Safety and efficacy of dual lumen balloon catheters for the Treatment of cerebral vascular malformations: A systematic review, pooled analysis, and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is little evidence in scientific literature assessing the safety and efficacy of dual-lumen balloon catheters (DLBCs) and their performance compared to single-lumen catheters (SLCs). METHODS: In this PROSPERO-registered, PRISMA-compliant systematic review, we identified all MEDLINE and EMBASE single-arm (DLBCs) and double-arm (DLBCs vs SLCs) cohorts where DLBCs were used for the treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) or dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs). Immediate angiographic outcome, vascular complications, technical failures, reflux episodes and entrapment were the primary outcomes. A meta-analysis of the double-arm studies summarized the primary outcomes of total procedural time and immediate angiographic outcome. RESULTS: The authors identified 18 studies encompassing 209 treated lesions with reported outcomes. Complete occlusion was achieved in 108/132 treated dAVFs (81.8%, 95% CI: [74-87.8%]) and in 45/77 treated AVMs (58.4%, [46.7-69.4%]). The proportion of completely occluded dAVFs was statistically significantly higher than that of AVMs, p < .001. There were eight reported vascular complications (3.8%, [1.8-7.7%]), five technical failures (2.4%, [0.9-5.8%]), 14 reflux events (6.7%, [3.9-11.2%]), two entrapment events (1%, [0.2-3.8%]) and 0 deaths (mortality rate 0%, [0-2.3%]). In a meta-analysis for the treatment of dAVFs, the total procedural time was significantly less for DLBCs compared to SLCs (64.9 vs 125.7 min, p < .0001). The odds of complete immediate occlusion were significantly higher with DLBCs compared to SLCs (odds ratio (OR) 4.6, [1.5-14.3], p = .008). CONCLUSION: Dual-lumen balloon catheters are safe and effective for the embolization of cerebral AVMs and dAVFs and can achieve faster and potentially superior results compared to SLCs. REGISTRATION-URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ Unique Identifier: CRD42021269096.

Laterality of previous stoke affects endovascular thrombectomy outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Investigations into the effect of previous stroke on thrombectomy outcomes have yielded conflicting results, and are limited by small sample sizes. We present the results of a large single center retrospective study aimed at investigating the effect of chronic stroke laterality on thrombectomy outcomes. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was queried for all thrombectomy cases conducted between December 2014 and January 2020, and patient imaging was prospectively reviewed for evidence of prior supratentorial infarction. Procedural, clinical, and demographic characteristics were recorded, and good clinical outcome was defined as a 90 day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of <2 or mRS score unchanged if baseline was >2. RESULTS: The final analysis cohort included 555 patients, 79 of whom were found to have radiographic evidence of prior chronic infarcts. On univariate analysis, patients with any chronic supratentorial infarct achieved a lower rate of good clinical outcome than patients with no chronic infarct (22.8% vs 41.0%, p=0.0021). With regard to subgroups, this difference remained only in patients with ipsilateral (14.3%, p=0.0018) and bilateral (11.8%, p=0.015) lesions. Patients with chronic contralateral supratentorial infarcts were no less likely to achieve good outcomes (40.7%, p=0.98). After multivariate regression controlling for age, sex, and baseline mRS, chronic ipsilateral infarcts (OR 0.22, CI 0.07 to 0.67) and chronic bilateral infarcts (OR 0.19, CI 0.04 to 0.85) were the only independent predictors of poor outcome in endovascular thrombectomy patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this single center retrospective study of thrombectomy patients with chronic supratentorial infarcts, the laterality of the previous stroke significantly affected the likelihood of good clinical outcomes.

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) Lobar Pneumonia Following Bronchoscopic Lung-Volume Reduction (BLVR): A Case Report and Review of Literature.

With the advent of bronchoscopic lung-volume reduction (BLVR), this minimally invasive technique represents a new and effective way of managing the debilitating symptoms associated with severe centrilobular emphysema. Despite its vast potential in the management of this disease, there are still several potential risk factors associated with the procedure that may predispose the patient to increased morbidity. Our patient received four endobronchial valves in the right-upper lobe (RUL) and right-middle lobe (RML). Although her immediate post-procedure course was uncomplicated, she returned shortly after discharge with a right-sided pneumothorax and right-lower lobar pneumonia with sputum culture growing methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). She was managed with tube thoracostomy and two weeks of cefazolin with clinical improvement. Despite the abundance of literature detailing the risk of pneumonia following BLVR, very little data exists discussing common causative organisms, choice of treatment, duration of treatment, and potential risk factors that may predispose these patients to infection.

Trends in Matriculation from Neurological Surgery Training Programs into Academic Versus Private Practice.

OBJECTIVE: A career in academic neurosurgery is an arduous endeavor. Specific factors influencing physician practice preferences remain unclear. This study analyzes data from the American Association of Neurological Surgeons membership identifying the impact of several demographic and educational characteristics influencing neurosurgical career choices centered on academia, private practice, or a combination in the United States. METHODS: A list of all current neurosurgeons was obtained from the American Association of Neurological Surgeons membership, and information on physician characteristics was collected via internet searches and institutional databases. The practice type of all neurosurgeons considered in this study were categorized as follows: private practice, academic, or a combination of private practice and academic, termed privademic. These data were subsequently correlated to race, gender, current age, training at a top 40 National Institutes of Health-funded medical school or residency program, and current practice. RESULTS: The median age of private practice and academic neurosurgeons was 58.18 and 53.61 years, respectively (P < 0.001). Age was significantly associated with practicing in an academic setting (odds ratio 0.96), with younger neurosurgeons pursuing careers in academia. Data indicated a positive and statistically significant contribution of female gender (P < 0.001) and training at a top-40 National Institutes of Health-funded institution to practicing in an academic setting (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Neurosurgery as a field has grown significantly over the past century. The authors recommend that future efforts seek to diversify the neurosurgical workforce by considering practice setting, demographic characteristics, and educational background.

Safety and Long-Term Efficacy Outcomes for Endovascular Treatment of Wide-Neck Bifurcation Aneurysms of the Middle Cerebral Artery: Insights From the SMART Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Wide-necked middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms pose specific challenges to endovascular management. Surgical clipping remains the standard treatment approach for these aneurysms in many centers. While recent data suggests the endovascular treatment may be comparable, a prospective datapoint has been lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Penumbra SMART registry, a prospective, multi-center, single-arm outcomes registry of Penumbra coil-treated aneurysms, was queried for endovascularly treated MCA bifurcation aneurysms with wide necks (dome:neck ratio <2 or neck >4 mm). Safety and efficacy outcomes were summarized for ruptured and unruptured aneurysms, including rupture, complication rate, and 1-year occlusion outcomes. RESULTS: Seventy-two aneurysms across 31 sites were enrolled. Of these, a total of 15 presented as ruptured aneurysms. Serious adverse events were reported in 21 (29.2%) of patients, with 8 (11.1%) attributed to the device/procedure. Immediately postoperatively, 75.0% of cases achieved "adequate" Raymond Roy Class I (40.3%) or II (34.7%) occlusion outcomes. Of the 72 patients treated, 60 (83.3%) underwent follow-up angiography at 1 year, and among these, 95.0% had 1-year occlusion outcomes of Raymond Roy Class I (71.7%) or II (23.3%). A total of 6 aneurysms (10.0%) were required or were planned for retreatment at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study represents the most significant prospective sample of endovascularly treated wide-neck MCA bifurcation aneurysms conducted to date. It supports the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of these aneurysms.

Opioid Use Disorder and Racial/Ethnic Health Disparities: Prevention and Management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to summarize risks and disparities associated with the prevalence and treatment of opioid use disorder in the perioperative and long-term setting, as well as evidence-based treatment and prevention targeted toward specific vulnerable populations. RECENT FINDING: There are significant demographic disparities in pain management and development and management of OUD in the chronic and surgical setting. While White patients traditionally receive more pain management, they are also at higher risk of developing OUD. Hispanic and Latin populations have the largest proportion of youth with OUD and often lack culturally appropriate translation services that allow for effective treatment. Native Americans have the second highest rate of OUD and often receive care in communities and healthcare settings that lack funding and resources to combat OUD. African Americans tend to suffer from the criminalization of OUD and are less able to seek treatment due to this, and furthermore, often lack community services that would benefit them. Additional vulnerable populations include homeless individuals that lack access to healthcare or health insurance. In addition, incarcerated individuals often lack access to naloxone and suffer from high rates of fatal overdose soon after being released to the community. People in rural settings lack needle-exchange programs and community-based interventions/support groups. Patients in the perioperative setting lack standard screening and pain management protocols. Interventions targeted toward each appropriate group can help decrease the rate of OUD and improve its treatment, and overarching interventions such as protocols, targeted funding, education and regulation can combat OUD for all populations.

Effect of the FDA Safety and Innovation Act on racial and gender diversity in neurosurgical device trials.

OBJECTIVE: The US FDA uses evidence from clinical trials in its determination of safety and utility. However, these trials have often suffered from limited external validity and generalizability due to unrepresentative study populations with respect to clinical patient demographics. Section 907 of the FDA Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA) of 2012 attempted to address this issue by mandating the reporting of certain study demographics in new device applications. However, no study has been performed on its effectiveness in the participant diversity of neurosurgical device trials. METHODS: The FDA premarket approval (PMA) online database was queried for all original neurosurgical device submissions from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2019. Endpoints of the study included racial and gender demographics of reported effectiveness trials, which were summated for each submission. Chi-square tests were performed on both endpoints for before and after years of FDASIA passage and implementation. RESULTS: A total of 33 device approvals were analyzed, with 14 occurring before SIA implementation and 19 after. Most trials (96.97%) reported gender to the FDA, while 66.67% reported race and 63.64% reported ethnicity. Gender breakdown did not change significantly post-SIA (53.30% female, p = 0.884). Racial breakdown was significantly different from the 2010 US Census for all races (p < 0.001) both pre- and post-SIA. Only Native American race was significantly different in terms of representation post-SIA, increasing from 0% to 0.63% (p = 0.0187). There was no significant change in ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: The FDASIA, as currently written, does not appear to have had a significant impact on the racial or gender diversity of neurosurgical device clinical trial populations. This may be due to the noncompulsory nature of its guidance, or a lack of more stringent regulation on the composition of clinical trials themselves.

Cannabis Abuse and Perioperative Complications Following Inpatient Spine Surgery in the United States.

MINI: Due to its complicated legal status, the effects of cannabis on elective spine surgery patients have not been well studied. In this nationwide analysis, we find that cannabis abuse is associated with higher perioperative thromboembolism and neurologic complications, respiratory complications, sepsis, length of stay, hospital charges, and rates of unfavorable discharge disposition.

Retrospective cohort analysis of a nationwide administrative database. The aim of this study was to analyze the association between cannabis abuse and serious adverse events following elective spine surgery. Cannabis is the most popular illicit drug in the United States, and its use has been increasing in light of state efforts to decriminalize and legalize its use for both medical and recreational purposes. Its legal status has long precluded extensive research into its adverse effects, and to date, little research has been done on the sequelae of cannabis on surgical patients, particularly in spine surgery. The 2012­2015 Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried for all patients undergoing common elective spine surgery procedures. These patients were then grouped by the presence of concurrent diagnosis of cannabis use disorder and compared with respect to various peri- and postoperative complications, all-cause mortality, discharge disposition, length of stay, and hospitalization costs. Propensity score matching was utilized to control for potential baseline confounders. A total of 423,978 patients met inclusion/exclusion criteria, 2393 (0.56%) of whom had cannabis use disorder. After controlling for baseline characteristics and comorbid tobacco use, these patients similar inpatient mortality, but higher rates of perioperative thromboembolism (odds ratio [OR] 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2­4.0; P  = 0.005), respiratory complications (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.4­2.9; P  < 0.001), neurologic complications such as stroke and anoxic brain injury (OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.2­7.5; P  = 0.007), septicemia/sepsis (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.0 to 2.5; P  = 0.031), and nonroutine discharge ( P  < 0.001), as well as increased lengths of stay (7.1 vs. 5.2 days, P  < 0.001) and hospitalization charges ($137,631.30 vs. $116,112.60, P  < 0.001). Cannabis abuse appears to be associated with increased perioperative morbidity among spine surgery patients. Physicians should ensure that a thorough preoperative drug use history is taken, and that affected patients be adequately informed of associated risks. Level of Evidence: 3.

Epidemiology of United States Inpatient Open Globe Injuries from 2009-2015.

PURPOSE: To study the epidemiology of inpatient open globe injuries (OGI) in the United States (US). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with a primary diagnosis of OGI in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2009 to 2015. Sociodemographic characteristics, including age, gender, race, ethnicity, insurance, and income were stratified for comparison. Annual prevalence rates were calculated using 2010 US Census data. Statistical analysis included Chi-square tests, ANCOVA, and Tukey tests. RESULTS: A total of 6,821 US inpatient hospital discharge records met inclusion/exclusion criteria. The estimated national prevalence of OGI during the 5-year period from 2009 to 2015 was 34,061 (95% confidence interval [CI] 31,445-36,677). The overall annual prevalence rate was 1.58 per 100,000 per year (CI 1.56-1.59). Overall, average annual prevalence rates were highest among patients 85 years or older (7.72, CI 6.95-8.49), on Medicare (3.92, CI 3.84-4.00), males (2.28, CI 2.25-2.30), African Americans (2.38, CI 2.32-2.44), and Native Americans (1.80, CI 1.62-2.00). OGI rates were lowest among Whites (1.21, CI 1.19-1.22), females (0.89, CI 0.87-0.91), those with private insurance (0.84, CI 0.82-0.86), and Asians (0.69, CI 0.64-0.74). Being in the lowest income quartile was a risk factor for OGI (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient OGIs disproportionately affected those over 85, young males, elderly females, patients of African-American descent, on Medicare, and in the lowest income quartile. Additionally, children and young children had lower rates of OGI compared to adolescents. Further studies should delineate causes for socioeconomic differences in OGI rates to guide future public health measures.

Association of Insurance Status with Patient Health at New Orleans Student-Run Free Clinics.

Since the closure of Charity Hospital after Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans Student-Run Free Clinics have helped fill the resulting void in healthcare access for the underserved New Orleans population. To better understand the health insurance status and health outcomes of this patient population, 1036 patient records from seven New Orleans Student-Run Free Clinics were collected and analyzed between February 2017 and March 2020. Insurance status was significantly associated with gender, race, homelessness, and prior incarceration, but not with education. Substance use rehabilitation centers had low uninsured rates, while homeless shelters had higher uninsured rates. Patients on Non-Medicaid insurance were most likely to be prescribed a medication for diabetes (p = .01), hypertension (p = .21), and psychiatric conditions (p = .04), followed by those on Medicaid, and then those who were uninsured. This study demonstrates the benefits of health insurance and provides important data that can inform future health insurance enrollment efforts and health policy.

Association of Neurosurgical Work Relative Value Units with Objective Markers of Operative Complexity.

OBJECTIVE: Relative value units (RVUs) form the backbone of health care service reimbursement calculation in the United States. However, it remains unclear how well RVUs align with objective measures of procedural complexity within neurosurgery. METHODS: The 2018 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for neurosurgical procedures with >50 patients, using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Length of stay (LOS), operative time, mortality, and readmission and reoperation rates were collected for each code and a univariate correlation analysis was performed, with significant predictors entered into a multivariate logistic regression model, which generated predicted work RVUs, which were compared with actual RVUs to identify undervalued and overvalued procedures. RESULTS: Among 64 CPT codes, LOS, operative time, mortality, readmission, and reoperation were significant independent predictors of work RVUs and together explained 76% of RVU variance in a multivariate model (R2 = 0.76). Using a difference of >1.5 standard deviations from the mean, procedures associated with greater than predicted RVU included surgery for intracranial carotid circulation aneurysms (CPTs 61697 and 61700; residual RVU = 12.94 and 15.07, respectively), and infratemporal preauricular approaches to middle cranial fossa (CPT 61590; residual RVU = 15.39). Conversely, laminectomy/foraminotomy for decompression of additional spinal cord, cauda equina, and/or nerve root segments (CPT 63048; residual RVU = -21.30), transtemporal craniotomy for cerebellopontine angle tumor resection (CPT 61526; residual RVU = -9.95), and brachial plexus neuroplasty (CPT 64713; residual RVU = -11.29) were associated with lower than predicted RVU. CONCLUSIONS: Work RVUs for neurosurgical procedures are largely predictive of objective measures of surgical complexity, with few notable exceptions.

Locum Tenens Neurosurgery in the United States: A Medicare Claims Analysis of Outcomes, Complications, and Cost of Care.

BACKGROUND: The utilization of locum tenens physicians in the United States has risen significantly as a stopgap for clinical practice needs, particularly in rural and other underserved areas. The difficulty in hiring new physicians to remote hospitals has resulted in the dependence of these institutions on locum tenens coverage. Here, we assess the quality and cost of neurosurgical care between locum and non-locum neurosurgeons in the United States, the first study in our knowledge to do so. METHODS: A 5% random sample of the Medicare claims limited data set was queried for 2005-2011 for neurosurgical cases using International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification, 9th edition (ICD-9-CM) procedure codes for common cranial and spine procedures. Cases were divided into locum and non-locum groups using ICD modifier Q6. The association between locum care and 30-day surgical complications, disposition, and cost of care was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 112,397 patients met inclusion criteria, with locum tenens practitioners involved in 164 (0.15%) cases. Locum and non-locum cohorts were statistically and clinically similar at baseline, with respect to comorbidity and case type. Mortality (0.00% vs. 0.19%; P=0.739), discharge disposition (P=0.739), surgical complication rates, and length of stay (8.74 ± 12.24 vs. 10.54 ± 15.51 days; P = 0.117) did not appear to differ significantly between the 2 groups. Hospitalization costs were also similar (158,780.20 ± 223,735.50 vs. 168,104.40 ± 308,074.90 USD; P = 0.698), as were amounts paid by patients (39,197.70 ± 14,144.75 vs. 39,234.36 ± 15,467.63 USD, P = 0.976). CONCLUSIONS: Among Medicare beneficiaries, there exists no difference in short-term complication rates, lengths of hospitalization, or costs between locum and non-locum neurosurgeons.

Early versus late surgical intervention for central cord syndrome: A nationwide all-payer inpatient analysis of length of stay, discharge destination and cost of care.

OBJECTIVE: Central cord syndrome (CCS) is the most common incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI), resulting in various degrees of neurologic compromise below the level of the affected cervical cord. The management of CCS is controversial regarding not only whether to surgically intervene, but also when surgery should occur. In this study, we conduct the largest multi-center study to date examining differences in inpatient outcomes, general discharge disposition, length of stay, and cost associated with early versus late surgical intervention for CCS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried for years 2012-2015 for patients who underwent surgery with a primary diagnosis of CCS. The median interval between admission and intervention was noted. Patients operated upon prior to this timepoint were placed in the early surgery group, and others into the later surgery group. The groups were then compared, while using 1:1 propensity score matching to control for baseline presentation, with respect to mortality, discharge disposition, length of stay, and total charges. RESULTS: A total of 422 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The median time from admission to intervention was 2 days. Patients with higher initial severity of injury were more likely to undergo early surgery. Upon controlling for severity of initial presentation, earlier intervention did not appear to affect mortality or post-operative length of stay. However, patients operated upon earlier had more favorable discharge destinations (p = 0.025) and a lower associated cost of care ($198,050.70 vs. $243,048.10, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Earlier surgical intervention for CCS may result in better patient disposition and less total charges. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Correlates of Google Search Rankings for Spine Surgeons: An Analysis of Academic Pedigree, Social Media Presence, and Patient Ratings.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to identify correlates of search ranking among academic pedigree, online ratings, and social media following. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients increasingly rely on online search in selecting healthcare providers. When choosing a spine surgeon, patients typically value surgical skill and experience as well as demeanor/bedside manner. It is unclear whether current search engine ranking algorithms reflect these preferences. METHODS: A Google.com search for the top 25 spine surgeon websites by search ranking was conducted for each of the largest 25 American cities. Resulting websites were then perused for academic pedigree, experience, and practice characteristics. Surgeons' research output and impact were then quantified via number of publications and H-index. Online ratings and followers in various social media outlets were also noted. These variables were assessed as possible correlates of search ranking via linear regression and multivariate analyses of variance. RESULTS: A total of 625 surgeons were included. Three categorical variables were identified as significant correlates of higher mean Google search ranking-orthopedics (vs. neurosurgery) as a surgical specialty (P = 0.023), board certification (P = 0.024), and graduation from a top 40 residency program (P = 0.046). Although the majority of the identified surgeons received an allopathic medical education, there was no significant difference in the mean rank of surgeons who had an MD versus DO medical degree (P = 0.530). Additionally, none of the continuous variables collected, including years in practice (P = 0.947), publications (P = 0.527), H-index (P = 0.278), social media following such as on Facebook (P = 0.105), or online ratings such as on Healthgrades (P = 0.080), were significant correlates of Google search ranking. CONCLUSIONS: Google search rankings do not always align with patient preferences, currently promoting orthopedic over neurosurgical specialists, graduation from top residency programs, and board certification, while largely ignoring academic pedigree, research, social media presence, and online ratings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Effect of Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Surgical Approach and Outcomes in the Management of Subaxial Cervical Fractures.

BACKGROUND: In the initial evaluation of suspected cervical fracture, computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for assessing bony anatomy and fracture morphology with high sensitivity and specificity. However, CT is relatively insensitive to ligamentous, discogenic, and myelopathic injury, leading to supplementary use of MRI, which is more sensitive and specific to these diseases. Here, we assess whether preoperative cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) affects surgical management of subaxial cervical fractures. METHODS: The National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried for MRI use, surgical approach, rate of operative intervention, all-cause mortality, days from admission to surgery, discharge disposition, length of hospital stay, and total hospital charges among those with closed subaxial cervical spine fractures from 2012 to 2015. The effect of MRI on these End points was evaluated, controlling for significant baseline differences in demographics, comorbidities, and presentation. RESULTS: A total of 820 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria; 255 (31.1%) were assessed with MRI and CT, 565 (68.9%) were evaluated with CT alone. After 1:1 propensity score matching based on severity of presentation, preoperative MRI was not significantly associated with surgical approach, in-hospital mortality, discharge disposition, length of stay, or total hospital charges. Segregating patients by functional status group shows MRI use among patients presenting with moderate loss of function associated with a shorter length of time between admission and surgery (1.50 vs. 2.59 days; P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of MRI to CT in the evaluation of subaxial cervical spine fractures does not seem to affect surgical management.

Poor sleep quality: A wake-up call for the elderly at a tertiary care centre in Islamabad, Pakistan.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the burden of sleep disorders in the elderly, and the effects of various co-morbidities linked with sleep disorders. METHODS: The longitudinal cross-sectional study was conducted in different outpatient departments at a tertiary care centre in Islamabad, Pakistan, from June 2014 to June 2015, and comprised patients of either gender aged 60 years or above. Pittsburgh sleep quality index and Epworth sleepiness scale were used to measure the quality and patterns of sleep and daytime sleepiness in the elderly. Data was analysed using SPSS 21. RESULTS: Of the 1000 subjects, 638(63.8%) were males, and 362(36.2%) were females. The overall mean age was 66.96±7.05 years. Epworth sleepiness scale >10 was found in 265(26.5%) subjects, while Pittsburgh sleep quality index score in 516(51.6%) was >5. Sleep quality score in 578(57.8%) women was statistically significant compared to 478(47.8%) males (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant burden of sleep-related disorders in the subjects.

TLRs in pulmonary diseases.

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) comprise a clan of proteins involved in identification and triggering a suitable response against pathogenic attacks. As lung is steadily exposed to multiple infectious agents, antigens and host-derived danger signals, the inhabiting stromal and myeloid cells of the lung express an aggregate of TLRs which perceive the endogenously derived damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) along with pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and trigger the TLR-associated signalling events involved in host defence. Thus, they form an imperative component of host defence activation in case of microbial infections as well as non-infectious pulmonary disorders such as interstitial lung disease, acute lung injury and airways disease, such as COPD and asthma. They also play an equally important role in lung cancer. Targeting the TLR signalling network would pave ways to the design of more reliable and effective vaccines against infectious agents and control deadly infections, desensitize allergens and reduce inflammation. Moreover, TLR agonists may act as adjuvants by increasing the efficiency of cancer vaccines, thereby contributing their role in treatment of lung cancer too. Overall, TLRs present a compelling and expeditiously bolstered area of research and addressing their signalling events would be of significant use in pulmonary diseases.