Improving appropriate use of intravenous albumin: results of a single-centre audit and multifaceted intervention.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous albumin has limited indications supported by randomised controlled trials, yet it is often prescribed for indications not supported by evidence. AIM: To reduce unnecessary transfusion of albumin. INTERVENTIONS: Under the leadership of a multidisciplinary quality improvement team, evidence-based recommendations were disseminated in tandem with a new electronic order set, an educational strategy, qualitative interviews with prescribers and a return policy change to reduce wastage. IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION: Interventions were introduced in a staggered fashion. The primary outcome, appropriate use of albumin, was monitored and quantified using pre-intervention and post-intervention audits. Process measures included statistical process run charts of monthly usage of 5% and 25% albumin and wastage. Data on length of stay (hospital and intensive care), new inpatient starts on kidney replacement and mortality were collected as balancing measures. RESULTS: Appropriate albumin usage based on indication increased from 30% to 50% (p<0.0001). There was significantly less overall albumin usage in the post-intervention period compared with the pre-intervention period (negative coefficient, p<0.0001), driven by a major reduction in the utilisation of the 5% formulation (p<0.0001). Overall albumin usage was significantly lower in the post-intervention period, decreasing from 800 to 450 vials per month. The intervention resulted in significantly less wastage (negative coefficient, p=0.017). Mortality, length of stay and new starts on kidney replacement therapy remained constant throughout the study period. CONCLUSION: Improved prescribing of albumin was achieved with a multifaceted approach. Substantial and sustained reductions in usage were achieved without negatively impacting patient-important outcomes. The estimated annual savings for the purchase cost of albumin was CAN $300 000. We provide a structured process for other organisations to optimise their use of albumin.

Role of a Pharmacist in Postdischarge Care for Patients With Kidney Disease: A Scoping Review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to explore and describe the role of pharmacists in providing postdischarge care to patients with kidney disease. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL (Ebscohost), Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus were searched on January 30, 2023. Publication date limits were not included. Search terms were identified based on 3 concepts: kidney disease, pharmacy services, and patient discharge. Experimental, quasi-experimental, observational, and qualitative studies, or study protocols, describing the pharmacist's role in providing postdischarge care for patients with kidney disease, excluding kidney transplant recipients, were eligible. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Six unique interventions were described in 10 studies meeting inclusion criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: Four interventions targeted patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) during hospitalization and 2 evaluated patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease. Pharmacists were a multidisciplinary care team (MDCT) member in 5 interventions and were the sole provider in 1. Roles commonly identified include medication review, medication reconciliation, medication action plan formation, kidney function assessment, drug dose adjustments, and disease education. Some studies showed improvements in diagnostic coding, laboratory monitoring, medication therapy problem (MTP) resolution, and patient education; prevention of hospital readmission was inconsistent. Limitations include lack of standardized reporting of kidney disease, transitions of care processes, and differences in outcomes evaluated. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: This review identifies potential roles of a pharmacist as part of a postdischarge MDCT for patients with varying degrees of kidney disease. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacist's role in providing postdischarge care to patients with kidney disease is inconsistent. Multidisciplinary care teams including a pharmacist provided consistent identification and resolution of MTPs, improved patient education, and increased self-awareness of diagnosis.

Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential is associated with acute kidney injury.

Age is a predominant risk factor for acute kidney injury (AKI), yet the biological mechanisms underlying this risk are largely unknown. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) confers increased risk for several chronic diseases associated with aging. Here we sought to test whether CHIP increases the risk of AKI. In three population-based epidemiology cohorts, we found that CHIP was associated with a greater risk of incident AKI, which was more pronounced in patients with AKI requiring dialysis and in individuals with somatic mutations in genes other than DNMT3A, including mutations in TET2 and JAK2. Mendelian randomization analyses supported a causal role for CHIP in promoting AKI. Non-DNMT3A-CHIP was also associated with a nonresolving pattern of injury in patients with AKI. To gain mechanistic insight, we evaluated the role of Tet2-CHIP and Jak2V617F-CHIP in two mouse models of AKI. In both models, CHIP was associated with more severe AKI, greater renal proinflammatory macrophage infiltration and greater post-AKI kidney fibrosis. In summary, this work establishes CHIP as a genetic mechanism conferring impaired kidney function recovery after AKI via an aberrant inflammatory response mediated by renal macrophages.

Assessing Discharge Communication and Follow-up of Acute Kidney Injury in British Columbia: A Retrospective Chart Review.

Background and objective: Acute kidney injury (AKI) affects up to 20% of hospitalizations and is associated with chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, increased mortality, and increased health care costs. Proper documentation of AKI in discharge summaries is critical for optimal monitoring and treatment of these patients once discharged. Currently, there is limited literature evaluating the quality of discharge communication after AKI. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and quality of documentation of episodes of AKI at a tertiary care center in British Columbia, Canada. Methods design setting patients and measurements: This was a retrospective chart review study of adult patients who experienced AKI during hospital admission between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018. Laboratory data were used to identify all admissions to the cardiac and general medicine ward complicated by AKI defined by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. A random sample of 300 AKI admissions stratified by AKI severity (eg, stages 1, 2, and 3) were identified for chart review. Patients were excluded if they required ongoing renal replacement therapy after admission, had a history of kidney transplant, died during their admission, or did not have a discharge summary available. Discharge summaries were reviewed for documentation of the following: presence of AKI, severity of AKI, AKI status at discharge, practitioner and laboratory follow-up plans, and medication changes. Results: A total of 1076 patients with 1237 AKI admissions were identified. Of the 300 patients selected for discharge summary review, 38 met exclusion criteria. In addition, AKI was documented in 140 (53%) discharge summaries and was more likely to be documented in more severe AKI: stage 1, 38%; stage 2, 51%; and stage 3, 75%. Of those with their AKI documented, 94 (67%) documented AKI severity, and 116 (83%) mentioned the AKI status or trajectory at the time of discharge. A total of 239 (91%) of discharge summaries mentioned a follow-up plan with a practitioner, but only 23 (10%) had documented follow-up with nephrology. Patients with their AKI documented were more likely to have nephrology follow-up than those without AKI documented (17% vs 1%). Regarding laboratory investigations, 92 (35%) of the summaries had documented recommendations. In summaries that included medications typically held during AKI, only about half made specific reference to those medications being held, adjusted, or documented a post-discharge plan for that medication. For those with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) listing, 64% of discharge summaries mentioned holding, and 9% mentioned a discharge plan. For those with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) listing, 38% mentioned holding these medications, and 46% mentioned a discharge plan. In summaries with diuretics listed, 35% mentioned holding, and 51% included a discharge plan. Conclusions and limitations: We found suboptimal quality and completeness of discharge reporting in patients hospitalized with AKI. This may contribute to inadequate follow-up and post-hospitalization care for this patient population. Strategies are required for increasing the presence and quality of AKI reporting in discharge summaries. Limitations include our definition of AKI based on lab criteria, which may have missed some of the injuries that met the criteria based on urine output. Another limitation is that our definition of AKI based on the highest and lowest creatinine during admission may have led to some overclassification. In addition, without outpatient laboratories, it is possible that we have not captured the true baseline creatinine in some patients.

Contexte et objectif: L'insuffisance rénale aiguë (IRA) complique jusqu'à 20 % des hospitalisations; elle est associée à l'insuffisance rénale chronique, aux maladies cardiovasculaires, à une mortalité accrue et à une augmentation des coûts de santé. La documentation appropriée de l'IRA dans les résumés de départ est essentielle pour optimiser la surveillance et le traitement des patients après leur sortie de l'hôpital. Il existe peu de littérature évaluant la qualité de la documentation de l'IRA dans les résumés de départ. Cette étude visait à évaluer l'exactitude et la qualité de la documentation des épisodes d'IRA dans un center de soins tertiaires de la Colombie-Britannique (Canada). Méthodologie conception et cadre de l'étude sujets et mesures: Il s'agit d'une étude rétrospective des dossiers de patients adultes ayant présenté une IRA au cours de leur admission à l'hôpital entre le 1er janvier 2018 et le 31 décembre 2018. Les données de laboratoire ont été utilisées pour répertorier toutes les admissions compliquées par une IRA (définie par les critères KDIGO) dans les services de cardiologie et de médecine générale. Un échantillon aléatoire de 300 admissions avec IRA stratifiée selon sa gravité (p. ex., stade, 1, 2 et 3) a été constitué pour l'examen des dossiers. Ont été exclus les patients qui avaient eu besoin d'une thérapie de suppléance rénale continue après leur admission, ceux qui avaient des antécédents de transplantation rénale, ceux qui étaient décédés pendant leur admission et ceux pour qui aucun résumé de départ n'était disponible. Les résumés de départ ont été examinés à la recherche d'une mention des éléments suivants : présence d'une IRA, gravité de l'IRA, statut de l'IRA à la sortie, plans de suivi pour les tests de laboratoire et suivi avec un praticien, changements dans la médication. Résultats: En tout, 1 076 patients avec un total de 1 237 admissions avec IRA ont été identifiés. Parmi les 300 patients sélectionnés pour l'examen du résumé de départ, 38 répondaient aux critères d'exclusion. L'IRA avait été documentée dans 140 (53 %) des cas et plus elle était grave, plus elle était susceptible d'être documentée (stade 1 = 38 %; stade 2 = 51 %; stade 3 = 75 %). Parmi ceux où l'IRA était documentée, 94 (67 %) mentionnaient sa gravité et 116 (83 %) mentionnaient son statut ou sa trajectoire à la sortie du patient. Un plan de suivi avec le praticien était mentionné dans 239 (91 %) des résumés de départ, mais seuls 23 (10 %) mentionnaient un suivi en néphrologie. Les patients dont l'IRA était documentée étaient plus susceptibles de faire l'objet d'un suivi en néphrologie que ceux sans mention de l'IRA (17 % contre 1 %). En ce qui concerne les plans de suivi de laboratoire, 92 (35 %) des résumés contenaient des recommandations. Dans les résumés qui mentionnaient des médicaments normalement maintenus pendant un épisode d'IRA, seule la moitié environ faisait spécifiquement référence à ces médicaments comme ayant été cessés, ajustés ou documentés dans un plan post-sortie. Dans les résumés de départ qui listaient des AINS, 64 % mentionnaient qu'ils avaient été cessés temporairement et 9 % comprenaient un plan au congé de l'hôpital. Dans les résumés de départ qui listaient des IECA/ARA, 38 % mentionnaient que ces médicaments avaient été cessés temporairement et 46 % comprenaient un plan au congé de l'hôpital. Dans les résumés qui listaient des diurétiques, 35 % mentionnaient qu'ils avaient été cessés temporairement et 51 % comprenaient un plan au congé de l'hôpital. Limites et conclusion: Nous avons constaté que la qualité et l'exhaustivité des résumés de départ étaient sous-optimales chez les patients hospitalisés ayant vécu un épisode d'IRA. Cette situation peut contribuer à l'inadéquation du suivi et des soins post-hospitalization pour cette population de patients. Des stratégies sont nécessaires pour accroître la documentation d'un épisode d'IRA dans les résumés de départ et augmenter la qualité de sa communication. Les résultats de cette étude sont notamment limités par notre définition de l'IRA fondée sur des critères de laboratoire qui pourraient avoir manqué des patients répondant aux critères fondés sur la production d'urine. Notre définition de l'IRA fondée sur le taux de créatinine le plus élevée et le plus faible pendant l'admission pourrait également avoir conduit à un surdiagnostic. En outre, sans les résultats de laboratoires externes, il est possible que nous n'ayons pas saisi la mesure initiale réelle de la créatinine chez certains patients.

Challenges in the Care of Patients with AKI Receiving Outpatient Dialysis: AKINow Recovery Workgroup Report.

BACKGROUND: Up to one third of survivors of AKI that required dialysis (AKI-D) during hospitalization remain dialysis dependent at hospital discharge. Of these, 20%-60%, depending on the clinical setting, eventually recover enough kidney function to stop dialysis, and the remainder progress to ESKD. METHODS: To describe the challenges facing those still receiving dialysis on discharge, the AKINow Committee conducted a group discussion comprising 59 participants, including physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, pharmacists, and patients. The discussion was framed by a patient who described gaps in care delivery at different transition points and miscommunication between care team members and the patient. RESULTS: Group discussions collected patient perspectives of ( 1 ) being often scared and uncertain about what is happening to and around them and ( 2 ) the importance of effective and timely communication, a comfortable physical setting, and attentive and caring health care providers for a quality health care experience. Provider perspectives included ( 1 ) the recognition of the lack of evidence-based practices and quality indicators, the significant variability in current care models, and the uncertain reimbursement incentives focused on kidney recovery and ( 2 ) the urgency to address communication barriers among hospital providers and outpatient facilities. CONCLUSIONS: The workgroup identified key areas for future research and policy change to ( 1 ) improve communication among hospital providers, dialysis units, and patients/care partners; ( 2 ) develop tools for risk classification, subphenotyping, and augmented clinical decision support; ( 3 ) improve education to providers, staff, and patients/care partners; ( 4 ) identify best practices to improve relevant outcomes; ( 5 ) validate quality indicators; and ( 6 ) assess the effect of social determinants of health on outcomes. We urge all stakeholders involved in the process of AKI-D care to align goals and work together to fill knowledge gaps and optimize the care to this highly vulnerable patient population.

Optimum Care of AKI Survivors Not Requiring Dialysis after Discharge: An AKINow Recovery Workgroup Report.

AKI survivors experience gaps in care that contribute to worse outcomes, experience, and cost.Challenges to optimal care include issues with information transfer, education, collaborative care, and use of digital health tools.Research is needed to study these challenges and inform optimal use of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions to promote recovery AKI affects one in five hospitalized patients and is associated with poor short-term and long-term clinical and patient-centered outcomes. Among those who survive to discharge, significant gaps in documentation, education, communication, and follow-up have been observed. The American Society of Nephrology established the AKINow taskforce to address these gaps and improve AKI care. The AKINow Recovery workgroup convened two focus groups, one each focused on dialysis-independent and dialysis-requiring AKI, to summarize the key considerations, challenges, and opportunities in the care of AKI survivors. This article highlights the discussion surrounding care of AKI survivors discharged without the need for dialysis. On May 3, 2022, 48 patients and multidisciplinary clinicians from diverse settings were gathered virtually. The agenda included a patient testimonial, plenary sessions, facilitated small group discussions, and debriefing. Core challenges and opportunities for AKI care identified were in the domains of transitions of care, education, collaborative care delivery, diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, and digital health applications. Integrated multispecialty care delivery was identified as one of the greatest challenges to AKI survivor care. Adequate templates for communication and documentation; education of patients, care partners, and clinicians about AKI; and a well-coordinated multidisciplinary posthospital follow-up plan form the basis for a successful care transition at hospital discharge. The AKINow Recovery workgroup concluded that advancements in evidence-based, patient-centered care of AKI survivors are needed to improve health outcomes, care quality, and patient and provider experience. Tools are being developed by the AKINow Recovery workgroup for use at the hospital discharge to facilitate care continuity.

The Quality of Discharge Summaries After Acute Kidney Injury.

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) increases the risk of hospital readmission, chronic kidney disease, and death. Therefore, effective communication in discharge summaries is essential for safe transitions of care. Objective: The objectives of this study were to determine the quality of discharge summaries in AKI survivors and identify predictors of higher quality discharge summaries. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Tertiary care academic center in Ontario, Canada. Patients: We examined the discharge summary quality of 300 randomly selected adult patients who survived a hospitalization with AKI at our tertiary care hospital, stratified by AKI severity. We included 150 patients each from 2015 to 2016 and 2018 to 2019, before and after introduction of a post-AKI clinic in 2017. Measurements: We reviewed charts for 9 elements of AKI care to create a composite score summarizing discharge summary quality. Methods: We used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of discharge summary quality. Results: The median discharge summary composite score was 4/9 (interquartile range, 2-6). The least frequently mentioned elements were baseline creatinine (n = 55, 18%), AKI-specific follow-up labs (n = 66, 22%), and medication recommendations (n = 80, 27%). The odds of having a higher quality discharge summary (composite score ≥4/9) was greater for every increase in baseline creatinine of 25 µmol/L (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03, 1.56), intrarenal etiology (aOR: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.26, 4.27), and increased AKI severity (stage 2 aOR: 2.57; 95% CI: 1.35, 4.91 and stage 3 aOR: 3.36; 95% CI: 1.56, 7.22). There was no association between discharge summary quality and the years before and after introduction of a post-AKI clinic (aOR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.46, 1.29). Limitations: The single-center study design limits generalizability. Conclusions: Most discharge summaries are missing key AKI elements, even in patients with severe AKI. These gaps suggest several opportunities exist to improve discharge summary communication following AKI.

Contexte: L'insuffisance rénale aiguë (IRA) augmente le risque de réadmission à l'hôpital, d'insuffisance rénale chronique et de décès. Une communication efficace est essentielle dans le résumé de départ pour assurer une transition sécuritaire des soins. Objectifs: Cette étude visait à évaluer la qualité des résumés de départ des survivants d'un épisode d'IRA et à identifier les facteurs prédictifs d'un résumé de départ de meilleure qualité. Conception: Examen rétrospectif des dossiers médicaux. Cadre: Un centre universitaire de soins tertiaires d'Ottawa (Ontario) au Canada. Sujets: Nous avons examiné la qualité du résumé de départ de 300 patients adultes ayant survécu à une hospitalisation pour IRA dans notre hôpital de soins tertiaires. Les patients ont été sélectionnés au hasard et stratifiés selon la gravité de l'IRA. Nous avons retenu 150 patients pour la période 2015-2016 et 150 patients pour la période 2018-2019; soit les périodes précédant et suivant l'introduction d'une clinique post-IRA en 2017. Mesures: Nous avons examiné les dossiers médicaux à la recherche de neuf éléments des soins d'IRA afin de créer un score composite évaluant la qualité du résumé de départ. Méthodologie: La régression logistique multivariée a été employée pour identifier les facteurs prédictifs de la qualité d'un résumé de départ. Résultats: Le score composite médian était de 4/9 (intervalle interquartile: 2-6). Les éléments les moins souvent mentionnés dans le résumé de départ étaient le taux de créatinine initial (n= 55; 18 %), les analyses de laboratoires liées spécifiquement au suivi de l'IRA (n= 66; 22 %) et les recommandations portant sur la médication (n= 80; 27 %). Les probabilités d'avoir un résumé de départ de qualité supérieure (score composite ≥4/9) étaient plus élevées pour chaque augmentation de 25 µmol/L de la créatinine initiale (RC corrigé [RCc] = 1,27; IC 95: 1,03-1,56), lorsque l'étiologie était intrarénale (RCc: 2,32; IC 95: 1,26-4,27) et la gravité de l'IRA accrue ([stade 2] RCc: 2,57; IC 95: 1,35-4,91; et [stade 3] RCc: 3,36; IC 95: 1,56-7,22). Aucune association n'a été observée entre la qualité du résumé de départ et la période étudiée, soit avant ou après l'introduction de la clinique post-IRA (RCc: 0,77; IC 95: 0,46-1,29). Limites: L'étude est monocentrique, ce qui limite la généralisabilité des résultats. Conclusion: Certains éléments clés des soins de l'IRA étaient absents de la plupart des résumés de départ, même chez les patients gravement atteints d'IRA. Ces lacunes indiquent qu'il est possible d'améliorer la communication du résumé de départ à la suite d'un épisode d'IRA.

Variability in Reporting eGFR at Dialysis Initiation in Canada: A Research Letter.

Background: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at dialysis initiation is increasingly recognized as a key quality indicator (QI) for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Specifically, guidelines recommend assessing deferral of dialysis initiation until symptoms arise or if the eGFR is ≤6 mL/min/1.73 m2. Despite the recognition of the importance of this QI, how eGFR at the time of dialysis initiation is defined, collected, and tracked at dialysis centers across Canada remains unknown. Objectives: To identify how provincial renal programs define eGFR at dialysis initiation, to compare practice across Canadian provinces, and to determine if there is a consistent benchmark for deferred dialysis start. Design: Cross-sectional survey distributed to the medical leads of each provincial renal program, administered from July 2021 to November 2021. Quebec was not included given it did not yet participate in Canadian Organ Replacement Register (CORR) data submission. Setting: The survey was designed and distributed by the Canadian Society of Nephrology Quality Improvement & Implementation Science Committee (CSN-QUIS) Indicator Working Group. Methods: The survey asked respondents on how eGFR is defined, collected, reported, and perceived barriers to QI data collection. The National Senior Renal Leaders Forum helped identify the key provincial medical leads to disseminate the survey for completion. Results: Surveys were distributed to the medical leads of the 9 provincial renal programs that participate in CORR. In total, there were 8 responses. Five provinces submit eGFR for all new dialysis starts and 3 provinces only submit this information for chronic patients. There is variation in determining when a patient with acute kidney injury requiring dialysis is classified as a chronic patient. Four provinces use a 30-day trigger, 3 provinces use a 90-day trigger, and the patient's nephrologist makes this determination in 1 province. The creatinine used for the eGFR at dialysis initiation was the value measured on the first dialysis session (ie, day 0) for 5 provinces; the last outpatient clinic creatinine value in 2 provinces, and 1 province did not have a standard definition. Three provinces did not have a benchmark target for eGFR at dialysis initiation, 1 province had a target of <9.5 mL/min/1.73 m2, 3 provinces had a target of <10 mL/min/1.73 m2, 1 province had a target of <15 mL/min/1.73 m2. All 8 responding provincial medical leads support the establishment of a national benchmark for this measure. Limitations: This survey was restricted to provincial medical leads and therefore is unable to determine practice at individual dialysis sites. The survey was not anonymous, so it may be subject to conformity bias. Conclusions: There is wide variability in how eGFR at dialysis initiation is measured and reported across Canada. Additionally, there is no consensus on a benchmark target for an intent-to-defer dialysis strategy. Standardization of target eGFR at dialysis initiation may facilitate national reporting and quality improvement initiatives.

Contexte: Le débit de filtration glomérulaire estimé (DFGe) à l'amorce de la dialyse est de plus en plus reconnu comme un indicateur clé de la qualité (IQ) chez les patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale terminale (IRT). Plus précisément, les lignes directrices recommandent d'évaluer la possibilité de reporter l'initiation de la dialyse jusqu'à l'apparition des symptômes ou l'atteinte d'un DFGe égal ou inférieur à 6 ml/min/1,73 m2. Bien qu'on reconnaisse l'importance de cet IQ, on ignore encore comment le DFGe est défini, mesuré et suivi au moment de l'initiation de la dialyse dans les centres de dialyse canadiens. Objectifs: Déterminer la façon dont les programmes rénaux provinciaux définissent le DFGe à l'initiation de la dialyse, comparer les pratiques en cours dans les différentes provinces canadiennes et déterminer s'il existe une cible de référence commune pour une initiation différée de la dialyse. Conception: Un sondage transversal distribué entre juillet et novembre 2021 aux directeurs médicaux de chaque programme provincial de soins rénaux. Le Québec n'a pas été inclus puisque la province n'a pas encore participé au Registre canadien des insuffisances et des transplantations d'organes (RCITO). Cadre: Le sondage a été conçu et distribué par le Groupe de travail sur les indicateurs du Quality Improvement & Implementation Science Committee de la Société canadienne de néphrologie (CSN-QUIS). Méthodologie: Les répondants au sondage devaient décrire la façon dont le DFGe est défini, mesuré et rapporté, ainsi que les obstacles perçus à la collecte de données sur les IQ. Le sondage a été distribué aux directeurs médicaux provinciaux identifiés par le biais du National Senior Renal leaders Forum. Résultats: Le sondage a été distribué aux directeurs médicaux des neuf programmes provinciaux de soins rénaux participant au RCITO; huit ont répondu. Cinq provinces soumettent le DFGe pour toute nouvelle initiation d'un traitement de dialyse; trois provinces ne soumettent cette information que pour les patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale chronique. Il existe des différences entre les provinces dans la détermination du moment où un patient passe de l'insuffisance rénale aiguë nécessitant une dialyse à l'insuffisance rénale chronique. Quatre provinces utilisent un délai de 30 jours, trois provinces utilisent un délai de 90 jours et dans la dernière province, cette détermination est faite par le néphrologue du patient. Dans cinq des huit provinces sondées, le taux de créatinine utilisé pour établir le DFGe à l'initiation de la dialyse est la valeur mesurée à la première séance de dialyse (au jour 0); deux provinces utilisent la valeur de créatinine mesurée lors de la dernière visite en ambulatoire, et une province n'a pas de définition normalisée. Trois provinces n'ont pas de cible de référence pour le DFGe à l'initiation de la dialyse; cette cible est de moins de 9,5 ml/min/1,73 m2 dans une province, de moins de 10 ml/min/1,73 m2 dans trois provinces, et de moins de 15 ml/min/1,73 m2 dans une province. Les huit responsables médicaux provinciaux ayant répondu au sondage appuient l'établissement d'une valeur de référence nationale pour cette mesure. Limites: Ce sondage n'a été envoyé qu'aux directions médicales provinciales, par conséquent, il ne permet pas de déterminer les pratiques en cours dans chaque site de dialyse. Le sondage n'étant pas anonyme, il pourrait comporter un biais de conformité. Conclusion: Il existe une grande variabilité au Canada dans la façon dont le DFGe est mesuré et rapporté au début de la dialyse. On observe en outre une absence de consensus quant à une cible de référence pour une stratégie d'initiation différée de la dialyse. La normalisation de la valeur cible de DFGe au début de la dialyse pourrait faciliter les initiatives nationales de déclaration et d'amélioration de la qualité.

Neurological Impairment in Critically Ill Patients on Dialysis: Research Letter for the INCOGNITO-AKI Feasibility Study.

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) resulting in kidney replacement therapy is rising among critically ill adults. Long-term kidney replacement therapy and critical illness are independently linked to acute and prolonged cognitive impairment, and structural brain pathology. Poor regional cerebral oxygenation (rSO2) may be a contributing factor. Objective: To assess the feasibility of testing the association between intradialytic rSO2 and acute and long-term neurological outcomes. Design: Longitudinal observational study. Setting and Participants: We enrolled patients initiating continuous kidney replacement therapy or intermittent hemodialysis in the Kingston Health Sciences Centre (KHSC) Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Measurements and Methods: rSO2 was monitored during the first 72 hours of continuous kidney replacement therapy or throughout each intermittent hemodialysis session. We measured acute neurological impairment by daily delirium screening and long-term neurocognitive outcomes using the Kinarm robot, Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status, and brain magnetic resonance imaging. Results: Of 484 ICU patients, 26 met the screening criteria. Two declined, and 13 met at least one exclusion criteria. Eleven patients were enrolled. Eight died in ICU, one died 2 months after discharge, and one declined follow-up. Data capture rates were high: rSO2/vitals (91.3%), and delirium screening and demographics (100%). Longitudinal testing was completed in 50% (1 of 2) of survivors. Limitations: Enrollment was low due to a variety of factors, limiting our ability to evaluate long-term outcomes. Conclusion: rSO2 and delirium data collection is feasible in critically ill patients undergoing kidney replacement therapy; high mortality limits follow-up.

Contexte: L'insuffisance rénale aiguë (IRA) menant à une thérapie de remplacement rénal est en augmentation chez les adultes aux soins intensifs. Un séjour aux soins intensifs et la thérapie de remplacement rénal à long terme sont indépendamment liés à des déficits cognitifs aigus et prolongés ainsi qu'à des pathologies structurelles du cerveau. La faible saturation régionale du cerveau en oxygène (rSO2) pourrait être un facteur contributif. Objectif: Évaluer la possibilité de tester l'association entre la rSO2 intradialytique et les résultats neurologiques aigus et chroniques. Type d'étude: Étude observationnelle longitudinale. Cadre et sujets de l'étude: Nous avons recruté des patients qui entamaient une thérapie de remplacement rénal en continu ou une hémodialyse intermittente à l'unité des soins intensifs (USI) du Kingston Health Sciences Centre (KHSC). Mesures et méthodologie: La rSO2 a été surveillée pendant les 72 premières heures de thérapie de remplacement rénal en continu, ou tout au long de chaque séance d'hémodialyse intermittente. Nous avons mesuré les déficits neurologiques aigus par un dépistage quotidien du délirium et les atteintes neurocognitives à long terme à l'aide du robot Kinarm, de la Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status et de l'imagerie par résonance magnétique cérébrale. Résultats: Sur les 484 patients hospitalisés à l'USI, 26 répondaient aux critères de sélection. Deux ont refusé de participer à l'étude et treize satisfaisaient à au moins un critère d'exclusion. Onze patients ont été inclus à l'étude. Huit patients sont décédés à l'USI, un est décédé deux mois après sa sortie de l'hôpital et un a refusé le suivi. Les taux de saisie des données étaient élevés: rSO2 et paramètres vitaux (91,3 %), dépistage du délirium et démographie (100 %). Des tests longitudinaux ont été effectués chez 50 % (1 de 2) des survivants. Limites: Le taux d'inscription était faible en raison de divers facteurs, ce qui a limité notre capacité à évaluer les résultats à long terme. Conclusion: Il est possible de collecter des données sur la rSO2 et le délirium chez les patients de soins intensifs qui suivent une thérapie de remplacement rénal; un taux de mortalité élevé a limité le suivi. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, registration number NCT04722939.

Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential is Associated with Acute Kidney Injury.

Age is a predominant risk factor for acute kidney injury (AKI), yet the biological mechanisms underlying this risk are largely unknown and to date no genetic mechanisms for AKI have been established. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is a recently recognized biological mechanism conferring risk of several chronic aging diseases including cardiovascular disease, pulmonary disease and liver disease. In CHIP, blood stem cells acquire mutations in myeloid cancer driver genes such as DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1 and JAK2 and the myeloid progeny of these mutated cells contribute to end-organ damage through inflammatory dysregulation. We sought to establish whether CHIP causes acute kidney injury (AKI). To address this question, we first evaluated associations with incident AKI events in three population-based epidemiology cohorts (N = 442,153). We found that CHIP was associated with a greater risk of AKI (adjusted HR 1.26, 95% CI: 1.19-1.34, p<0.0001), which was more pronounced in patients with AKI requiring dialysis (adjusted HR 1.65, 95% CI: 1.24-2.20, p=0.001). The risk was particularly high in the subset of individuals where CHIP was driven by mutations in genes other than DNMT3A (HR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.37-1.61, p<0.0001). We then examined the association between CHIP and recovery from AKI in the ASSESS-AKI cohort and identified that non-DNMT3A CHIP was more common among those with a non-resolving pattern of injury (HR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.14-4.64, p = 0.03). To gain mechanistic insight, we evaluated the role of Tet2-CHIP to AKI in ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) and unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) mouse models. In both models, we observed more severe AKI and greater post-AKI kidney fibrosis in Tet2-CHIP mice. Kidney macrophage infiltration was markedly increased in Tet2-CHIP mice and Tet2-CHIP mutant renal macrophages displayed greater proinflammatory responses. In summary, this work establishes CHIP as a genetic mechanism conferring risk of AKI and impaired kidney function recovery following AKI via an aberrant inflammatory response in CHIP derived renal macrophages.

Informed consent practices in clinical research: present and future.

Clinical research must balance the need for ambitious recruitment with protecting participants' autonomy; a requirement of which is informed consent. Despite efforts to improve the informed consent process, participants are seldom provided sufficient information regarding research, hindering their ability to make informed decisions. These issues are particularly pervasive among patients experiencing acute illness or neurological impairment, both of which may impede their capacity to provide consent. There is a critical need to understand the components, requirements, and methods of obtaining true informed consent to achieve the vast numbers required for meaningful research. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the tenets underlying informed consent in research, including the assessment of capacity to consent, considerations for patients unable to consent, when to seek consent from substitute decision-makers, and consent under special circumstances. Various methods for obtaining informed consent are addressed, along with strategies for balancing recruitment and consent.

Predictive Models for Kidney Recovery and Death in Patients Continuing Dialysis as Outpatients after Starting in Hospital.

BACKGROUND: For patients who initiate dialysis during a hospital admission and continue to require dialysis after discharge, outpatient dialysis management could be improved by better understanding the future likelihood of recovery to dialysis independence and the competing risk of death. METHODS: We derived and validated linked models to predict the subsequent recovery to dialysis independence and death within 1 year of hospital discharge using a population-based cohort of 7657 patients in Ontario, Canada. Predictive variables included age, comorbidities, length of hospital admission, intensive care status, discharge disposition, and prehospital admission eGFR and random urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio. Models were externally validated in 1503 contemporaneous patients from Alberta, Canada. Both models were created using proportional hazards survival analysis, with the "Recovery Model" using Fine-Gray methods. Probabilities generated from both models were used to develop 16 distinct "Recovery and Death in Outpatients" (ReDO) risk groups. RESULTS: ReDO risk groups in the derivation group had significantly distinct 1-year probabilities for recovery to dialysis independence (first quartile: 10% [95% confidence interval (CI), 9% to 11%]; fourth quartile: 73% [70% to 77%]) and for death (first quartile: 12% [11% to 13%]; fourth quartile: 46% [43% to 50%]). In the validation group, model discrimination was modest (c-statistics [95% CI] for recovery and for death quartiles were 0.70 [0.67 to 0.73] and 0.66 [0.62 to 0.69], respectively), but calibration was excellent (integrated calibration index [95% CI] was 7% [5% to 9%] and 4% [2% to 6%] for recovery and death, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The ReDO models generated accurate expected probabilities of recovery to dialysis independence and death in patients who continued outpatient dialysis after initiating dialysis in hospital. An online tool on the basis of the models is available at https://qxmd.com/calculate/calculator_874 .

Association of Primary Versus Rotating Nephrologist Model of Care in Hemodialysis Programs with Patient Outcomes.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Nephrologist staffing models for patients receiving hemodialysis vary widely. Patients may be cared for continuously by a single primary nephrologist or by a group of nephrologists on a rotating basis. It remains unclear whether these differing care models influence clinical outcomes. In this population-based cohort study of more than 14,000 incident patients on maintenance hemodialysis from Ontario, Canada, we found no difference in mortality, kidney transplantation, home dialysis initiation, hospitalizations, or emergency department visits when care was provided by a single primary nephrologist or a rotating group of nephrologists. These results suggest that primary nephrologist models do not necessarily improve objective clinical outcomes, providing reassurance to patients, providers, and administrators that both models are acceptable options.

The Feasibility of a Transitional Care Unit for Patients Newly Started on In-Center Hemodialysis: A Research Letter.

Background: Patients with end-stage kidney disease face high mortality and morbidity after dialysis initiation. Transitional care units (TCUs) are typically 4- to 8-week structured multidisciplinary programs targeted toward patients starting hemodialysis during this high-risk time in their care. The goals of such programs are to provide psychosocial support, provide dialysis modality education, and reduce risks of complications. Despite apparent benefits, the TCU model may be challenging to implement, and the effect on patient outcomes is unclear. Objective: To assess a newly created multidisciplinary TCUs' feasibility for patients newly started on hemodialysis. Design: Before-and-after study. Setting: Kingston Health Sciences Centre hemodialysis unit in Ontario, Canada. Patients: We considered all adult patients (age 18+) who initiated in-center maintenance hemodialysis eligible for the TCU program, although patients on infection control precautions and evening shifts were not able to receive TCU care due to staffing limitations. Measurements: We defined feasibility as eligible patients completing the TCU program in a timely fashion without additional need for space, no signal of harm, and without explicit concerns from TCU staff or patients at weekly meetings. Key outcomes at 6 months included mortality, proportion hospitalized, dialysis modality, vascular access, initiation of transplant workup, and code status. Methods: The TCU care consisted of 1:1 nursing and education until predefined clinical stability and dialysis decisions were satisfied. We compared outcomes among the pre-TCU cohort who initiated hemodialysis between June 2017 and May 2018, and TCU patients who initiated dialysis between June 2018 and March 2019. We summarized outcomes descriptively, along with unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: We included 115 pre-TCU patients and 109 post-TCU patients, of whom 49/109 (45%) entered and completed the TCU. The most common reasons for not participating in the TCU included evening hemodialysis shifts (18/60, 30%) or contact precautions (18/60, 30%). The TCU patients completed the program in a median of 35 (25-47) days. We observed no differences in mortality (9% vs 8%; OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.28-3.13) or proportion hospitalized (38% vs 39%; OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.51-2.03) between the pre-TCU cohort and TCU patients. There was also no difference in use of home dialysis (16% vs 10%; OR = 1.67, 95% CI = 0.64-4.39), non-catheter access (32% vs 25%; OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 0.69-2.98), initiation of transplant workup (14% vs 12%; OR 1.67; 95% CI = 0.64-4.39), and choosing "do not resuscitate" (DNR) orders (22% vs 19%; OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.54-2.77). There was no negative patient or staff feedback on the program. Limitations: Small sample size and potential for selection bias given inability to provide TCU care for patients on infection control precautions or evening shifts. Conclusions: The TCU accommodated a large number of patients, who completed the program in a timely fashion. The TCU model was determined to be feasible at our center. There was no difference in outcomes due to the small sample size. Future work at our center is required to expand the number of TCU dialysis chairs to evening shifts and evaluate the TCU model in prospective, controlled studies.

Contexte: Les patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale terminale (IRT) sont confrontés à des taux élevés de mortalité et de morbidité après l'initiation de la dialyse. De façon générale, les unités de soins transitoires (UST) sont des programmes multidisciplinaires structurés d'une durée de quatre à huit semaines pour les patients qui amorcent des traitements d'hémodialyse pendant cette période à haut risque de leur prise en charge. Les objectifs de ces programmes sont d'offrir un soutien psychosocial, de dispenser une formation sur les modalités de dialyse et de réduire les risques de complications. Malgré les avantages apparents, le modèle des UST peut être difficile à mettre en œuvre et son effet sur les résultats des patients n'est pas clair. Objectif: Examiner la faisabilité d'une UST multidisciplinaire nouvellement créée pour les patients qui amorcent des traitements d'hémodialyse. Type d'étude: Étude de type « avant-après ¼. Cadre: L'unité d'hémodialyse du Kingston Health Sciences Centre (KHSC) en Ontario (Canada). Sujets: Nous avons considéré que tous les patients adultes (18 ans et plus) qui avaient commencé des traitements d'hémodialyse d'entretien en centre étaient admissibles au programme d'UST, bien que les patients qui faisaient la dialyse de nuit ou qui faisaient l'objet de mesures de prévention contre les infections n'aient pas pu recevoir de soins d'UST en raison de limitations de personnel. Mesures: Nous avons défini la faisabilité selon que les patients admissibles terminaient le programme d'UST en temps opportun sans besoin supplémentaire d'espace, sans signe de préjudice et sans préoccupations explicites de leur part ou du personnel de l'UST lors des réunions hebdomadaires. Les principaux critères d'évaluation à 6 mois comprenaient la mortalité, la proportion d'hospitalisations, la modalité de dialyse, l'accès vasculaire, le début de l'évaluation à une transplantation et l'état de réanimation cardio-vasculaire. Méthodologie: Les soins d'UST consistaient en des soins infirmiers 1:1 et de l'éducation prodigués jusqu'à ce que la stabilité clinique prédéfinie et les décisions de dialyse soient satisfaites. Nous avons comparé les résultats de la cohorte pré-UST qui avaient commencé l'hémodialyse entre juin 2017 et mai 2018 avec ceux des patients UST qui avaient commencé la dialyse entre juin 2018 et mars 2019. Nous avons résumé les résultats de façon descriptive, accompagnés des rapports de cotes (RC) non corrigés et des intervalles de confiance (IC) à 95 %. Résultats: Nous avons inclus 115 patients pré-UST et 109 patients post-UST, desquels 45 % (49/109) ont complété le programme d'UST. Les raisons les plus couramment invoquées pour ne pas participer au programme d'UST comprenaient l'hémodialyse de nuit (18/60; 30 %) et les mesures de prévention de contact (18/60; 30 %). Les patients UST ont terminé le programme en un temps médian de 35 (25-47) jours. Nous n'avons observé aucune différence entre la cohorte pré-UST et les patients UST en ce qui concerne la mortalité (9 % c. 8 %; RC = 0,93; IC 95 % = 0,28-3,13) ou la proportion d'hospitalisations (38 % c. 39 %; RC = 1,02; IC 95 % = 0,51-2,03). Aucune différence non plus dans l'utilisation de la dialyse à domicile (16 % c. 10 %; RC = 1,67; IC 95 % = 0,64-4,39), l'accès sans cathéter (32 % c. 25 %; RC = 1,44; IC 95 % = 0,69-2,98), le début de l'évaluation à une greffe (14 % c. 12 %; RC = 1,67; IC 95 = 0,64-4,39) et le choix des ordonnances de « ne pas réanimer ¼ (NPR) (22 % c. 19 %; RC = 1,22; IC 95 % = 0,54-2,77). Le programme n'a reçu aucun commentaire négatif, ni des patients, ni du personnel. Limites: L'échantillon était faible et l'étude présente une possibilité de biais de sélection étant donné l'incapacité à fournir des soins d'UST aux patients faisant l'objet de mesures de prévention contre les infections ou qui suivaient leurs traitements de nuit. Conclusion: Le programme d'UST a accueilli un grand nombre de patients, et ceux-ci ont terminé le programme en temps opportun. Le modèle UST a été jugé réalisable à notre centre. Nous n'avons pas observé de différences dans les résultats en raison de la petite taille de l'échantillon. D'autres essais à notre centre sont nécessaires pour étendre les places en dialyse dans l'UST aux quarts de soir et pour évaluer le modèle UST dans des études prospectives et contrôlées.

Hypocalcemia Risk of Denosumab Across the Spectrum of Kidney Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Denosumab can be used in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) but has been linked with cases of severe hypocalcemia. The incidence of and risk factors for hypocalcemia after denosumab use are not well established. Using linked health care databases at ICES, we conducted a population-based cohort study of adults >65 years old with a new prescription for denosumab or a bisphosphonate between 2012 and 2020. We assessed incidence of hypocalcemia within 180 days of drug dispensing and stratified results by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR in mL/min/1.73 m2 ). We used Cox proportional hazards to assess risk factors for hypocalcemia. There were 59,151 and 56,847 new denosumab and oral bisphosphonate users, respectively. Of the denosumab users, 29% had serum calcium measured in the year before their prescription, and one-third had their serum calcium checked within 180 days after their prescription. Mild hypocalcemia (albumin corrected calcium <2.00 mmol/L) occurred in 0.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6, 0.7) of new denosumab users and severe hypocalcemia (<1.8 mmol/L) in 0.2% (95% CI 0.2, 0.3). In those with an eGFR <15 or receiving maintenance dialysis, the incidence of mild and severe hypocalcemia was 24.1% (95% CI 18.1, 30.7) and 14.9% (95% CI 10.1, 20.7), respectively. In this group, kidney function and baseline serum calcium were strong predictors of hypocalcemia. We did not have information on over-the-counter vitamin D or calcium supplementation. In new bisphosphonate users, the incidence of mild hypocalcemia was 0.3% (95% CI 0.3, 0.3) with an incidence of 4.7% (95% CI 1.5, 10.8) in those with an eGFR <15 or receiving maintenance dialysis. In this large population-based cohort, we found that the overall risk of hypocalcemia with new denosumab use was low but increased substantially in those with eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Future studies should investigate strategies to mitigate hypocalcemia. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Fluid Management for Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury Receiving Kidney Replacement Therapy: An International Survey.

BACKGROUND: In critically ill patients receiving KRT, high ultrafiltration rates and persistent fluid accumulation are associated with adverse outcomes. The purpose of this international survey was to evaluate current practices and evidence gaps related to fluid removal with KRT in critically ill patients. METHODS: This was a multinational, web-based survey distributed by seven networks comprising nephrologists and intensivists. Physicians involved in the care of critically ill patients were invited to complete a 39-question survey about fluid management practices on KRT. The survey was distributed from September 2021 to December 2021. RESULTS: There were 757 respondents from 96 countries (response rate of 65%). Most respondents practiced adult medicine (89%) and worked in an academic center (69%). The majority (91%) reported aiming for a 0.5- to 2-L negative fluid balance per day when fluid removal is indicated, although there was important variability in what respondents considered a safe maximal target. Intensivists were more likely than nephrologists to use adjunct volume status assessment methods ( i.e. , ultrasound, hemodynamic markers, and intra-abdominal pressure), while nephrologists were more likely to deploy cointerventions aimed at improving tolerance to fluid removal ( i.e. , osmotic agents and low-temperature dialysate). There was a broad consensus that rapid decongestion should be prioritized when fluid accumulation is present, but the prevention of hypotension was also reported as a competing priority. A majority (77%) agreed that performing trials that compare fluid management strategies would be ethical and clinically relevant. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified multiple areas of variability in current practice of fluid management for patients receiving KRT. Most nephrologists and intensivists agreed that several knowledge gaps related to fluid removal strategies should be investigated in future randomized controlled trials.

Magnesium and Fracture Risk in the General Population and Patients Receiving Dialysis: A Narrative Review.

Purpose of Review: Magnesium is an essential mineral for bone metabolism, but little is known about how magnesium intake alters fracture risk. We conducted a narrative review to better understand how magnesium intake, through supplementation, diet, or altering the concentration of dialysate magnesium, affects mineral bone disease and the risk of fracture in individuals across the spectrum of kidney disease. Sources of Information: Peer-reviewed clinical trials and observational studies. Methods: We searched for relevant articles in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. The methodologic quality of clinical trials was assessed using a modified version of the Downs and Black criteria checklist. Key Findings: The role of magnesium intake in fracture prevention is unclear in both the general population and in patients receiving maintenance dialysis. In those with normal kidney function, 2 meta-analyses showed higher bone mineral density in those with higher dietary magnesium, whereas 1 systematic review showed no effect on fracture risk. In patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, a higher concentration of dialysate magnesium is associated with a lower concentration of parathyroid hormone, but little is known about other bone-related outcomes. In 2 observational studies of patients receiving hemodialysis, a higher concentration of serum magnesium was associated with a lower risk of hip fracture. Limitations: This narrative review included only articles written in English. Observed effects of magnesium intake in the general population may not be applicable to those with chronic kidney disease particularly in those receiving dialysis.

Justification: Le magnésium est un minéral essentiel pour le métabolisme osseux, mais on en sait peu sur la façon dont un apport en magnésium modifie le risque de fracture. Nous avons procédé à un examen narratif afin de mieux comprendre comment les maladies liées à la densité minérale osseuse et le risque de fracture sont affectés par un apport en magnésium (supplémentation, régime alimentaire ou modification de la concentration de dialysat de magnésium) chez les personnes atteintes d'insuffisance rénale. Sources: Essais cliniques et études observationnelles examinés par des pairs. Méthodologie: Nous avons répertorié les articles pertinents dans les bases de données MEDLINE et EMBASE. Une version modifiée des critères de contrôle de la qualité des études de Downs et Black a servi à évaluer la qualité méthodologique des essais cliniques retenus. Principaux résultats: Le rôle d'un apport en magnésium dans la prévention des fractures n'est pas clair, tant dans la population générale que chez les patients sous dialyse d'entretien. Chez les personnes ayant une fonction rénale normale, deux méta-analyses ont montré que les personnes dont le régime alimentaire est riche en magnésium présentent une densité minérale osseuse plus élevée; alors qu'une revue systématique n'a montré aucun effet sur le risque de fracture. Chez les patients sous hémodialyse d'entretien ou dialyse péritonéale, une concentration plus élevée de dialysat de magnésium est associée à une plus faible concentration d'hormone parathyroïdienne, mais on en sait peu sur les autres effets liés aux os. Dans deux études observationnelles portant sur des patients sous hémodialyse, une concentration plus élevée de magnésium sérique a été associée à un risque plus faible de fracture de la hanche. Limites: Cet examen narratif ne comprend que des articles rédigés en anglais. Il est possible que les effets d'un apport en magnésium observés dans la population générale ne puissent s'appliquer aux personnes atteintes d'une néphropathie chronique, en particulier aux personnes sous dialyse.

Cardiovascular Drug Use After Acute Kidney Injury Among Hospitalized Patients With a History of Myocardial Infarction.

Introduction: Patients who survive acute kidney injury (AKI) may receive fewer cardioprotective drugs. Our objective was to measure the difference in time to dispensing of evidence-based cardiovascular drugs in patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) with and without AKI. Methods: This was a population-based cohort study of patients 66 years of age and older with a history of MI who survived a hospitalization complicated with AKI, propensity-score matched to patients without AKI. The primary outcome was time to outpatient dispensing of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), statin, or ß-blocker within 1 year of hospital discharge. Results: We identified 28,871 patients with AKI, of whom 21,452 were matched 1:1 to patients without AKI. In the matched cohort, mean age was 80 years, 40% were female, and 34% had an MI during the index hospitalization. AKI was associated with less frequent dispensing of all 3 cardiovascular drug classes within 1 year of hospital discharge (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.95). This association was most pronounced in patients with stage 2 (sHR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.88) and stage 3 (sHR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.64-0.79) AKI. We observed less frequent dispensing of statins in patients with stage 2 (sHR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.81-0.92) and stage 3 (sHR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93) AKI and less frequent dispensing of ß-blockers in patients with stage 3 AKI (sHR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79-0.94). Conclusion: In patients with a history of MI, survivors of AKI were less likely to receive prescriptions for ACEi/ARB, statins, or ß-blockers within 1 year of hospital discharge. This association was most pronounced in patients with stages 2 and 3 AKI.

Association of an Acute Kidney Injury Follow-up Clinic With Patient Outcomes and Care Processes: A Cohort Study.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: To determine whether attendance at an acute kidney injury (AKI) follow-up clinic is associated with reduced major adverse kidney events. STUDY DESIGN: Propensity-matched cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients hospitalized with AKI in Ontario, Canada, from February 1, 2013, through September 30, 2017, at a single clinical center, who were not receiving dialysis when discharged. EXPOSURE: Standardized assessment by a nephrologist. OUTCOMES: Time to a major adverse kidney event, defined as death, initiation of maintenance dialysis, or incident/progressive chronic kidney disease. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Propensity scores were used to match each patient who attended an AKI follow-up clinic to 4 patients who received standard care. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to assess the association between the care within an AKI follow-up clinic and outcomes. To avoid immortal time bias, we randomly assigned index dates to the comparator group. RESULTS: We matched 164 patients from the AKI follow-up clinic to 656 patients who received standard care. During a mean follow-up of 2.2±1.3 (SD) years, care in the AKI follow-up clinic was not associated with a reduction in major adverse kidney events relative to standard care (22.1 vs 24.7 events per 100 patient-years; HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.75-1.11]). The AKI follow-up clinic was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.55-0.91]). Patients aged at least 66 years who attended the AKI follow-up clinic were more likely to receive ß-blockers (HR, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.02-1.77]) and statins (HR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.05-1.74]), but not angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 0.94-1.56]). LIMITATIONS: Single-center study and residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS: Specialized postdischarge follow-up for AKI survivors was not associated with a lower risk of major adverse kidney events but was associated with a lower risk of death and increased prescriptions for some cardioprotective medications.

Long-term Health Care Utilization and Associated Costs After Dialysis-Treated Acute Kidney Injury in Children.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common among hospitalized children and is associated with increased hospital length of stay and costs. However, there are limited data on postdischarge health care utilization after AKI hospitalization. Our objectives were to evaluate health care utilization and physician follow-up patterns after dialysis-treated AKI in a pediatric population. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study, using provincial health administrative databases. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: All children (0-18 years) hospitalized between 1996 and 2017 in Ontario, Canada. Excluded individuals comprised non-Ontario residents; those with metabolic disorders or poisoning; and those who received dialysis or kidney transplant before admission, a kidney transplant by 104 days after discharge, or were receiving dialysis 76-104 days from dialysis start date. EXPOSURE: Episodes of dialysis-treated AKI, identified using validated health administrative codes. AKI survivors were matched to 4 hospitalized controls without dialysis-treated AKI by age, sex, and admission year. OUTCOME: Our primary outcome was postdischarge hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and outpatient physician visits. Secondary outcomes included outpatient visits by physician type and composite health care costs. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Proportions with≥1 event and rates (per 1,000 person-years). Total and median composite health care costs. Adjusted rate ratios using negative binomial regression models. RESULTS: We included 1,688 pediatric dialysis-treated AKI survivors and 6,752 matched controls. Dialysis-treated AKI survivors had higher rehospitalization and emergency department visit rates during the analyzed follow-up periods (0-1, 0-5, and 0-10 years postdischarge, and throughout follow-up), and higher outpatient visit rates in the 0-1-year follow-up period. The overall adjusted rate ratio for rehospitalization was 1.46 (95% CI, 1.25-1.69; P<0.0001) and for outpatient visits was 1.16 (95% CI, 1.09-1.23; P=0.01). Dialysis-treated AKI survivors also had higher health care costs. Nephrologist follow-up was infrequent among dialysis-treated AKI survivors (18.6% by 1 year postdischarge). LIMITATIONS: Potential miscoding of study exposures or outcomes. Residual uncontrolled confounding. Data for health care costs and emergency department visits was unavailable before 2006 and 2001, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Dialysis-treated AKI survivors had greater postdischarge health care utilization and costs versus hospitalized controls. Strategies are needed to improve follow-up care for children after dialysis-treated AKI to prevent long-term complications.