Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Cardiol ; 130: 152-156, 2020 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32680673

RESUMEN

Impairments in heart rate (HR) reserve and HR recovery are associated with mortality, and the combination of these two, termed exercise HR gradient (EHRG), is a better predictor than either alone. However, the confounding effect of beta-blockade on chronotropic impairment to exercise has not been fully explored; the aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of beta blockade on EHRG. Participants were 2769 Veterans (58.7 ± 11.6 years) who underwent a maximal exercise test for clinical reasons. HR reserve and HR recovery were acquired and divided into quintiles and summed to provide an EHRG score. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) was performed to evaluate the impact of HR reserve, HR recovery and EHRG on all-cause mortality for patients with and without beta-blocker use. During a mean follow up of 10.9 ± 4.1 years, 657 patients died. Among patients without beta-blocker therapy, adding EHRG score to an established model including multiple baseline risk factors and exercise capacity resulted in an NRI of 14.3% (p <0.001). Adding HR recovery instead of EHRG score yielded an NRI of 11.5% (p <0.001), whereas HR reserve had no significant NRI among patients without beta-blocker therapy. In contrast, among participants on beta-blocker therapy, the addition of HR reserve, HR recovery, or EHRG score did not result in any significant reclassification. In conclusion, EHRG was superior to both HR reserve and HR recovery in predicting mortality and provides significant reclassification of risk but only among patients not taking beta-blockers.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/farmacología , Prueba de Esfuerzo/efectos de los fármacos , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Mortalidad , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo
2.
Arq. bras. cardiol ; 105(4): 381-389, tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-764468

RESUMEN

AbstractBackground:Aerobic fitness, assessed by measuring VO2max in maximum cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) or by estimating VO2max through the use of equations in exercise testing, is a predictor of mortality. However, the error resulting from this estimate in a given individual can be high, affecting clinical decisions.Objective:To determine the error of estimate of VO2max in cycle ergometry in a population attending clinical exercise testing laboratories, and to propose sex-specific equations to minimize that error.Methods:This study assessed 1715 adults (18 to 91 years, 68% men) undertaking maximum CPX in a lower limbs cycle ergometer (LLCE) with ramp protocol. The percentage error (E%) between measured VO2max and that estimated from the modified ACSM equation (Lang et al. MSSE, 1992) was calculated. Then, estimation equations were developed: 1) for all the population tested (C-GENERAL); and 2) separately by sex (C-MEN and C-WOMEN).Results:Measured VO2max was higher in men than in WOMEN: -29.4 ± 10.5 and 24.2 ± 9.2 mL.(kg.min)-1 (p < 0.01). The equations for estimating VO2max [in mL.(kg.min)-1] were: C-GENERAL = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.483 + 7; C-MEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.791 + 7; and C-WOMEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 9.820 + 7. The E% for MEN was: -3.4 ± 13.4% (modified ACSM); 1.2 ± 13.2% (C-GENERAL); and -0.9 ± 13.4% (C-MEN) (p < 0.01). For WOMEN: -14.7 ± 17.4% (modified ACSM); -6.3 ± 16.5% (C-GENERAL); and -1.7 ± 16.2% (C-WOMEN) (p < 0.01).Conclusion:The error of estimate of VO2max by use of sex-specific equations was reduced, but not eliminated, in exercise tests on LLCE.


ResumoFundamento:A condição aeróbica, avaliada pela medida do VO2máx no teste cardiopulmonar de exercício máximo (TCPE) ou estimada por equações no teste de exercício, é preditora de mortalidade. Porém, o erro obtido pela estimativa em um dado indivíduo pode ser alto, afetando decisões clínicas.Objetivo:Determinar o erro de estimativa do VO2máx em cicloergometria em população atendida nos serviços de ergometria e propor equações específicas por sexo para minimizar o erro na estimativa do VO2máx.Métodos:Foram avaliados 1715 adultos (18 a 91 anos) (68% homens) submetidos a TCPE máximo em cicloergômetro de membros inferiores (CMI) com protocolo de rampa. Calculou-se o erro percentual (E%) entre o VO2máx medido e o estimado pela equação ACSM modificada (Lang e col. MSSE, 1992). A seguir, foram desenvolvidas equações de estimativa: 1) para toda a amostra testada (C-GERAL) e 2) separadamente por sexo (C-HOMENS e C-MULHERES).Resultados:O VO2máx medido foi maior em homens do que em mulheres - 29,4 ± 10,5 e 24,2 ± 9,2 mL.(kg.min)-1 (p < 0,01) -. As equações de estimativa do VO2máx foram mL.(kg.min)-1: C-GERAL = [carga final (W)/peso (kg)] x 10,483 + 7; C‑HOMENS = [carga final (W)/peso (kg)] x 10,791 + 7; e C-MULHERES = [carga final (W)/peso (kg)] x 9,820 + 7. Os E% em homens foram -3,4 ± 13,4% (ACSM modificada), 1,2 ± 13,2% (C-GERAL) e -0,9 ± 13,4% (C-HOMENS) (p < 0,01). Em mulheres, obtivemos: -14,7 ± 17,4% (ACSM modificada), -6,3 ± 16,5% (C-GERAL) e -1,7 ± 16,2% (C-MULHERES) (p < 0,01).Conclusão:O erro de estimativa do VO2máx através de equações específicas por sexo foi reduzido, porém não eliminado, nos testes de exercício em CMI.


Asunto(s)
Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Algoritmos , Prueba de Esfuerzo/métodos , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Consumo de Oxígeno/fisiología , Factores de Edad , Modelos Lineales , Valores de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...