Lipid profile and risk factors for neoatherosclerosis after drug-eluting stent implantation in acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Predictors of neoatherosclerosis in patients who received primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the frequency and risk factors of neoatherosclerosis 1-year after the onset of ACS. METHODS: This study investigated 83 patients who underwent PCI for ACS followed by 1-year follow-up optical coherence tomography. The patients were categorized into the neoatherosclerosis (n = 11) and non-neoatherosclerosis groups (n = 72). Baseline characteristics, PCI procedures, medical therapies, and blood tests at 1-year, including detailed lipid profiles, were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Diabetes mellitus was more prominent in the neoatherosclerosis than in the non-neoatherosclerosis group (45% vs. 17 %, respectively, p = 0.03). Total cholesterol (171 ± 37 mg/dL vs. 145 ± 25 mg/dL, respectively, p < 0.01), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (124 ± 36 mg/dL vs. 94 ± 24 mg/dL, respectively, p < 0.01), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (94 ± 36 mg/dL vs. 72 ± 19 mg/dL, respectively, p < 0.01), and lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) (70 [19-112] mg/dL vs. 10 [3-25] mg/dL, respectively, p = 0.03) at follow-up were significantly higher in the neoatherosclerosis group. Multivariate analysis revealed that neoatherosclerosis was associated with high serum non-HDL-C (odds ratio [OR]: 1.075; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.011-1.144; p < 0.01) and high serum Lp(a) levels (>30 mg/dL) (OR: 11.0; 95 % CI: 1.492-81.02; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Poorly controlled non-HDL-C and Lp(a) would be risk factors of neoatherosclerosis in patients 1-year after ACS.

Pathological evaluation of predictors for delayed endothelial coverage after currently available drug-eluting stent implantation in coronary arteries: Impact of lesions with acute and chronic coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after currently available drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation to prevent stent thrombosis (ST) remains controversial. Delayed healing is frequently identified as a leading cause of ST in the early phase. However, a thorough pathological investigation into strut coverage after currently available DES implantation is lacking-a gap addressed in the current study. METHODS: From our autopsy registry of 199 stented lesions, 4,713 struts from 66 currently available DES-stented lesions with an implant duration ≤370 days were histologically evaluated. Endothelial coverage was defined as the presence of luminal endothelial cells overlying struts and an underlying smooth muscle cell layer. The stented lesions were classified into acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n = 40) and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) (n = 26) groups and were compared. Endothelial coverage predictors were identified through logistic analysis. RESULTS: Although ACS and CCS lesions presented comparable clinical characteristics, including age, sex, and cause of death, the latter exhibited a significantly higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease and hemodialysis than the former (33.3% vs. 65.2%; P = .02, 7.7% vs. 30.4%; P = .02). The poststent implant median duration was significantly shorter in ACS lesions than in CCS lesions (13 [IQR 5-26 days] vs. 40 [IQR 16-233 days]; P < .01). The endothelial coverage percentage was 3.5% at 30 days and 27.7% at 90 days after currently available DES implantation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis implicated implant duration of ≤90 days (odds ratio [OR], 0.009; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.006-0.012; P < .01), superficial calcification (OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.07-0.17; P < .01), ACS culprit site (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.94; P = .039), and circumferentially durable polymer-coated DES (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.24-0.41; P < .01) as delayed endothelial coverage predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Endothelial coverage was limited at 90 days after currently available DES implantation, and the ACS culprit site and circumferentially durable polymer-coated DES were identified as independent predictors of delayed endothelial coverage. Our findings suggest the importance of underlying plaque morphology and stent technology for vessel healing after such implantation.

Biological differences of three paclitaxel- and sirolimus-coated balloons on coronary lesions in a rabbit model.

BACKGROUND: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are important treatment options for coronary artery disease; however, randomised controlled trials comparing various DCB technologies are sparse, and further investigations are needed. AIMS: This preclinical study aimed to histologically and biologically compare the drug effects and safety of a low-dose paclitaxel-coated DCB (PCB; AGENT), a regular-dose PCB (SeQuent Please NEO) and a sirolimus-coated DCB (SCB; MagicTouch). METHODS: The DCBs were inflated in the healthy iliac arteries of 18 rabbits, which were euthanised after 28 days. The treated iliac arteries and distal skeletal muscles were histopathologically evaluated, and drug concentrations were measured. RESULTS: In the histopathological evaluation, the medial smooth muscle cell loss score regarding depth, an indicator of drug efficacy, was significantly higher with AGENT and SeQuent Please NEO than with MagicTouch (4.0 [3.6-4.0] vs 3.7 [3.7-4.0] vs 2.2 [2.0-2.4]), with significant differences in comparisons between AGENT and MagicTouch (p<0.01) and between SeQuent Please NEO and MagicTouch (p<0.01). AGENT and SeQuent Please NEO showed comparable drug concentrations in the treated artery (p=0.61). In contrast, the drug concentrations in distal skeletal muscles were the highest for MagicTouch, followed by SeQuent Please NEO and AGENT (28.07 [13.19-52.46] ng/mg vs 0.66 [0.22-3.76] ng/mg vs 0.25 [0.04-3.23] ng/mg, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that PCBs might have higher efficacy and lower drug concentrations in distal skeletal muscles than the MagicTouch SCB. The efficacy of the AGENT low-dose PCB and the SeQuent Please NEO regular-dose PCB was comparable.

A novel lesion crossing technique: Balloon deployment using FORcible Manner (BADFORM) technique.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a novel endovascular technique for crossing arterial lesions: The BAlloon Deployment using FORcible Manner (BADFORM) technique. BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment (EVT) for peripheral artery disease has been widely adopted, and developments in device technology and techniques have resulted in acceptable success rates. However, it may be difficult to deliver devices even after wire externalization, especially in the presence of an extremely long chronic total occlusion or severely calcified lesion. The BADFORM technique might be useful in these cases. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed ten consecutive EVT cases using the BADFORM technique performed at our institution between April 2015 and September 2016. In all cases, wire externalization was established with the rendezvous technique. The BADFORM technique was performed when antegrade passage of any device was impossible after wire externalization. Physicians positioned a low-profile balloon or microcatheter just proximal to the calcified lesion and attached the device to the externalized wire using a torque device at the proximal catheter exit port. The externalized wire was then pulled retrogradely. RESULTS: All patients were receiving hemodialysis and had critical limb ischemia. All lesions were severely calcified, and 90% were chronic total occlusions. The technical success and procedure success rates were 90% and 70%, respectively. Delivered devices included five balloon catheters and four microcatheters. One procedure-related vessel injury occurred at the distal puncture site (digital artery), however, this was controlled by external manual compression. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of the BADFORM technique might be acceptable. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.