Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 17(1): 533, 2017 Aug 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28784176

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study compares a combination of processes of care and clinical targets among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) between specialist diabetes clinics (SDCs) and general medical clinics (GMCs), and how differences between these two types of clinics differ with hospital type (community, provincial and regional). METHODS: Type 2 diabetes mellitus patient medical records were collected from 595 hospitals (499 community, 70 provincial, 26 regional) in Thailand between April 1 to June 30, 2012 resulting in a cross-sectional sample of 26,860 patients. Generalized linear mixed modeling was conducted to examine associations between clinic type and quality of care. The outcome variables of interest were split into clinical targets and process of care. A subsequent subgroup analysis was conducted to examine if the nature of clinical target and process of care differences between GMCs and SDCs varied with hospital type (regional, provincial, community). RESULTS: Regardless of the types of hospitals (regional, provincial, or community) patients attending SDCs were considerably more likely to have eye and foot exam. In terms of larger hospitals (regional and provincial) patients attending SDCs were more likely to achieve HbA1c exam, All FACE exam, BP target, and the Num7Q. Interestingly, SDCs performed better than GMCs at only provincial hospitals for LDL-C target and the All7Q. Finally, patients with T2DM who attended community hospital-GMCs had a better chance of achieving the blood pressure target than patients who attended community hospital-SDCs. CONCLUSIONS: Specialized diabetes clinics outperform general medical clinics for both regional and provincial hospitals for all quality of care indicators and the number of quality of care indicators achieved was never lower. However, this better performance of SDC was not observed in community hospital. Indeed, GMCs outperformed SDCs for some quality of care indicators in the community level setting.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Hospitales Generales , Especialización , Adulto , Anciano , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Auditoría Médica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tailandia
2.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 108(2): 265-72, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25737034

RESUMEN

AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the achievement of clinical targets for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in general medical clinics (GMCs) and specialist diabetes clinics (SDCs) for different hospital types (regional, provincial and community) in Thailand. METHODS: We used the medical records of patients (n=26,860) with T2DM from 595 hospitals (26 regional, 70 provincial and 499 community) across all 77 provinces in Thailand. Generalized linear mixed models were used to conduct multi-level modeling to evaluate the achievement of individual outcomes (A - glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) <7.0% (53 mmol/mol), B - Blood Pressure (BP) <140/80 mmHg and C - LDL-Cholesterol <100mg/dL) and aggregated outcomes (AllABC - achieved all three of the targets, AnyABC - achieved at least one target, ABCcount - the number of targets achieved: 0, 1, 2 or 3). RESULTS: Neither clinic types (SDCs or GMCs) were consistency superior across all hospital types. For regional hospitals, SDCs were associated with higher odds of achieving BP, AnyABC, and ABCcount (OR=1.55, 95%CI: 1.25-1.92, p<0.001; OR=1.35, 95%CI: 1.02-1.79; p=0.04; RR=1.10, 95%CI: 1.01-1.20, p=0.03, respectively). For provincial hospitals, SDCs exhibited higher achievement of BP and LDL-C (OR=1.52, 95%CI: 1.23-1.87, p<0.001; OR=1.28, 95%CI: 1.04-1.58, p=0.02, respectively). For community hospitals, however GMCs demonstrated higher achievement of BP and AnyABC (OR=0.81, 95%CI: 0.67-0.98, p=0.03; OR=0.74, 95%CI: 0.56-0.97, p=0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In larger (regional and provincial) hospitals, SDCs outperform GMCs in several (but not all) clinical targets. In contrast, in community hospital, where most patients with T2DM are serviced, GMCs were shown to have superior performance.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Presión Sanguínea , Colesterol/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Anciano , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Estudios Transversales , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatología , Femenino , Hospitales Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Especializados/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tailandia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA