Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 26
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent ; 21(5): 517-23, 2001 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11693244

RESUMEN

A retrospective quantitative radiographic analysis determined the effect of graft material and smoking status on the maintenance of graft height over 3 years. Analysis of variance models with planned comparison were constructed to compare mean graft change by (1) graft material and (2) smoking status. Maintenance of bone height was significantly greater in intraoral autogenous grafts versus allografts (P < .05). The effect of smoking on implant loss revealed a significant difference in implant survival (P < .05). Autogenous bone generally resulted in a more favorable outcome over a 3-year period. Smoking adversely impacted implant survival in sinus grafts.


Asunto(s)
Aumento de la Cresta Alveolar/métodos , Trasplante Óseo/diagnóstico por imagen , Implantación Dental Endoósea/métodos , Implantes Dentales , Maxilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Seno Maxilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Análisis de Varianza , Sustitutos de Huesos/uso terapéutico , Trasplante Óseo/métodos , Conferencias de Consenso como Asunto , Bases de Datos como Asunto , Fracaso de la Restauración Dental , Estudios de Seguimiento , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Maxilar/cirugía , Seno Maxilar/cirugía , Radiografía Panorámica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fumar , Análisis de Supervivencia , Trasplante Autólogo , Trasplante Homólogo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants ; 13 Suppl: 11-45, 1998.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9715571

RESUMEN

Retrospective data from sinus floor augmentation bone grafts were collected from 38 surgeons for 1007 sinus grafts that involved the placement of 2997 implants over a 10-year period, with the majority of the implants followed for 3 years or more postrestoration. There were 229 implant failures reported. Various root-form implants and grafting modalities were used. A consensus conference was organized to evaluate the data and reach a consensus on optimal treatment protocols. The complete database demonstrated a 90.0% success rate for implants placed in sinus grafts with at least 3 years of function. Differences in grafting materials, implant surfaces, and timing protocols were statistically analyzed. However, the database was so multivariate and multifactorial that it was difficult to draw definitive conclusions; these must await controlled prospective studies. The consensus conference therefore developed and voted on multiple consensus statements derived by committee review for bone graft materials, type of implants, timing for implant placement, failure analysis, radiographic analysis, indications/contraindications, prosthetics, and nomenclature. Several consensus statements were obtained, the most significant being that the sinus graft should now be considered a highly predictable and effective therapeutic modality.


Asunto(s)
Seno Maxilar/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Preprotésicos Orales , Sustitutos de Huesos/uso terapéutico , Trasplante Óseo/métodos , Bases de Datos como Asunto , Implantación Dental Endoósea , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Maxilar/cirugía , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 25 Suppl 2: S213-7, 1997 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9310682

RESUMEN

Dental implants provide a restorative tool to support crowns, bridge abutments, and removable dentures. Osseointegrated implants are titanium posts that are surgically implanted in alveolar bone. A tight immobile bond (osseointegration) forms between bone and titanium, and prosthetic and restorative fixtures are attached to the implants. Titanium implants differ from natural teeth, which may make them more susceptible to mechanical stress. A small proportion of implants are not successful and may fail due to infection. The microbiota of implants is similar to that of teeth in similar clinical states. Implants that fail because of mechanical stress are colonized by species associated with healthy teeth. Infected implants are colonized by subgingival species, including Porphyromonas gingivalis, Bacteroides forsythus, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Campylobacter gracilis, Streptococcus intermedius, and Peptostreptococcus micros. Different patients may be colonized by different microbial complexes, indicating that optimal treatment should be directed to the specific infection.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/etiología , Implantes Dentales/efectos adversos , Humanos
6.
J Mass Dent Soc ; 38(3): 135-7, 1989.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2698414
7.
J Dent Educ ; 52(12): 712-20, 1988 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3057015

RESUMEN

Standardized prospective clinical trials are uncommon in implant dentistry. Aside from the Brånemark and staple trials; both restricted to edentulous jaws, and two blade trials in their early and as yet inconclusive stages, most implant studies are retrospective. As such, they lack uniformity in patient selection, methodology, evaluation, and definitions of success and do not yield the information needed for critical clinical decisions. There are data to compare treatments for edentulous jaws, but virtually none for the partially edentulous patient. Decisions, out of necessity, involve retrospection and interpolation. In the absence of a definitive data base, added attention must be paid to patient safety and informed consent. Patient selection, implant selection, site selection, and surgical and prosthetic management--all of which influence implant efficacy and safety--are highlighted. It is the opinion of this author, based upon the benefit/risk information reviewed, that osseointegrated root forms are the implants of choice when adequate bone is available, and that blade implants and subperiosteal implants are indicated when bone space is restricted. Prospective clinical trials must be given the highest priority in planning for implant research.


Asunto(s)
Implantación Dental , Arcada Edéntula/cirugía , Implantación Dental/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Arcada Parcialmente Edéntula/cirugía , Falla de Prótesis
13.
Lab Anim Sci ; 30(5): 902-4, 1980 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7431875

RESUMEN

Ketamine (10mg/kg body weight) was administered intramuscularly in 10 baboons (Papio anubis). Subsequently, a combination of ketamine (10mg/kg body weight) and diazepam (7.5 mg) was administered intramuscularly. Results indicated that using diazepam concurrently with ketamine suppressed or eliminated the epileptoid movements characteristic of anesthesia with ketamine used alone.


Asunto(s)
Diazepam/administración & dosificación , Inmovilización , Ketamina/administración & dosificación , Papio , Animales , Combinación de Medicamentos , Inyecciones Intramusculares/veterinaria , Masculino
18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-380670

RESUMEN

Bone maintenance based on various attachment mechanisms is the key to tooth-root replacement safety and efficacy. The dental implant has broad applicability based on design, but demonstrates progressive peri-implant bone loss. The allogeneic tooth transplant, significantly less applicable because of size, is antigenic and rejected by bone-replacement root resorption. Since the predictability and survival times of these implant and transplant modalities are similar and there is less residual bone loss with the transplant, it is suggested that for clinical situations such as the fresh extraction socket, where there is room, the allotransplant, rather than implant, is the root-replacement of choice.


Asunto(s)
Proceso Alveolar/anatomía & histología , Implantación Dental , Diente Artificial , Diente/trasplante , Proceso Alveolar/fisiología , Animales , Resorción Ósea/prevención & control , Implantación Dental Endoósea , Diseño de Dentadura , Humanos , Enfermedades Maxilomandibulares/prevención & control , Osteogénesis , Periodoncio/fisiología , Trasplante Autólogo , Trasplante Homólogo
20.
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA