A predictive score for the result of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and vancomycin-resistant enterococci screening.

BACKGROUND: The duration of extensively drug-resistant bacteria (XDR) carriage depends on several factors for which the information can be difficult to recover. AIM: To determine whether past screening and clinical results of patients can predict the results of subsequent screening. METHODS: In total, 256 patients were retrospectively included from 10 healthcare centres in France from January 2014 to January 2022. We created a predictive clearance score, ranging from -5 to +7, that included the number of XDR species and the type of resistance detected in the sample, as well as the time from the last positive sample, the number of previous consecutive negative samples, and obtaining at least one negative PCR result in the collection. This score could be used for the upcoming rectal screening of a patient carrying an XDR as soon as the last screening sample was negative. FINDINGS: The negative predictive value was >99% for score ≤0. The median time to achieve XDR clearance was significantly shorter for a score of 0 (443 days (259-705)) than that based on previously published criteria. CONCLUSION: This predictive score shows high performance for the assessment of XDR clearance. Relative to previous guidelines, it could help to lift specific infection prevention and control measures earlier. Nevertheless, the decision should be made according to other factors, such as antimicrobial use and adherence to hand hygiene.

Asymptomatic carriage of extensively drug-resistant bacteria (eXDR), a simple way to assess spontaneous clearance.

The duration of eXDR carriage depends on several factors that might be difficult to recover. We aim to assess the duration of eXDR carriage by using a simple to recover parameter: the number of consecutive negative screening. 131 eXDR carriers (51 VRE and 80 CPE) were included. The number of consecutive negative screenings was strongly associated with eXDR clearance. All patients displaying at least three negative screenings over a seven-month period were never screened positive thereafter. Taking into account the number of negative screenings as a part of a case-by-case risk assessment would be helpful for the decision to maintain or lift eXDR-focused precautions.

Impact of rapid diagnostic tests on the management of patients presenting with Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia.

OBJECTIVE: Pathogens are usually identified from blood cultures using a two-step procedure: Gram staining on the day of bacterial growth (D0), followed by identification and susceptibility testing the following day (D1). We aimed to evaluate the use of rapid tests performed on D0 in patients presenting with Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with≥1 positive monomicrobial blood culture with Gram staining suggestive of an Enterobacteriaceae were prospectively included. Two successive strategies were evaluated: i) conventional strategy (CS), ii) combination of a rapid identification test and third-generation cephalosporin susceptibility testing (rapid strategy, e.g. RS). RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were included (CS=42; RS=41). Compared with CS, the median delay of identification was significantly shorter with RS (22 hours [20-27] vs. 47 hours [42-53]; P<0.001). Patients in the RS group more frequently received an effective (82.9% vs. 73.8%, P=0.43) and appropriate (70.7% vs. 54.7%, P=0.17) antibiotic therapy on D1. Moreover, all five RS patients infected with a non-susceptible strain received an effective therapy on D1 versus only three of eight CS patients. CONCLUSIONS: Use of rapid testing was associated with a reduced time to result availability. This strategy should be useful to initiate an early effective and appropriate therapy and to improve the care of patients.