RESUMEN
A retrospective quantitative radiographic analysis determined the effect of graft material and smoking status on the maintenance of graft height over 3 years. Analysis of variance models with planned comparison were constructed to compare mean graft change by (1) graft material and (2) smoking status. Maintenance of bone height was significantly greater in intraoral autogenous grafts versus allografts (P < .05). The effect of smoking on implant loss revealed a significant difference in implant survival (P < .05). Autogenous bone generally resulted in a more favorable outcome over a 3-year period. Smoking adversely impacted implant survival in sinus grafts.
Asunto(s)
Aumento de la Cresta Alveolar/métodos , Trasplante Óseo/diagnóstico por imagen , Implantación Dental Endoósea/métodos , Implantes Dentales , Maxilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Seno Maxilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Análisis de Varianza , Sustitutos de Huesos/uso terapéutico , Trasplante Óseo/métodos , Conferencias de Consenso como Asunto , Bases de Datos como Asunto , Fracaso de la Restauración Dental , Estudios de Seguimiento , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Maxilar/cirugía , Seno Maxilar/cirugía , Radiografía Panorámica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fumar , Análisis de Supervivencia , Trasplante Autólogo , Trasplante Homólogo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Retrospective data from sinus floor augmentation bone grafts were collected from 38 surgeons for 1007 sinus grafts that involved the placement of 2997 implants over a 10-year period, with the majority of the implants followed for 3 years or more postrestoration. There were 229 implant failures reported. Various root-form implants and grafting modalities were used. A consensus conference was organized to evaluate the data and reach a consensus on optimal treatment protocols. The complete database demonstrated a 90.0% success rate for implants placed in sinus grafts with at least 3 years of function. Differences in grafting materials, implant surfaces, and timing protocols were statistically analyzed. However, the database was so multivariate and multifactorial that it was difficult to draw definitive conclusions; these must await controlled prospective studies. The consensus conference therefore developed and voted on multiple consensus statements derived by committee review for bone graft materials, type of implants, timing for implant placement, failure analysis, radiographic analysis, indications/contraindications, prosthetics, and nomenclature. Several consensus statements were obtained, the most significant being that the sinus graft should now be considered a highly predictable and effective therapeutic modality.
Asunto(s)
Seno Maxilar/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Preprotésicos Orales , Sustitutos de Huesos/uso terapéutico , Trasplante Óseo/métodos , Bases de Datos como Asunto , Implantación Dental Endoósea , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Maxilar/cirugía , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Implantación Dental/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Trasplante Óseo , Articulación de la Cadera/cirugía , Humanos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/terapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia del TratamientoRESUMEN
Dental implants provide a restorative tool to support crowns, bridge abutments, and removable dentures. Osseointegrated implants are titanium posts that are surgically implanted in alveolar bone. A tight immobile bond (osseointegration) forms between bone and titanium, and prosthetic and restorative fixtures are attached to the implants. Titanium implants differ from natural teeth, which may make them more susceptible to mechanical stress. A small proportion of implants are not successful and may fail due to infection. The microbiota of implants is similar to that of teeth in similar clinical states. Implants that fail because of mechanical stress are colonized by species associated with healthy teeth. Infected implants are colonized by subgingival species, including Porphyromonas gingivalis, Bacteroides forsythus, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Campylobacter gracilis, Streptococcus intermedius, and Peptostreptococcus micros. Different patients may be colonized by different microbial complexes, indicating that optimal treatment should be directed to the specific infection.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/etiología , Implantes Dentales/efectos adversos , HumanosRESUMEN
Standardized prospective clinical trials are uncommon in implant dentistry. Aside from the Brånemark and staple trials; both restricted to edentulous jaws, and two blade trials in their early and as yet inconclusive stages, most implant studies are retrospective. As such, they lack uniformity in patient selection, methodology, evaluation, and definitions of success and do not yield the information needed for critical clinical decisions. There are data to compare treatments for edentulous jaws, but virtually none for the partially edentulous patient. Decisions, out of necessity, involve retrospection and interpolation. In the absence of a definitive data base, added attention must be paid to patient safety and informed consent. Patient selection, implant selection, site selection, and surgical and prosthetic management--all of which influence implant efficacy and safety--are highlighted. It is the opinion of this author, based upon the benefit/risk information reviewed, that osseointegrated root forms are the implants of choice when adequate bone is available, and that blade implants and subperiosteal implants are indicated when bone space is restricted. Prospective clinical trials must be given the highest priority in planning for implant research.
Asunto(s)
Implantación Dental , Arcada Edéntula/cirugía , Implantación Dental/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Arcada Parcialmente Edéntula/cirugía , Falla de PrótesisRESUMEN
Acceptance of implants by dentist, readiness for use, and general indications are described. Individual evaluation for implants is detailed and success of implants defined. Indications for removal are cited and appropriate statistic methodology presented.
Asunto(s)
Implantación Dental , Comportamiento del Consumidor , Implantación Dental/normas , Implantación Dental/estadística & datos numéricos , Diseño de Dentadura , Dentaduras , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Arcada Edéntula/diagnóstico , Arcada Edéntula/diagnóstico por imagen , Arcada Edéntula/fisiopatología , Arcada Parcialmente Edéntula/diagnóstico , Arcada Parcialmente Edéntula/diagnóstico por imagen , Arcada Parcialmente Edéntula/fisiopatología , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Falla de Prótesis , Radiografía , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Ketamine (10mg/kg body weight) was administered intramuscularly in 10 baboons (Papio anubis). Subsequently, a combination of ketamine (10mg/kg body weight) and diazepam (7.5 mg) was administered intramuscularly. Results indicated that using diazepam concurrently with ketamine suppressed or eliminated the epileptoid movements characteristic of anesthesia with ketamine used alone.
Asunto(s)
Diazepam/administración & dosificación , Inmovilización , Ketamina/administración & dosificación , Papio , Animales , Combinación de Medicamentos , Inyecciones Intramusculares/veterinaria , MasculinoAsunto(s)
Carbono , Implantación Dental Endoósea/instrumentación , Diente Artificial , Proceso Alveolar/diagnóstico por imagen , Proceso Alveolar/fisiología , Animales , Cristalización , Análisis del Estrés Dental , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Encía/anatomía & histología , Haplorrinos , Humanos , Masculino , Papio , RadiografíaAsunto(s)
Carbono , Implantación Dental Endoósea/instrumentación , Proceso Alveolar/anatomía & histología , Proceso Alveolar/diagnóstico por imagen , Animales , Materiales Biocompatibles , Cerámica , Cristalización , Implantación Dental Endoósea/métodos , Diseño de Dentadura , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiografía , Estudios RetrospectivosAsunto(s)
Diente Impactado/cirugía , Diente no Erupcionado/cirugía , Diente/trasplante , Adolescente , Adulto , Anodoncia/cirugía , Diente Premolar/trasplante , Niño , Diente Canino/trasplante , Humanos , Incisivo/anomalías , Diente Molar/trasplante , Boca Edéntula/cirugía , Odontogénesis , Enfermedades Periodontales/cirugía , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Pronóstico , Férulas (Fijadores) , Factores de Tiempo , Avulsión de Diente/cirugía , Erupción Dental , Extracción Dental/métodos , Resorción Dentaria/etiología , Raíz del Diente/fisiología , Trasplante AutólogoAsunto(s)
Implantación Dental , Anciano , Implantación de Cuchilla (Odontología) , Placas Óseas , Carbono , Cristalización , Implantación Dental/efectos adversos , Implantación Dental/métodos , Implantación Dental Endoósea , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Predicción , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Bone maintenance based on various attachment mechanisms is the key to tooth-root replacement safety and efficacy. The dental implant has broad applicability based on design, but demonstrates progressive peri-implant bone loss. The allogeneic tooth transplant, significantly less applicable because of size, is antigenic and rejected by bone-replacement root resorption. Since the predictability and survival times of these implant and transplant modalities are similar and there is less residual bone loss with the transplant, it is suggested that for clinical situations such as the fresh extraction socket, where there is room, the allotransplant, rather than implant, is the root-replacement of choice.