Receptors involved in dexketoprofen analgesia in murine visceral pain.

Various animal models, especially rodents, are used to study pain, due to the difficulty of studying it in humans. Many drugs that produce analgesia have been studied and there is evidence among which NSAIDs deserve to be highlighted. Dexketoprofen (DEX) provides a broad antinociceptive profile in different types of pain; therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the profile of antinociceptive potency in mice. Analgesic activity was evaluated using the acetic acid abdominal constriction test (writhing test), a chemical model of visceral pain. Dose-response curves for i.p. DEX administration (1, 3, 10, 30 and 100 mg/kg), using at least six mice in each of at least five doses, was obtained before and 30 min after pre-treatment with different pharmacological agents. Pretreatment of the mice with opioid receptor antagonists was not effective; however, the serotonin receptor antagonist and nitric oxide synthase inhibitor produce a significant increase in DEX-induced antinociception. The data from the present study shows that DEX produces antinociception in the chemical twisting test of mice, which is explained with difficulty by the simple inhibition of COX. This effect appears to be mediated by other mechanisms in which the contribution of the NO and 5-HT pathways has an important effect on DEXinduced antinociception.

Interleukin-1beta in synergism gabapentin with tramadol in murine model of diabetic neuropathy.

Neuropathic pain is a complication of cancer and diabetes mellitus and the most commonly used drugs in the treatment of the diabetic neuropathic pain have only limited efficacy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of the biomarker interleukin-1beta (IL-1ß) in the pharmacological interaction of gabapentin with tramadol in a model of diabetic neuropathic pain. CF-1 male mice, pretreated with 200 mg/kg i.p. of streptozocin (STZ), were used and at day 3 and 7 were evaluated by the hot plate test and the spinal cord level of IL-1ß was determined. Antinociceptive interaction of the coadministration i.p. of gabapentin with tramadol, in basic of the fixed the ratio 1:1 of their ED50 values alone, was ascertained by isobolographic analysis. Tramadol was 1.13 times more potent than gabapentin in saline control mice, 1.40 times in STZ mice at 3 days and 1.28 times in STZ at 7 days. The interaction between gabapentin and tramadol was synergic, with an interaction index of 0.30 and 0.22 for mice pretreated with STZ at 3 and 7 days. The combination of gabapentin with tramadol reversed the increased concentration of IL-1ß induced by STZ in diabetic neuropathic mice. These findings could help clarify the mechanism of diabetic neuropathy.

Antinociceptive interaction of gabapentin with minocycline in murine diabetic neuropathy.

OBJECTIVE: Diabetic neuropathy (DN) is the most common complication of diabetes and pain is one of the main symptoms of diabetic neuropathy, however, currently available drugs are often ineffective and complicated by adverse events. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the antinociceptive interaction between gabapentin and minocycline in a mice experimental model of DN by streptozocin (STZ). METHODS: The interaction of gabapentin with minocycline was evaluated by the writhing and hot plate tests at 3 and 7 days after STZ injection or vehicle in male CF1 mice. RESULTS: STZ (150 mg/kg, i.p.) produced a marked increase in plasma glucose levels on day 7 (397.46 ± 29.65 mg/dL) than on day 3 (341.12 ± 35.50 mg/dL) and also developed neuropathic pain measured by algesiometric assays. Gabapentin produced similar antinociceptive activity in both writhing and hot plate tests in mice pretreated with STZ. However, minocycline was more potent in the writhing than in the hot plate test in the same type of mice. The combination of gabapentin with minocycline produced synergistic interaction in both test. CONCLUSION: The combination of gabapentin with minocycline in a 1:1 proportion fulfills all the criteria of multimodal analgesia and this finding suggests that the combination provide a therapeutic alternative that could be used for human neuropathic pain management.

Antinociception induced by atorvastatin in different pain models.

Atorvastatin is a statin that inhibits the 3-hydroxy-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase. Several landmark clinical trials have demonstrated the beneficial effects of statin therapy for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. It is assumed that the beneficial effects of statin therapy are entirely due to cholesterol reduction. Statins have an additional activity (pleiotropic effect) that has been associated to their anti-inflammatory effects. The aim of the present study was to assess the antinociceptive activity of atorvastatin in five animal pain models. The daily administration of 3-100mg/kg of atorvastatin by oral gavage induced a significant dose-dependent antinociception in the writhing, tail-flick, orofacial formalin and formalin hind paw tests. However, this antinociceptive activity of atorvastatin was detectable only at high concentrations in the hot plate assay. The data obtained in the present study demonstrates the effect of atorvastatin to reduce nociception and inflammation in different animal pain models.

Interaction between dexibuprofen and dexketoprofen in the orofacial formalin test in mice.

Animal models are used to research the mechanisms of pain and to mimic human pain. The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of interaction between dexketoprofen and dexibuprofen, by isobolographic analysis using the formalin orofacial assay in mice. This assay presents two-phase time course: an early short-lasting, phase I, starting immediately after the formalin injection producing a tonic acute pain, leaving a 15 min quiescent period, followed by a prolonged, phase II, after the formalin and representing inflammatory pain. Administration of dexketoprofen or dexibuprofen produced a dose-dependent antinociception, with different potency, either during phases I or II. The co-administration of dexketoprofen and dexibuprofen produced synergism in phase I and II. In conclusion, both dexketoprofen and dexibuprofen are able to induce antinociception in the orofacial formalin assay. Their co-administration produced a synergism, which could be related to the different degree of COX inhibition and other mechanisms of analgesics.

Synergism between COX-3 inhibitors in two animal models of pain.

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: The antinociception induced by the intraperitoneal coadministration in mice of combinations of metamizol and paracetamol was evaluated in the tail flick test and orofacial formalin test. METHODS: The antinociception of each drugs alone and the interaction of the combinations was evaluated by isobolographic analysis in the tail-flick and in the formalin orofacial assay of mice. RESULTS: Mice pretreated with the drugs demonstrated that the antinociception of metamizol and paracetamol is dose-dependent. The potency range on the antinocifensive responses for metamizol or paracetamol was as follows: orofacial (Phase II) > orofacial (Phase I) > tail flick. In addition, the coadministration of metamizol with paracetamol induced a strong synergistic antinociception in the algesiometer assays. Both drugs showed effectiveness in inflammatory pain. CONCLUSION: These actions can be related to the differential selectivity of the drugs for inhibition of COX isoforms and also to the several additional antinociception mechanisms and pathways initiated by the analgesic drugs on pain transmission. Since the efficacy of the combination of metamizol with paracetamol has been demonstrated in the present study, this association could have a potential beneficial effect on the pharmacological treatment of clinical pain.

Synergism between NSAIDs in the orofacial formalin test in mice.

Opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used to relieve acute and chronic pain. The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of interaction between dexketoprofen and NSAID examples of COXs inhibitors using the isobolographic analysis in the formalin orofacial test in mice. The drugs, i.p., induced a dose-dependent antinociception with different potencies in both test phases. Combinations of dexketoprofen with naproxen, nimesulide, ibuprofen or paracetamol on the basis of the fixed ratio (1:1) of their ED(50)'s values alone demonstrated synergism in both phases. This is important since the orofacial pain is a test not currently used in mice; the drugs are all analgesic for humans and phase II is representative of inflammatory pain. The synergism was: COX-3>COX-2>COX-1 inhibitors, this is particularly interesting since the inhibitor of COX-3, paracetamol, displayed a robust anti-inflammatory activity in an assay of acute and inflammatory pain that mimics inflammatory pain in humans. In conclusion, the synergism of the dexketoprofen/NSAID combinations may improve this type of therapeutic profile, since with low doses of the components, side effects are not likely to occur, and they may be used in long-term treatments.

Atropine reverses the antinociception of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the tail-flick test of mice.

The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) clonixin, diclofenac, piroxicam, ketoprofen, meloxicam, and paracetamol induced antinociception after intraperitoneal or intrathecal administration in mice submitted to an acute thermal algesiometric test without inflammation (tail-flick). Antinociception was evaluated by the increase in reaction time difference (Delta latency), between readings obtained before and after the administration of drugs. The antinociception induced by doses of NSAIDs producing between 20% and 30% of the maximum possible effect (MPE) 30 min after intraperitoneal and 15 min after intrathecal injections was compared with the antinociception obtained after pretreatment with 1 mg/kg atropine ip, 30 min before. Systemic atropine (1 mg/kg) significantly antagonized NSAID-induced antinociception in all cases, both after intraperitoneal and intrathecal administration. Cholinergic depletion by intracerebroventricular hemicholinium-3 (HC-3, 5 microg) 5 h before prevented the antinociceptive effect of all NSAIDs. These observations suggest that intrinsic muscarinic cholinergic facilitatory pathways represent an important modulating system in pain perception in this animal model of acute thermal pain. The results of the present work support the increasingly accepted notion that NSAIDs are effective analgesics even when inflammation is not present, acting by mechanisms that involve actions on spinal and supraspinal nociceptive transmission. It is suggested that, similar to morphine and clonidine, the active mechanism of NSAIDs may involve the release of acetylcholine (ACh) in the spinal cord.

Adrenergic mechanisms in antinociceptive effects of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in acute thermal nociception in mice.

OBJECTIVE: The interactions of alpha-adrenoceptors with the antinociceptive effects of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were assessed in acute thermal nociception in mice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analgesic effect was analyzed by the tail-flick test. RESULTS: The pretreatment with yohimbine (1 mg/kg i.p.), 30 min prior to the intraperitoneal injection of ketoprofen (50 mg/kg), diclofenac (30 mg/kg) and piroxicam (50 mg/kg) antagonized the antinociception induced by these NSAIDs, significantly reducing the tail-flick latency. Yohimbine did not affect paracetamol (125 mg/kg) induced antinociception. Prazosin (1 mg/kg i.p.) antagonized only the effect of paracetamol, without affecting the latency of the other drugs. When NSAIDs were administered i.t. (ketoprofen 2 m/kg; diclofenac 0.9 mg/kg; piroxicam 1.5 mg/kg; paracetamol 3.75 mg/kg), the same results were obtained after i.p. pretreatment with yohimbine and prazosin. The pretreatment of phenoxybenzamine (1 mg/kg i.p.) antagonized all antinociceptive effects. CONCLUSIONS: NSAIDs induced antinociception in an acute thermal pain model without inflammation. The mechanism of antinociception induced by ketoprofen, diclofenac and piroxicam involves an activation of alpha2-adrenoceptors at spinal and supraspinal levels, while paracetamol-induced antinociception is probably due mainly to central activation of the descending noradrenergic inhibitory system by alpha1-adrenoceptors.

Carbachol interactions with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

The inhibition of cyclooxygenase enzymes by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) does not completely explain the antinociceptive efficacy of these agents. It is known that cholinergic agonists are antinociceptive, and this study evaluates the interactions between carbachol and some NSAIDs. Antinociceptive activity was evaluated in mice by the acetic acid writhing test. Dose-response curves were constructed for NSAIDs and carbachol, administered either intraperitoneally (i.p.) or intrathecally (i.t.). The interactions of carbachol with NSAIDs were evaluated by isobolographic analysis after the simultaneous administration of fixed proportions of carbachol with each NSAID. All of the drugs were more potent after spinal than after systemic administration. The combinations of NSAIDs and carbachol administered i.p. were supra-additive; however, the i.t. combinations were only additive. Isobolographic analysis of the coadministration of NSAIDs and carbachol and the fact that atropine antagonized the synergistic effect suggest that carbachol may strongly modulate the antinociceptive activity of NSAIDs; thus, central cholinergic modulation would be an additional mechanism for the antinociceptive action of NSAIDs, unrelated to prostaglandin biosynthesis inhibition.

Interaction between the antinociceptive effect of ketoprofen and adrenergic modulatory systems.

The interaction between the antinociceptive activity of ketoprofen and adrenergic agents was evaluated in the writhing test of mice. Dose-response curves were obtained for systemic and intrathecal antinociceptive effects of ketoprofen, phenylephrine, clonidine, desipramine, and prazosin; and ED50 were calculated. The interactions were evaluated by isobolographic analysis of the systemic or intrathecal co-administration of fixed-ratio combinations of ketoprofen with each adrenergic agent. The intraperitoneal combinations of ketoprofen with phenylephrine, clonidine, and prazosin showed supra-additivity, indicating that activation of alpha1 and alpha2 adrenoceptors play a role in nociceptive transmission at supraspinal levels. The same combinations given intrathecal were only additive. Desipramine intraperitoneal was also supra-additive: however, when ketoprofen was administered intrathecally with desipramine, only an additive interaction was obtained. The supra-additive interactions suggest that complementary mechanisms of antinociception have been activated, related with interference with the multiplicity of receptors and systems involved in the transmission of the nociceptive information. Racemic ketoprofen has an antinociceptive activity which is probably not only due to COX inhibition but also involves noradrenergic systems at spinal and supraspinal levels.

An isobolographic analysis of the adrenergic modulation of diclofenac antinociception.

UNLABELLED: We evaluated the noradrenergic modulation of the antinociceptive activity of diclofenac in mice using the acetic acid writhing test. Dose-response curves were obtained for the antinociceptive effect of diclofenac, phenylephrine, clonidine, desipramine, prazosin, and yohimbine administered both systemically and intrathecally, and ED(50)s were calculated. Noradrenergic modulation was evaluated by performing an isobolographic analysis of the systemic or intrathecal coadministration of fixed-ratio combinations of diclofenac with each adrenergic drug. The systemic, but not the intrathecal, combinations of diclofenac with phenylephrine or clonidine showed supraadditivity, suggesting that the activation of alpha(1) and alpha(2) adrenoceptors interfered with the nociceptive transmission at spinal and supraspinal levels. Supraadditive effects were not demonstrated for the intrathecal injection of diclofenac combined with phenylephrine, clonidine and a selective norepinephrine uptake inhibitor (desipramine) or adrenergic antagonists. We conclude that interaction between adrenoceptors and diclofenac can modulate antinociception by activating common or different mechanisms. Diclofenac has an antinociceptive activity that, in addition to cyclooxygenase inhibition, can be modulated by additive and supraadditive interactions with adrenergic drugs. IMPLICATIONS: Diclofenac analgesia in mice can be modulated by interaction with adrenergic drugs. The systemic but not the intrathecal administration of phenylephrine and clonidine produced supraadditive interactions. For desipramine, prazosin, and yohimbine, supraadditive interactions were not statistically demonstrated. The coadministration of drugs inducing supraadditive effects could be clinically relevant for the treatment of chronic pain because of reduction of doses and side effects.

NSAID antinociception measured in a chemical and a thermal assay in mice.

The antinociceptive activity of several nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) that were administered either intraperitoneally or intrathecally was assessed in mice by two algesiometric tests. The first was the writhing test, which assessed the abdominal constrictions that were induced by intraperitoneal acetic acid (a chemical test), and the second was the tail flick test, which measured pain responses to heat stimuli. The corresponding effective doses and their relative potencies were compared because these tests use different nociceptive stimuli with different transmission pathways. The intraperitoneal and intrathecal dose-response curves for the antinociception induced by every NSAID that was tested were parallel in the writhing test. In the tail flick test, however, only the intraperitoneal and intrathecal dose-response curves for ketoprofen, piroxicam, naproxen, nimesulide, paracetamol and diclofenac were parallel. The results obtained in this study confirm that NSAIDs possess different abilities to induce inhibition of cyclooxygenase, and they can be indirectly assessed by their different antinociceptive activities, depending on the algesiometric assays that are used. The antinociception of most NSAIDs might involve central mechanisms. The findings demonstrate the increasing importance of the spinal cord in processing and modulating nociceptive input, because intrathecal administration of NSAIDs is always more effective (in terms of potency) than systemic administration; thus, the antinociceptive efficacy of NSAIDs strongly depends on the algesiometric assay that is used and on the type of the nociceptive stimulus to which the test subject is exposed.

Differential effects of trigeminal tractotomy on Adelta- and C-fiber-mediated nociceptive responses.

In this study we have tested in the rat, whether trigeminal tractotomy, which deprives the spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis (Sp5C) of its trigeminal inputs, affected differentially nociceptive responses mediated by C- vs. Adelta-nociceptors from oral and perioral regions. Tractotomy had no effect on the threshold of the jaw opening reflex, induced by incisive pulp stimulation (Adelta-fiber-mediated), but blocked the formalin response (mainly C-fiber-mediated). These results suggest that nociceptive responses mediated by trigeminal C-fibers completely depend on the integrity of the Sp5C, while intraoral sensations triggered Adelta-fibers (especially of dental origin) are primarily processed in the rostral part of the spinal trigeminal nucleus.

alpha-Adrenoceptor and opioid receptor modulation of clonidine-induced antinociception.

1. The antinociceptive action of clonidine (Clon) and the interactions with alpha 1, alpha 2 adrenoceptor and opioid receptor antagonists was evaluated in mice by use of chemical algesiometric test (acetic acid writhing test). 2. Clon produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive action and the ED50 for intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) was lower than for intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration (1 ng kg-1 vs 300 ng kg-1). The parallelism of the dose-response curves indicates activation of a common receptor subtype. 3. Systemic administration of prazosin and terazosin displayed antinociceptive activity. Pretreatment with prazosin produced a dual action: i.c.v. Clon effect did not change, and i.p. Clon effect was enhanced. Yohimbine i.c.v. or i.p. did not induce antinonciception, but antagonized Clon-induced activity. These results suggest that alpha 1- and alpha 2-adrenoceptors, either located at the pre- and/or post-synaptic level, are involved in the control of spinal antinociception. 4. Naloxone (NX) and naltrexone (NTX) induced antinociceptive effects at low doses (microgram kg-1 range) and a lower antinociceptive effect at higher doses (mg kg-1 range). Low doses of NX or NTX antagonized Clon antinociception, possibly in relation to a preferential mu opioid receptor antagonism. In contrast, high doses of NX or NTX increased the antinociceptive activity of Clon, which could be due to an enhanced inhibition of the release of substance P. 5. The results obtained in the present work suggest the involvement of alpha 1-, alpha 2-adrenoceptor and opioid receptors in the modulation of the antinociceptive activity of clonidine, which seems to be exerted either at spinal and/or supraspinal level.

Interaction of opioids with antidepressant-induced antinociception.

The antinociceptive activity of antidepressant drugs is poorly understood. In this study, using the acetic acid writhing test in mice, the antinociception produced by clomipramine (CLO), maprotiline (MAP), imipramine (IMI), and zimelidine (ZIM) was tested and correlated with opioid drugs. All the compounds displayed a significant dose-dependent antinociception, which was not antagonized by naloxone (NX) or naltrexone (NTX). The administration of morphine (M) plus CLO, MAP, IMI or ZIM resulted in a significant additive effect that was antagonized by 1 or 10 mg/kg NX or NTX, except in the case of IMI. This finding suggests that the additive effect seems to be partially due to activation of opioid receptors, except for the case of imipramine. However, aminophylline, a non-selective blocker of A1/A2 adenosine receptors, significantly antagonized the antinociceptive activity of CLO, IMI, MAP and ZIM, demonstrating an interaction at the level of adenosine receptors. This work suggests that the antinociceptive activity of antidepressants could be dependent on critical levels of free 5-HT and NE at receptor(s) site(s) in CNS and on their interaction with opioid and adenosine receptors.

The analgesic effect of clonixine is not mediated by 5-HT3 subtype receptors.

1. The analgesic effect of clonixinate of L-lysine (Clx) in the nociceptive C-fiber reflex in rat and in the writhing test in mice is reported. 2. Clx was administered by three routes, i.v., i.t. and i.c.v., inducing a dose-dependent antinociception. 3. The antinociceptive effect of Clx was 40-45% with respect to the control integration values in the nociceptive C-fiber reflex method. 4. The writhing test yielded ED50 values (mg/kg) of 12.0 +/- 1.3 (i.p.), 1.8 +/- 0.2 (i.t.) and 0.9 +/- 0.1 (i.c.v.) for Clx administration. 5. Ondansetron was not able to antagonize the antinociception response of Clx in the algesiometric tests used. 6. Chlorophenilbiguanide did not produce any significative change in the analgesic effect of Clx in the nociceptive C-fiber reflex method. 7. It is suggested that the mechanism of action of the central analgesia of Clx is not mediated by 5-HT3 subtype receptors.

Effect of p-chlorophenylalanine and alpha-methyltyrosine on the antinociceptive effect of antidepressant drugs.

The role of para-chlorophenylalanine and alpha-methyl-DL-p-tyrosine in the antinociceptive effects of the intracerebroventricular administration of the antidepressant drugs clomipramine, zimelidine, imipramine and maprotiline was studied using the acetic acid writhing test in mice. The results demonstrated an antinociceptive effect for all these antidepressants. Pretreatment with para-chlorophenylalanine significantly reduced the antinociception induced by the ED50's of imipramine and maprotiline, and did not modify the effects of zimelidine and clomipramine, pretreatment with alpha-methyl-tyrosine did not modify the antinociception induced by these drugs except maprotiline. Pretreatment with para-chlorophenylalanine plus alpha-methyltyrosine significantly reduced the antinociceptive effect of all the antidepressants tested. The main finding of the present study is that the association of para-chlorophenylalanine plus alpha-methyltyrosine reduced the antinociceptive action of all the antidepressants. This means that critical levels of both 5-HT and NA are responsible for mediating the antinociceptive effects of antidepressants on the writhing test in mice.