteoporosis in patients with esophageal cancer and survival outcomes related to osteoporosis. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated BMD changes for 197 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who were disease-free for 5 years after radical esophagectomy. Osteoporosis was diagnosed using computed tomography with an L1 attenuation threshold of ≤110 HU. Survival analysis was performed on 381 consecutive patients with 5-year follow-up after radical esophagectomy. Results: BMD decreased annually after esophagectomy. The median attenuation (HU) was 134.2 before surgery and 135.2, 127.4, 123.3, 115.2, 105.6, and 102.4 at 6 months and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years after surgery, respectively. Osteoporosis was diagnosed in 25.9% patients before surgery and 23.3%, 29.4%, 40.1%, 46.7%, 54.8%, and 60.4% patients with osteoporosis were observed at 6 months and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years after surgery, respectively. Postoperative BMD did not decrease in patients aged ≤54 years, those who had never been smokers, and those with no weight loss after esophagectomy. Multivariate analysis identified that age (≥65 years) at surgery and smoking history were independent risk factors for osteoporosis at 5 years after esophagectomy. Patients with preoperative osteoporosis tended to have worse prognosis in disease-free survival and overall survival than those without osteoporosis, who were more likely to die due to non-esophageal cancer. Conclusion: Esophageal cancer survivors are more likely to develop osteoporosis after esophagectomy, and preoperative osteoporosis might be associated with prognosis.

Modified Collard technique is more effective than circular stapled for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a propensity score-matched study.

The anastomotic technique after esophagectomy is of great interest in the prevention of anastomotic complications that adversely affect postoperative recovery. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of modified Collard (MC) and circular stapled (CS) anastomoses after esophagectomy. A total of 504 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastric CS or MC anastomosis from January 2013 to December 2019 were enrolled. Out of 504 patients, 134 and 370 underwent CS and MC anastomoses. The frequency of anastomotic leakage and stricture was significantly lesser in the MC group than in the CS group (3.0 vs. 10.5%, P = 0.0014 and 11.1 vs. 34.3%, P < 0.001, respectively). CS anastomosis was an independent risk factor for anastomotic stricture (odds ratio, 4.89; P < 0.001). Oral intake was significantly higher in the group without anastomotic stricture than in the group with anastomotic stricture at 2, 3, and 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.001, P = 0.013, and P < 0.001, respectively). The percentage body weight loss (%BWL) was -12.2% in the group with anastomotic stricture and -7.5% in the group without anastomotic stricture at 3 months postoperatively (P = 0.0012). Anastomotic stricture was an independent factor associated with %BWL (odds ratio, 4.86; P = 0.010). Propensity score-matched analysis, which included 88 pairs of patients, confirmed a significantly lower anastomotic stricture rate in the MC group than in the CS group (10.2 vs. 35.2%, P < 0.001). MC anastomosis is better than CS anastomosis for reducing the frequency of anastomotic stricture, which may be useful for maintaining early postoperative nutritional status.

Tumor Deposit Is an Independent Factor Predicting Early Recurrence and Poor Prognosis in Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Accurate prognostic estimation is crucial; however, the prognostic value of tumor deposits in gastric cancer remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate their prognostic significance. METHODS: Clinicopathological and prognostic data of 1012 gastric cancer patients who underwent R0 or R1 surgery from 2010 to 2017 at the Osaka International Cancer Institute were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Overall, 6.3% patients had tumor deposits, which were associated with Borrmann type, surgical procedure, type of gastrectomy, extent of lymphadenectomy, tumor size, histology, pT, pN, pM, pStage, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, preoperative chemotherapy, and postoperative chemotherapy. Tumor deposit-positive patients had worse 5-year disease-free survival (32.60% vs. 92.45%) and overall survival (41.22% vs. 89.37%) than tumor deposit-negative patients. Subgroup analysis regarding pStage II-III also showed significant differences between patients with and without tumor deposits for 5-year disease-free survival (34.15% vs. 80.98%) and overall survival (43.17% vs. 75.78%). Multivariable analysis showed that older age, undifferentiated histology, deeper tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and presence of tumor deposits were significantly correlated with early tumor recurrence and shorter survival time; these factors were identified as independent prognostic factors. The 5-year disease-free survival of tumor deposit-positive patients was significantly worse than that of patients in the pStage III group and comparable to that of patients in the pT4, pN3, and pM1 groups. The 5-year overall survival of tumor deposit-positive patients was comparable to that of the pT4, pN3, pM1, and pStage III groups. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor deposits are strong and independent predictors of tumor recurrence and poor survival.

Antemortem diagnosis of pulmonary tumor thrombotic microangiopathy associated with gastric cancer and response to immediate chemotherapy.

Pulmonary tumor thrombotic microangiopathy is a rare and fatal complication of cancer that features widespread tumor cell-derived embolisms in the small arteries and arterioles of the lung and is often associated with thrombus formation. We describe the case of a 43-year-old woman who was hospitalized with cough and respiratory distress that lasted for 2 months. Computed tomography findings demonstrated multiple areas of interlobular septal thickening and ground-glass opacities in both lungs. Transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated a D-shaped left ventricle suggesting right heart overload, and pulmonary blood flow scintigraphy revealed multiple small, peripheral, and patchy areas of reduced blood flow. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a signet-ring carcinoma. The patient was diagnosed with pulmonary tumor thrombotic microangiopathy based on her clinical presentation and treatment with tegafur, gimeracil oteracil potassium, oxaliplatin, and an anticoagulant was initiated on the 3rd day after admission. The symptoms improved rapidly after treatment initiation. The patient was discharged 28 days after initiation of chemotherapy without the need for supplemental oxygen. This case suggests that the immediate use of chemotherapy and anticoagulants for treating pulmonary tumor thrombotic microangiopathy may improve patient survival.

DUPAN-II normalisation as a biological indicator during preoperative chemoradiation therapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Duke pancreatic mono-clonal antigen type 2 (DUPAN-II) is a famous tumour maker for pancreatic cancer (PC) as well as carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9). We evaluated the clinical implications of DUPAN-II levels as a biological indicator for PC during preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT). METHODS: This retrospective analysis included data from 221 consecutive patients with resectable and borderline resectable PC at diagnosis who underwent preoperative CRT between 2008 and 2017. We focused on 73 patients with elevated pre-CRT DUPAN-II levels (> 230 U/mL; more than 1.5 times the cut-off value for the normal range). Pre- and post-CRT DUPAN-II levels and the changes in DUPAN-II ratio were measured. RESULTS: Univariate analysis identified normalisation of DUPAN-II levels after CRT as a significant prognostic factor (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.06, confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-4.24, p = 0.042). Total normalisation ratio was 49% (n = 36). Overall survival (OS) in patients with normalised DUPAN-II levels was significantly longer than that in 73 patients with elevated levels (5-year survival, 55% vs. 21%, p = 0.032) and in 60 patients who underwent tumour resection (5-year survival, 59% vs. 26%, p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Normalisation of DUPAN-II levels during preoperative CRT was a significant prognostic factor and could be an indicator to monitor treatment efficacy and predict patient prognosis.

The utility of bile juice culture analysis for the management of postoperative infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections are common after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Our institution routinely performs intraoperative bile culture with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Herein we examined whether antibiotic selection based on bile culture analysis reduced the surgical site infection risk after pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: A total of 349 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with intraoperative bile cultures in our institution between 2008 and 2019. Patients were categorized into "group A" (196 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy between 2008 and 2013) or "group B" (153 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy between 2018 and 2019). Group A received cefazoline perioperatively and for 2 days postoperatively, whereas group B received piperacillin-tazobactam instead based on the bile culture findings in group A. RESULTS: In group A, 91 (46.4%) intraoperative bile cultures were positive, and surgical site infections occurred in 61 patients (31.1%). A total of 32 patients had both positive bile culture and surgical site infection, of whom 23 (71.9%) exhibited the same microorganisms in the biliary and surgical site infection cultures. Due to the common finding of cefazoline-resistant Enterococcus spp. and Enterobacter spp. in group A, group B received piperacillin-tazobactam. Surgical site infection incidence in group B was 18.3% (n = 28), which was significantly lower than in group A (P = .006). Cefazoline-resistant Enterococcus spp. and Enterobacter spp., respectively, were cultured in 69.8% and 24.3% of patients with preoperative biliary drainage, compared with 32.2% and 9.7% of patients without preoperative biliary drainage. CONCLUSION: The perioperative selection of antibiotics based on bile culture findings at pancreaticoduodenectomy can reduce the incidence of surgical site infection.

Safety and efficacy of preoperative indocyanine green fluorescence marking in laparoscopic gastrectomy for proximal gastric and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (ICG MAP study).

PURPOSE: The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) and proximal gastric cancer (PGC) is rising worldwide. Recently, the use of indocyanine green (ICG) tracer-guided surgery has been reported; however, its efficacy for total/proximal gastrectomy has not been clarified. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of ICG fluorescent marking for tumor localization in AEG/PGC treatment by laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: We enrolled patients with AEG/PGC from October 2016 to March 2019 from a prospectively registered database. On the day before surgery, ICG markings were made at four locations just at the edge of the tumor by gastrointestinal fiberscope examination. Surgery was performed while viewing the fluorescence image of ICG, and the proximal portions of the esophagus and the distal portion of the stomach were resected at the edge of the area where ICG had spread. RESULTS: We enrolled 130 patients with AEG/PGC. Overall, 107 patients were eventually included in the study: AEG n = 64 (60%) and PGC n = 43 (40%). ICG markings were detected intraoperatively in all cases, and cancer invasion into the resection lines of the esophagus and stomach, performed based on ICG fluorescence images, was negative in all cases. The median visible range of ICG fluorescence was 22.5 mm. ICG diffusion expanded 20 mm proximal for AEG. There were no adverse events associated with endoscopic ICG injection. CONCLUSION: ICG fluorescence imaging is feasible and safe and can potentially be used as a tumor-marking agent for determining the surgical resection line for total/proximal gastrectomy in AEG and PGC treatment.

Recurrence Pattern Comparing Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Preoperative Chemotherapy with Docetaxel plus 5-Fluorouracil and Cisplatin for Advanced Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) or chemotherapy (CT) followed by surgery is currently being administered for advanced esophageal cancer. However, few studies have directly compared CRT and CT for treating locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. This study aimed to assess postoperative recurrence patterns and post-recurrence outcomes in patients with radical esophagectomy after CRT or triplet CT regimen with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF). METHODS: This study included 325 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who received preoperative CRT or DCF followed by curative esophagectomy between January 2010 and December 2019. We compared recurrence patterns after surgery and post-recurrence treatments between CRT and DCF. Locoregional recurrence was defined as recurrences at the primary tumor site or regional lymph nodes. Distant recurrence was defined as non-regional lymph node recurrences, systemic metastases, malignant pleural effusions, or peritoneal metastases. RESULTS: Among 325 patients, 74 received preoperative CF + RT and 251 received preoperative DCF. A propensity score-matched cohort of 53 with CRT and 53 with DCF was included. CRT patients had tumors located in the upper esophagus and had more advanced cancer than DCF patients; however, no differences in patient characteristics were observed in the matched cohort. CRT patients had better histopathological responses and control of locoregional recurrence than DCF patients. On the other hand, distant recurrence, especially in the non-regional lymph node, lung, and pleural dissemination, significantly developed more frequently in CRT patients. Furthermore, CRT patients may have received insufficient post-recurrence treatment, owing to fewer treatment options. Therefore, although there was no difference in recurrence rate in the two groups, CRT patients had significantly poorer post-recurrence survival than DCF patients. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative DCF could reduce distant recurrence after surgery compared to preoperative CRT. The differences in recurrence patterns can be related to the selection of post-recurrence treatment and their prognosis after recurrence.

The DOLFIN method: a novel laparoscopic Billroth-I gastroduodenostomy for gastric cancer with duodenal invasion.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Billroth-I gastroduodenostomy using a delta-shaped anastomosis is safe and feasible. However, it is often difficult to perform in patients who have a short posterior wall of the duodenum. Thus, we have developed a new method named duodenal overlap functional anastomosis with linear stapler (DOLFIN). We hereby report the technical details of the new method and our preliminary experience performing it. METHODS: After the completion of lymphadenectomy, the duodenum was transected craniocaudally with an endoscopic linear stapler. The hepatoduodenal mesentery was dissected approximately 4 cm along the duodenal bulb, and the anastomosis between the posterior wall of the stomach and the lesser curvature of the duodenum was created. The common entry hole was then transected using an endoscopic linear stapler, and the anastomosis was finally completed. RESULTS: There were 36 patients with gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) or robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) with B-I reconstruction using DOLFIN. There were no postoperative complications classified as C-D grade 3 or more and complications related to anastomosis, such as anastomotic leak or stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our DOLFIN gastroduodenostomy can be performed safely. In addition, it results in good postoperative outcomes. A long-term comparative study is required to further evaluate the clinical usefulness of this method.

Risk factors and long-term postoperative outcomes in patients with postoperative dysphagia after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Aim: Dysphagia is one of the most common complications after esophagectomy. However, no study has investigated the long-term postoperative outcomes in patients with postoperative dysphagia. Here, we aimed to identify risk factors for postoperative dysphagia and to investigate long-term postoperative outcomes in such patients. Methods: This study included 304 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent curative esophagectomy. They were diagnosed with postoperative dysphagia through a contrast videofluoroscopic swallowing study, and postoperative outcomes were compared based on swallowing function. Results: In total, 112 patients (37%) were diagnosed with postoperative dysphagia. Older age, low BMI, and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy were identified as independent risk factors for postoperative dysphagia. In the dysphagia group, a significantly larger number of patients developed in-hospital pneumonia, and hospital stays were also significantly extended. After discharge, 37 (33%) patients with postoperative dysphagia developed pneumonia. Even more than 1 year after esophagectomy, a significantly larger number of patients (24 patients, 21%) with postoperative dysphagia developed pneumonia compared to those without postoperative dysphagia. Postoperative dysphagia was identified as an independent risk factor for out-of-hospital pneumonia. Regarding nutritional status, there was no difference in weight loss 1 year after esophagectomy, but significant weight loss was observed 2 years after esophagectomy in the dysphagia group. Conclusion: Postoperative dysphagia was associated with both preoperative patient factors and surgical factors. Moreover, patients with postoperative dysphagia had long-term and short-term pneumonia risk. The personalization of long-term follow-up through more aggressive rehabilitation and nutritional guidance is required for patients with postoperative dysphagia.