RESUMEN
Both Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and cocaine use have been associated with impairment in neuropsychological functioning. The high comorbidity between HIV and cocaine use highlights the importance of ascertaining whether there is a compounding effect of cocaine use in individuals with HIV. Among neuropsychological domains impacted by HIV, verbal memory deficits have received substantial attention partly because they have been associated with declines in functional status in HIV positive individuals. We collected California Verbal Learning Test-II data from HIV participants who met lifetime diagnostic criteria of cocaine abuse and/or dependence (HIV/CocDx+, N = 80 & HIV/CocDx-, N = 30, respectively) and those with and without recent cocaine use, which was confirmed by toxicology analysis (HIV/Coc+, N = 56 & HIV/Coc-, N = 57, respectively). The Item Specific Deficit Approach (ISDA) was employed to determine any additional cocaine-associated deficits in encoding, consolidation, and retrieval, which attempts to control for potential confounding factors of memory such as attention. Using conventional methods of evaluating memory profiles, we found that the HIV/Coc + group demonstrated worse learning, immediate and delayed free recall, and recognition in contrast to the HIV/Coc - group; although using the ISDA, we found that encoding was the only significant difference between HIV/Coc + and HIV/Coc-participant, with HIV/Coc - performing better. Our data suggest that for individuals with HIV, cocaine use is associated with a temporary decline in verbal memory, is characterized by greater encoding deficits, and these effects may reduce with abstinence. Clinically, our findings suggest that reduced encoding is the likely contributor to verbal memory decline in HIV/Coc + and these effects are partially reversible-at least to the level of their HIV/Coc - counterparts.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Cocaína , Cocaína , Infecciones por VIH , Cocaína/efectos adversos , Trastornos Relacionados con Cocaína/complicaciones , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Humanos , Trastornos de la Memoria/etiología , Pruebas NeuropsicológicasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Various concussion characteristics and personal factors are associated with cognitive recovery in athletes. We developed an index based on concussion frequency, severity, and timeframe, as well as cognitive reserve (CR), and we assessed its predictive power regarding cognitive ability in retired professional football players. METHOD: Data from 40 retired professional American football players were used in the current study. On average, participants had been retired from football for 20 years. Current neuropsychological performances, indicators of CR, concussion history, and play data were used to create an index for predicting cognitive outcome. RESULTS: The sample displayed a range of concussions, concussion severities, seasons played, CR, and cognitive ability. Many of the participants demonstrated cognitive deficits. The index strongly predicted global cognitive ability (R(2) = .31). The index also predicted the number of areas of neuropsychological deficit, which varied as a function of the deficit classification system used (Heaton: R(2) = .15; Wechsler: R(2) = .28). CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrated that a unique combination of CR, sports concussion, and game-related data can predict cognitive outcomes in participants who had been retired from professional American football for an average of 20 years. Such indices may prove to be useful for clinical decision making and research.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas/complicaciones , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Conmoción Encefálica/etiología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Trastornos del Conocimiento/diagnóstico , Reserva Cognitiva/fisiología , Femenino , Fútbol Americano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Jubilación/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Depression in Parkinson disease (PD) is associated with faster disease progression, lower activities of daily living, and more severe cognitive impairment. Even mild symptoms of depression may impact outcomes in patients with PD. Nevertheless, a low rate of agreement has been reported between patient and clinician ratings of depression, suggesting that clinicians may underestimate depression in patients with PD. However, to accurately compare the rates of agreement, comparable estimates are needed so that patient and clinician ratings have similar meaning (eg, mild, moderate, severe, etc). The purpose of this study was to examine this question by investigating the degree of association and rate of agreement of levels of symptom severity among self-report and clinician ratings using established cutoffs that correspond to more comparable estimates of these levels for both patient and clinician. Our findings suggest that patient's self-report of depressive symptoms was significantly correlated with clinician-based report irrespective of the stage of disease. Moreover, patients demonstrated a 72% rate of agreement with clinicians in classifying symptoms as asymptomatic, mildly symptomatic, or fully symptomatic, a rate significantly higher than the rate of 35% previously reported. This difference in rate of agreement may be accounted for using varying criteria for severity levels across the studies. Findings suggest that clinician and patient reports show a high rate of agreement across a range of depressive symptoms and that self-report measures may provide a relatively efficient means of detecting depressive symptoms especially if patients are disinclined to initiate their report.
Asunto(s)
Depresión/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/psicología , Autoinforme/normas , Anciano , Depresión/clasificación , Depresión/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/clasificación , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Previous research investigating whether combat-related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is associated with impaired neuropsychological functioning has yielded inconsistent findings. The present study addressed many methodological limitations of previous research. Neuropsychological measures of intellectual ability, learning, memory, attention, visuospatial ability, executive functioning, language, and psychomotor speed were compared in four groups of early middle-aged community dwelling veterans. The four demographically comparable groups were: (a) those with current PTSD symptoms (n=80); (b) those with a prior history of PTSD but not currently experiencing active PTSD symptoms (n=80); (c) a non-PTSD psychiatrically matched control group (n=80); and (d) a normal control group (n=80). Results indicated that the four groups did not statistically differ on the neuropsychological measures and that veterans with PTSD perform similarly to demographically matched controls. Results further suggested that the cognitive difficulties previously linked to PTSD may actually have been secondary to preexisting individual differences or other clinical conditions coexisting with PTSD.