Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 202
Filtrar
1.
Surg Today ; 2024 May 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702438

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: There have been no adequate comparisons of the efficacy, safety, and efficiency of analgesia after laparoscopic colorectal resection (LAC), with and without epidural anesthesia (EDA). METHODS: This was a multicenter prospective observational study of patients undergoing LAC. The primary end point was the mean visual analog scale (VAS) score on postoperative days (PODs) 1-7. The secondary end points were the highest VAS, complication rate, days to first ambulation and fatigue, length of hospital stay, and time to commencement of surgery. RESULTS: We compared an EDA group (Group E, n = 48) and a no-EDA group (Group O, n = 48) after matching. The mean VAS was not significantly different between the groups (28.7 vs. 30.1, p = 0.288). On assessing the secondary end points, the highest VAS was not significantly different between the groups. In fact, the VAS was lower in Group E only on POD 2. There was no difference in the incidence of complications, the time to first postoperative evacuation was shorter in Group E, and postoperative hospitalization was similar. The time to surgery was shorter in Group O. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that LAC without EDA is a feasible option, but with the early and regular use of adjunctive measures to provide more stable analgesia.

2.
Asian J Endosc Surg ; 17(3): e13316, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692584

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: According to several clinical trials for patients with rectal cancer, laparoscopic surgery significantly reduces intraoperative complications and bleeding compared with laparotomy and demonstrated comparable long-term results. However, obesity is considered one of the risk factors for increased surgical difficulty, including complication rate, prolonged operation time, and bleeding. METHODS: Patients with clinical pathological stage II/III rectal cancer and a body mass index of ≥25 kg/m2 who underwent laparotomy or laparoscopic surgery between January 2009 and December 2013 at 51 institutions participating in the Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery were included. These patients were divided into major bleeding (>500 mL) group and minor bleeding (≤500 mL) group. The risk factors of major bleeding were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: This study included 517 patients, of which 74 (19.9%) experienced major bleeding. Patient characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups. The major bleeding group had a longer operative time (p < 0.001) and a larger tumor size than the minor bleeding group (p = 0.011). In the univariate analysis, age >65 years, laparotomy, operative time >300 min, and multivisceral resection were significantly associated with intraoperative massive bleeding. In the multivariate analysis, age >65 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-4.82), laparotomy (OR, 20.82; 95% CI, 11.56-39.75), operative time >300 min (OR, 5.39; 95% CI, 1.67-132), and multivisceral resection (OR, 10.72; 95% CI, 2.47-64.0) showed to be risk factors for massive bleeding. CONCLUSION: Age >65 years, laparotomy, operative time >300 min, and multivisceral resection were risk factors for massive bleeding during rectal cancer surgery in patients with obesity.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Laparoscopía , Obesidad , Tempo Operativo , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/complicaciones , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Obesidad/complicaciones , Anciano , Japón/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Laparotomía , Adulto , Índice de Masa Corporal
3.
J Anus Rectum Colon ; 8(2): 132-136, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38689780

RESUMEN

Background: Spatial and temporal heterogeneities of RAS and other molecular genes should be considered in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs); acquired RAS mutation is sometimes observed at disease progression of treatment with the anti-EGFR mAb. At the same time, discrepancy of RAS status from tissues and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the same patient is sometimes observed. Based on this, we commenced two observational studies to clarify these heterogeneities of RAS and BRAF in mCRC, using next generation sequencing from liquid biopsy. Methods/Design: RAS-trace study is an observational study to monitor ctDNA RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA status every 4-12 weeks using the Plasma-SeqSensei™ CRC RUO Kit (Sysmex Inostics GmbH) in mCRC with RAS/BRAF wild-type (wt) on tumor tissue. The primary endpoint was the time to the acquired RAS mutations. A total of 42 patients has been accrued. RAS-trace-2 study is also an observational study aimed at comparing the efficacy of the anti-EGFR mAb in ctDNA RAS/BRAF wt with ctDNA RAS or BRAF mutant mCRC patients, whose RAS/BRAF are wt in tumor tissue. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in patients with ctDNA RAS/BRAF wt and RAS or BRAF mutant. A total of 240 patients will be accrued over 2 years. Discussion: These trials will help us understanding the clinical significance of spatial and temporal heterogeneities of RAS, BRAF and other genes, while optimizing the anti-EGFR mAb treatment strategies in mCRC.

4.
J Med Case Rep ; 18(1): 222, 2024 May 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704583

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The greater omentum comprises peritoneal, adipose, vascular, and lymphoid tissues. Most omental malignancies are metastatic tumors, and the incidence of primary tumors is rare. We report on a prior omental smooth muscle tumor case in an adult male patient. CASE PRESENTATION: A 54-year-old Japanese male patient with no relevant medical history was diagnosed with an abdominal mass during a routine medical checkup. Subsequent contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a mass of approximately 3 cm in size in the greater omentum, and a laparotomy was performed. A 27 × 25 × 20 mm raised lesion was found in the omentum. Microscopically, spindle cells were observed and arranged in whorls and fascicles. Individual tumor cells had short spindle-shaped nuclei with slightly increased chromatin and were characterized by a slightly eosinophilic, spindle-shaped cytoplasm. The mitotic count was less than 1 per 50 high-power fields. The tumor cells showed positive immunoreactivity for α smooth muscle actin, HHF35, and desmin on immunohistochemical examination. The Ki-67 labeling index using the average method was 1.76% (261/14806). No immunoreactivity was observed for any of the other tested markers. We considered leiomyoma owing to a lack of malignant findings. However, primary omental leiomyoma has rarely been reported, and it can be difficult to completely rule out the malignant potential of smooth muscle tumors in soft tissues. Our patient was decisively diagnosed with a primary omental smooth muscle tumor considering leiomyoma. Consequently, the patient did not undergo additional adjuvant therapy and was followed up. The patient was satisfied with treatment and showed neither recurrence nor metastasis at the 13-month postoperative follow-up. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: We encountered a primary smooth muscle tumor of the greater omentum with no histological findings suggestive of malignancy in an adult male patient. However, omental smooth muscle tumors are extremely difficult to define as benign, requiring careful diagnosis. Further case reports with long-term follow-up and case series are required to determine whether a true omental benign smooth muscle tumor (leiomyoma) exists. In addition, proper interpretation of the Ki-67 labeling index should be established. This case study is a foundation for future research.


Asunto(s)
Leiomioma , Epiplón , Neoplasias Peritoneales , Tumor de Músculo Liso , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Humanos , Masculino , Epiplón/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Leiomioma/patología , Leiomioma/cirugía , Leiomioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Leiomioma/diagnóstico , Tumor de Músculo Liso/patología , Tumor de Músculo Liso/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/patología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Peritoneales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Diagnóstico Diferencial
5.
Asian J Endosc Surg ; 17(3): e13312, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38626926

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In patients with stage II colon cancer (CC) undergoing minimally invasive surgery, the association between the clinical significance of lymph node yield and tumor localization remains unknown. We aimed to determine the optimal number of lymph nodes to be retrieved based on tumor localization in patients with stage II CC undergoing minimally invasive surgery. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study. Overall, 263 patients with stage II CC who underwent laparoscopic surgery between January 1, 2008 and December 31 were enrolled. The primary outcome was the optimal number of lymph nodes retrieved based on tumor localization. RESULTS: The median number of retrieved lymph nodes was 30 and 26 in the right-(n = 125) and left-sided (n = 138) CC groups, respectively (p = .0007). Inadequate dissection (<12 nodes) occurred in 4.2% of patients: 1.6% in the right-sided CC group and 6.5% in the left-sided CC group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed a decreasing trend in adjusted hazard ratios with increasing nodes, with an optimal cutoff of 15 lymph nodes in the left-sided CC group (adjusted hazard ratio, 5.868; 95% confidence interval, 1.247-27.62; p = .02). Lymph node yield was not independently associated with survival in the right-sided CC group. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with left-sided stage II CC undergoing laparoscopic surgery, aiming for at least 15 retrieved lymph nodes may be optimal for accurate staging and prognostic assessment. The optimal lymph node yield likely varies based on tumor location, requiring further investigation in right-sided CC.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Pronóstico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos
6.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 7983, 2024 04 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38575668

RESUMEN

Dimension reduction has been used to visualise the distribution of multidimensional microbiome data, but the composite variables calculated by the dimension reduction methods have not been widely used to investigate the relationship of the human gut microbiome with lifestyle and disease. In the present study, we applied several dimension reduction methods, including principal component analysis, principal coordinate analysis (PCoA), non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS), and non-negative matrix factorization, to a microbiome dataset from 186 subjects with symptoms of  allergic rhinitis (AR) and 106 controls. All the dimension reduction methods supported that the distribution of microbial data points appeared to be continuous rather than discrete. Comparison of the composite variables calculated from the different dimension reduction methods showed that the characteristics of the composite variables differed depending on the distance matrices and the dimension reduction methods. The first composite variables calculated from PCoA and NMDS with the UniFrac distance were strongly associated with AR (FDR adjusted P = 2.4 × 10-4 for PCoA and P = 2.8 × 10-4 for NMDS), and also with the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium and Prevotella. The abundance of Bifidobacterium was also linked to intake of several nutrients, including carbohydrate, saturated fat, and alcohol via composite variables. Notably, the association between the composite variables and AR was much stronger than the association between the relative abundance of individual genera and AR. Our results highlight the usefulness of the dimension reduction methods for investigating the association of microbial composition with lifestyle and disease in clinical research.


Asunto(s)
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Rinitis Alérgica , Humanos , Bifidobacterium , Prevotella , Análisis de Escalamiento Multidimensional
7.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38553360

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The phase 3 BEACON CRC study demonstrated the survival benefits of encorafenib and cetuximab, with or without binimetinib (the BEACON triplet or doublet regimen), for BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This expanded access program (EAP) and subsequent follow-up study assessed the efficacy and safety of the BEACON triplet regimen in Japanese patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The EAP was an open-label, single-arm study including Japanese patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC whose disease progressed after 1 to 2 prior regimens. The patients received the BEACON triplet regimen with 28-day cycles. The subsequent follow-up study assessed the survival outcomes following EAP completion. Safety was assessed only during the EAP. RESULTS: Among the 86 enrolled patients, 81 received the BEACON triplet regimen. The objective response rate and median progression-free survival were 27.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.0%-39.1%) and 5.26 (95% CI, 4.14-5.52) months, respectively. Grade 3 to 4 adverse events and treatment-related adverse events occurred in 43.2% and 28.4% of patients, respectively. No new safety signals were observed during the EAP. Among 58 patients with confirmed survival at EAP completion, 57 were included in the follow-up study. With a median observation period of 9.17 months through the EAP and follow-up study, the median overall survival was 10.38 (95% CI, 9.00-16.16) months. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety of the BEACON triplet regimen in Japanese patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC were consistent with those reported in the BEACON CRC trial, supporting its use as a standard treatment for pretreated patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC.

8.
Oncology ; 2024 Feb 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38382488

RESUMEN

[Introduction] Anti-p53 antibody (p53Ab) is useful for monitoring colorectal cancer (CRC) recurrence. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical impact of p53Ab ratio (p53R) before and after surgery to predict recurrence in patients with CRC. [Methods] In total, 1,223 patients with stage I-III CRC who underwent curative surgery between January 2005 and December 2019 were enrolled in this retrospective study. In patients with elevated p53Ab levels, p53R was calculated by measuring p53Ab levels within one month preoperatively and three months postoperatively. The optimal p53R level was determined, and its relationship with clinicopathological factors and prognosis was examined. We also evaluated the efficacy of the combination of p53R and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) values. [Results] Overall, 341 patients (27.9%) showed elevated p53Ab levels. Preoperative p53Ab levels were significantly associated with tumor location, lymphatic invasion, and venous invasion. The p53R level was significantly higher in patients with recurrent disease. Patients with high p53R levels had significantly shorter relapse-free survival (RFS) than those with low p53R levels (p < 0.001). When p53R was combined with preoperative CEA values, specificity improved to 0.97, with an accuracy of 0.88. [Conclusion] In patients with CRC and elevated preoperative p53Ab levels, p53R expression may be prognostically useful after radical resection. Furthermore, the combination of p53R and preoperative CEA levels may be useful for postoperative follow-ups.

9.
Nat Med ; 30(3): 730-739, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38347302

RESUMEN

Certain genetic alterations and right-sided primary tumor location are associated with resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor (EGFR) treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The phase 3 PARADIGM trial (n = 802) demonstrated longer overall survival with first-line anti-EGFR (panitumumab) versus antivascular endothelial growth factor (bevacizumab) plus modified FOLFOX6 in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC with left-sided primary tumors. This prespecified exploratory biomarker analysis of PARADIGM (n = 733) evaluated the association between circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) gene alterations and efficacy outcomes, focusing on a broad panel of gene alterations associated with resistance to EGFR inhibition, including KRAS, NRAS, PTEN and extracellular domain EGFR mutations, HER2 and MET amplifications, and ALK, RET and NTRK1 fusions. Overall survival was prolonged with panitumumab plus modified FOLFOX6 versus bevacizumab plus modified FOLFOX6 in patients with ctDNA that lacked gene alterations in the panel (that is, negative hyperselected; median in the overall population: 40.7 versus 34.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.92) but was similar or inferior with panitumumab in patients with ctDNA that contained any gene alteration in the panel (19.2 versus 22.2 months; hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.53), regardless of tumor sidedness. Negative hyperselection using ctDNA may guide optimal treatment selection in patients with mCRC. ClinicalTrials.gov registrations: NCT02394834 and NCT02394795 .


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Panitumumab/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Recto/tratamiento farmacológico , Biomarcadores , Receptores ErbB/genética , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras)
10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38331650

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The significance of angiogenic factors as predictors of second-line (2L) chemotherapy efficacy when combined with angiogenesis inhibitors for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains unestablished. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter prospective observational study, 17 angiogenic factors were analyzed in plasma samples collected at pretreatment and progression stages using a Luminex multiplex assay. Patients who received chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (BEV group), FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab (RAM group), or FOLFIRI plus aflibercept (AFL group) as the 2L treatment were included. Interactions between pretreatment and treatment groups for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and response rate (RR) were assessed using the propensity-score weighted Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: From February 2018 to September 2020, 283 patients were analyzed in the 2L cohort. A strong interaction was observed for PFS between BEV and RAM with HGF, sNeuropilin-1, sVEGFR-1, and sVEGFR-3. Interactions for RR between the BEV and RAM groups were observed for sNeuropilin-1 and sVEGFR-1. Contrarily, OS, PlGF, sVEGFR-1, and sVEGFR-3 differentiated the treatment effect between BEV and AFL. Plasma samples were evaluable for dynamic analysis in 203 patients. At progression, VEGF-A levels significantly decreased in the BEV group and increased in the RAM and AFL groups. CONCLUSION: The pretreatment plasma sVEGFR-1 and sVEGFR-3 levels could be predictive biomarkers for distinguishing BEV and RAM when combined with chemotherapy in 2L mCRC treatment. Based on the VEGF-A dynamics at progression, selecting RAM or AFL for patients with significantly elevated VEGF-A levels may be a 2L treatment strategy, with BEV considered for the third-line treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: UMIN000028616.

11.
Ann Surg ; 279(2): 283-289, 2024 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37551612

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the genuine prognostic relevance of primary tumor sidedness (PTS) in patients with early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC). BACKGROUND: The prognostic relevance of PTS in early-stage CRC remains a topic of debate. Several large epidemiological studies investigated survival only and did not consider the risk of recurrence so far. METHODS: Patients with stage II/III adenocarcinoma of the colon and upper rectum from 4 randomized controlled trials were analyzed. Survival outcomes were compared according to the tumor location: right-sided (cecum to transverse colon) or left-sided (descending colon to upper rectum). RESULTS: A total of 4113 patients were divided into a right-sided group (N=1349) and a left-sided group (N=2764). Relapse-free survival after primary surgery was not associated with PTS in all patients and each stage [hazard ratio (HR) adjusted =1.024 (95% CI: 0.886-1.183) in all patients; 1.327 (0.852-2.067) in stage II; and 0.990 (0.850-1.154) in stage III]. Also, overall survival after primary surgery was not associated with PTS in all patients and each stage [HR adjusted =0.879 (95% CI: 0.726-1.064) in all patients; 1.517 (0.738-3.115) in stage II; and 0.840 (0.689-1.024) in stage III]. In total, 795 patients (right-sided, N=257; left-sided, N=538) developed recurrence after primary surgery. PTS was significantly associated with overall survival after recurrence (HR adjusted =0.773, 95% CI: 0.627-0.954). CONCLUSIONS: PTS had no impact on the risk of recurrence for stage II/III CRC. Treatment stratification based on PTS is unnecessary for early-stage CRC.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Humanos , Pronóstico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Recto , Estudios Retrospectivos
12.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(21)2023 Oct 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37958346

RESUMEN

The treatment strategies and prognoses of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) differ according to the sidedness of the primary tumor. TP53 gain-of-function (GOF) and non-GOF variants have been reported to be differentially associated with prognosis by sidedness. We aimed to evaluate the sidedness-dependent prognostic impact of gene alterations in metastatic CRC. Patients enrolled between April 2017 and March 2019 were included in this study. Those excluded were individuals whose tumor tissues were obtained after chemotherapy and those who were enrolled in the study more than six months after starting first-line chemotherapy. Finally, we assessed 531 patients who underwent complete gene sequencing. The study revealed a significant difference in overall survival between individuals with left-sided CRC (n = 355) and right-sided colon cancer (CC) (n = 176) when considering the TP53 non-GOF variant, KRAS wild-type, NOTCH1 wild-type, NOTCH1 covariant, NOTCH3 sole variant, and MYC amplification. Multivariate analysis on each side revealed that the TP53 GOF and KRAS variants were independent poor prognostic factors for left-sided CRC (p = 0.03 and p < 0.01, respectively), and the TP53 non-GOF variant, BRAF V600E, and MYC amplification for right-sided CC (p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p = 0.02, respectively). The NOTCH3 sole variant was an independent and favorable prognostic factor for left-sided CRC (p < 0.01). The prognostic significance of gene alterations differed between left-sided CRC and right-sided CC.

13.
Ann Gastroenterol Surg ; 7(6): 940-948, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37927926

RESUMEN

Background: The lymph node metastasis rate in right-sided colon cancer is unknown, and the optimal central vascular ligation level remains controversial. We aimed to determine the lymph node metastasis rate and short-term results of radical surgery with extended lymph node dissection in right-sided colon cancer. Methods: This prospective multicenter observational study included patients with stage II/III right-sided colon cancer from five cancer hospitals. The metastasis rate of each node station was analyzed according to tumor location and main feeding artery. Results: Between April 2018 and August 2021, 208 patients underwent dissection around the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and vein (SMV). In transverse colon cancer, 7.5% and 2.5% of metastases occurred around the SMV and SMA at the root of the middle colic artery (MCA), respectively; 6.7% and 6.7% at the root of the right colic artery. In caecal cancer, 1.9% of metastases occurred around the SMV and 1.9% around the SMA. In ascending colon cancer, the rate was 1.1% around the SMV. Of the tumors, 17% fed mainly by the ileocolic artery had node metastases along the middle or right colic artery, as did 66.7% fed mainly by the right colic artery and 41.2% fed by the MCA (p = 0.01). Postoperative complications occurred in 42 patients (20.2%). Conclusion: Routine prophylactic extended lymphadenectomy around the SMA might not be necessary in caecum and ascending colon cancer. Dissection around the SMA may be necessary in cases of transverse colon cancer or when the feeding artery is the MCA.

14.
J Anus Rectum Colon ; 7(4): 307-310, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37900696

RESUMEN

A 72-year-old man with type 2 sub-circumferential tumors in the descending colon and two nodules around the pedicle of the inferior mesenteric artery (main lymph node area) underwent laparoscopic left hemicolectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy. Two lymph nodes around the inferior mesenteric artery pedicle were completely excised. Pathological examination revealed a moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma. Nodules were only found in the main lymph node area, and no lymph node structures were observed in these nodules. These tumor deposits (TDs) may be extramural TDs without lymph node structure or lymph node skip metastasis. The presence of TDs in colorectal cancer is associated with an adverse prognosis, and the requirement of chemotherapy in such cases should be examined. Therefore, it is important to correctly recognize TDs and categorize the disease into a high- or low-risk group within stage III. We report this case because it is necessary to review the definition of TDs, and the assessment of extramural TDs remains controversial.

15.
J Surg Oncol ; 128(8): 1372-1379, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37753717

RESUMEN

AIM: There are well-known methods for decompressing the colorectal tract before surgery, including transanal decompression tubes (TDT) and self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS). This study aimed to compare the short and long-term results in patients with malignant large bowel obstruction in whom TDT or SEMS were placed before surgery. METHODS: This retrospective observational study enrolled 225 patients with malignant large bowel obstruction in whom TDT or SEMS were placed preoperatively and underwent R0 resection between 2008 and 2020. One-to-two propensity score matching was performed according to patient characteristics. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS). The secondary endpoints were the overall survival (OS) and postoperative complication rate. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients in the TDT group and 114 in the SEMS group were matched. The 3-year RFS rates were 66.7% in the TDT group and 69.9% in the SEMS group (p = 0.54), and the 3-year OS rates were 90.5% in the TDT group and 87.1% in the SEMS group (p = 0.52). No significant differences in the long-term results were observed between the two groups. Regarding short-term results, the SEMS group had significantly fewer stoma construction (p = 0.007) and shorter postoperative hospitalization (p < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications (grade ≥ 2) was significantly lower in the SEMS group (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: No significant differences in the long-term results were observed between the TDT and SEMS group. The SEMS showed significant usefulness in terms of improving short-term outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Obstrucción Intestinal , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles/efectos adversos , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , Stents/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Descompresión/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
BMC Cancer ; 23(1): 779, 2023 Aug 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37605122

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment strategy for resectable BRAF V600E mutant colorectal oligometastases (CRM) has not been established due to the rarity and rapid progression of the disease. Since the unresectable recurrence rate is high, development of novel perioperative therapies are warranted. On December 2020, the BEACON CRC triplet regimen of encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab was approved for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan. METHODS: The NEXUS trial is a multicenter phase II clinical study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the perioperative use of encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab in patients with previously untreated surgically resectable BRAF V600E mutant CRM. The key inclusion criteria are as follows: histologically diagnosed with colorectal adeno/adenosquamous carcinoma; RAS wild-type and BRAF V600E mutation by tissue or blood; and previously untreated resectable distant metastases. The triplet regimen (encorafenib: 300 mg daily; binimetinib: 45 mg twice daily; cetuximab: 400 mg/m2, then 250 mg/m2 weekly, 28 days/cycle) is administered for 3 cycles each before and after curative resection. The primary endpoint of the study is the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate and the secondary end points are the PFS, disease-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate. The sample size is 32 patients. Endpoints in the NEXUS trial as well as integrated analysis with the nationwide registry data will be considered for seeking regulatory approval for the perioperative use of the triplet regimen. DISCUSSION: The use of the triplet regimen in the perioperative period is expected to be safe and effective in patients with resectable BRAF V600E mutant CRM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: jRCT2031220025, April. 16, 2022.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Adenoescamoso , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Humanos , Cetuximab/efectos adversos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía
17.
Cancer Med ; 12(18): 18702-18716, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37641470

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several biomarkers have been established for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We investigated whether plasma angiogenesis factors could predict the efficacy of biologics combined with chemotherapy in first-line (1L) treatment in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC and the dynamics of plasma angiogenesis factors at progression during 1L treatment. METHODS: In this multicenter prospective observational study, serial plasma samples were prospectively collected at pretreatment and progression stages; 17 plasma angiogenesis factors were analyzed using the multiplex assay with Luminex® technology. Interactions between the pretreatment measurements and treatment groups on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with RAS wild-type were assessed using the propensity-score weighted Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: From February 2018 to September 2020, 202 patients were enrolled in the 1L cohort; 133 patients had RAS wild-type (chemotherapy plus bevacizumab [BEV group, n = 33] and plus anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies [aEGFR group, n = 100]). A trend of strong interaction on PFS was observed for interleukin-8 (IL-8) (p = 0.0752) and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1) (p = 0.0156). Regarding OS, IL-8 (p = 0.0283), soluble vascular endothelial growth factor-receptor-1 (sVEGFR-1) (p = 0.0777) and sVCAM-1 (p = 0.0011) tended to differentiate the treatment effect. In 112 patients, plasma samples were evaluable for dynamic analysis (57 and 55 from the BEV and aEGFR groups, respectively). In the BEV group, six factors significantly increased during progression, whereas two decreased. In the aEGFR group, three factors significantly increased, and six decreased. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment plasma IL-8 and sVCAM-1 levels could be predictive biomarkers to distinguish BEV and anti-EGFR mAbs when combined with chemotherapy in the 1L treatment of RAS wild-type mCRC. Several plasma angiogenesis factors showed significant change at progression in 1L chemotherapy plus biologics for RAS wild-type mCRC, which are potential biomarkers for selecting an optimal angiogenesis inhibitor in second-line treatment.


Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos , Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Interleucina-8/genética , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Recto/tratamiento farmacológico , Biomarcadores , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Fluorouracilo
18.
Future Oncol ; 19(17): 1165-1174, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37458152

RESUMEN

For BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the BEACON phase 3 trial showed survival benefit of triplet therapy with cetuximab (anti-EGFR antibody), encorafenib (BRAF inhibitor) and binimetinib (MEK inhibitor) as well as doublet therapy with cetuximab and encorafenib over irinotecan-based chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR antibody. Both regimens are standards of care in Japan, but definite biomarkers for predicting efficacy and selecting treatment remain lacking. The mechanisms underlying resistance to these regimens also warrant urgent exploration to further evolve treatment. This prospective observational/translational study evaluated real-word clinical outcomes with cetuximab and encorafenib with or without binimetinib for BRAF-mutated mCRC patients and investigated biomarkers for response and resistance by collecting blood samples before and after treatment. Clinical Trial Registration: UMIN000045530 (https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000051983).


The BEETS trial is a study that looks at how well two combinations of targeted therapies (cetuximab + encorafenib with or without binimetinib) work and how safe they are for patients with advanced colorectal cancer that has a mutation (change) in the BRAF gene. In this trial, patients participate voluntarily instead of being assigned to one of the two therapy groups. When a patient has BRAF-mutated advanced colorectal cancer, it means that the cancer cells in their body have changes in a gene called BRAF. This gene normally produces a protein called BRAF, which is involved in the growth of cells. However, when there is a mutation in this gene, it can cause the production of an overactive BRAF protein, leading to fast and excessive cell growth and division. For patients with BRAF-mutated advanced colorectal cancer, combinations of targeted therapies have been found to be effective as a second- or third-line treatment, based on the results of a phase 3 clinical trial. The main goal of the BEETS trial is to evaluate how well these treatments work and how safe they are when used in real-world clinical practice. Additionally, the study will use laboratory tests (liquid biopsy) to explore new biomarkers that can help predict how well a treatment will work and assist in selecting the most suitable treatment plans. We hope that the findings of this study will contribute to improving the overall management of this specific type of cancer.


Asunto(s)
Beta vulgaris , Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Cetuximab/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Recto/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Mutación , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto
19.
Int J Clin Oncol ; 28(8): 1063-1072, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37286878

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with 5-fluorouracil plus mitomycin-C is a standard treatment for stage II/III squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA). We performed this dose-finding and single-arm confirmatory trial of CRT with S-1 plus mitomycin-C to determine the recommended dose (RD) of S-1 and evaluate its efficacy and safety for locally advanced SCCA. METHODS: Patients with clinical stage II/III SCCA (UICC 6th) received CRT comprising mitomycin-C (10 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29) and S-1 (60 mg/m2/day at level 0 and 80 mg/m2/day at level 1 on days 1-14 and 29-42) with concurrent radiotherapy (59.4 Gy). Dose-finding used a 3 + 3 cohort design. The primary endpoint of the confirmatory trial was 3-year event-free survival. The sample size was 65, with one-sided alpha of 5%, power of 80%, and expected and threshold values of 75% and 60%, respectively. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (dose-finding, n = 10; confirmatory, n = 59) were enrolled. The RD of S-1 was determined as 80 mg/m2/day. Three-year event-free survival in 63 eligible patients who received the RD was 65.0% (90% confidence interval 54.1-73.9). Three-year overall, progression-free, and colostomy-free survival rates were 87.3%, 85.7%, and 76.2%, respectively; the complete response rate was 81% on central review. Common grade 3/4 acute toxicities were leukopenia (63.1%), neutropenia (40.0%), diarrhea (20.0%), radiation dermatitis (15.4%), and febrile neutropenia (3.1%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Although the primary endpoint was not met, S-1/mitomycin-C chemoradiotherapy had an acceptable toxicity profile and favorable 3-year survival and could be a treatment option for locally advanced SCCA. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: jRCTs031180002.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Ano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Humanos , Mitomicina , Canal Anal/patología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Quimioradioterapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Fluorouracilo , Neoplasias del Ano/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Ano/radioterapia , Cisplatino
20.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 408(1): 222, 2023 Jun 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37266706

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study compared the surgical outcomes between laparoscopic colectomy (LC) and open colectomy (OC) for mid-transverse colon cancer (MTC). METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study compared the short- and long-term surgical outcomes for patients with advanced MTC (T3 and T4 with or without nodal involvement) who underwent LC or OC between January 2008 and December 2019 using a propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS: A total of 177 patients with advanced MTC were enrolled. After matching, 58 cases for the OC and LC groups were selected. No significant differences in age, sex, tumor progression, or procedure type (extended resection or segmental resection) existed between groups. The LC group had significantly less blood loss (20 mL vs. 50 mL, p=0.048) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (8 days vs. 12 days, p<0.001) than the OC group. Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2) occurred in 27.6% and 25.9% of the OC and LC groups respectively (p=1). Three patients (5.2%) and one patient (1.7%) of the OC and LC groups respectively developed anastomotic leakage (p=0.62). Re-operation was required in five patients (8.6%) in the OC group and one patient (1.7%) in the LC group (p=0.21). No surgery-related deaths occurred in either group. The 3-year overall survival rates (stage II: LC 100% vs. OC 92.8%, p=0.15; stage III: 88.9% vs. 84.3%, p=0.88, respectively) were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: LC is a minimally invasive technique with lesser blood loss, shorter postoperative hospital stays, and oncologic equivalence to OC. Hence, LC is useful for MTC treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000042676.


Asunto(s)
Colon Transverso , Neoplasias del Colon , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Colon Transverso/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Colectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...