Disease burden and costs for patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis and chronic moderate-to-severe refractory pain on treatment with strong opioids in Spain.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the disease burden and costs in patients with hip or knee OA and chronic moderate-to-severe refractory pain, receiving strong opioids in Spain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a 36-month longitudinal secondary analysis of the real-word OPIOIDS study. Patients aged ≥18 years with hip or knee OA and chronic moderate-to-severe refractory pain receiving strong opioids were considered. The disease burden included analgesia assessments (NRS scale), cognitive functioning (MMSE scale), basic activities of daily living (Barthel index), and comorbidities (severity and frequency). Costs due to the use of healthcare resources and productivity loss were estimated. RESULTS: 2832 patients were analyzed; age was 72.0 years (SD=14.3), 76.8% were women. Patients had mainly been treated with fentanyl (n=979; 37.6%), tapentadol (n=625; 24.0%), oxycodone (n=572; 22.0%), and buprenorphine (n=425; 16.3%). Pain intensity decreased by 1 point (13.7%), with a 2.6-point decline in the cognitive scale (14.3%, with a 5.3%-increase in patients with cognitive deficit) over a mean treatment period of 384.6 days (SD: 378.8). Barthel scores decreased significantly yielding to a slightly increase in proportion of patients with severe-to-total dependency; 1.2%-2.9%. In the first year of treatment, average healthcare costs were €2013/patient, whereas the average productivity loss cost was €12,227/working-active patient. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Strong opioids resulted in high healthcare costs with a limited reduction in pain, an increase in cognitive deficit, and a slight increase of patients with severe to total dependency over 36 months of treatment.

Disease burden and costs for patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis and chronic moderate-to-severe refractory pain on treatment with strong opioids in Spain / Carga de la enfermedad y costes en pacientes con osteoartritis de cadera y rodilla con dolor crónico refractario moderado-severo tratados con opioides mayores en España

Introduction and objectives: To determine the disease burden and costs in patients with hip or knee OA and chronic moderate-to-severe refractory pain, receiving strong opioids in Spain. Materials and methods: This was a 36-month longitudinal secondary analysis of the real-word OPIOIDS study. Patients aged ≥18 years with hip or knee OA and chronic moderate-to-severe refractory pain receiving strong opioids were considered. The disease burden included analgesia assessments (NRS scale), cognitive functioning (MMSE scale), basic activities of daily living (Barthel index), and comorbidities (severity and frequency). Costs due to the use of healthcare resources and productivity loss were estimated. Results: 2832 patients were analyzed; age was 72.0 years (SD=14.3), 76.8% were women. Patients had mainly been treated with fentanyl (n=979; 37.6%), tapentadol (n=625; 24.0%), oxycodone (n=572; 22.0%), and buprenorphine (n=425; 16.3%). Pain intensity decreased by 1 point (13.7%), with a 2.6-point decline in the cognitive scale (14.3%, with a 5.3%-increase in patients with cognitive deficit) over a mean treatment period of 384.6 days (SD: 378.8). Barthel scores decreased significantly yielding to a slightly increase in proportion of patients with severe-to-total dependency; 1.2%–2.9%. In the first year of treatment, average healthcare costs were €2013/patient, whereas the average productivity loss cost was €12,227/working-active patient. Discussion and conclusions: Strong opioids resulted in high healthcare costs with a limited reduction in pain, an increase in cognitive deficit, and a slight increase of patients with severe to total dependency over 36 months of treatment.(AU)

Introducción y objetivos: Determinar la carga de la enfermedad y los costes en pacientes con osteoartritis de cadera y rodilla y dolor crónico refractario moderado-severo, en tratamiento con opioides mayores en España. Materiales y métodos: Se trata de un subanálisis de 36 meses de duración, procedente del estudio observacional OPIOIDS. Participaron pacientes con una edad ≥18 años, diagnosticados con osteoartritis de cadera y rodilla y dolor crónico refractario moderado-severo, en tratamiento con opioides mayores. La carga de la enfermedad incluyó la evaluación de la analgesia (escala NRS), del funcionamiento cognitivo (escala MMSE), de la capacidad para realizar las actividades de la vida diaria (índice de Barthel) y de las comorbilidades (gravedad y frecuencia). También se estimaron los costes asociados al uso de recursos sanitarios y a la productividad laboral. Resultados: Se analizaron 2.832 pacientes (edad: 72,0 años [DE: 14,3]; mujeres: 76,8%), que habían sido principalmente tratados con fentanilo (n=979; 37,6%), tapentadol (n=625; 24,0%), oxicodona (n=572; 22,0%) y buprenorfina (n=425; 16,3%). La intensidad del dolor disminuyó una unidad (13,7%), con una reducción de 2,6 unidades en la escala cognitiva (14,3% y aumento del 5,3% en los pacientes con déficit cognitivo) durante una media de 384,6 días (DE: 378,8). Las puntuaciones en la escala de Barthel disminuyeron significativamente, con un ligero aumento en la proporción de pacientes con dependencia grave/total, entre 1,2% y 2,9%. En el primer año, los costes sanitarios medios fueron 2.013€/paciente, mientras que los costes medios de pérdida de productividad fueron 12.227€/trabajador. Discusión y conclusiones: El tratamiento con opioides mayores durante 36 meses implicó elevados costes sanitarios, con una eficacia analgésica limitada, un aumento del déficit cognitivo y un ligero aumento de los pacientes con dependencia grave/total.(AU)

Epidemiology and resource use in Spanish type 2 diabetes patients without previous cardiorenal disease: CaReMe Spain study summary.

AIMS: To determine the first manifestation of cardiovascular or kidney disease (CVKD) and associated resource use in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients during seven years of follow-up. METHODS: Observational-retrospective secondary data study using medical records of patients aged ≥18 years with T2DM and without prior CVKD between 2013 and 2019. The index date was 01/01/2013 (fixed date). The manifestation of CVKD was defined by the first diagnosis of heart-failure (HF), chronic-kidney disease (CKD), myocardial-infarction (MI), stroke or peripheral-artery disease (PAD). The main variables were baseline characteristics, manifestation of CVKD, mortality, resource use and costs. Descriptive analyses and Cox model were applied to the data. RESULTS: 26,542 patients were selected (mean age: 66.6 years, women: 47.8%, mean duration of T2DM: 17.1 years). 18.7% (N=4974) developed a first CVKD manifestation during the seven years [distribution: HF (22.4%), CKD (36.6%), MI (14.5%), stroke (15.3%) and PAD (11.3%)]. Overall mortality was 8.3% (N=2214). The mortality risk of the group that developed HF or CKD as the first manifestation compared to the CVKD-free cohort was higher [HR: 2.5 (95% CI: 1.8-3.4) and 1.8 (95% CI: 1.4-2.3)], respectively. The cumulative costs per patient of HF (€50,942.80) and CKD (€48,979.20) were higher than MI (€47,343.20) and stroke (€47,070.30) and similar to PAD (€51,240.00) vs. €13,098.90 in patients who did not develop CVKD, p<0.001. CONCLUSIONS: In T2DM patients, HF and CKD were the first most common manifestations and had higher mortality and re-hospitalisation rates. HF and CKD were associated with the highest resource use and costs for the Spanish National-Health-System.

Clinical and Economic Impact of Long-Term Inhaled Corticosteroid Withdrawal in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treated with Triple Therapy in Spain.

Purpose: To determine the clinical and economic impact of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) withdrawal in Spanish patients with COPD receiving triple therapy (TT) with ICS, long-acting ß2-agonist (LABA), and long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA). Patients and Methods: This was an observational, retrospective study of BIG-PAC database medical records. Patients aged ≥40 years receiving TT from 2016 to 2018 were followed for 1 year. Two cohorts were identified: patients continuing TT (ICS+LABA+LAMA), and patients receiving TT with ICS withdrawn (LABA+LAMA). Variables included medication, exacerbations (moderate and severe), pneumonia, mortality, health resource use (HRU), and cost per patient/year. Cohorts were compared using propensity score matching (PSM). Multivariate statistical analysis using analysis of covariance and Cox proportional risks was conducted. Results: Of 6541 patients included, 5740 (87.8%) continued TT and 801 (12.2%) had ICS withdrawn. Patients with ICS withdrawal were younger, had lower disease burden, higher ICS doses, and more exacerbations compared with those continuing ICS. PSM matched 795 patients in each cohort. Mean age was 68.5 years (SD: 11.2), 69.9% were male, and mean Charlson index was 2.0. Patients with ICS withdrawal had more total exacerbations in the 12 months following withdrawal compared with patients continuing TT (36.6% vs 31.4%; p=0.030). No significant differences were found for pneumonia (3.3% vs 3.6%; p=0.583) and mortality (9.9% vs 7.5%; p=0.092). Median time to first exacerbation was shorter in patients with ICS withdrawal compared with those continuing ICS (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.57-0.83; p<0.001). Mean health cost per patient/year among patients with ICS withdrawal was higher than those continuing TT (€2993 vs €2130; p<0.001). Conclusion: ICS withdrawal in patients with COPD receiving TT was associated with increased exacerbations, HRU, and costs compared with continuing TT, with health and economic impacts on patients and the Spanish National Healthcare System, respectively. Pneumonia and mortality rates were similar between groups.

Treatment patterns and use of healthcare resources of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and hypercholesterolemia and patients with familial hypercholesterolemia in Spain: Protocol of the Reality study.

Background: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) and dyslipidemia are associated to a higher risk of cardiovascular events, mortality, use of healthcare resources and costs. In Spain, the evidence about the administration of lipid-lowering treatments in clinical practice, and their clinical effectiveness in patients with ASCVD and hypercholesterolemia and patients with FH is scarce. Therefore, a multidisciplinary working group of cardiologists, family physicians, internal medicine specialists and neurologists was gathered for the Reality study. The aim of this study is to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and concomitant medication of patients with ASCVD and hypercholesterolemia and of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). The use of healthcare resources and costs associated to the management of these diseases after their diagnosis were also considered. Methods: This is an observational and retrospective study, based on the BIG-PAC® database, which includes the electronic medical registries (EMRs) of 1.8 million people from 7 Autonomous Communities in Spain (including public primary care centers and hospitals). The study includes patients who had a new or recurrent episode of ASCVD during the recruitment period (from 01/01/2017 to 31/12/2018). The index date will be defined as the date of the ASCVD event, and the follow-up period will be 24 months. According to their first diagnosis in the database, patients will be classified as ASCVD (5 groups: stable/unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and peripheral arterial disease) or FH. Discussion: This study aims to analyze the treatment patterns and use of healthcare resources of ASCVD and FH in Spain. The prevalence of these disorders will also be estimated. Due to the high morbidity and mortality associated with these diseases, it is expected that our study will provide useful information for healthcare systems and decision makers to improve the management of these disabling diseases.

Persistence, use of resources and costs in patients under migraine preventive treatment: the PERSEC study.

BACKGROUND: Migraine represents a serious burden for national health systems. However, preventive treatment is not optimally applied to reduce the severity and frequency of headache attacks and the related expenses. Our aim was to assess the persistence to traditional migraine prophylaxis available in Spain and its relationship with the healthcare resource use (HRU) and costs. METHODS: Retrospective observational study with retrospective cohort design of individuals with migraine treated with oral preventive medication for the first time from 01/01/2016 to 30/06/2018. One-year follow-up information was retrieved from the Big-Pac™ database. According to their one-year persistence to oral prophylaxis, two study groups were created and describe regarding HRU and healthcare direct and indirect costs using 95% confidence intervals (CI). The analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed as a sensitivity analysis. Patients were considered persistent if they continued on preventive treatment until the end of the study or switched medications within 60 days or less since the last prescription. Non-persistent were those who permanently discontinued or re-initiated a treatment after 60 days. RESULTS: Seven thousand eight hundred sixty-six patients started preventive treatment (mean age (SD) 48.2 (14.8) and 80.4% women), of whom 2,545 (32.4%) were persistent for 6 months and 2,390 (30.4%) for 12 months. Most used first-line preventive treatments were antidepressants (3,642; 46.3%) followed by antiepileptics (1,738; 22.1%) and beta-blockers (1,399; 17.8%). The acute treatments prescribed concomitantly with preventives were NSAIDs (4,530; 57.6%), followed by triptans (2,217; 28.2%). First-time preventive treatment prescribers were mostly primary care physicians (6,044; 76.8%) followed by neurologists (1,221; 15.5%). Non-persistent patients required a higher number of primary care visits (mean difference (95%CI): 3.0 (2.6;3.4)) and days of sick leave (2.7 (0.8;4.5)) than the persistent ones. The mean annual expenditure was €622 (415; 829) higher in patients who not persisted on migraine prophylactic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we observed a high discontinuation rate for migraine prophylaxis which is related to an increase in HRU and costs for non-persistent patients. These results suggest that the treatment adherence implies not only a clinical benefit but also a reduction in HRU and costs.

Achieving Lower LDL-C Levels After a Recent Myocardial Infarction Might Be Associated with Lower Healthcare Resource Use and Costs in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: There is little evidence on the relationship between achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and costs in patients on lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). We described healthcare resource use and costs (direct and indirect) by achieved LDL-C in patients receiving LLT after a recent myocardial infarction (MI) in Spain. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of anonymized electronic medical records from seven regions in Spain (BIG-PAC® database; n = 1.9 million). Eligible patients were adults (≥ 18 years) hospitalized for an MI between January 2015 and December 2017, treated with a statin and/or ezetimibe, and having recorded LDL-C values at baseline and during follow-up. Healthcare resource use and direct and indirect costs (in 2018, €) were described by achieved LDL-C levels during a follow-up of 18 months. RESULTS: Of 6025 patients (mean age, 69.7 years; 77% male), only 11% achieved LDL-C goals as defined in the 2016 ESC/EAS guidelines (< 70 mg/dL), and just 1% reached the lower target (< 55 mg/dL) in the current 2019 guidelines. Achieving lower LDL-C levels translated to lower healthcare resource use and costs. Mean total (direct and indirect) costs ranged from €5044 for patients with LDL-C < 55 mg/dL to €7567 for patients with LDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dL. CONCLUSION: Very few patients achieved recommended LDL-C goals despite using LLT. Achieving lower LDL-C levels after an MI might be associated with lower healthcare resource use and costs. Use of more intensive LLT, leading to greater reductions in LDL-C, could therefore be beneficial both from a clinical and an economic perspective.

Sick Leave and Costs in Active Workers with Chronic Osteoarthritis Pain in Spain: Outcomes of the OPIOIDS Real World Study.

Purpose: To estimate the number of sick leave days and productivity costs in active workers with osteoarthritis (OA) who initiated opioid treatment for moderate/severe chronic pain in clinical practice in Spain. Patients and Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the longitudinal, retrospective OPIOIDS study, using electronic medical records (EMR) of patients aged ≥18 years, who started an opioid treatment for moderate/severe chronic OA pain between 2010 and 2015 after treatment failure with ≥1 first-line drugs (acetaminophen, metamizole and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs]). The number of days of sick leave and productivity costs were analyzed during a follow-up period of 36 months. Results: A total of 5089 patients with moderate/severe chronic OA pain, aged 56.8 years (standard deviation [SD]: 4.6) (56.6% were female), were analyzed: 73.3% of them started a treatment with weak opioids and 26.7% of them were treated with strong opioids. At 36 months, adherence was 21.0% (strong opioids: 15.4%; weak opioids: 23.0%; p<0.001), and 77% of patients had at least one sick leave related with chronic OA pain, with an average of 93 days off work in all working patients (120.5 days in patients with sick leaves). Besides, 16.9% of the study population had sick leave periods that lasted at least 6 months. Pain reduction was modest (-1.2 points; -4.0%, p<0.001). The cost of sick leave was €2594 patient/year, and factors such as older age (ß=0.043), female sex (ß=0.036), comorbidities (ß=0.035) and strong opioid use (ß=0.031) were associated with higher productivity costs (p<0.05 in all associations). Conclusion: Active workers who started opioid treatment for moderate/severe chronic OA pain showed an increased frequency of sick leave and productivity cost, with a modest effect on pain relief. Older age, female sex, comorbidities, and strong opioids were associated with higher costs for society.

Epidemiología y tratamiento de la insuficiencia cardiaca en España: estudio PATHWAYS-HF / Epidemiology and treatment of heart failure in Spain: the HF-PATHWAYS study

Introducción y objetivos: Describir la epidemiología y el tratamiento administrado recientemente a una amplia cohorte de pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca (IC).Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo de base poblacional, realizado utilizando la base de datos BIG-PAC, que incluye a personas de edad ≥ 18 años que solicitaron atención por IC en 2017-2019. Las principales variables fueron: prevalencia/incidencia-anual, comorbilidades, variables clínicas y medicación administrada.Resultados: Se identificó a 19.762 pacientes con IC de un total de 1.189.003 sujetos que requirieron atención médica en 2017-2019 (en 2019, media de edad, 78,3 años; el 53,0% varones). De ellos, la distribución por tipo de fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo (FEVI) fue: el 51,7% con FEVI reducida, el 40,2% con FEVI conservada y el 8,1% con FEVI en rango medio. En el año 2019, la prevalencia fue del 1,89% (IC95%, 1,70-2,08), con una tasa de incidencia de 2,78 casos nuevos por cada 1.000 sujetos/año. No se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en prevalencia y/o incidencia durante el periodo 2017-2019. De los pacientes con IC-FEr, solo un 64% tomaba bloqueadores beta; el 80,5%, inhibidores de la enzima de conversión de la angiotensina/antagonistas del receptor de la angiotensina II o sacubitrilo-valsartán, y un 29,8%, un antialdosterónico. Además, desde el diagnóstico (basal) hasta los 24 meses de seguimiento, se muestra una discreta optimización del tratamiento, más destacada entre los primeros 3-6 meses.Conclusiones: Los datos epidemiológicos se mantienen estables, con una prevalencia inferior a la reportada en estudios de base no poblacional. Existe un amplio margen de mejora en la optimización del tratamiento médico de la IC-FEr (AU)

Introduction and objectives: To describe the epidemiology and treatment of a large contemporary cohort of patients with heart failure (HF).Methods: Observational, retrospective, population-based study using the BIG-PAC database, which includes people aged ≥ 18 years seeking care for HF between 2017 and 2019. The main variables were the prevalence/annual incidence rate, comorbidities, clinical variables, and medication administered.Results: We identified 19 762 patients with HF from a total of 1 189 003 persons seeking medical attention from 2017 to 2019 (2019: mean age, 78.3 years; 53.0% men). Distribution by type of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was as follows: 51.7% reduced, 40.2% preserved, and 8.1% mid-range. In 2019, the prevalence was 1.89% (95%CI, 1.70-2.08), with an incidence rate of 2.78 new cases per 1000 persons/y. No statistically significant differences were observed in prevalence and/or incidence from 2017 to 2019. Among patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 64% received beta-blockers, 80.5% angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers or sacubitril-valsartan, and 29.8% an aldosterone antagonist. In addition, from the diagnosis (baseline) to 24 months of follow-up, there was discreet treatment optimization, which was notable in the first 3 to 6 months.Conclusions: Epidemiological data on HF remained stable during the study period, with a lower prevalence than that reported in non–population-based studies. There is wide room for improvement in the optimization of medical treatment of HFrEF (AU)

Epidemiology and treatment of heart failure in Spain: the HF-PATHWAYS study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To describe the epidemiology and treatment of a large contemporary cohort of patients with heart failure (HF). METHODS: Observational, retrospective, population-based study using the BIG-PAC database, which includes people aged ≥ 18 years seeking care for HF between 2017 and 2019. The main variables were the prevalence/annual incidence rate, comorbidities, clinical variables, and medication administered. RESULTS: We identified 19 762 patients with HF from a total of 1 189 003 persons seeking medical attention from 2017 to 2019 (2019: mean age, 78.3 years; 53.0% men). Distribution by type of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was as follows: 51.7% reduced, 40.2% preserved, and 8.1% mid-range. In 2019, the prevalence was 1.89% (95%CI, 1.70-2.08), with an incidence rate of 2.78 new cases per 1000 persons/y. No statistically significant differences were observed in prevalence and/or incidence from 2017 to 2019. Among patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 64% received beta-blockers, 80.5% angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers or sacubitril-valsartan, and 29.8% an aldosterone antagonist. In addition, from the diagnosis (baseline) to 24 months of follow-up, there was discreet treatment optimization, which was notable in the first 3 to 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Epidemiological data on HF remained stable during the study period, with a lower prevalence than that reported in non-population-based studies. There is wide room for improvement in the optimization of medical treatment of HFrEF.

All-cause community acquired pneumonia cost by age and risk in real-world conditions of care in Spain.

BACKGROUND: Economic burden of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is recognized. Few studies have documented such burden in adults stratified by age, risk status, and by care setting. Spanish data available is scarce. METHOD: A retrospective, multicenter study in seven regions of Spain (2017-2019) was conducted. Patients ≥18 years with a primary all-cause CAP episode diagnosis were identified. Episode-level variables included risk-stratum based on presence of an immunocompromising/chronic condition, age, number and length of hospitalized and outpatient episodes, and CAP-related healthcare costs/sick leaves were included. RESULTS: 7,108 episodes [mean age (SD): 59.2 (19.6), 50.42% male, 31.0% hospitalized] were analyzed. Low-risk group accounted for 47.7% of all CAP episodes, 31.5% moderate-risk and 20.8% high-risk. Pneumococcus was identified in 42.2% of cases. Mean CAP episode length was 22.9 days for hospitalized and 13.7 days for outpatient episode. Total healthcare cost for episode was higher in inpatient vs. outpatient: €3,955 vs. €511, p < 0.001, with higher sick leave cost (€3,281 vs. €2,632, p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: CAP required hospitalization cost is high regardless of age or comorbidities for the Spanish NHS. Given that almost half of the patients in this study did not have traditional risk factors for CAP, better preventative strategies should seriously be considered.

Economic impact of treatment-resistant depression: A retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: To determine the incidence of Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD) in Spain and to estimate its economic burden, using real world data. METHODS: A retrospective, observational-study was carried out using data from the BIG-PAC database®. Patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of major depressive-disorder (MDD) who initiated a new antidepressant treatment in 2015-2017 were included. The patients were classified as TRD and non-TRD. Patients were classified as TRD if they had, during the first year of antidepressant treatment: a) failure with ≥2 antidepressants including the prescription of ≥3 antidepressants (N06A) or ≥2 antidepressant and ≥1 antipsychotic (N05A; including lithium) b) antidepressants administered for ≥ 4 weeks each, and c) the time between the end of one treatment and the initiation of the next was ≤ 90 days. Inherent limitations of data collection from databases should also be considered in this analysis (e.g., lack of information about adherence to treatment). Follow-up period: 18 months. The incidence rate was calculated as the number of TRD patients per 1,000 persons-year divided by the population attended. OUTCOMES: direct healthcare and indirect costs. Two sensitivity analyses were performed varying the index date and the period used to define TRD patients (6 vs.12 months). RESULTS: 21,630 patients with MDD aged ≥ 18 years (mean age: 53.2 years; female: 67.2%) were analyzed, of whom 3,559 met TRD criteria, yielding a 3-year cumulative incidence of 16.5% (95%CI: 16%-17%) among MDD patients. The annual population incidence rate of TRD in 2015-2017, was 0.59, 1.02 and 1.18/1,000 person-years, respectively (mean: 0.93/1,000 person-year). Overall, mean total costs per MDD patient were €4,147.9, being higher for TRD than for non-TRD patients (€6,096 vs. €3,846; p<0.001): a) direct costs (€1,341 vs. €624; p<0.001), b) lost productivity (€1,274 vs. €821; p<0.001) and c) permanent disability (€3,481 vs. €2,401; p<0.001, adjusted). Sensitivity analyses showed no differences with the reported results. CONCLUSIONS: The population based TRD incidence in Spain was similar to recent data from other European countries. TRD is associated with greater resource use and higher costs compared with non-TRD patients.

Epidemiology and costs of depressive disorder in Spain: the EPICO study.

Depressive Disorders are the most common psychiatric diagnoses in the general population. To estimate the frequency, costs associated with Depressive Disorders in usual clinical practice, and in the whole Spanish population, a longitudinal, retrospective, observational study was carried out using data from the BIG-PAC database®. Study population: all patients aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of a Depressive Disorder in 2015-2017. Prevalence was computed as the proportion of Depressive Disorder cases in the adult general population, and the incidence rate, as the number of new Depressive Disorder cases diagnosed per 1,000 person-years in the population using health services, during 2015-2017. We collected demographic variables, comorbidity, direct health costs, and indirect costs (temporary and permanent disability). Health costs related to Depressive Disorders were estimated according to the annual resource use rate (resource/patient/year). Indirect costs were calculated according to the human capital method. Using the study data and information from the Spanish National Institute of Statistics, we estimated the cost of Depressive Disorders corresponding to the Spanish adult population, including premature mortality. 69,217 Depressive Disorder patients aged ≥ 18 years who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were studied (mean age: 56.8 years; female: 71.4%). Prevalence of Depressive Disorders in the general population was 4.73% (95% CI: 4.70-4.76%). Annual incidence rates (2015-2017) were 7.12, 7.35 and 8.02 per 1,000 person-years, respectively. Total costs observed in our Depressive Disorder patients were € 223.9 million (corresponding to a mean of € 3,235.3; mean/patient/year), of which, 18.4% were direct health care costs and 81.6%, non-health indirect costs (18% temporary occupational disability, 63.6% permanent disability). Considering also the cost of premature death, the mean cost per patient/year was € 3,402 and the estimated societal costs of Depressive Disorders in Spain were € 6,145 million. The prevalence and incidence of Depressive Disorders are consistent with other series reviewed. Resource use and total costs (especially non-health costs) were high.

Disease Burden and Costs in Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Osteoarthritis Pain Refractory to Standard of Care: Ancillary Analysis of the OPIOIDS Real-World Study.

INTRODUCTION: To determine the disease burden and costs in moderate-to-severe chronic osteoarthritis (OA) pain refractory to standard-of-care treatment in the Spanish National Health System (NHS). METHODS: Ancillary analysis of the OPIOIDS real-world, non-interventional, retrospective, 4-year longitudinal study including patients aged at least 18 years with moderate-to-severe chronic OA pain refractory to standard-of-care with sequential NSAIDs plus opioids. Burden assessment included measurement of analgesia, cognitive functioning, basic activities of daily living, severity and frequency of comorbidities, and all-cause mortality. Costs accounted for healthcare resource utilization and related costs (year 2018). RESULTS: Records of 13,317 patients were analyzed; 68.9 (14.7) years old, 71.3% (70.5-72.1%) women, 58.1% refractory to NSAID plus weak opioid and 41.9% to NSAID plus strong opioid, accounting for 10.7% (10.5-10.8%) of patients with chronic OA pain. Mean number of comorbidities was 2.9 (1.8) and its severity was 1.8 (1.7). Pain decreased by 0.9 points (12.2%) and cognitive declined by 2.3 points (9.1%, with 4.3% more patients with cognitive deficit) and dependency worsened by 0.4 points (0.5%, with 2.3% more patients with severe-to-total dependence) over a mean treatment period of 188.6 (185.4-191.8) days on NSAIDs followed by 400.6 (393.7-407.5) days on opioids. The adjusted mortality rate was higher in patients with OA taking NSAID plus strong opioids; hazard ratio 1.44 (1.26-1.65; p < 0.001). The 4-year healthcare cost was €7350/patient (€7193-7507 or €1838/year) and was higher in those taking strong versus weak opioids; €9886 (€9608-10,164, €2472/year) vs. €5519 (€5349-5689, €1380/year), p < 0.001. Analgesia cost (16.0% of total cost, 70.2% opioids) was higher with strong versus weak opioids, 19.6% vs. 11.3%, p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: In routine clinical practice in Spain, patients with moderate-to-severe chronic OA pain refractory to standard analgesic treatment with NSAIDs plus opioids reported modest reductions in pain, while presenting a considerable burden of comorbidities, cognitive impairment, and dependency. Healthcare costs significantly increased for the NHS particularly with NSAIDs plus strong opioids.