RESUMEN
Introduction: Hospital meals potentially influence patients' nutritional, physical, and emotional well-being during their admission. Patients on pureed diets report poorer meal satisfaction, due to taste, appearance, and recognisability, potentially impacting on their nutritional status. This study compared whether a moulded pureed diet made from modified maize starch led to improved taste, appearance, recognisability, and overall liking, compared to an unmoulded pureed diet made from potato starch in an acute hospital. Methods: Patients on texture-modified diets were recruited and presented with two pureed diets - unmoulded and moulded. Participants were asked to identify meat and vegetable dishes prior to eating. After the meal, participants indicated their diet preference in terms of appearance, taste, and overall liking. Results: 145 participants were recruited, of which 126 completed data collection. 86% correctly identified moulded meat dishes, 69% correctly identified moulded vegetable dishes, with an overall 77% accuracy in identifying moulded puree side dishes. On unmoulded puree side dishes, participants correctly identified 25% of meat dishes, 4% of vegetable dishes, with an overall accuracy of 14%. In terms of preference, the moulded puree was preferred, with 81% for appearance, 76% for taste and 75% for overall preference. When participants had differing preferences for appearance and taste (e.g., prefers unmoulded puree appearance and moulded puree taste), 95% of them subsequently aligned their overall preference with their taste preference (i.e., overall preferred moulded pureed diet). This suggests that taste has a stronger influence on overall preference compared to appearance. Discussion: Findings indicate that a moulded pureed diet made from modified maize starch led to improved recognisability, taste, appearance, and overall liking compared to an unmoulded pureed diet made from potato starch. Taste had a stronger influence on overall preference compared to appearance. These findings capture patient preferences and may have implications on how hospital pureed diets may be improved, potentially improving patient nutrition and health outcomes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Early parent-implemented intervention enhances parent-child interaction and improves language skills in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Parent coaching is often delivered as standard care for children with ASD, where parents are taught to apply strategies in their child's play activities and daily routines to achieve the prior stated goals. However, the ability to conduct parent coaching in physical in-clinic sessions is limited by resource constraints such as clinic space and therapist manpower. Furthermore, parents may experience difficulties with the generalisation of intervention strategies taught in the clinic to their natural home environments. In this study, telerehabilitation is evaluated as an alternative platform to deliver parent coaching for parent-implemented interventions to children with ASD in their homes. METHODS: This parallel-group, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of parent coaching delivered through video conferencing (telerehabilitation) versus in-clinic (standard care) delivery. Children aged 15 to 48 months (n = 200) who meet the cut-off score for ASD on the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2 are eligible. Parent-child dyads are randomly assigned to receive parent coaching either through weekly telerehabilitation or standard care. The primary outcome is the child's development as measured by the subscale and composite scores of a standardised developmental assessment. Primary analysis will determine if the lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval for the mean difference in pre-post change between groups exceeds -5 (the non-inferiority margin). Secondary outcomes are the child's adaptive behaviour, parent-child interaction, parental stress, and family quality of life. Outcomes will be measured pre-intervention, midterm, and post-intervention. Secondary analysis will determine if there is any between-group difference for the pre-post change in scores at the 5% significance level using two-sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U test. DISCUSSION: As a randomised controlled trial of a moderately large scale, this study will contribute to the limited existing literature on the effectiveness of parent coaching via telerehabilitation for early parent-implemented intervention for children with ASD. The results of this study will provide insights on whether telerehabilitation is comparable to conventional in-clinic parent coaching in enhancing parent-child interaction and improving language skills. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05792449. Registered (retrospectively) on 31 March 2023.
