Associations of intrapartum antibiotics and growth, atopy, gastrointestinal and sleep outcomes at one year of age.

BACKGROUND: Studies investigating neonatal outcomes following intrapartum antibiotic exposure show conflicting results. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively in pregnancy to 1-year-of-age, from 212 mother-infant pairs. Adjusted multivariable regression models estimated relationships following exposure to intrapartum antibiotics among vaginally-born, full-term infants and outcomes related to growth, atopic disease, gastrointestinal symptoms, and sleep at 1-year. RESULTS: Intrapartum antibiotic exposure (n = 40) was not associated with mass, ponderal index, BMI z-score (1- year), lean mass index (5-months) or height. Antibiotic exposure in labour ≥4-h was associated with increase in fat mass index at 5-months (ß 0.42 [95% CI: 0.03, 0.80], p = 0.03). Intrapartum antibiotic was associated with atopy in the first year (OR: 2.93 [95% CI: 1.34, 6.43], p = 0.007). Antibiotic exposure during intrapartum or day 1-7 was associated with newborn fungal infection requiring antifungal therapy (OR 3.04 [95% CI: 1.14, 8.10], p = 0.026), and number of fungal infections (IRR: 2.90 [95% CI: 1.02, 8.27], p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: Intrapartum and early life exposure to antibiotics were independently associated with measures of growth, atopy, and fungal infections suggesting that intrapartum and early neonatal antibiotics be used prudently following careful risk-benefit analysis. IMPACT: This prospective study: Shows a shift in fat mass index at 5 months associated with antibiotic administration ≥4 h in labour; an earlier age than previously reported; Shows atopy reported less frequently among those not exposed to intrapartum antibiotics; Supports earlier research of increased likelihood of fungal infection following exposure to intrapartum or early-life antibiotics; Adds to growing evidence that antibiotics used intrapartum and in early neonatal periods influence longer-term outcomes for infants. Suggests that use of intrapartum and early neonatal antibiotics should be used prudently after careful consideration of risk and benefit.

Growth and body composition trajectories in infants meeting the WHO growth standards study requirements.

BACKGROUND: While the World Health Organization (WHO) developed postnatal growth standards for infants, corresponding body composition data remains scarce. This study explores growth and body composition trajectories in infants meeting the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study (MGRS) eligibility criteria. STUDY DESIGN: Infants enrolled in this longitudinal cohort underwent anthropometric and body composition measurement by air displacement plethysmography (ADP) at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 5 months postnatally. Age and sex-specific growth and body composition percentiles were generated using GAMLSS, with extrapolated data at 5 months for those exceeding ADP weight limits. We evaluated which anthropometric measure (body mass index (BMI), weight for length or mid upper arm circumference) was most closely related to adiposity. RESULTS: Of the 225 infants with body composition measures, 187 met the WHO MGRS criteria. Their length and weight curves were comparable with WHO growth curves. Trajectory curves for fat and fat-free mass were developed. Of the anthropometric measures, BMI z score was most closely related to fat mass index z score at all timepoints. CONCLUSION: This study presents body composition trajectories for infants meeting the WHO growth standard criteria. BMI z score is the best anthropometric metric to estimate adiposity in infants. IMPACT: While postnatal growth standards derived from the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study (MGRS) exist for the routine clinical assessment of infant growth, this study fills the previous gap in the availability of corresponding body composition data for term-born, healthy, breastfed infants meeting the MGRS criteria. Extrapolation was used to obtain body composition values for infants exceeding the weight limit of the ADP device, to avoid construction of biased body composition curves. Sex-specific growth curves for fat mass, fat-free mass, fat mass index, and fat-free mass index are presented for a population meeting the World Health Organization growth standard criteria.

Infants' First Solid Foods: Impact on Gut Microbiota Development in Two Intercontinental Cohorts.

The introduction of solid foods is an important dietary event during infancy that causes profound shifts in the gut microbial composition towards a more adult-like state. Infant gut bacterial dynamics, especially in relation to nutritional intake remain understudied. Over 2 weeks surrounding the time of solid food introduction, the day-to-day dynamics in the gut microbiomes of 24 healthy, full-term infants from the Baby, Food & Mi and LucKi-Gut cohort studies were investigated in relation to their dietary intake. Microbial richness (observed species) and diversity (Shannon index) increased over time and were positively associated with dietary diversity. Microbial community structure (Bray-Curtis dissimilarity) was determined predominantly by individual and age (days). The extent of change in community structure in the introductory period was negatively associated with daily dietary diversity. High daily dietary diversity stabilized the gut microbiome. Bifidobacterial taxa were positively associated, while taxa of the genus Veillonella, that may be the same species, were negatively associated with dietary diversity in both cohorts. This study furthers our understanding of the impact of solid food introduction on gut microbiome development in early life. Dietary diversity seems to have the greatest impact on the gut microbiome as solids are introduced.

Maternal outcomes and birth interventions among women who begin labour intending to give birth at home compared to women of low obstetrical risk who intend to give birth in hospital: A systematic review and meta-analyses.

BACKGROUND: We previously concluded that risk of stillbirth, neonatal mortality or morbidity is not different whether birth is intended at home or hospital. Here, we compare the occurrence of birth interventions and maternal outcomes among low-risk women who begin labour intending to birth at home compared to women intending to birth in hospital. METHODS: We used our registered protocol (PROSPERO, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk, No.CRD42013004046) and searched five databases from 1990-2018. Using R, we obtained pooled estimates of effect (accounting for study design, study setting and parity). FINDINGS: 16 studies provided data from ~500,000 intended home births for the meta-analyses. There were no reported maternal deaths. When controlling for parity in well-integrated settings we found women intending to give birth at home compared to hospital were less likely to experience: caesarean section OR 0.58(0.44,0.77); operative vaginal birth OR 0.42(0.23,0.76); epidural analgesia OR 0.30(0.24,0.38); episiotomy OR 0.45(0.28,0.73); 3rd or 4th degree tear OR 0.57(0.43,0.75); oxytocin augmentation OR 0.37(0.26,0.51) and maternal infection OR 0.23(0.15,0.35). Pooled results for postpartum haemorrhage showed women intending home births were either less likely or did not differ from those intending hospital birth [OR 0.66(0.54,0.80) and RR 1.30(0.79,2.13) from 2 studies that could not be pooled with the others]. Similar results were found when data were stratified by parity and by degree of integration into health systems. INTERPRETATION: Among low-risk women, those intending to birth at home experienced fewer birth interventions and untoward maternal outcomes. These findings along with earlier work reporting neonatal outcomes inform families, health care providers and policy makers around the safety of intended home births. FUNDING: Partial funding: Association of Ontario Midwives open peer reviewed grant.

Perinatal or neonatal mortality among women who intend at the onset of labour to give birth at home compared to women of low obstetrical risk who intend to give birth in hospital: A systematic review and meta-analyses.

BACKGROUND: More women are choosing to birth at home in well-resourced countries. Concerns persist that out-of-hospital birth contributes to higher perinatal and neonatal mortality. This systematic review and meta-analyses determines if risk of fetal or neonatal loss differs among low-risk women who begin labour intending to give birth at home compared to low-risk women intending to give birth in hospital. METHODS: In April 2018 we searched five databases from 1990 onward and used R to obtain pooled estimates of effect. We stratified by study design, study settings and parity. The primary outcome is any perinatal or neonatal death after the onset of labour. The study protocol is peer-reviewed, published and registered (PROSPERO No.CRD42013004046). FINDINGS: We identified 14 studies eligible for meta-analysis including ~ 500,000 intended home births. Among nulliparous women intending a home birth in settings where midwives attending home birth are well-integrated in health services, the odds ratio (OR) of perinatal or neonatal mortality compared to those intending hospital birth was 1.07 (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.70 to 1.65); and in less integrated settings 3.17 (95% CI, 0.73 to 13.76). Among multiparous women intending a home birth in well-integrated settings, the estimated OR compared to those intending a hospital birth was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.84 to 1.38); and in less integrated settings was 1.58 (95% CI, 0.50 to 5.03). INTERPRETATION: The risk of perinatal or neonatal mortality was not different when birth was intended at home or in hospital. FUNDING: Partial funding: Association of Ontario Midwives open peer reviewed grant. RESEARCH IN CONTEXT: Evidence before this study Although there is increasing acceptance for intended home birth as a choice for birthing women, controversy about its safety persists. The varying responses of obstetrical societies to intended home birth provide evidence of contrasting views. A Cochrane review of randomised controlled trials addressing this topic included one small trial and noted that in the absence of adequately sized randomised controlled trials on the topic of intended home compared to intended hospital birth, a peer reviewed protocol be published to guide a systematic review and meta-analysis including observational studies. Reviews to date have been limited by design or methodological issues and none has used a protocol published a priori.Added value of this study Individual studies are underpowered to detect small but potentially important differences in rare outcomes. This study uses a published peer-reviewed protocol and is the largest and most comprehensive meta-analysis comparing outcomes of intended home and hospital birth. We take study design, parity and jurisdictional support for home birth into account. Our study provides much needed information to policy makers, care providers and women and families when planning for birth.Implications of all the available evidence Women who are low risk and who intend to give birth at home do not appear to have a different risk of fetal or neonatal loss compared to a population of similarly low risk women intending to give birth in hospital.

Home birth integration into the health care systems of eleven international jurisdictions.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to develop assessment criteria that could be used to examine the level of integration of home birth within larger health care systems in developed countries across 11 international jurisdictions. METHODS: An expert panel developed criteria and a definition to assess home birth integration within health care systems. We selected jurisdictions based on the publications that were eligible for inclusion in our systematic review and meta-analysis on planned place of birth. We sent the authors of the included publications a questionnaire about home birth practitioners and practices in their respective health care system at the time of their studies. We searched published peer-reviewed, non-peer-reviewed, and gray literature, and the websites of professional bodies to document information about home birth integration in each jurisdiction based on our criteria. Where information was lacking, we contacted experts in the field from the relevant jurisdiction. RESULTS: Home birth is well integrated into the health care system in British Columbia (Canada), England, Iceland, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Ontario (Canada), and Washington State (USA). Home birth is less well integrated into the health care system in Australia, Japan, Norway, and Sweden. CONCLUSIONS: This paper is the first to propose criteria for the evaluation of home birth integration within larger maternity care systems. Application of these criteria across 11 international jurisdictions indicates differences in the recognition and training of home birth practitioners, in access to hospital facilities, and in the supplies and equipment available at home births, which give rise to variation in the level of integration across different settings. Standardized criteria for the evaluation of systems integration are essential for interpreting planned home birth outcomes that emerge from contextual differences.

Labour Outcomes After Successful External Cephalic Version Compared With Spontaneous Cephalic Version.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare obstetrical outcomes for women with a cephalic presentation at birth resulting from successful external cephalic version (ECV) compared to those resulting from spontaneous cephalic version (SCV). METHODS: Secondary analysis was performed on Early External Cephalic Version Trial data. A total of 931 study participants had breech presentations between 34 and 36 weeks' gestation and cephalic presentations at birth. The incidence of intrapartum interventions was compared between patients with successful ECV (557) and those with SCV (374). A generalized linear mixed model was used to determine ORs for our primary outcomes. Parity, maternal BMI, previous CS, and enrolment centre were controlled for in the analysis. RESULTS: No differences were found after ECV compared with SCV in the incidence of CS (96 of 557 and 76 of 374, respectively; adjusted OR [aOR] 0.89; 95% CI 0.63-1.26), instrumental birth (68 of 557 and 29 of 373, respectively; aOR 1.55; 95% CI 0.96-2.50), or normal vaginal birth (393 of 557 and 268 of 373, respectively; aOR 0.92; 95% CI 0.68-1.24). Multiparous women with successful ECV were half as likely to require a CS compared with those with SCV and no ECV (28 of 313 and 42 of 258, respectively; aOR 0.45; 95% CI 0.26-0.80). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to compare birth outcomes of breech pregnancies that convert to cephalic presentation by means of SCV with birth outcomes of breech pregnancies that have ECV. Women with a cephalic-presenting fetus at birth as a result of successful ECV are not at greater risk of obstetrical interventions at birth when compared with women with fetuses who spontaneously turn to a cephalic presentation in the third trimester.

Intrapartum antibiotics for GBS prophylaxis alter colonization patterns in the early infant gut microbiome of low risk infants.

Early life microbial colonization and succession is critically important to healthy development with impacts on metabolic and immunologic processes throughout life. A longitudinal prospective cohort was recruited from midwifery practices to include infants born at full term gestation to women with uncomplicated pregnancies. Here we compare bacterial community succession in infants born vaginally, with no exposure to antibiotics (n = 53), with infants who were exposed to intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) for Group B Streptococcus (GBS; n = 14), and infants born by C-section (n = 7). Molecular profiles  of the 16 S rRNA genes indicate that there is a delay in the expansion of Bifidobacterium, which was the dominate infant gut colonizer, over the first 12 weeks and a persistence of Escherichia when IAP for GBS exposure is present during vaginal labour. Longer duration of IAP exposure increased the magnitude of the effect on Bifidobacterium populations, suggesting a longer delay in microbial community maturation. As with prior studies, we found altered gut colonisation following C-section that included a notable lack of Bacteroidetes. This study found that exposure of infants to IAP for GBS during vaginal birth affected aspects of gut microbial ecology that, although dramatic at early time points, disappeared by 12 weeks of age in most infants.

Predictors of success of external cephalic version and cephalic presentation at birth among 1253 women with non-cephalic presentation using logistic regression and classification tree analyses.

INTRODUCTION: Among women with a fetus with a non-cephalic presentation, external cephalic version (ECV) has been shown to reduce the rate of breech presentation at birth and cesarean birth. Compared with ECV at term, beginning ECV prior to 37 weeks' gestation decreases the number of infants in a non-cephalic presentation at birth. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to investigate factors associated with a successful ECV procedure and to present this in a clinically useful format. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were collected as part of the Early ECV Pilot and Early ECV2 Trials, which randomized 1776 women with a fetus in breech presentation to either early ECV (34-36 weeks' gestation) or delayed ECV (at or after 37 weeks). The outcome of interest was successful ECV, defined as the fetus being in a cephalic presentation immediately following the procedure, as well as at the time of birth. The importance of several factors in predicting successful ECV was investigated using two statistical methods: logistic regression and classification and regression tree (CART) analyses. RESULTS: Among nulliparas, non-engagement of the presenting part and an easily palpable fetal head were independently associated with success. Among multiparas, non-engagement of the presenting part, gestation less than 37 weeks and an easily palpable fetal head were found to be independent predictors of success. These findings were consistent with results of the CART analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of parity, descent of the presenting part was the most discriminating factor in predicting successful ECV and cephalic presentation at birth.

A comparison of intestinal microbiota in a population of low-risk infants exposed and not exposed to intrapartum antibiotics: The Baby & Microbiota of the Intestine cohort study protocol.

BACKGROUND: The intestinal microbiota influences metabolic, nutritional, and immunologic processes and has been associated with a broad range of adverse health outcomes including asthma, obesity and Type 2 diabetes. Early life exposures may alter the course of gut microbial colonization leading to differences in metabolic and immune regulation throughout life. Although approximately 50 % of low-risk full-term infants born in Canada are exposed to intrapartum antibiotics, little is known about the influence of this common prophylactic treatment on the developing neonatal intestinal microbiota. The purpose of this study is to describe the intestinal microbiome over the first 3 years of life among healthy, breastfed infants born to women with low-risk pregnancies at full term gestation and to determine if at 1 year of age, the intestinal microbiome of infants exposed to intrapartum antibiotics differs in type and quantity from the infants that are not exposed. METHODS: A prospectively followed cohort of 240 mother-infant pairs will be formed by enrolling eligible pregnant women from midwifery practices in the City of Hamilton and surrounding area in Ontario, Canada. Participants will be followed until the age of 3 years. Women are eligible to participate in the study if they are considered to be low-risk, planning a vaginal birth and able to communicate in English. Women are excluded if they have a multiple pregnancy or a preterm birth. Study questionnaires are completed, anthropometric measures are taken and biological samples are acquired including eight infant stool samples between 3 days and 3 years of age. DISCUSSION: Our experience to date indicates that midwifery practices and clients are keen to participate in this research. The midwifery client population is likely to have high rates of breastfeeding and low rates of intervention, allowing us to examine the comparative development of the microbiome in a relatively healthy and homogenous population. Results from this study will make an important contribution to the growing understanding of the patterns of intestinal microbiome colonization in the early years of life and may have implications for best practices to support the establishment of the microbiome at birth.

Outcomes associated with planned place of birth among women with low-risk pregnancies.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that planned home birth is associated with a decreased likelihood of intrapartum intervention with no difference in neonatal outcomes compared with planned hospital birth. The purpose of our study was to evaluate different birth settings by comparing neonatal mortality, morbidity and rates of birth interventions between planned home and planned hospital births in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: We used a provincial database of all midwifery-booked pregnancies between 2006 and 2009 to compare women who planned home birth at the onset of labour to a matched cohort of women with low-risk pregnancies who had planned hospital births attended by midwives. We conducted subgroup analyses by parity. Our primary outcome was stillbirth, neonatal death (< 28 d) or serious morbidity (Apgar score < 4 at 5 min or resuscitation with positive pressure ventilation and cardiac compressions). RESULTS: We compared 11 493 planned home births and 11 493 planned hospital births. The risk of our primary outcome did not differ significantly by planned place of birth (relative risk [RR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-1.55). These findings held true for both nulliparous (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.62-1.73) and multiparous women (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.49-2.05). All intrapartum interventions were lower among planned home births. INTERPRETATION: Compared with planned hospital birth, planned home birth attended by midwives in a jurisdiction where home birth is well-integrated into the health care system was not associated with a difference in serious adverse neonatal outcomes but was associated with fewer intrapartum interventions.

Learning from Adverse Events in Obstetrics: Is a Standardized Computer Tool an Effective Strategy for Root Cause Analysis?

OBJECTIVE: Adverse events occur in up to 10% of obstetric cases, and up to one half of these could be prevented. Case reviews and root cause analysis using a structured tool may help health care providers to learn from adverse events and to identify trends and recurring systems issues. We sought to establish the reliability of a root cause analysis computer application called Standardized Clinical Outcome Review (SCOR). METHODS: We designed a mixed methods study to evaluate the effectiveness of the tool. We conducted qualitative content analysis of five charts reviewed by both the traditional obstetric quality assurance methods and the SCOR tool. We also determined inter-rater reliability by having four health care providers review the same five cases using the SCOR tool. RESULTS: The comparative qualitative review revealed that the traditional quality assurance case review process used inconsistent language and made serious, personalized recommendations for those involved in the case. In contrast, the SCOR review provided a consistent format for recommendations, a list of action points, and highlighted systems issues. The mean percentage agreement between the four reviewers for the five cases was 75%. The different health care providers completed data entry and assessment of the case in a similar way. Missing data from the chart and poor wording of questions were identified as issues affecting percentage agreement. CONCLUSION: The SCOR tool provides a standardized, objective, obstetric-specific tool for root cause analysis that may improve identification of risk factors and dissemination of action plans to prevent future events.

Objectif : Des événements indésirables se manifestent dans jusqu'à 10 % des cas obstétricaux et jusqu'à la moitié de ces événements sont évitables. Les analyses de cas et l'analyse des causes fondamentales au moyen d'un outil structuré pourraient aider les fournisseurs de soins à tirer des leçons des événements indésirables et à identifier les tendances et les problèmes systémiques récurrents. Nous avons cherché à établir la fiabilité d'un logiciel d'analyse des causes fondamentales connu sous le nom de Standardized Clinical Outcome Review (SCOR). Méthodes : Nous avons conçu une étude faisant appel à des méthodes mixtes pour évaluer l'efficacité de l'outil. Nous avons mené une analyse qualitative du contenu de cinq dossiers ayant été analysés tant au moyen des méthodes traditionnelles d'assurance de la qualité en obstétrique qu'au moyen de l'outil SCOR. Nous avons également déterminé la fidélité interévaluateurs en demandant à quatre fournisseurs de soins d'analyser les cinq mêmes dossiers au moyen de l'outil SCOR. Résultats : L'analyse qualitative comparative a révélé que le processus traditionnel d'assurance de la qualité dans le cadre de l'analyse des cas utilisait un langage hétérogène et formulait de sérieuses recommandations personnalisées à l'endroit des intervenants du dossier. En revanche, l'analyse au moyen de l'outil SCOR fournissait un format uniforme pour les recommandations et une liste de points de décision, en plus de faire ressortir les problèmes systémiques. Le taux moyen d'entente (en pourcentage) entre les quatre évaluateurs pour les cinq dossiers en question était de 75 %. Les autres fournisseurs de soins ont procédé à la saisie des données et à l'évaluation des dossiers de façon semblable. L'absence de certaines données dans les dossiers et la mauvaise formulation des questions ont été identifiées comme étant des problèmes affectant le taux d'entente. Conclusion : L'outil SCOR permet la tenue d'une analyse des causes fondamentales de façon standardisée, objective et centrée sur l'obstétrique, ce qui pourrait améliorer l'identification des facteurs de risque et la dissémination des plans d'action pour la prévention de futurs événements.