Comparative analysis of long-term results of three epithelial cell transplantation procedures for treating limbal stem cell deficiency.

This study compared the long-term outcome of different epithelial transplantation techniques to treat limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD). We conducted a retrospective 15-year comparative systematic cohort study of patients with LSCD who underwent either cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation (CLET), simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET), or cultivated oral mucosal epithelial transplantation (COMET). We reviewed the demographic data, etiology, LSCD severity, best-corrected visual acuity, surgical outcomes, and complications. A total of 103 eyes of 94 patients (mean age, 45.0 ± 16.4 years) with LSCD were enrolled. The most common cause of LSCD was chemical injury (42.7 %). The median follow-up time was 75 months. The success rates of CLET, SLET, and COMET were 45.5 %, 77.8 %, and 57.8 %, respectively. The 7-year survival rates after CLET, SLET, and COMET were 50.0 %, 72.2 %, and 53.2 %, respectively. Steven-Johnson syndrome (SJS) had a significantly lower survival rate than other causes (p < 0.001), but SLET had a significantly higher survival rate than CLET (p = 0.018) and COMET (p = 0.047). Visual improvement of more than four Snellen lines was achieved in 53.1 % of successful cases and 28.2 % of failed cases. SJS, Schirmer I test <5 mm, and the presence of postoperative recurrent epithelial defects were significant risk factors for a failed surgery. All epithelial transplantation techniques had favorable long-term surgical outcomes. More than half of the patients achieved a stable ocular surface and visual acuity improvement up to 7 years postoperatively. SLET tends to have a better surgical outcome than CLET and COMET, especially in patients with SJS.

Genetic analysis of allogenic donor cells after successful allo-limbal epithelial transplantation in simple and cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation procedures.

This non-comparative cohort study investigated long-term donor cell survival after allogenic simple/cultivated limbal epithelial transplantations (allo-SLET/allo-CLET, respectively) by genetic analysis. Transplanted corneal epithelial cells, which underwent impression cytology and/or corneal-button biopsy, were examined for personal identities of autosomal short-tandem repeats; the percentages of donor cells were calculated based on matching recipient or donor buccal-DNA references. Twelve patients were included; 4 underwent allo-CLET, 8 underwent allo-SLET. Eight patients (67%) had total limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD). Genetic analysis was performed postoperatively (mean, 55.3 months). Donor cells were detected in 4 of 12 patients (25%), all of whom underwent allo-SLET; 1 patient had a donor genotype and 3 patients had a mixed donor/recipient genotype. The longest time of donor cell detection was 30 months. Seven patients (58%) used systemic immunosuppressives at the time of genetic analysis (mean use, 22.5 months). Allogenic donor cells survived in both procedures for the long term postoperatively, which encourages the long-term use of systemic immunosuppressives. Donor cells may not be the only factor in graft survival, in that most successful cases had a recipient profile. Their presence for a specific time may promote niches for the patients' own cells to repopulate, especially for partial LSCD.

Efficacy and outcome of simple limbal epithelial transplantation for limbal stem cell deficiency verified by epithelial phenotypes integrated with clinical evaluation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and outcome of simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET) for limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) using epithelial phenotype detection integrated with clinical manifestation. METHODS: This prospective multicenter study included patients with LSCD who underwent autologous SLET (autoSLET) and living-related allogenic SLET (Lr-alloSLET). All patients were assessed by slit-lamp biomicroscopy, in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), and impression cytology with immunofluorescence staining (ICIF) before and after surgery. The criteria for success were the presence of a clinically non-conjunctivalized cornea and corneal epithelium detected by IVCM or ICIF. Otherwise, the case would be considered a failure. Visual improvement and risk factors for SLET failure were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 28 eyes of 26 patients (11 autoSLET and 17 Lr-alloSLET) were included. The median age was 53 years (range, 35-63), and the follow-up time was 29.5 months (range, 17.5-39.8). The overall survival rate was 89.3% at 2 years and 75.6% at 3 years with no difference between autoSLET and Lr-alloSLET (p = 0.24). Seven eyes subsequently underwent penetrating keratoplasty. Immunohistochemistry analysis showed that all corneal buttons had corneal epithelium and limbal stem cell markers. Visual improvement was achieved in both SLET groups (p < 0.001). Failed SLET developed between 5 and 32 months postoperatively. However, absolute risk factors for SLET failure were unidentified. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of autoSLET and Lr-alloSLET for LSCD was excellent. Limbal explants can regenerate and restore the corneal surface while maintaining the characteristics of limbal stem cells as shown by epithelial phenotype detection and immunohistochemistry integrated with clinical evaluation.