Impact of Adjuvant Radiotherapy Setting on Quality-of-Life in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To determine differences in post-treatment QoL across treatment settings in patients receiving adjuvant radiation therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS: This was a prospective observational cohort study of patients with HNSCC initially evaluated in a head and neck surgical oncologic and reconstructive clinic at an academic medical center (AMC). Participants were enrolled prior to treatment in a prospective registry collecting demographic, social, and clinical data. Physical and social-emotional QoL (phys-QoL and soc-QoL, respectively) was measured using the University of Washington-QoL questionnaire at pre-treatment and post-treatment visits. RESULTS: A cohort of 177 patients, primarily male and White with an average age of 61.2 ± 11.2 years, met inclusion criteria. Most patients presented with oral cavity tumors (n = 132, 74.6%), had non-HPV-mediated disease (n = 97, 61.8%), and were classified as Stage IVa (n = 72, 42.8%). After controlling for covariates, patients treated at community medical centers (CMCs) reported a 7.15-point lower phys-QoL compared with those treated at AMCs (95% CI: -13.96 to -0.35, p = 0.040) up to 12 months post-treatment. Additionally, patients who were treated at CMCs had a 5.77-point (-11.86-0.31, p = 0.063) lower soc-QoL score compared with those treated at an AMC, which was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that HNSCC patients treated with radiation at AMCs reported significantly greater phys-QoL in their first-year post-treatment compared to those treated at CMCs, but soc-QoL did not differ significantly. Further observational studies are needed to explore potential factors, including treatment planning and cancer resource engagement, behind disparities between AMCs and CMCs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Step 3 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Six-week postoperative opioid use and pain following a randomized controlled trial evaluating multimodal analgesia for head and neck free flap patients.

Introduction: Head and neck malignancy treatment often involves invasive surgeries, necessitating effective postoperative pain control. However, chronic reliance on opioid medications remains a challenge for many patients after surgery. Multimodal analgesia (MMA) within enhanced recovery after surgery protocols has shown success in limiting narcotic pain medications for other cancer types. In a prior study, MMA comprising acetaminophen, ketorolac, gabapentin, and a neurogenic block reduced opioid use in the 7-day postoperative period for major head and neck reconstructive surgery. This study investigates the impact of multimodal analgesia on opioid prescription and pain during the 6-week postoperative period for patients undergoing major head and neck oncologic surgeries, aiming to understand the longer-term effects of narcotic use. Methods: The study retrospectively examined participants in a [hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation pragmatic trial to assess multimodal analgesia's long-term effectiveness in head and neck free flap surgery. Arm A received scheduled acetaminophen and as-needed opioids, while Arm B received scheduled gabapentin, ketorolac, a regional nerve block at the donor site, scheduled acetaminophen, and as-needed opioids. Retrospective data collection included opioid prescription use and pain scores up to 6 weeks after surgery, gathered from the Kansas prescription drug monitoring program, K-TRACS. Results: Thirty patients participated, 14 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B. The average morphine milligram equivalents per day of filled prescriptions were not significantly different between Arm A and Arm B (7.23 vs. 7.88, p = .845). Additionally, average pain scores at 6 weeks showed no significant difference between the two groups (1.4 vs. 1.9, p = .612). Conclusion: Patients with head and neck cancer treated with multimodal analgesia during the perioperative period did not exhibit significant differences in opioid use and pain within 6 weeks after discharge. To confirm these findings, a re-examination with strict measures of opioid use and scheduled pain assessments in a prospective manner is warranted. Level of Evidence: 4.

Forecasting Rural and Urban Otolaryngologists, Radiation Oncologists, and Oropharyngeal Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To forecast oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) incidence with otolaryngologist and radiation oncologist numbers per population by rural and urban counties through 2030. METHODS: Incident OPC cases were abstracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 19 database, and otolaryngologists and radiation oncologists from the Area Health Resources File by county from 2000 to 2018. Variables were analyzed by metropolitan counties with over 1,000,000 people (large metros), rural counties adjacent to a metro (rural adjacent), and rural counties not adjacent to a metro (rural not adjacent). Data were forecasted via an unobserved components model with regression slope comparisons. RESULTS: Per 100,000 population, forecasted OPC incidence increased from 2000 to 2030 (large metro: 3.6 to 10.6 cases; rural adjacent: 4.2 to 11.9; rural not adjacent: 4.3 to 10.1). Otolaryngologists remained stable for large metros (2.9 to 2.9) but declined in rural adjacent (0.7 to 0.2) and rural not adjacent (0.8 to 0.7). Radiation oncologists increased from 1.0 to 1.3 in large metros, while rural adjacent remained similar (0.2 to 0.2) and rural not adjacent increased (0.2 to 0.6). Compared to large metros, regression slope comparisons indicated similar forecasted OPC incidence for rural not adjacent (p = 0.58), but greater for rural adjacent (p < 0.001, r = 0.96). Otolaryngologists declined for rural regions (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, r = -0.56, and r = -0.58 for rural adjacent and not adjacent, respectively). Radiation oncologists declined in rural adjacent (p < 0.001, r = -0.61), while increasing at a lesser rate for rural not adjacent (p = 0.002, r = 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Rural OPC incidence disparities will grow while the relevant, rural health care workforce declines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 134:136-142, 2024.

Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Preoperative Counseling for Head and Neck Cancer Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential use of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, such as ChatGPT, in preoperative counseling for patients undergoing head and neck cancer surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. SETTING: Single institution tertiary care center. METHODS: ChatGPT was used to generate presurgical educational information including indications, risks, and recovery time for five common head and neck surgeries. Chatbot-generated information was compared with information gathered from a simple browser search (first publicly available website excluding scholarly articles). The accuracy of the information, readability, thoroughness, and number of errors were compared by five experienced head and neck surgeons in a blinded fashion. Each surgeon then chose a preference between the two information sources for each surgery. RESULTS: With the exception of total word count, ChatGPT-generated pre-surgical information has similar readability, content of knowledge, accuracy, thoroughness, and numbers of medical errors when compared to publicly available websites. Additionally, ChatGPT was preferred 48% of the time by experienced head and neck surgeons. CONCLUSION: Head and neck surgeons rated ChatGPT-generated and readily available online educational materials similarly. Further refinement in AI technology may soon open more avenues for patient counseling. Future investigations into the medical safety of AI counseling and exploring patients' perspectives would be of strong interest. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A. Laryngoscope, 134:2757-2761, 2024.

Free Flap Outcomes for Head and Neck Surgery in Patients with COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affects the vascular system, subjecting patients to a hypercoagulable state. This is of particular concern for the success of microvascular free flap reconstruction. This study aims to report head and neck free flap complications in patients with COVID-19 during the perioperative period. We believe these patients are more likely to experience flap complications given the hypercoagulable state. METHODS: This is a multi-institutional retrospective case series of patients infected with COVID-19 during the perioperative period for head and neck free flap reconstruction from March 2020 to January 2022. RESULTS: Data was collected on 40 patients from 14 institutions. Twenty-one patients (52.5%) had a positive COVID-19 test within 10 days before surgery and 7 days after surgery. The remaining patients had a positive test earlier than 10 days before surgery. A positive test caused a delay in surgery for 16 patients (40.0%) with an average delay of 44.7 days (9-198 days). Two free flap complications (5.0%) occurred with no free flap deaths. Four patients (10.0%) had surgical complications and 10 patients had medical complications (25.0%). Five patients (12.5%) suffered from postoperative COVID-19 pneumonia. Three deaths were COVID-19-related and one from cancer recurrence during the study period. CONCLUSION: Despite the heightened risk of coagulopathy in COVID-19 patients, head and neck free flap reconstructions in patients with COVID-19 are not at higher risk for free flap complications. However, these patients are at increased risk of medical complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 2023.

Disentangling Social Determinants of Health and Rurality in Head and Neck Cancer 2-Year Mortality.

Social determinants of health (SDoH) and rurality are known factors that may influence outcomes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Patients residing in remote locations or those with multiple SDoH may encounter barriers to initial diagnosis, adherence to multidisciplinary treatments, and posttreatment surveillance, which may impact their overall survival. However, previous studies have shown mixed results associated with rural residence. The aim of this study is to identify the impact of rurality and SDoH on 2-year survival in HNSCC. The study was conducted using a Head and Neck Cancer Registry at a single institution from June 2018 through July 2022. Rurality, defined by US census scores, and individual measures of SDoH were used. Our results indicate that each additional adverse SDoH factor results in 1.5 times the odds of mortality at 2 years. Individualized measures of SDoH, rather than rurality alone, better reflect patient prognosis in HNSCC.

Implementation of AIRVO™ System for Postoperative Tracheostomy Care in Head and Neck Free Flaps.

OBJECTIVE: Effective postoperative tracheostomy management after free flap surgery is critical but can offer challenges including difficulty with humidification delivery and contraindications toward neck instrumentation. The purpose of this project was to establish a multidisciplinary team and implement the AIRVO™ tracheostomy humidification system for those undergoing free flap surgery and determine its effect on respiratory secretions and related events. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of head and neck free flap surgery patients prior to implementation of AIRVO™ (Jan 2021-May 2021) and after (August 2021-December 2021) were analyzed with a 2 month (June 2021-July 2021) implementation phase. Main variables analyzed included excessive tracheal secretions, necessity of supplemental oxygen above baseline for a day or greater, respiratory rapid response calls, elevation to intensive care units (ICU), and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients (40 pre-AIRVO™ and 42 with AIRVO™) met criteria for the study. A significant reduction in excessive tracheal secretions (40% pre-AIRVO™, 11.9% with AIRVO™, P = .01) and necessity of supplemental oxygen above baseline (25% pre-AIRVO™, 7.1% with AIRVO™, P = .04) were observed. No significant difference in hospital length of stay (P = .63) was observed. No respiratory rapid responses or elevation to ICU care were seen in either groups. CONCLUSION: The AIRVO™ system provided an efficient, portable, free of neck instrumentation, and easy to use device that resulted in a reduction in excessive tracheal secretion events and necessity of supplemental oxygenation needs in free flap tracheostomy patients.

Adjuvant radiotherapy mitigates impact of perineural invasion on oncologic outcomes in early-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. A multi-institutional analysis of 557 patients.

OBJECTIVES: Understand the prognostic impact of perineural invasion (PNI) in early-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). Assess the influence of adjuvant radiotherapy on outcomes of patients with PNI-positive early-stage OCSCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective seven-institution cohort study including patients with pathologic T1-2 N0-1 OCSCC who underwent primary surgery with negative margins. Outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS) and locoregional control (LRC). Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate oncologic outcomes. Interaction terms were introduced to assess relationships between PNI and adjuvant radiotherapy. RESULTS: Among 557 patients (mean (SD) age 61.0 (13.9), 47.2% female, 66.6% pathologic T1, 93.5% pathologic N0), 93 had PNI-positive tumors, among which 87.1% underwent neck dissection and 39.6% received radiotherapy. On multivariable analysis, PNI was associated with lower DFS and LRC. Adjuvant radiotherapy was not associated with improved outcomes on multivariable analysis of the entire cohort. However, among patients with PNI-positive tumors, adjuvant radiotherapy significantly decreased hazard for DFS. CONCLUSION: Among patients with low-risk, early-stage OCSCC, PNI was associated with worse DFS and LRC. In patients with PNI-positive tumors, adjuvant radiotherapy lowered hazard for DFS on multivariable analysis. These data support using adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with early-stage OCSCC with PNI.

Association of Social-Ecological Factors With Delay in Time to Initiation of Postoperative Radiation Therapy: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Importance: Timely initiation of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) is associated with reduced recurrence rates and improved overall survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Measurement of the association of social-ecological variables with PORT delays is lacking. Objective: To assess individual and community-level factors associated with PORT delay among patients with HNSCC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study carried out between September 2018 and June 2022 included adults with untreated HNSCC who were enrolled in a prospective registry at a single academic tertiary medical center. Demographic information and validated self-reported measures of health literacy were obtained at baseline visits. Clinical data were recorded, and participant addresses were used to calculate the area deprivation index (ADI), a measure of community-level social vulnerability. Participants receiving primary surgery and PORT were analyzed. Univariable and multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for PORT delays. Exposures: Surgical treatment and PORT. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was PORT initiation delay (>42 days from surgery). Risk of PORT initiation delay was evaluated using individual-level (demographic, health literacy, and clinical data) and community-level information (ADI and rural-urban continuum codes). Results: Of 171 patients, 104 patients (60.8%) had PORT delays. Mean (SD) age of participants was 61.0 (11.2) years, 161 were White (94.2%), and 105 were men (61.4%). Insurance was employer-based or public among 65 (38.5%) and 75 (44.4%) participants, respectively. Mean (SD) ADI (national percentile) was 60.2 (24.4), and 71 (41.8%) resided in rural communities. Tumor sites were most commonly oral cavity (123 [71.9%]), with 108 (63.5%) classified as stage 4 at presentation. On multivariable analysis, a model incorporating individual-level factors with health literacy in addition to community-level factors was most predictive of PORT delay (AOC= 0.78; R2, 0.18). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study provides a more comprehensive assessment of predictors of PORT delays that include health literacy and community-level measures. Predictive models that incorporate multilevel measures outperform models with individual-level factors alone and may guide precise interventions to decrease PORT delay for at-risk patients with HNSCC.

Assessing the Risk of Adjuvant Radiotherapy Initiation Delays With Social Support Surveys.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), initiating postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) greater than 42 days after surgery is associated with a higher risk of poor survival outcomes. Social support has been shown to modulate behaviors related to care-seeking and treatment adherence. In this study, we sought to determine the relationship between social support metrics and PORT delays. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Single tertiary medical center. METHODS: Patients with HNSCC who underwent primary surgical excision requiring PORT were prospectively enrolled. Patient-perceived social support metrics were assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS) at initial presurgical evaluation. Associations with PORT delays were evaluated via univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. An additional 28 patients were recommended to receive PORT but did not initiate treatment and were included for secondary analysis. All four subscales of the MOS-SSS (positive social interaction, affectionate support, tangible support, and emotional/informational support) were significantly associated with PORT initiation delays on univariable analysis. On multivariable analysis, the overall MOS-SSS score (odds ratio [OR] 2.08, 1.15-4.35, p = .028) was significantly associated with PORT initiation delays. On secondary analysis, lower tangible support was associated with a lack of PORT initiation (OR 1.63, 1.05-2.54, p = .028). CONCLUSION: Social support metrics were significantly associated with PORT delays, which may help promote tighter scheduling and closer monitoring of high-risk patients.

Pilot randomized, controlled, preoperative intervention for nutrition trial in head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Several prospective studies report improved outcomes with pretreatment nutrition interventions prior to radiation therapy for head and neck cancer (HNC), but none have assessed similar interventions before surgery for HNC. METHODS: POINT, a pilot randomized controlled trial, was conducted to evaluate a multimodal nutrition intervention. Patients undergoing primary surgery with free flap reconstruction for HNC were randomly assigned to the control arm or a preoperative multimodal nutrition intervention. RESULTS: POINT included 49 patients. Nutrition risk scores did not change significantly for either the intervention or control group. Control patients had a significant decrease in body weight in the preoperative period (p < 0.001). Conversely, weight among intervention patients did not significantly decrease (p = 0.680). The intervention mitigated weight loss in patients with dysphagia (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative nutrition optimization shows potential to reduce weight loss normally experienced by patients with head and neck cancer prior to surgical extirpation, especially among those with subjective dysphagia.

Treatment Tolerance of Cetuximab versus Alternative Chemotherapy Agents in Non-Cisplatin Candidates with Head and Neck Cancer Receiving Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Standard of care for radiosensitization in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with high-dose cisplatin. The optimal chemoradiation regimen for patients medically unfit for cisplatin is unclear. We compared our experience with concurrent cetuximab (CTX) versus other cytotoxic non-cisplatin agents. METHODS: We reviewed 53 patients between 2011 and 2017 with HNSCC treated with CCRT ineligible for cisplatin. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatment tolerance was evaluated in those receiving CTX versus non-CTX chemotherapy (NCC). Of the NCC regimens, the majority were carboplatin/paclitaxel and were dosed at an area under the curve (AUC) of 2 and 45-50 mg/m2, respectively. Standard radiation dosing was 70 Gray (Gy) in the definitive setting and 60-66 Gy in the postoperative setting. Patient characteristics and treatment toxicities were evaluated using categorical methods. RESULTS: Patients were well balanced overall including differences between performance status and the comorbidity score. NCC patients experienced more radiation treatment breaks (52.4% vs. 21.9%, p = 0.022), radiation delays >1 week (33.3% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.01), and chemotherapy dose-limiting toxicity (61.9% vs. 28.1%, p = 0.015) compared to CTX patients. Nutritional dependence on a PEG tube was more likely in the NCC cohort (52.4% vs. 22.6%, p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest decreased treatment tolerance in non-cisplatin cytotoxic chemotherapy compared to cetuximab. Further prospective study is needed to clarify optimal chemotherapy in patients unable to receive cisplatin.

Prognostic Implications of Skin Invasion in Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of histopathologic skin invasion on 2- and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with primary surgery for locally advanced oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case-control study was performed comparing previously untreated patients with pT4a OCSCC with and without skin invasion. SETTING: Academic medical center. METHODS: Propensity score-matched cohorts were derived by age, sex, surgical margins, pathologic N classification, adjuvant treatment, and primary tumor site. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate 2- and 5-year OS and DFS, which were compared between cohorts via the log rank (Mantel-Cox) test statistic. RESULTS: Overall 25 patients were identified to have pathologic skin invasion, and 50 were selected for the matched control group. OS was significantly lower for patients with skin invasion as compared with controls at 2 years (30.8% vs 53.3%, P = .018) and 5 years (16.6% vs 42.2%, P = .01). DFS was significantly lower for patients with skin invasion vs controls at 2 years (23.7% vs 47.7, P = .037) and 5 years (15.8% vs 41.4%, P = .024). CONCLUSION: Histopathologic skin invasion in OCSCC is associated with dismal prognosis in patients who underwent primary surgical treatment. OS outcomes for patients with skin invasion are comparable to survival of patients with recurrent/metastatic disease and T4N2 disease.

The Use of Dissemination and Implementation to Improve Multimodal Analgesia in Head and Neck Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To optimize the delivery of multimodal analgesia to patients undergoing major head and neck oncologic surgeries. METHODS: Pilot study included patients enrolled to receive either scheduled acetaminophen and as-needed opioids (control group) or scheduled acetaminophen, gabapentin, ketorolac, and as-needed opioids (experimental group). RCT, a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation pragmatic trial, was designed to test the effectiveness of the intervention. Arm A received scheduled acetaminophen and as-needed opioids. Arm B received scheduled gabapentin, ketorolac, a regional nerve block at the free tissue donor site, scheduled acetaminophen and as-needed opioids. RESULTS: Pilot: Thirty-one patients undergoing major head and neck surgery were enrolled. Mean MMEs administered in control group (n = 15) was 251.60 mg (SD = 224.57 mg); mean MMEs in Experimental group (n = 16) was 195.78 mg (SD = 131.08 mg), p = 0.401. LOS was 8.0 days in control versus 7.0 days in experimental group (p = 0.054). RCT: Interim analysis for safety and futility was planned during trial's design after 30 patients (n = 14 Arm A, and n = 16 Arm B). Mean MMEs administered were 135.1 mg in Arm A, (SD = 86.0 mg) versus mean MME of 51.3 mg in Arm B (SD = 43.3 mg, (p < 0.05)). Given clear superiority results, the trial was prematurely terminated. Functional pain scores, LOS, and complications were similar between the arms (p > 0.05). Variability of mean MME was compared before and after implementation of the management protocols: SD in RCT#1 was 181.46 mg versus 124.6 mg in RCT#2. CONCLUSION: Multimodal analgesia significantly reduced the need for opioids in patients undergoing major head and neck surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1, Randomized Clinical Trial Laryngoscope, 133:S1-S11, 2023.

Post-operative Outcomes in Pediatric Patients Following Facial Reconstruction With Fibula Free Flaps.

EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVE: Assess outcomes of pediatric facial reconstruction with fibula free flaps. OBJECTIVES: Free flap reconstruction of complex maxillofacial defects in pediatric patients is rare. Post-operative complications, donor site morbidity, impact on craniofacial growth, and oro-dental rehabilitation are unknown. Our study assesses the outcomes of pediatric maxillofacial reconstruction with composite fibula free flaps. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: Multi-institutional retrospective chart review from 2000 to 2020 on pediatric patients undergoing maxillomandibular reconstruction with fibula free flaps. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients underwent 89 surgeries; 5 maxillary and 84 mandibular defects. Median age: 12 years. Defects were acquired following resection of sarcoma/carcinoma 44% or benign tumors 50%. 73% of cases had immediate free flap reconstruction. Closing osteotomies were reported in 74%; 1 in 40%, 2 in 27%, and more than 2 in 6.7%. Hardware was used in 98% and removed in 25%. 9.2% demonstrated long-term hardware exposure, greater than 3 months following reconstruction. Short-term complications: wound infection 6.7%, flap salvage/failure 2.2%, fistula 1.1%, and compromised craniofacial growth: 23%. Two patients developed trismus. Long-term fibula donor site complications: hypertrophic scarring: 3.4%, dysesthesia: 1.1%, and long-term gait abnormality: 1.1%. Dental rehabilitation was performed in 33%. Post-operative speech outcomes showed 94% with fully intelligible speech. CONCLUSION: Pediatric maxillary and mandible defects repaired with fibula free flaps demonstrated complication rates comparable to the adult free flap population. Long-term follow-up did not demonstrate adverse outcomes for craniofacial growth. Hardware for flap retention was utilized and remained in place with minimal exposure. Post-operative gait abnormality is rare. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:302-306, 2023.

Assessment of conditions leading to lost-to-follow-up of head and neck cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Head and neck cancer patients require close clinical follow up to monitor and address sequelae of treatment and for adequate cancer surveillance. The goal of this study is to determine barriers and risk factors for head and neck cancer patients who are lost-to-follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A chart review of the Head and Neck Cancer Registry was performed to identify patients who were lost-to-follow-up (LTF). LTF was defined as missing two consecutive appointments as recommended by their oncologic surgeon. Those identified as LTF were contacted via email and phone to complete a 16-question survey addressing possible barriers to follow up. RESULTS: Of the 353 patients reviewed, 53 met the criteria for LTF (15%). Forty-eight participants were contacted, and 23 surveys were completed (48%). Of the 23 patients that responded, 22% reported difficulty scheduling an appointment, 30% had transportation barriers, 22% had personal or work obligations that prevented follow up, 17% did not follow up because they "felt better," and 39% were following up with an otolaryngologist or oncologist closer to home. Only three participants (13%) were aware of the recommended 5-year surveillance period. CONCLUSION: Head and neck cancer patients have a variety of reasons they are lost to follow-up. Understanding these barriers is critical to creating a patient-centered model that balances both clinical surveillance needs and reasonable expectations for patients. Improvements can be made to educate patients on the recommended length of follow-up and its importance.

Sarcopenia and Treatment Toxicity in Older Adults Undergoing Chemoradiation for Head and Neck Cancer: Identifying Factors to Predict Frailty.

This study was performed to identify treatment related toxicities in older adults undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer and nutritional and skeletal muscle measures that might identify frailty. Imaging analysis was done with the following skeletal muscle measurements: skeletal muscle index (SMI), skeletal muscle density (SMD), and skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). Patients were dichotomized by age into younger (<70 years old, 221 patients) and older age groups (≥70 years old, 51 patients). Low SMI was more common in older patients (86.7%) compared to younger patients (51.7%, p < 0.01), as were low SMD (57.8% vs. 37.3%, p = 0.012) and low SMG (76.1% vs. 44.2%, p < 0.01), despite having similar BMIs (27.3 kg/m2 versus 27.7 kg/m2, p = 0.71). Older patients were significantly more likely to experience chemotherapy toxicity than younger patients (54.9% versus 32.3%, p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis age (p < 0.01), current smoking status (p < 0.01), and low SMI (p < 0.01) remained as significant predictors for missed chemotherapy cycles or discontinuation. Older patients were more likely to require ≥5-day radiation breaks than younger patients (27.5% versus 8.6%, p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, age (p < 0.01), low albumin status (p = 0.03), and low SMI (p = 0.04) were identified as predictors of prolonged radiation treatment breaks. Based on the results of our study, sarcopenia may be used as an additional marker for frailty alongside traditional performance status scales.

Decision regret 3 and 6 months after treatment for head and neck cancer: Observational study of associations with clinicodemographics, anxiety, and quality of life.

BACKGROUND: While quality of life (QOL), psychosocial health, and adverse treatment outcomes have been studied in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, decision regret is an important and understudied complication that can negatively impact future health care decision making. METHODS: Data collected using a HNC patient registry with questionnaires administered at initial consultation visits plus 3 and 6 months after treatment completion was retrospectively analyzed. A visual analog anxiety scale and the University of Washington Quality of Life were given at clinic visits. Decision regret was determined using a validated scale. Demographic and clinical variables were collected retrospectively and at baseline. RESULTS: Patients with higher anxiety and lower self-reported QOL had higher concurrent regret at 3-month (n = 140) and at 6-month (n = 82) post-treatment. Later disease stage at presentation, nonprimary surgical treatment, and lower health literacy were associated with greater regret. CONCLUSIONS: Decision regret was highest in HNC patients with high anxiety, low QOL, and more advanced disease.

Burnout in microvascular reconstructive otolaryngology - head and neck surgeons: Potential modifiable workplace factors.

BACKGROUND: Burnout has been previously assessed in head and neck microvascular reconstructive surgeons (HNMVS), but not in the context of modifiable workplace factors. METHODS: Anonymous, cross-sectional survey. The Abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory - Human Services Survey for Medical Personnel (aMBI-HSS) was utilized to assess emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization (DP), and personal achievement (PA). Modifiable risk factors were also evaluated. RESULTS: High risk of burnout by EE, DP, and PA was demonstrated in 24%, 9%, and 27% of respondents, respectively. EE was associated with <10% dedicated research time, lack of autonomy over clinic schedule, inadequate inpatient support, and lack of supportive clinical partner. DP was associated with >3 operative days, difficulty balancing academic commitments, and lack of supportive clinical partner. Dedicated research time and two or fewer days of block time were protective. CONCLUSIONS: Burnout was associated with several modifiable workplace factors. Addressing these may prevent moderate to severe burnout in HNMVS.

Telemedicine for head and neck cancer surveillance in the COVID-19 era: Promise and pitfalls.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has led to increased telemedicine visits. This study examines current preferences and barriers for telemedicine among patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS: Single institution retrospective analysis of 64 patients scheduling visits with the head and neck surgical oncology clinic at a tertiary academic medical center. Data were collected detailing patient preferences and barriers regarding telemedicine appointments. Patients electing to participate in telemedicine were compared to those preferring in-person appointments. RESULTS: Most patients (68%) were not interested in telemedicine. Preference for in-person examination was the most common reason for rejecting telemedicine, followed by discomfort with or limited access to technology. Patients elected telemedicine visits to avoid infection and for convenience. CONCLUSIONS: When given a choice, patients with head and neck cancer preferred in-person visits over telemedicine. Although telemedicine may improve health care access, patient preferences, technology-related barriers, and limitations regarding cancer surveillance must be addressed moving forward.