The preference of women living with HIV for the HPV self-sampling of urine at a rural HIV clinic in Uganda.

Background: Women living with HIV have a double risk of acquiring cervical cancer (CC) due to repeated human papilloma virus (HPV) infections resulting from reduced immunity, with CC screening being low at 46.7%. Objectives: To determine the factors associated with the preference for HPV self-sampling using urine as well as establish its feasibility among women living with HIV attending a rural HIV clinic in Uganda. Method: A cross-sectional study design using quantitative data collection methods was used at the HIV clinic, Luweero District Hospital, among 426 women aged between 30 and 65 years. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and modified Poisson regression. Urine samples were analysed using a Liferiver high-risk HPV genotyping real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) kit to determine the prevalence of the 15 HPV subtypes. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (CIN2) was determined by visual inspection under acetic acid (VIA) using the nurse-led approach. Results: Most women (296/426, 70%) preferred nurse-led screening. Preference for HPV self-sampling using urine was associated with older age (46-65 years) (adjusted prevalence risk ratios [aPRR] 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-2.24), history of sexually transmitted infections (aPRR 0.74: 95% CI: 0.55-0.98) and acquisition of CC information from the television (aPRR 1.48: 95% CI: 1.09-2.02). Approximately 97% (68/70) of women living with HIV tested HPV positive with one or more subtypes. The most prevalent subtype of HPV was HPV 58 (87.1%). Only one woman tested positive with VIA. Conclusion: Nurse-led CC screening is preferred among women living with HIV, and HPV self-sampling using urine is feasible at the HIV clinic. Therefore, educational programmes to reassure the masses about urine HPV self-sampling need to be designed. Contribution: This study's findings provide early insights into the merits and demerits of the current HPV sample collection approaches. Hence, HPV testing should be tailored to routine HIV care in rural communities.

Cervical cell lift: A novel triage method for the spatial mapping and grading of precancerous cervical lesions.

BACKGROUND: Primary HPV screening, due to its low specificity, requires an additional liquid-based cytology (LBC) triage test. However, even with LBC triage there has been a near doubling in the number of patients referred for colposcopy in recent years, the majority having low-grade disease. METHODS: To counter this, a triage test that generates a spatial map of the cervical surface at a molecular level has been developed which removes the subjectivity associated with LBC by facilitating identification of lesions in their entirety. 50 patients attending colposcopy were recruited to participate in a pilot study to evaluate the test. For each patient, cells were lifted from the cervix onto a membrane (cervical cell lift, CCL) and immunostained with a biomarker of precancerous cells, generating molecular maps of the cervical surface. These maps were analysed to detect high-grade lesions, and the results compared to the final histological diagnosis. FINDINGS: We demonstrated that spatial molecular mapping of the cervix has a sensitivity of 90% (95% CI 69-98) (positive predictive value 81% (95% CI 60-92)) for the detection of high-grade disease, and that AI-based analysis could aid disease detection through automated flagging of biomarker-positive cells. INTERPRETATION: Spatial molecular mapping of the CCL improved the rate of detection of high-grade disease in comparison to LBC, suggesting that this method has the potential to decisively identify patients with clinically relevant disease that requires excisional treatment. FUNDING: CRUK Early Detection Project award, Jordan-Singer BSCCP award, Addenbrooke's Charitable Trust, UK-MRC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals/Advanced Sterilisation Products, and NWO.

The Reservoir of Persistent Human Papillomavirus Infection; Strategies for Elimination Using Anti-Viral Therapies.

Human Papillomaviruses have co-evolved with their human host, with each of the over 200 known HPV types infecting distinct epithelial niches to cause diverse disease pathologies. Despite the success of prophylactic vaccines in preventing high-risk HPV infection, the development of HPV anti-viral therapies has been hampered by the lack of enzymatic viral functions, and by difficulties in translating the results of in vitro experiments into clinically useful treatment regimes. In this review, we discuss recent advances in anti-HPV drug development, and highlight the importance of understanding persistent HPV infections for future anti-viral design. In the infected epithelial basal layer, HPV genomes are maintained at a very low copy number, with only limited viral gene expression; factors which allow them to hide from the host immune system. However, HPV gene expression confers an elevated proliferative potential, a delayed commitment to differentiation, and preferential persistence of the infected cell in the epithelial basal layer, when compared to their uninfected neighbours. To a large extent, this is driven by the viral E6 protein, which functions in the HPV life cycle as a modulator of epithelial homeostasis. By targeting HPV gene products involved in the maintenance of the viral reservoir, there appears to be new opportunities for the control or elimination of chronic HPV infections.

Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.

BACKGROUND: This is an update of the Cochrane review published in Issue 5, 2011. Worldwide, cervical cancer is the fourth commonest cancer affecting women. High-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is causative in 99.7% of cases. Other risk factors include smoking, multiple sexual partners, the presence of other sexually transmitted diseases and immunosuppression. Primary prevention strategies for cervical cancer focus on reducing HPV infection via vaccination and data suggest that this has the potential to prevent nearly 90% of cases in those vaccinated prior to HPV exposure. However, not all countries can afford vaccination programmes and, worryingly, uptake in many countries has been extremely poor. Secondary prevention, through screening programmes, will remain critical to reducing cervical cancer, especially in unvaccinated women or those vaccinated later in adolescence. This includes screening for the detection of pre-cancerous cells, as well as high-risk HPV. In the UK, since the introduction of the Cervical Screening Programme in 1988, the associated mortality rate from cervical cancer has fallen. However, worldwide, there is great variation between countries in both coverage and uptake of screening. In some countries, national screening programmes are available whereas in others, screening is provided on an opportunistic basis. Additionally, there are differences within countries in uptake dependent on ethnic origin, age, education and socioeconomic status. Thus, understanding and incorporating these factors in screening programmes can increase the uptake of screening. This, together with vaccination, can lead to cervical cancer becoming a rare disease. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at women, to increase the uptake, including informed uptake, of cervical screening. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Issue 6, 2020. MEDLINE, Embase and LILACS databases up to June 2020. We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of included studies and contacted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions to increase uptake/informed uptake of cervical screening. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Where possible, the data were synthesised in a meta-analysis using standard Cochrane methodology. MAIN RESULTS: Comprehensive literature searches identified 2597 records; of these, 70 met our inclusion criteria, of which 69 trials (257,899 participants) were entered into a meta-analysis. The studies assessed the effectiveness of invitational and educational interventions, lay health worker involvement, counselling and risk factor assessment. Clinical and statistical heterogeneity between trials limited statistical pooling of data. Overall, there was moderate-certainty evidence to suggest that invitations appear to be an effective method of increasing uptake compared to control (risk ratio (RR) 1.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.49 to 1.96; 141,391 participants; 24 studies). Additional analyses, ranging from low to moderate-certainty evidence, suggested that invitations that were personalised, i.e. personal invitation, GP invitation letter or letter with a fixed appointment, appeared to be more successful. More specifically, there was very low-certainty evidence to support the use of GP invitation letters as compared to other authority sources' invitation letters within two RCTs, one RCT assessing 86 participants (RR 1.69 95% CI 0.75 to 3.82) and another, showing a modest benefit, included over 4000 participants (RR 1.13, 95 % CI 1.05 to 1.21). Low-certainty evidence favoured personalised invitations (telephone call, face-to-face or targeted letters) as compared to standard invitation letters (RR 1.32, 95 % CI 1.11 to 1.21; 27,663 participants; 5 studies). There was moderate-certainty evidence to support a letter with a fixed appointment to attend, as compared to a letter with an open invitation to make an appointment (RR 1.61, 95 % CI 1.48 to 1.75; 5742 participants; 5 studies). Low-certainty evidence supported the use of educational materials (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.54; 63,415 participants; 13 studies) and lay health worker involvement (RR 2.30, 95% CI 1.44 to 3.65; 4330 participants; 11 studies). Other less widely reported interventions included counselling, risk factor assessment, access to a health promotion nurse, photo comic book, intensive recruitment and message framing. It was difficult to deduce any meaningful conclusions from these interventions due to sparse data and low-certainty evidence. However, having access to a health promotion nurse and attempts at intensive recruitment may have increased uptake. One trial reported an economic outcome and randomised 3124 participants within a national screening programme to either receive the standard screening invitation, which would incur a fee, or an invitation offering screening free of charge. No difference in the uptake at 90 days was found (574/1562 intervention versus 612/1562 control, (RR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.03). The use of HPV self-testing as an alternative to conventional screening may also be effective at increasing uptake and this will be covered in a subsequent review. Secondary outcomes, including cost data, were incompletely documented. The majority of cluster-RCTs did not account for clustering or adequately report the number of clusters in the trial in order to estimate the design effect, so we did not selectively adjust the trials. It is unlikely that reporting of these trials would impact the overall conclusions and robustness of the results. Of the meta-analyses that could be performed, there was considerable statistical heterogeneity, and this should be borne in mind when interpreting these findings. Given this and the low to moderate evidence, further research may change these findings. The risk of bias in the majority of trials was unclear, and a number of trials suffered from methodological problems and inadequate reporting. We downgraded the certainty of evidence because of an unclear or high risk of bias with regards to allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data and other biases. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is moderate-certainty evidence to support the use of invitation letters to increase the uptake of cervical screening. Low-certainty evidence showed lay health worker involvement amongst ethnic minority populations may increase screening coverage, and there was also support for educational interventions, but it is unclear what format is most effective. The majority of the studies were from developed countries and so the relevance of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), is unclear. Overall, the low-certainty evidence that was identified makes it difficult to infer as to which interventions were best, with exception of invitational interventions, where there appeared to be more reliable evidence.

Dynamics of papillomavirus in vivo disease formation & susceptibility to high-level disinfection-Implications for transmission in clinical settings.

BACKGROUND: High-level disinfection protects tens-of-millions of patients from the transmission of viruses on reusable medical devices. The efficacy of high-level disinfectants for preventing human papillomavirus (HPV) transmission has been called into question by recent publications, which if true, would have significant public health implications. METHODS: Evaluation of the clinical relevance of these published findings required the development of novel methods to quantify and compare: (i) Infectious titres of lab-produced, clinically-sourced, and animal-derived papillomaviruses, (ii) The papillomavirus dose responses in the newly developed in vitro and in vivo models, and the kinetics of in vivo disease formation, and (iii) The efficacy of high-level disinfectants in inactivating papillomaviruses in these systems. FINDINGS: Clinical virus titres obtained from cervical lesions were comparable to those obtained from tissue (raft-culture) and in vivo models. A mouse tail infection model showed a clear dose-response for disease formation, that papillomaviruses remain stable and infective on fomite surfaces for at least 8 weeks without squames and up to a year with squames, and that there is a 10-fold drop in virus titre with transfer from a fomite surface to a new infection site. Disinfectants such as ortho-phthalaldehyde and hydrogen peroxide, but not ethanol, were highly effective at inactivating multiple HPV types in vitro and in vivo. INTERPRETATION: Together with comparable results presented in a companion manuscript from an independent laboratory, this work demonstrates that high-level disinfectants inactivate HPV and highlights the need for standardized and well-controlled methods to assess HPV transmission and disinfection. FUNDING: Advanced Sterilization Products, UK-MRC (MR/S024409/1 and MC-PC-13050) and Addenbrookes Charitable Trust.

The early detection of cervical cancer. The current and changing landscape of cervical disease detection.

Cervical cancer prevention has undergone dramatic changes over the past decade. With the introduction of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination, some countries have seen a dramatic decline in HPV-mediated cervical disease. However, widespread implementation has been limited by economic considerations and the varying healthcare priorities of different countries, as well as by vaccine availability and, in some instances, vaccine hesitancy amongst the population/government. In this environment, it is clear that cervical screening will retain a critical role in the prevention of cervical cancer and will in due course need to adapt to the changing incidence of HPV-associated neoplasia. Cervical screening has, for many years, been performed using Papanicolaou staining of cytology samples. As our understanding of the role of HPV in cervical cancer progression has advanced, and with the availability of sensitive detection systems, cervical screening now incorporates HPV testing. Although such tests improve disease detection, they are not specific, and cannot discriminate high-grade from low-grade disease. This has necessitated the development of effective triage approaches to stratify HPV-positive women according to their risk of cancer progression. Although cytology triage remains the mainstay of screening, novel strategies under evaluation include DNA methylation, biomarker detection and the incorporation of artificial intelligence systems to detect cervical abnormalities. These tests, which can be partially anchored in a molecular understanding of HPV pathogenesis, will enhance the sensitivity of disease detection and improve patient outcomes. This review will provide insight on these innovative methodologies while explaining their scientific basis drawing from our understanding of HPV tumour biology.

Human papillomavirus type 16 causes a defined subset of conjunctival in situ squamous cell carcinomas.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the conjunctiva is associated with a number of risk factors, including HIV infection, iatrogenic immunosuppression and atopy. In addition, several studies have suggested an involvement of HPV, based on the presence of viral DNA, but did not establish whether there was active infection or evidence of causal disease association. In this manuscript, 31 cases of conjunctival in situ squamous cell carcinoma were classified as HPV DNA-positive or -negative, before being analysed by immunohistochemistry to establish the distribution of viral and cellular biomarkers of HPV gene expression. Our panel included p16INK4a, TP53 and MCM, but also the virally encoded E4 gene product, which is abundantly expressed during productive infection. Subsequent in situ detection of HPV mRNA using an RNAscope approach confirmed that early HPV gene expression was occurring in the majority of cases of HPV DNA-positive conjunctival in situ squamous cell carcinoma, with all of these cases occurring in the atopic group. Viral gene expression correlated with TP53 loss, p16INK4a elevation, and extensive MCM expression, in line with our general understanding of E6 and E7's role during transforming infection at other epithelial sites. A characteristic E4 expression pattern was detected in only one case. HPV mRNA was not detected in lower grades of dysplasia, and was not observed in cases that were HPV DNA-negative. Our study demonstrates an active involvement of HPV in the development of a subset of conjunctival in situ squamous cell carcinoma. No high-risk HPV types were detected other than HPV16. It appears that the conjunctiva is a vulnerable epithelial site for HPV-associated transformation. These cancers are defined by their pattern of viral gene expression, and by the distribution of surrogate markers of HPV infection.

Correction to: Human papillomavirus type 16 causes a defined subset of conjunctival in situ squamous cell carcinomas.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.