Surgical treatment of patellar tendon rupture after total knee arthroplasty with a double-row repair method using the hamstring tendons: A novel technique with functional results.

BACKGROUND: Patellar tendon rupture (PTR) is extremely rare but serious complication after primary or revision total knee arthroplasty. Due to the serious failure rates of end-to-end repair techniques, various augmentation techniques have been described. In this study, the results of patients with PTR after reconstruction using our own technique with semitendinosus (ST) and gracilis tendons taken from the affected side were evaluated retrospectively. METHODS: A total of 14 patients, whose diagnosis was made based on physical examination and clinical findings, and supported radiologically (ultrasonography), were included in the study. In these patients, reconstruction was performed using double-row repair technique with the ST and gracilis tendons. Active-passive knee joint range of motion, active knee extension loss, and the Caton-Deschamps index at preoperative and final follow-up visits were compared. Tegner-Lysholm knee score and Kujala score were used to evaluate functional results. RESULTS: In 14 patients (8 women and 6 men) with a mean age of 68.1 years, the median time between injury and surgery was 6.6 weeks. In all patients, the rupture was in the distal part of the patellar tendon. While the median preoperative Caton-Deschamps index was 1.8, the postoperative median value was found to be 1.25 after an average follow-up of 3.8 years (P = .014). The median preoperative knee extension loss decreased from 25° to 5° postoperatively. Tegner-Lysholm knee score and Kujala score of the patients at their last follow-up were significantly increased (P < .01). CONCLUSION: For PTR developing after total knee arthroplasty, the double-row reconstruction technique with ST and gracilis tendons is effective.

Comparison of single and double incision leg fasciotomy in disaster settings-Experience from 2023 Türkiye earthquakes.

INTRODUCTION: Although there are studies comparing methods for leg fasciotomy in compartment syndrome after fractures, choice of single or double fasciotomies in disasters was not investigated. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of single and double incision leg fasciotomy in the setting of disaster. METHODS: Patients that have undergone fasciotomy after 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquakes were retrospectively analyzed. The cases were separated into two groups as single incision and double incision according to the method of the first fasciotomy. The number of debridements after each fasciotomy, muscle group excisions, completion time of treatment, presence of amputation, the method of closure (primary closure or graft/flap) and positive results of wound cultures were analyzed and compared between two groups. RESULTS: 62 legs of 52 patients (22 females, 30 males, age 36.9 ± 11.2 years) with compartment syndrome that have undergone fasciotomy after 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquakes were included in the study. Single-incision group included 27 legs and double incision group included 35 legs. Amputation was needed in 15 patients (%24.2), six in single incision group and nine in double incision group. (p = 0.75). Compartment excision (eight patients in single incision, nine patients in double incision groups, p = 0.81), number of debridements (median 4 in both groups, p = 0.55), wound closure time (median 17 days in single incision, 22 days in double incision groups, p = 0.52), graft or flap requirement (11 patients in single incision, 16 patients in double incision groups, p = 0.53), positive culture results (15 patients in single incision, 16 patients in double incision groups, p = 0.44) were not different statistically between two groups. CONCLUSION: Single and double incision fasciotomy methods are equally effective and safe in treatment of compartment syndrome of the leg in disaster situations. To our knowledge, this is the first study comparing outcomes of single and double incision fasciotomy in disaster settings.

Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Suture Versus Headless Screw Fixation for Tibial Eminence Fractures in Children.

BACKGROUND: Suture and screw fixations are widely used to treat tibial eminence fractures (TEFs). Although a few biomechanical and clinical studies have compared suture fixation (SF) and screw fixation in the treatment of TEFs in children, no comparative clinical studies are available regarding headless screw fixation (HSF). PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of children with TEF who underwent SF and HSF. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The study included 24 patients treated with either SF (11 patients) or HSF (13 patients) within 1 month of TEF (type 2 or 3) without associated ligamentous and bone injury between 2015 and 2020. All patients were evaluated at a minimum 2-year follow-up in terms of Lysholm score, Tegner activity level, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score, and isometric strength test. Knee stability was compared based on the Lachman test, pivot-shift test, and KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of Lysholm score, Tegner activity level, and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score at follow-up. All patients were able to resume their daily activities within 6 months after the injury. However, flexion deficits (6°-10°) were found in 2 patients in the SF group and 1 patient in the HSF group, and extension deficits (3°-5°) were found in 3 patients in the SF group and 1 patient in the HSF group, without significant intergroup difference. Stability based on the Lachman test, pivot-shift test, and KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference was also similar between the 2 groups at follow-up. No statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups in isometric tests performed. CONCLUSION: The present study is the first to compare the clinical and functional results of SF and HSF techniques. The HSF technique demonstrated comparable clinical and functional outcomes, suggesting its potential as an alternative to the SF technique.