Cost-utility analysis of expanding the colorectal cancer screening policy in Flanders.

OBJECTIVE: Since 2013, Flanders has introduced a screening programme for colorectal cancer for all citizens aged between 50 and 74 years. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-utility of an expansion of the colorectal cancer screening policy in Flanders (Belgium) and to place these findings in the international context. METHODS: Cost-utility analysis using high-detail data about screening participation, screening results, and epidemiological data, a Markov cohort model has been constructed to study long-term costs and effects. A cost-utility analysis was performed as a three-way comparison between current, expanded (from age 45 years), and no screening scenarios, from a societal and healthcare perspective. Robustness was assessed by both one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Analyses show that both current and expanded screening result in quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gains and are mostly cost-saving. Overall, 97.5% of Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs) remained well below € 2000 per QALY for all comparisons. Parameters related to the colonoscopy that follows a positive test result such as compliance and cost are especially impactful on the cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Screening participation and screening costs have remained comparatively stable, making colorectal cancer screening a cost-effective (dominant) policy. Expanding the screen age to 45 years is also cost-effective (dominant) compared with current screening, albeit with a slimmer margin.

The insights of health and welfare professionals on hurdles that impede economic evaluations of welfare interventions.

BACKGROUND: Four hurdles associated with economic evaluations in welfare interventions were identified and discussed in a previous published literature review. These hurdles include (i) 'Ignoring the impact of condition-specific outcomes', (ii) 'Ignoring the impact of QoL externalities', (iii) 'Calculation of costs from a too narrow perspective' and (iv) 'The lack of well-described & standardized interventions'. This study aims to determine how healthcare providers and social workers experience and deal with these hurdles in practice and what solutions or new insights they would suggest. METHODS: Twenty-two professionals of welfare interventions carried out in Flanders, were interviewed about the four described hurdles using a semi-structured interview. A thematic framework was developed to enable the qualitative analysis. The analysis of the semi-structured interviews was facilitated through the use of the software program QRS NVivo 10. RESULTS: The interviews revealed a clear need to tackle these hurdles. The interviewees confirmed that further study of condition-specific outcomes in economic evaluations are needed, especially in the field of mental health and stress. The proposed dimensions for the condition-specific questionnaires varied however between the groups of interviewees (i.e. general practitioners vs social workers). With respect to QoL externalities, the interviewees confirmed that welfare interventions have an impact on the social environment of the patient (friends and family). There was however no consensus on how this impact of QoL externalities should be taken into account in welfare interventions. Professionals also suggested that besides health care costs, the impact of welfare interventions on work productivity, the patients' social life and other items should be incorporated. Standardization appears to be of limited added value for most of the interviewees because they need a certain degree of freedom to interpret the intervention. Furthermore, the target population of the interventions is diverse which requires a tailor-made approach. CONCLUSION: This qualitative research demonstrated that these hurdles occur in practice. The proposed solutions for these hurdles can contribute to the improvement of the methodological quality of economic evaluations of welfare interventions.

Quantifying benefit-risk preferences for new medicines in rare disease patients and caregivers.

BACKGROUND: Rare disease patients and caregivers face uncommon, serious, debilitating conditions often characterised by poor prognosis and limited treatment options. This study aimed to explore what they consider of value when choosing between hypothetical therapeutic options and to quantify both their benefit-risk preferences and the influence of disease context. METHODS: A mixed-methods survey with patients and caregivers was conducted in the United Kingdom across a range of rare diseases. Discrete-choice experiments that compared hypothetical treatment profiles of benefits and risks were used to measure respondent preferences across a set of seven attributes related to health outcomes, safety, and process of care. Bespoke questions on current disease management and the joint use of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 questionnaire and of two Likert scales capturing self- and proxy-assessed disease-induced threat to life and impairment were implemented to describe disease context. Additionally, qualitative insights on the definitions of value and risk were collected from respondents. RESULTS: Final study sample included 721 patients and 152 informal caregivers, across 52 rare diseases. When choosing between hypothetical novel treatments for rare diseases, respondents attributed most importance to drug response, risk of serious side effects, and the ability to conduct usual activities while on treatment. In contrast, attributes related to treatment modalities were the least important. Respondents expressed a willingness to accept risks in hopes of finding some benefit, such as a higher chance of drug response or greater health improvement potential. Increasing disease severity, impairment or disability, and the lack of effective therapeutic options were shown to raise significantly the willingness to gain benefit through increased risk. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study performing a quantitative discrete choice experiment amongst patients and caregivers across 52 rare conditions. It enables a more detailed understanding of the relationship between disease context, treatment attributes and the degree of risk respondents are willing to take to gain a specific degree of benefit. Researchers of novel therapeutics for rare diseases should be encouraged to invest in preference elicitation studies to generate rigorous patient evidence and specific regulatory guidance should be issued to acknowledge their importance and their use in marketing authorisations.

Quality of life outcomes in women with endometriosis are highly influenced by recruitment strategies.

STUDY QUESTION: To what extent are outcome measures in endometriosis-related quality of life studies influenced by the setting in which patient recruitment is performed? SUMMARY ANSWER: Quality of life outcomes in women with endometriosis are highly influenced by recruitment strategies. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Most studies on quality of life in women with endometriosis are conducted in tertiary care centres or patient associations. It is conceivable that the setting in which patient recruitment is performed influences the quality of life results. This has not been investigated before. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Retrospective questionnaire based cohort study (part of the World Endometriosis Research Foundation (WERF) EndoCost study). The investigated women were recruited in three settings: a tertiary care centre for endometriosis (n = 135); five secondary care centres (n = 63); an endometriosis patient association (n = 291). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The secondary and tertiary care population included women with a laparoscopic and/or histological diagnosis of endometriosis. The patient association population consisted of women with a self-reported diagnosis of surgically confirmed endometriosis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The populations did not differ in terms of age, co-morbidities and education level. Delay of diagnosis was the longest in the patient association (median 7 years) (tertiary care 2 years; secondary care 1.5 years) (P < 0.001). The tertiary care population reported more laparotomies (64%) than the other populations (secondary care 43%; patient association 47%) (P = 0.002). Affected job was least prevalent in the secondary care setting (35%) (patient association 64%; tertiary care 56%) (P < 0.001). Affected relationships were most prevalent in the patient association setting (52%) (tertiary care 38%; secondary care 22%) (P < 0.001). Chronic pain was least prevalent in patients in secondary care (44%) (tertiary care 65%; patient association 61%) (P = 0.009). Substantial differences in quality of life were detected between secondary care (median physical component 50.4, mental component 49.6); tertiary care (physical component 46.2, mental component 46.2) and the patient association (physical component 45.0, mental component 44.6) (P < 0.001, P = 0.018). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The response rate was relatively low (35%). Analysis of the hospital populations revealed that non-responders and responders did not differ with respect to age or revised American Fertility Society classification, indicating that the non-responder bias is limited. However, other factors, such as social and marital status or symptomatology, might be different for non-responders. Missing values were analysed as if the symptom was not present. Missing values never exceeded 10%, except for one value. Therefore, it can be expected that the effect of missing data on the outcome is negligible. Twenty-five patients belonged to more than one category. A sensitivity analysis showed that the influence of assigning patients to another category was limited. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Outcomes regarding quality of life are highly influenced by recruitment strategy. None of the groups appeared to be a representative selection of the total population of women with endometriosis. An alternative strategy for creating a representative population for cost and quality of life studies is probably to recruit women who live in a specific geographic area rather than women that visit a specific hospital or are a member of a patient association. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The WERF EndoCost study was funded by the World Endometriosis Research Foundation. The sponsors did not have a role in the design and conduct of this study: collection, management, analysis, interpretation of the data; preparation, review, approval of the manuscript. L.H. is the chief executive and T.M.D. was a board member of WERF at the time of funding. T.M.D holds the Merck-Serono Chair and the Ferring Chair in Reproductive Medicine in Leuven, Belgium and has served as consultant for Merck-Serono, Schering-Plough, Astellas, and Arresto. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.

What is known about the cost-effectiveness of orphan drugs? Evidence from cost-utility analyses.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: In times of financial and economic hardship, governments are looking to contain pharmaceutical expenditure by focusing on cost-effective drugs. Because of their high prices and difficulties in demonstrating effectiveness in small patient populations, orphan drugs are often perceived as not able to meet traditional reimbursement threshold value for money. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the available evidence on the cost-effectiveness of orphan drugs. METHODS: All orphan drugs listed as authorized on the website of the European Medicines Agency on 21 November 2013 were included in the analysis. Cost-utility analyses (CUAs) were identified by searching the Tufts Medical Center Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry and Embase. For each CUA, a number of variables were collected. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The search identified 23 articles on the Tufts registry and 167 articles on Embase. The final analysis included 45 CUAs and 61 incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs) for 19 orphan drugs. Of all ICURS, 16·3% were related to dominant drugs (i.e. more effective and less expensive than the comparator), 70·5% were related to drugs that are more effective, but at a higher cost, and 13·1% were related to dominated drugs (i.e. less effective and more expensive than the comparator). The median overall ICUR was €40 242 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) with a minimum ICUR of €6311/QALY and a maximum ICUR of €974,917/QALY. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that orphan drugs can meet traditional reimbursement thresholds. Considering a threshold of £30,000/QALY, in this study, ten (52·6%) of a total of 19 orphan drugs for which data were available meet the threshold. As much as fifteen orphan drugs (78·9%) are eligible for reimbursement if a threshold of €80,000/QALY is considered.

Economic burden of inadequate management of allergic diseases in the European Union: a GA(2) LEN review.

BACKGROUND: In the European Union (EU), between 44 and 76 million individuals of the 217 million EU employees suffer from allergic disease of the airways or the skin. Up to 90% of these persons are untreated or insufficiently treated. This has major socio-economic consequences such as absence from work (absenteeism), particularly reduced productivity at work (presenteeism). METHODS: We used published literature and online statistical information from Eurostat and Eurofound to assess the costs of allergic disease to society. RESULTS: Allergies have an impact on direct, indirect, intangible and opportunity costs. Most importantly, for the EU, avoidable indirect costs per patient insufficiently treated for allergy range between €55 and €151 billion per annum due to absenteeism and presenteeism, that is, €2405 per untreated patient per year. On the other hand, appropriate therapy for allergic diseases is available at comparatively low costs at an average of €125 per patient annually, equalling only 5% of the costs of untreated disease, allowing potential savings of up to €142 billion. CONCLUSIONS: A better care for allergies based on guideline-based treatment would allow Europe's economy substantial savings. In addition, allergies have an impact on learning and performance at school and university, leading to opportunity costs for society. This cannot be calculated moneywise but will have an impact in a modern knowledge-based society. Still allergies are trivialized in society, noting that the costs of therapy are paid by patients and healthcare services, whereas economic savings are made by employers and society. A change of this mindset is urgently needed.

The significant effect of endometriosis on physical, mental and social wellbeing: results from an international cross-sectional survey.

STUDY QUESTION: To what extent do the management of endometriosis and the symptoms that remain after treatment affect the quality of life in women with the disease? SUMMARY ANSWER: Many women with endometriosis had impaired quality of life and continued to suffer from endometriosis-associated symptoms even though their endometriosis has been managed in tertiary care centres. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The existing literature indicates that quality of life and work productivity is reduced in women with endometriosis. However, most studies have small sample sizes, are treatment related or examine newly diagnosed patients only. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey among 931 women with endometriosis treated in 12 tertiary care centres in 10 countries. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Women diagnosed with endometriosis who had at least one contact related to endometriosis-associated symptoms during 2008 with a participating centre were enrolled into the study. The study investigated the effect of endometriosis on education, work and social wellbeing, endometriosis-associated symptoms and health-related quality of life, by using questions obtained from the World Endometriosis Research Foundation (WERF) GSWH instrument (designed and validated for the WERF Global Study on Women's Health) and the Short Form 36 version 2 (SF-36v2). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Of 3216 women invited to participate in the study, 1450 (45%) provided informed consent and out of these, 931 (931/3216 = 29%) returned the questionnaires. Endometriosis had affected work in 51% of the women and affected relationships in 50% of the women at some time during their life. Dysmenorrhoea was reported by 59%, dyspareunia by 56% and chronic pelvic pain by 60% of women. Quality of life was decreased in all eight dimensions of the SF-36v2 compared with norm-based scores from a general US population (all P < 0.01). Multivariate regression analysis showed that number of co-morbidities, chronic pain and dyspareunia had an independent negative effect on both the physical and mental component of the SF-36v2. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The fact that women were enrolled in tertiary care centres could lead to a possible over-representation of women with moderate-to-severe endometriosis, because the participating centres typically treat more complex and referred cases of endometriosis. The response rate was relatively low. Since there was no Institute Review Board approval to do a non-responder investigation on basic characteristics, some uncertainty remains regarding the representativeness of the investigated population. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This international multicentre survey represents a large group of women with endometriosis, in all phases of the disease, which increases the generalizability of the data. Women still suffer from frequent symptoms, despite tertiary care management, in particular chronic pain and dyspareunia. As a result their quality of life is significantly decreased. A patient-centred approach with extensive collaboration across disciplines, such as pain specialists, psychologists, sexologists and social workers, may be a valuable strategy to improve the long-term care of women with endometriosis. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The WERF EndoCost study is funded by the World Endometriosis Research Foundation (WERF) through grants received from Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Takeda Italia Farmaceutici SpA, Pfizer Ltd and the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. The sponsors did not have a role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review or approval of the manuscript. L.H. is the chief executive and T.D. was a board member of WERF at the time of funding. T.D. holds the Merck-Serono Chair in Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, and the Ferring Chair in Reproductive Medicine at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven in Belgium and has served as consultant/research collaborator for Merck-Serono, Schering-Plough, Astellas and Arresto.

Do we need authorized orphan drugs when compounded medications are available?

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Orphan drugs are used to diagnose, prevent or treat a rare disease. This Commentary aims to present a number of case studies questioning the need for designating compounded medications with a long history of effective use, which is well-supported by published clinical evidence. COMMENT: Prior to the market introduction of orphan drugs, medication compounding was done in our hospital pharmacy for several rare diseases. Examples include amifampridine for the treatment of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (Firdapse(®)), ibuprofen for the treatment of neonatal patent ductus arteriosus (Pedea(®)) and zinc acetate for the treatment of Wilson's disease (Wilzin(®)). Several 'non-orphan' pharmaceutical products, used off-label for the treatment of rare diseases, that became orphan medicinal products include Hydrea(®) for the treatment of sickle-cell syndrome (Siklos(®)) and Viagra(®) for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (Revatio(®)). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: In our opinion, as indicated by our examples, a better balance should be struck between the development of orphan drugs along the recently established regulatory pathways and the pragmatic use of pharmacy-compounded products and evidence-based off-label use of already available commercial products. Societal needs would be best met by focusing orphan drug development on rare diseases for which there is a high unmet medical need.

Incidence and drug treatment of emotional distress after cancer diagnosis: a matched primary care case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Emotional distress is common in cancer patients. This study aimed to describe, in the year after a cancer diagnosis: the incidence of anxiety, depression and excessive alcohol use; the pattern of these diagnoses and treatment over time; and the nature and duration of the prescribed treatment. METHODS: A matched case-control study was conducted using routinely collected primary care data from 173 Scottish general practices. A presumptive diagnosis of emotional distress (anxiety, depression and/or excessive alcohol use) was based on prescription data or diagnostic code. Prescriptions for psychotropic drugs were described in terms of drug class, volume and treatment duration. RESULTS: In total, 7298 cancer cases and 14 596 matched-controls were identified. Overall, 1135 (15.6%) cases and 201 (1.4%) controls met criteria for emotional distress (odds ratio 13.7, 95% confidence interval 11.6-16.1). Psychotropic drugs were prescribed in the 6 months following initial cancer diagnosis for 1066 (14.6%) cases and 161 (1.1%) controls. The volume and duration of anxiolytic and antipsychotic prescribing was significantly different between cases and controls. CONCLUSION: This study quantified the higher incidence of new emotional distress in cancer patients in the first year post diagnosis. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of emotional distress at any time in the year after cancer diagnosis.

The cost-effectiveness of immunotherapy for respiratory allergy: a review.

This article reviews the international literature on the cost-effectiveness of immunotherapy for respiratory allergy. Included studies conducted an economic evaluation of immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, allergic conjunctivitis, allergic rhinitis, asthma or allergic rhinitis in combination with asthma. Although there were few economic evaluations and these suffered from methodological shortcomings, the evidence appears to support the cost-effectiveness of immunotherapy as compared with pharmacotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, subcutaneous immunotherapy as compared with pharmacotherapy for allergic rhinitis and immunotherapy as compared with pharmacotherapy for allergic rhinitis and asthma. One economic evaluation suggested that immunotherapy as compared with pharmacotherapy is unlikely to be cost-effective for asthma. The questions of the cost-effectiveness of sublingual vs subcutaneous immunotherapy and of the cost-effectiveness of immunotherapy for allergic conjunctivitis have not been resolved to date. The cost-effectiveness of immunotherapy depends on the duration of the clinical benefit of immunotherapy following treatment cessation, and on the break-even point of cumulative costs between immunotherapy and pharmacotherapy. There is a need for economic evaluations based on high-quality prospective and long-term clinical studies comparing immunotherapy with pharmacotherapy in real-life practice and comparing sublingual with subcutaneous immunotherapy.

Market uptake of orphan drugs--a European analysis.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Variations in market uptake of an orphan drug have important implications with respect to access to care and inequality of treatment. Therefore, the aim of this study was to quantify both the sales and volume uptake of orphan drugs in Europe and to assess whether a country's gross domestic product (GDP) and/or health technology assessment (HTA) influences the orphan drugs' market uptake. METHODS: We analysed the numbers of orphan drugs launched and the sales and volume uptake for 17 orphan drugs in 23 European countries from 2001 until the beginning of 2010 using the IMS Health database. Countries were clustered based on GDP and the availability of a formal HTA-organization. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The uptake of orphan drugs varied across European countries. The highest volumes and contributions of orphan drugs in the first year occurred in countries with a high GDP (and implicitly, a higher budget for healthcare), independently of the existence of an HTA-organization. In contrast, in countries with a low GDP, orphan drugs were less available when there was a formal HTA-organization. There, budgetary restrictions can cause the exclusion of less cost-effective orphan drugs. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: We observed substantial variation in the market uptake of orphan drugs. Such variation may have important implications with respect to access to care and inequality of treatment. The uptake of orphan drugs could be promoted through the clinical added value of orphan drugs (CAVOD) project and various conditional pricing and reimbursement mechanisms.

What is the value for money of medicines? A registry study.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Economic evaluation is used to assess the value for money of medicines and inform pharmaceutical pricing/reimbursement decisions in many countries. This paper aims to report on estimates of the value for money of medicines in Europe. METHODS: Estimated cost-utilities were derived from studies included in the Tufts Medical Center Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry between 2000 and 2007. For each study, the following variables were examined: publication year, target population, intervention type, country of patient sample, disease classification, prevention stage, funding source, study perspective, discounting, sensitivity analysis, incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) and methodological quality. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Six hundred and eight ICURs were reported in 231 cost-utility analyses. Around 17·1% of ratios related to medicines that were more effective and less expensive than the comparator; 76·5% related to medicines that improved outcomes, but increased costs; and 6·4% related to medicines that were less effective and more expensive than the comparator. The median ratio was 12,238 € per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Using threshold values of 20,000 and 50,000 € per QALY, the probability that medicines provided value for money was 58% and 81%, respectively. Preventive medicines studied provided more value for money than curative medicines (P=0·002). Studies sponsored by industry generated more favourable results than studies sponsored from other sources (P<0·001). However, no association was observed between the funding source and the methodological quality of economic evaluations. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The evidence base suggests that the majority of medicines provided value for money. Such information informs policy decisions relating to the allocation of scarce health care resources in Europe.

How much is the life of a cancer patient worth? A pharmaco-economic perspective.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Countries struggle to accommodate the introduction of new effective cancer medicines, while containing costs. Our objective is to comment on several pharmaco-economic challenges involved in determining the value of cancer medicines by reviewing cost-effectiveness thresholds for cancer medicines in several countries and by discussing the cost-effectiveness of anti-cancer biotechnology and orphan medicines. COMMENT: A literature search was carried out of PubMed, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination databases, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and EconLit up to August 2009. Health technology assessment agencies in England and Scotland are willing to incur a higher cost per quality-adjusted life year for cancer medicines than for other medicines. Risk-sharing arrangements have been implemented to optimize the value of cancer medicines. The cost-effectiveness of biotechnology medicines in cancer care is challenged by their high price, and depends on the ability to identify the most responsive target population, through use of suitable biomarkers. The evaluation of orphan medicines in cancer care needs to balance the absence of an alternative therapy for a life-threatening disease against the high cost-effectiveness ratio, and usually weak clinical data. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Current strategies used to inform decisions on the funding of expensive anti-cancer medicines are commented on to highlight important issues and problems. Pharmaco-economic evaluation is an important tool for assessing the value of cancer medicines and to inform evidence-based decision making in cancer care. Value-judgments such as preferential consideration of anti-cancer medicines can then be made explicitly.

[Medicine information for patients with a major depression at hospital discharge]. / Information sur les médicaments "sur mesure" pour des patients en etat dépressif. Rapport de thèse de doctorat.

This article provides an overview of several parts of a doctoral thesis on medicine information for patients with a major depression at hospital discharge. A review of the international literature showed that medicine information can increase knowledge and adherence. Inpatients would like to receive more information on the medicines prescribed. The GIPPOZ-study showed positive results on a few economic outcomes when a differentiated approach in providing information on antidepressants was applied. Follow-up calls of participants of the GIPPOZ-study yielded interesting qualitative findings on problems and perspective after discharge from hospital. The hospital pharmacists stressed the individual approach of patients during the GIPPOZ-study. Practice and health policy suggestions were formulated. Health care professionals should provide more information to patients on their medicines. Policy makers should guarantee a structure so that health care professionals can fulfill their role as provider of medication information.

[How to improve the continuity of pharmacotherapy at hospital admission and discharge]. / Comment optimiser la continuité du traitement médicamenteux entre l'hôpital et le domicile?

The continuity of pharmacotherapy is of vital importance when patients move from one health care setting to another. Unfortunately, this continuity is not always guaranteed. The aim of this study is to propose solutions to enhance the continuity of pharmacotherapy at hospital admission and discharge. The study consists of a systematic review of the international literature and an analysis of seamless care initiatives in seven selected countries; a summary of Belgian data on problems as well as solutions with regard to continuity of care; a quantification of the extent of medication changes as a result of a hospital stay in Belgium; and a qualitative analysis of the perception of Belgian health care professionals (HCPs) on approaches to improve seamless care. The literature review yielded 15 papers of sufficient quality. However, this review did not generate definitive conclusions on the clinical impact and the cost-effectiveness of interventions aiming to enhance the continuity of pharmacotherapy. The most important initiatives that have been put in practice in foreign countries include the development and implementation of guidelines for HCPs; national information campaigns; education of HCPs; and the development of information technologies as to share patient and prescription data between settings of care. For Belgium, 66 seamless care initiatives were identified. The high number and variety of projects show the interest for this topic as well as the involvement of various HCPs from diverse settings in the development of solutions. Based on this research, and the solutions discussed in the focus groups, the following elements are proposed to enhance the continuity of pharmacotherapy: a national guideline governing the continuity of pharmacotherapy; a national campaign to sensitize HCPs and patients in this area; the availability of a comprehensive and up to date medication list for each patient; and electronic healthcare infrastructure that facilitates sharing of information.

Medication information for Flemish inpatients with major depression: evaluation and construct validity of the Consumer Information Rating Form.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Evaluating the quality of written medication information is a major topic of concern when patient pamphlets are developed. The objective of this study is to evaluate a patient pamphlet on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) by calculating Flesch-Douma readability scores and by applying the Consumer Information Rating Form (CIRF) to Flemish inpatients with major depression taking SSRIs. METHODS: The pamphlet was evaluated by calculating Flesch-Douma readability scores. The study enrolled patients with major depression taking SSRIs. Patient received a SSRI pamphlet and completed a self-administered structured questionnaire consisting of the adapted CIRF and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Construct validity was explored by means of factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The Flesch-Douma readability scores showed that the pamphlet was easy to read, had much interest in the reader and was very popular. The sample of 96 patients consisted of doubtful/definite cases in terms of anxiety (10.65 +/- 4.90) and doubtful cases in terms of depression (8.91 +/- 5.23). Using the CIRF, patients assigned positive scores to comprehensibility, utility and design quality of the pamphlet. Factor analysis on the original CIRF confirmed the three original factors (P < 0.001). Cronbach's alpha of factors ranged from 0.69 to 0.83. CONCLUSION: The SSRI pamphlet is of good quality. Our study supported the construct validity of the CIRF to Flemish inpatients with major depression.

Pharmacotherapy of allergic rhinitis: a pharmaco-economic approach.

This article reports on a systematic literature review of the costs of allergic rhinitis (AR), the economic value of pharmacotherapy of AR, and the factors affecting costs and economic value of pharmacotherapy. Included studies had carried out a cost-of-illness analysis, cost analysis, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility or cost-benefit analysis. Allergic rhinitis imposes a substantial economic burden on society, with indirect costs of productivity loss being larger than the direct healthcare costs. Cost estimates were biased because of difficulties of diagnosis; exclusion of patients who do not seek healthcare; exclusion of over-the-counter medication; difficulties in estimating productivity loss. There is limited evidence on costs of seasonal/perennial and intermittent/persistent AR. Little is known of the economic value of pharmacotherapy of AR, although levocetirizine appears to be cost-effective as compared with placebo. Economic evaluations suffered limitations from small sample sizes, short trial duration, lack of standardized effectiveness measure, restricted scope of costs. Finally, the economic value of pharmacotherapy of AR is influenced by the perspective of the economic evaluation, relative effectiveness and costs of available drugs, patient compliance with treatment.