Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop ; 52: e20190205, 2019 Sep 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31508783

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Multi-drug-resistant bacteria surveillance (MDR) systems are used to identify the epidemiology of MDR bacteria in neonates and children. This study aimed to describe the patterns by which MDR bacteria colonize and infect neonatal (NICU) and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients in the state of Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was performed using electronic data on NICU and PICU patients reported to the Rio de Janeiro State MDR bacteria surveillance system. All healthcare institutions that reported at least one case during the study period were included. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2017, 10,210 MDR bacteria cases, including 9261 colonizations and 949 infections, were reported. Among the colonizations, 5379 occurred in NICUs and 3882 in PICUs, while 405 infections occurred in NICUs and 544 in PICUs. ESBL producing Klebsiella sp and E. coli were the most reported colonization-causing agents in NICUs (1983/5379, 36.9%) and PICUs (1494/3882; 38.5%). The main causing bacteria reported in catheter-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), ventilator associated pneumonia, and catheter-associated urinary tract infection in NICUs were Klebsiella sp and E.coli (56/156, 35.9%), carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CRGNB) (22/65, 33.9%), and CRGNB (11/36, 30.6%) respectively, while in PICUs, they were MRSA (53/169, 31.4%), CRGNB (50/87, 57.4%), Klebsiella sp and E.coli (18/52, 34.6%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MDR Gram-negative bacteria (ESBL producers and carbapenem-resistant bacteria) were the most reported agents among MDR bacteria reported to Rio de Janeiro surveillance system. Except for CLABSI in children, they caused all device-associated infections in NICUs and PICUs.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/clasificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/clasificación , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal
2.
Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop ; Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop;52: e20190205, 2019. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1020444

RESUMEN

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Multi-drug-resistant bacteria surveillance (MDR) systems are used to identify the epidemiology of MDR bacteria in neonates and children. This study aimed to describe the patterns by which MDR bacteria colonize and infect neonatal (NICU) and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients in the state of Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was performed using electronic data on NICU and PICU patients reported to the Rio de Janeiro State MDR bacteria surveillance system. All healthcare institutions that reported at least one case during the study period were included. RESULTS Between 2014 and 2017, 10,210 MDR bacteria cases, including 9261 colonizations and 949 infections, were reported. Among the colonizations, 5379 occurred in NICUs and 3882 in PICUs, while 405 infections occurred in NICUs and 544 in PICUs. ESBL producing Klebsiella sp and E. coli were the most reported colonization-causing agents in NICUs (1983/5379, 36.9%) and PICUs (1494/3882; 38.5%). The main causing bacteria reported in catheter-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), ventilator associated pneumonia, and catheter-associated urinary tract infection in NICUs were Klebsiella sp and E.coli (56/156, 35.9%), carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CRGNB) (22/65, 33.9%), and CRGNB (11/36, 30.6%) respectively, while in PICUs, they were MRSA (53/169, 31.4%), CRGNB (50/87, 57.4%), Klebsiella sp and E.coli (18/52, 34.6%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS MDR Gram-negative bacteria (ESBL producers and carbapenem-resistant bacteria) were the most reported agents among MDR bacteria reported to Rio de Janeiro surveillance system. Except for CLABSI in children, they caused all device-associated infections in NICUs and PICUs.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Estudios Transversales , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/clasificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/clasificación , Monitoreo Epidemiológico
3.
Braz J Infect Dis ; 22(4): 338-344, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30278872

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common healthcare-associated infections (HAI) in neonates admitted in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). METHODS: We did a systematic review using PRISMA methodology to identify the main etiological agents in Brazilian NICUs. Eligible studies published without period restriction were identified in PUBMED, SCIELO, LILACS and DOAJ. Studies were included if they were conducted in neonates hospitalized at NICU. Studies done in outpatient care, neonates outside NICU, emergency department, primary care, long-term care facilities or a combination of these were excluded. RESULTS: We identified 6384 articles in the initial search and four papers met the inclusion criteria. In all studies included, rates of device-associated infections were described, including VAP rates. The VAP incidence density, in exclusively Brazilian NICU, ranged from 3.2 to 9.2 per 1000 ventilator-days. Pneumonia was described as the main HAI in NICU in one article, as the second type of HAI in two other articles and as the fourth type of HAI in the last one. The main pathogens causing all HAI types were described in three of four articles, but, none of the articles reported which pathogens were related or associated to VAP. CONCLUSION: Etiological agents causing VAP in Brazilian NICUs are, until the present time, not known.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Brasil/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Recién Nacido , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/microbiología , Sesgo de Publicación , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
4.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; Braz. j. infect. dis;22(4): 338-344, July-Aug. 2018. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-974224

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Introduction Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common healthcare-associated infections (HAI) in neonates admitted in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Methods We did a systematic review using PRISMA methodology to identify the main etiological agents in Brazilian NICUs. Eligible studies published without period restriction were identified in PUBMED, SCIELO, LILACS and DOAJ. Studies were included if they were conducted in neonates hospitalized at NICU. Studies done in outpatient care, neonates outside NICU, emergency department, primary care, long-term care facilities or a combination of these were excluded. Results We identified 6384 articles in the initial search and four papers met the inclusion criteria. In all studies included, rates of device-associated infections were described, including VAP rates. The VAP incidence density, in exclusively Brazilian NICU, ranged from 3.2 to 9.2 per 1000 ventilator-days. Pneumonia was described as the main HAI in NICU in one article, as the second type of HAI in two other articles and as the fourth type of HAI in the last one. The main pathogens causing all HAI types were described in three of four articles, but, none of the articles reported which pathogens were related or associated to VAP. Conclusion Etiological agents causing VAP in Brazilian NICUs are, until the present time, not known.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Brasil/epidemiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Incidencia , Sesgo de Publicación , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/microbiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA