Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 52(7): 848-858, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35615972

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is significant overdiagnosis of milk allergy in young children in some countries, leading to unnecessary use of specialized formula. This guidance, developed by experts without commercial ties to the formula industry, aims to reduce milk allergy overdiagnosis and support carers of children with suspected milk allergy. METHODS: Delphi study involving two rounds of anonymous consensus building and an open meeting between January and July 2021. Seventeen experts in general practice, nutrition, midwifery, health visiting, lactation support and relevant areas of paediatrics participated, located in Europe, North America, Middle East, Africa, Australia and Asia. Five authors of previous milk allergy guidelines and seven parents provided feedback. FINDINGS: Participants agreed on 38 essential recommendations through consensus. Recommendations highlighted the importance of reproducibility and specificity for diagnosing milk allergy in children with acute or delayed symptoms temporally related to milk protein ingestion; and distinguished between children directly consuming milk protein and exclusively breastfed infants. Consensus was reached that maternal dietary restriction is not usually necessary to manage milk allergy, and that for exclusively breastfed infants with chronic symptoms, milk allergy diagnosis should only be considered in specific, rare circumstances. Consensus was reached that milk allergy diagnosis does not need to be considered for stool changes, aversive feeding or occasional spots of blood in stool, if there is no temporal relationship with milk protein ingestion. When compared with previous guidelines, these consensus recommendations resulted in more restrictive criteria for detecting milk allergy and a more limited role for maternal dietary exclusions and specialized formula. INTERPRETATION: These new milk allergy recommendations from non-conflicted, multidisciplinary experts advise narrower criteria, more prominent support for breastfeeding and less use of specialized formula, compared with current guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a la Leche , Alérgenos , Niño , Preescolar , Técnica Delphi , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Fórmulas Infantiles , Hipersensibilidad a la Leche/diagnóstico , Proteínas de la Leche , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
2.
Matern Child Nutr ; 14(4): e12615, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29740973

RESUMEN

Unconditional cash transfers (UCTs) are used as a humanitarian intervention to prevent acute malnutrition, despite a lack of evidence about their effectiveness. In Niger, UCT and supplementary feeding are given during the June-September "lean season," although admissions of malnourished children to feeding programmes may rise from March/April. We hypothesised that earlier initiation of the UCT would reduce the prevalence of global acute malnutrition (GAM) in children 6-59 months old in beneficiary households and at population level. We conducted a 2-armed cluster-randomised controlled trial in which the poorest households received either the standard UCT (4 transfers between June and September) or a modified UCT (6 transfers from April); both providing 130,000 FCFA/£144 in total. Eligible individuals (pregnant and lactating women and children 6-<24 months old) in beneficiary households in both arms also received supplementary food between June and September. We collected data in March/April and October/November 2015. The modified UCT plus 4 months supplementary feeding did not reduce the prevalence of GAM compared with the standard UCT plus 4 months supplementary feeding (adjusted odds ratios 1.09 (95% CI [0.77, 1.55], p = 0.630) and 0.93 (95% CI [0.58, 1.49], p = 0.759) among beneficiaries and the population, respectively). More beneficiaries receiving the modified UCT plus supplementary feeding reported adequate food access in April and May (p < 0.001) but there was no difference in endline food security between arms. In both arms and samples, the baseline prevalence of GAM remained elevated at endline (p > 0.05), despite improved food security (p < 0.05), possibly driven by increased fever/malaria in children (p < 0.001). Nonfood related drivers of malnutrition, such as disease, may limit the effectiveness of UCTs plus supplementary feeding to prevent malnutrition in this context. Caution is required in applying the findings of this study to periods of severe food insecurity.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Nutrición del Niño , Abastecimiento de Alimentos/economía , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales del Lactante/economía , Sistemas de Socorro/economía , Lactancia Materna , Trastornos de la Nutrición del Niño/economía , Trastornos de la Nutrición del Niño/epidemiología , Trastornos de la Nutrición del Niño/prevención & control , Preescolar , Composición Familiar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Niger
3.
BMC Public Health ; 15: 1289, 2015 Dec 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26700866

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The global burden of acute malnutrition among children remains high, and prevalence rates are highest in humanitarian contexts such as Niger. Unconditional cash transfers are increasingly used to prevent acute malnutrition in emergencies but lack a strong evidence base. In Niger, non-governmental organisations give unconditional cash transfers to the poorest households from June to September; the 'hunger gap'. However, rising admissions to feeding programmes from March/April suggest the intervention may be late. METHODS/DESIGN: This cluster-randomised controlled trial will compare two types of unconditional cash transfer for 'very poor' households in 'vulnerable' villages defined and identified by the implementing organisation. 3,500 children (6-59 months) and 2,500 women (15-49 years) will be recruited exhaustively from households targeted for cash and from a random sample of non-recipient households in 40 villages in Tahoua district. Clusters of villages with a common cash distribution point will be assigned to either a control group which will receive the standard intervention (n = 10), or a modified intervention group (n = 10). The standard intervention is 32,500 FCFA/month for 4 months, June to September, given cash-in-hand to female representatives of 'very poor' households. The modified intervention is 21,500 FCFA/month for 5 months, April, May, July, August, September, and 22,500 FCFA in June, providing the same total amount. In both arms the recipient women attend an education session, women and children are screened and referred for acute malnutrition treatment, and the households receive nutrition supplements for children 6-23 months and pregnant and lactating women. The trial will evaluate whether the modified unconditional cash transfer leads to a reduction in acute malnutrition among children 6-59 months old compared to the standard intervention. The sample size provides power to detect a 5 percentage point difference in prevalence of acute malnutrition between trial arms. Quantitative and qualitative process evaluation data will be prospectively collected and programme costs will be collected and cost-effectiveness ratios calculated. DISCUSSION: This randomised study design with a concurrent process evaluation will provide evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of earlier initiation of seasonal unconditional cash transfer for the prevention of acute malnutrition, which will be generalisable to similar humanitarian situations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN25360839, registered March 19, 2015.


Asunto(s)
Protección a la Infancia/economía , Programas de Gobierno/economía , Desnutrición/economía , Desnutrición/prevención & control , Adulto , Niño , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales Infantiles , Protección a la Infancia/estadística & datos numéricos , Preescolar , Suplementos Dietéticos/economía , Urgencias Médicas , Composición Familiar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Persona de Mediana Edad , Niger/epidemiología , Pobreza/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Prevalencia , Adulto Joven
4.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci ; 59(7): 659-73, 2004 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15304530

RESUMEN

The importance of attaining adequate macronutrient and micronutrient intake throughout the life course is essential for the maintenance of health. Claims have been made for the benefits of micronutrient supplementation in later life, and this review considers the strength of the evidence behind these claims focusing on studies with cardiovascular, cancer, eye health, immune, and cognitive end points. While observational data suggest the presence of a link between dietary micronutrient intake and health outcomes, evidence from large randomized controlled trials does not support the use of antioxidant vitamin or mineral supplements among well-nourished older populations. Moreover, there is evidence of possible adverse affects of micronutrient supplementation. In conclusion, the considerable enthusiasm for the use of micronutrient, especially antioxidant, supplements as anti-aging treatments or as treatments for specific diseases of later life is not supported by the currently available scientific literature.


Asunto(s)
Suplementos Dietéticos , Geriatría , Micronutrientes/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Cognición/efectos de los fármacos , Oftalmopatías/prevención & control , Humanos , Inmunidad/efectos de los fármacos , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...