Extended Intraoperative Longitudinal 3-Dimensional Cone Beam Computed Tomography Imaging With a Continuous Multi-Turn Reverse Helical Scan.

OBJECTIVES: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging is becoming an indispensable intraoperative tool; however, the current field of view prevents visualization of long anatomical sites, limiting clinical utility. Here, we demonstrate the longitudinal extension of the intraoperative CBCT field of view using a multi-turn reverse helical scan and assess potential clinical utility in interventional procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A fixed-room robotic CBCT imaging system, with additional real-time control, was used to implement a multi-turn reverse helical scan. The scan consists of C-arm rotation, through a series of clockwise and anticlockwise rotations, combined with simultaneous programmed table translation. The motion properties and geometric accuracy of the multi-turn reverse helical imaging trajectory were examined using a simple geometric phantom. To assess potential clinical utility, a pedicle screw posterior fixation procedure in the thoracic spine from T1 to T12 was performed on an ovine cadaver. The multi-turn reverse helical scan was used to provide postoperative assessment of the screw insertion via cortical breach grading and mean screw angle error measurements (axial and sagittal) from 2 observers. For all screw angle measurements, the intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to determine observer reliability. RESULTS: The multi-turn reverse helical scans took 100 seconds to complete and increased the longitudinal coverage by 370% from 17 cm to 80 cm. Geometric accuracy was examined by comparing the measured to actual dimensions (0.2 ± 0.1 mm) and angles (0.2 ± 0.1 degrees) of a simple geometric phantom, indicating that the multi-turn reverse helical scan provided submillimeter and degree accuracy with no distortion. During the pedicle screw procedure in an ovine cadaver, the multi-turn reverse helical scan identified 4 cortical breaches, confirmed via the postoperative CT scan. Directly comparing the screw insertion angles (n = 22) measured in the postoperative multi-turn reverse helical and CT scans revealed an average difference of 3.3 ± 2.6 degrees in axial angle and 1.9 ± 1.5 degrees in the sagittal angle from 2 expert observers. The intraclass correlation coefficient was above 0.900 for all measurements (axial and sagittal) across all scan types (conventional CT, multi-turn reverse helical, and conventional CBCT), indicating excellent reliability between observers. CONCLUSIONS: Extended longitudinal field-of-view intraoperative 3-dimensional imaging with a multi-turn reverse helical scan is feasible on a clinical robotic CBCT imaging system, enabling long anatomical sites to be visualized in a single image, including in the presence of metal hardware.

Use of cone-beam computed tomography for advanced imaging of the equine patient.

Access to volumetric imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), has increased over the past decade and has revolutionised the way clinicians evaluate equine anatomy. More recent advancements have resulted in the development of multiple commercially available cone-beam CT (CBCT) scanners for equine use. CBCT scanners modify the traditional fan-shaped beam of ionising radiation into a three-dimensional pyramidal- or cone-shaped beam of radiation. This modification enables the scanner to acquire sufficient data to create diagnostic images of a region of interest after a single rotation of the gantry. The rapid acquisition of data and divergent X-ray beam causes some artifacts to be more prominent on CBCT images-as well as the unique cone-beam artifact-resulting in decreased contrast resolution. While the use of CT for evaluation of the equine musculoskeletal anatomy is not new, there is a paucity of literature and scientific studies on the capabilities of CBCT for equine imaging. CBCT units do not require a specialised table for imaging and in some cases are portable for imaging in the standing or anaesthetised patient. This review article summarises the basic physics of CT technology, including how CBCT imaging differs, and provides objective information about the strengths and limitations of this modality. Finally, potential future applications and techniques for imaging with CT which will need to be explored in order to fully consider the capabilities of CT imaging in the horse are discussed.