Comparison of two diagnostic criteria in the diagnosis of anaphylaxis in a tertiary adult allergy clinic.

Background: Anaphylaxis is a very dynamic issue with its incidence and trigger profile changing over the years. We aimed to compile the characteristics of anaphylaxis cases diagnosed in our clinic prospectively and to make a comparison between diagnostic criteria proposed by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network (NIAID/FAAN) and World Allergy Organization (WAO). Method: Three-item diagnostic criteria recommended by NIAID/FAAN (2006) were used in the diagnosis of anaphylaxis. The clinical features of the cases, risk factors, etiologies, severity of anaphylaxis, and treatment approach were determined. The same patients were also classified by current WAO diagnostic criteria. Results: A total of 204 patients (158F/46 M, median age 45.3 years) were included. Drugs (65.2%), venom (9.8%) and food allergies (9.3%) were the top 3 etiologies. Among drug triggers, chemotherapeutics were the most common (17.7%), followed by antibiotics (15.3%) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (14.2%). The patients were mostly diagnosed with the second criterion (84.8%), followed by the first criterion (11.8%) and the third criterion (3.4%) of the NIAID/FAAN criteria. In terms of WAO criteria, 82.8% of the patients were diagnosed with the first criterion, and 14.3% with the second criterion while 2.9% of the patients did not meet the WAO criteria. The severity of anaphylaxis was evaluated as grade-2, 3 and 4 in 30.9%, 64.2%, and 4.9% of the patients, respectively. Adrenaline was administered to 31.9% of the patients especially who had angioedema and bronchospasm (p = 0.04). Conclusion: Our data suggest that covering more details in patient's history may prevent possible underdiagnosis and WAO diagnostic criteria seem to be insufficient in some patients. We believe that our results will contribute to the literature on anaphylaxis and would be groundwork for future studies.

Comparison of perennial and preseasonal allergoid immunotherapy in grass pollen allergic patients.

BACKGROUND: The clinical and immunological efficacy of preseasonal allergoid immunotherapy has been previously investigated, however, studies comparing the effectiveness of the two protocols are limited in the literature. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and immunological efficacy of pre-seasonal and perennial allergoid immunotherapy. METHODS: This is a prospective cross sectional two-arm study. During the season; symptom and medication scores were filled. Before and at the end of the season; RQLQ was applied, Phl p sIgE, sIgG4 and IL-10 levels were measured. RESULTS: In preseasonal group patients had better symptom control for most of the weeks, particularly during the peak pollen period (April: w-2 & w-4, p = 0.04; May: w-2, p = 0.02; June: w-1, w-2, p = 0.02; w-3, w-5, p = 0.03; July: w-2, p = 0.01; w-3, p = 0.02; w-4, p = 0.04). In the perennial group, sIgG4 [1st time point: preseasonal 0.02 mgA/L vs perennial 0.13 mgA/L (p < 0.0001); 2nd time point: preseasonal 0.52 mgA/L vs perennial 0.33 mgA/L; 3rd time point: preseasonal 0.04 mgA/L vs perennial 0.12 mgA/L (p < 0.0001)] and IL-10 (1st time point: preseasonal 1.45 pg/ml vs perennial 2.03 pg/ml; 2nd time point: preseasonal 2.29 pg/ml vs perennial 2.19 pg/ml; 3rd time point: preseasonal 2.32 pg/ml vs perennial 2.16 pg/ml) levels were higher and more stable. CONCLUSIONS: Preseasonal immunotherapy provided better control of symptoms throughout the pollen season. However, the blocking antibody response was stronger and more permanent in the perennial immunotherapy group.

Field sting reactions in patients receiving Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy: real-life experience.

BACKGROUND: Hymenoptera stings can cause systemic allergic reactions (SARs) that are prevented by venom immunotherapy (VIT). Sting challenge tests or field stings are used to evaluate the outcome of VIT. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the consequences of field stings in patients during or after completion of VIT, and to identify patients at higher risk. METHODS: Patients treated with VIT between 1995 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Contacted patients were invited to the clinic and a questionnaire was conducted regarding the history of field stings. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients (F/M: 45/70, mean age: 38.5 ± 12 years) treated with VIT were included; 74/115 were contacted and asked about field stings after VIT cessation. A history of 73 field stings was reported in 38 patients, 25 of whom were treated with honeybee venom and 13 with common wasp venom. Eighteen of the reactions were SARs [8 with honeybees (1 grade-I, 6 grade-II, 1 grade-III) and 10 with common wasps (1 grade-I, 5 grade-II, 4 grade-III)]. There was no association between the severity of index reactions and field stings with either the honeybee or common wasp. The median duration of VIT was longer in patients showing no reaction than in patients with an SAR. Of the 7 patients on ACE inhibitors or beta-blockers, 1 asthmatic patient developed grade-II SAR due to field stings in the first year of VIT. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that VIT lasting at least 3 years is effective in preventing SARs after field stings.

What happens to basophils and tryptase, LXA4 and CysLTs during aspirin desensitization?

INTRODUCTION: Aspirin desensitization (AD) is an effective treatment in patients with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD) by providing inhibitory effect on symptoms and polyp recurrence. However, limited data is available on how AD works. We aimed to study comprehensively the mechanisms underlying AD by examining basophil activation (CD203c upregulation), mediator-releases of tryptase, CysLT, and LXA4, and LTB4 receptor expression for the first 3 months of AD. METHODS: The study was conducted in patients with NERD who underwent AD (group 1: n = 23), patients with NERD who received no desensitization (group 2: n = 22), and healthy volunteers (group 3, n = 13). All participants provided blood samples for flow cytometry studies (CD203c and LTB4 receptor), and mediator releases (CysLT, LXA4, and tryptase) for the relevant time points determined. RESULTS: All baseline parameters of CD203c and LTB4 receptor expressions, tryptase, CysLT, and LXA4 releases were similar in each group (p > 0.05). In group 1, CD203c started to be upregulated at the time of reactions during AD, and continued to be high for 3 months when compared to controls. All other study parameters were comparable with baseline and at the other time points in each group (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although basophils are active during the first 3 months of AD, no releases of CysLT, tryptase or LXA4 exist. Therefore, our results suggest that despite active basophils, inhibition of mediators can at least partly explain underlying the mechanism in the first three months of AD.

Incidence and clinical course of COVID-19 in patients using omalizumab for chronic spontaneous urticaria and/or severe allergic asthma and using mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma: A single center real life experience.

Introduction: To assess the incidence and course of COVID-19 in patients with severe asthma/chronic spontaneous urticaria using biological agents. Materials and Methods: A total of 202 patients (142 with asthma, and 60 with urticaria) were enrolled. The subjects were asked via face-to-face or telephone interview whether they had been diagnosed with COVID-19 and the course of the disease. Result: Study group consisted of 132 women, and 70 men (median age= 48 years). Median omalizumab dose was 300 mg/month in asthma (min-max= 150-1200 mg). The mepolizumab dose of two patients diagnosed with EGPA was 300 mg/month. Thirty one (15.3%) patients were diagnosed with COVID-19, 22 (71%) of whom were receiving omalizumab and nine (29%) were receiving mepolizumab. Asthma or chronic spontaneous urticaria diagnosis, age, sex, smoking, weight, comorbidities, atopy, and biological agent use were not statistically different between patients with or without COVID-19. Nine COVID-19 patients were hospitalized, and three of them required intensive care. Mepolizumab usage was higher in hospitalized patients (5, 55.6%), whereas omalizumab usage was higher in home-treated patients (18, 81%). The mean duration of biological use in home-treated patients was significantly higher than that of the hospitalized patients (35.64 months vs. 22.56 months, p= 0.024). Biological treatment was interrupted in 47 (23%) patients, selfinterruption due to the infection risk was the foremost reason (34%). Conclusions: The incidence of COVID-19 among patients with asthma and urticaria on mepolizumab and omalizumab was higher compared to studies from other countries. The disease course appeared mild in patients receiving long-term biological therapy.

Effectiveness of Low-Dose Mepolizumab in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (EGPA): A Real-Life Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Data showing effectiveness of mepolizumab in patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) are limited. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective chart review of patients with EGPA treated with mepolizumab. Clinical, laboratory, functional parameters and asthma, rhinitis control, and quality of life scores (Asthma Control Test [ACT], Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire [AQLQ], Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire [RQLQ], and SinoNasal Outcome Test [SNOT]-22) were evaluated at the baseline, 6th month, and 12th month. Complete response was defined as the absence of asthma and/or ear, nasal symptoms and exacerbations with a prednisone of ≤7.5 mg/day, partial response if it was achieved with a prednisone of >7.5 mg/day. RESULTS: Overall, 25 patients (18 F/7 M) with a median age of 47 years (23-76) were enrolled. Mepolizumab 100 mg/month was administered (dose increased to 300 mg/month in 3 patients). Mepolizumab significantly decreased daily dose of oral corticosteroid (OCS) from 11.04 mg to 3.65 mg together with a significant improvement in ACT, AQLQ, RQLQ, and SNOT-22 scores and a significant reduction in asthma exacerbations and blood eosinophil count at the 6th and 12th month (all p values <0.05). The mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s increased (at baseline: 1.88 L to 2.46 L at the 12th month [p = 0.037]). Seventy-six percent of patients responded completely at the 6th month and 81.25% at the 12th month. The complete responders at the 6th and 12th month were older than partial responders and nonresponders (p = 0.030 and p = 0.057, respectively). Patients with complete response at the 6th month were on lower doses of OCS than partial responders and nonresponders (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose mepolizumab was effective in EGPA patients by improving sinonasal and asthma outcomes, while reducing the need for OCS.

Allergen-specific immunotherapy practices and course of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients during COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is accepted as the only disease-modifying therapy for IgE-mediated allergic airway diseases and hymenoptera venom allergy. AIT requires repeated contact between patient and physician or nurse in the hospital. Because it is a long-term treatment, compliance is essential issue to obtain maximal efficacy. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic reshaped doctor-patient interaction and pattern of hospital admissions. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the possible changes in the administration of AIT and associated factors, in addition to the characteristics of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 infection. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent AIT for hymenoptera venom allergy, allergic rhinitis or allergic asthma between 11 March 2020 and 31 January 2021 were included in our retrospective study. Perennial and preseasonal AIT practices were evaluated. We identified patients with COVID-19 infection among the ones who received AIT. RESULTS: The mean age of 215 patients was 37.8±11.9 years and 52.1% of the patients were female. In our study, 35.4% of perennial AIT patients did not continue treatment after the COVID-19 pandemic, and the cause was patient-related in 66.7% of the cases. Compliance was 70.7% in patients receiving perennial AIT. The highest compliance rate for AIT was for venom allergy (86.5%). Thirty-four patients (15.8%) were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection. No mortality due to COVID-19 infection was observed in those who underwent AIT. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 pandemic has reduced compliance to AIT. Compliance was higher in venom immunotherapy than in aeroallergens. Severe COVID-19 infection and COVID-19 related death were not observed in patients receiving AIT.

Mepolizumab Is an Effective Option in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Regardless of Baseline Features: Single-Center Real-Life Data.

BACKGROUND: Mepolizumab has been approved as a treatment option for severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) patients in our country. We aimed to evaluate the clinical and functional efficacy of mepolizumab in this group of patients in real life as well as the response rates to mepolizumab and the possible factors affecting the response. METHODS: The study was a retrospective chart review of patients with SEA treated with mepolizumab. The data were collected at baseline, and at the 6th and 12th month. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients (41F/21M) with a mean age of 44.41 ± 13.24 years were included in the study. They had poor symptom control with a mean asthma control test (ACT) score of 16.61 ± 5.59, frequent exacerbations with a mean of 3.4 ± 3.7 in the previous 12 months, and 80.6% required daily oral corticosteroid (OCS) with a median dosage of 8 mg/day as methylprednisolone. The ACT score increased to 22.47 ± 3.18 and 22.03 ± 4.31, respectively, and blood eosinophil count decreased from 1,146/µL to 89/µL and 85/µL at the 6th and 12th month, respectively. The mean FEV1 at baseline was 2.102 L there was an increase of 0.373 L at 6th month and 0.596 L at 12th month. The percentage of regular users of OCS decreased to 66.0% at 6th month with a median dosage of 4 mg and 52.6% at 12th month with a median dosage of 2 mg. Mepolizumab reduced the rate of exacerbations compared with the previous year from a mean of 3.40 to 0.15 at 6th month and 0.36 at 12th month. There was a significant improvement in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), and Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores at both of time points. The rate of responders and super-responders at 6th month was 60% and 28%, respectively, and consequently, the overall response rate was 88%. At the 12th month, the super-responder rate increased to 44.7% as well as the overall response to 89.4%. The only difference between the nonresponders, responders, and super-responders at the 6th and 12th month was whether regular daily OCS was used pre-mepolizumab. All nonresponders at both 6th and 12th month were using OCS regularly, whereas most of super-responder used the OCS only during exacerbations. CONCLUSION: Mepolizumab effectively reduced asthma exacerbations, steroid requirement, blood eosinophil counts and improved asthma control, pulmonary function, sinonasal symptoms and quality of life. Our data suggest that mepolizumab would be effective in selected patients in real-life settings.

The role of component-resolved diagnosis in Hymenoptera venom allergy in clinical practice.

Background: Hymenoptera venom allergy is an immunoglobulin (Ig) E mediated hypersensitivity reaction to Hymenoptera venoms. Obvious identification of the culprit insect that causes the clinical symptoms and, hence, the accurate selection of venom for curative treatment, is of great importance for the effectiveness and safety of venom immunotherapy. Objective: In this study, the contribution of component-resolved diagnostics (CRD) is evaluated in the diagnosis of Hymenoptera venom allergy. Method: Ninety-three patients from four different centers in Turkey were included in the study. Conventional tests, including prick and intradermal skin tests, with commercial venom extracts and serum specific IgE (sIgE) levels for whole venoms were performed. An sIgE analysis for venom allergen components, including rApi m 1, rApi m 2, rApi m 10, rVes v 1, rVes v 5, were evaluated by immunoblotting. Results: In conventional test results, 17 of 35 patients with bee venom allergy were positive to honey bee venom, whereas 18 patients were positive to bee and wasp venoms. In 28 of 35 patients with bee venom allergy, the diagnosis was confirmed with CRD. CRD revealed a sensitivity of 80% in patients with bee venom allergy. According to conventional tests, 7 of 24 patients with vespid venom allergy demonstrated sensitivity only to Vespula species, whereas 17 patients revealed double positivity. The total diagnostic sensitivity of Ves v 1 and Ves v 5 was calculated as 87.5%. Ten of 23 patients with a history of hypersensitivity to both venoms showed double sensitivity with CRD; one patient had cross-reactivity, one patient was found to be sensitive only to bee venom, and, eight patients were sensitive only to Vespula species. Eleven patients had an uncertain history in terms of the culprit insect type and six of them had double sensitivity in CRD. Conclusion: CRD seemed to be more helpful in diagnosing vespid venom allergy than bee venom allergy. It can also discriminate clinically significant sensitizations from irrelevant ones.

Coincidence of pollen season and coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: less time outdoors - lesser allergy symptoms in 2020.

BACKGROUND: This year, pollen season coincided with the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Strict preventive measures have been implemented during April and May and then a normalization phase started in our country in June. Our aim is to evaluate the effect of preventive measures during the pandemic process on allergic airway disease symptoms. METHODS: A prospective questionnaire-based study was planned and a questionnaire form was sent to the cell-phones of the subjects with pollen allergy followed in our clinic. Number of airborne grass pollens was determined by Burkard volumetric 7-day spore trap. RESULTS: A total of 222 pollen allergic patients were included in the study. At the beginning of the pandemic, majority of the subjects were spending time mostly indoors. The rate of home-office workers gradually decreased and the rate of office workers and the number of days at work increased from April to June, significantly. Nasal and ocular symptoms of the patients, also increased in June compared to April and May and, approximately one-third of the patients had less symptoms when compared to the same period of the previous year. The rates of using a face mask and taking a shower on return home were high among the subjects during all season. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that spending less time outside during the pollen season and wearing a mask outdoors reduces exposure to pollens and causes a reduction in symptoms. Thus, strict application of measures that cannot be applied in daily practice can make a significant contribution to the management of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

ß-blockers and ACE inhibitors are not a risk factor for severe systemic sting reactions and adverse events during venom immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: There is controversy whether taking ß-blockers or ACE inhibitors (ACEI) is a risk factor for more severe systemic insect sting reactions (SSR) and whether it increases the number or severity of adverse events (AE) during venom immunotherapy (VIT). METHODS: In this open, prospective, observational, multicenter trial, we recruited patients with a history of a SSR and indication for VIT. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate whether patients taking ß-blockers or ACEI show more systemic AE during VIT compared to patients without such treatment. RESULTS: In total, 1,425 patients were enrolled and VIT was performed in 1,342 patients. Of all patients included, 388 (27.2%) took antihypertensive (AHT) drugs (10.4% took ß-blockers, 11.9% ACEI, 5.0% ß-blockers and ACEI). Only 5.6% of patients under AHT treatment experienced systemic AE during VIT as compared with 7.4% of patients without these drugs (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.43-1.22, p = 0.25). The severity of the initial sting reaction was not affected by the intake of ß-blockers or ACEI (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.89-1.46, p = 0.29). In total, 210 (17.7%) patients were re-stung during VIT and 191 (91.0%) tolerated the sting without systemic symptoms. Of the 19 patients with VIT treatment failure, 4 took ß-blockers, none an ACEI. CONCLUSIONS: This trial provides robust evidence that taking ß-blockers or ACEI does neither increase the frequency of systemic AE during VIT nor aggravate SSR. Moreover, results suggest that these drugs do not impair effectiveness of VIT. (Funded by Medical University of Graz, Austria; Clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT04269629).

Omalizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA): single-center experience in 18 cases.

BACKGROUND: Data are limited regarding the effectiveness of omalizumab in patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). Our aim was to evaluate the clinical and functional effectiveness of omalizumab in patients with EGPA in long-term follow-up. METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review of patients with EGPA who were treated with omalizumab injections between May 2012 and April 2018. Once treatment with omalizumab was started, data were collected at various time points: baseline, the 16th week, 1st year, and annually until the last evaluation. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (16F/2M) with a mean age of 48.61 ± 11.94 years were included. Data were available for all patients for the first year, 12 patients for the second year, 10 patients for the third  year, 8 patients for the fourth  year and 5 patients for the fifth year. All patients were on mean dosage of 15.77 ± 7.6 mg/day oral corticosteroid (OCS) as daily bases for mean 8.61 ± 4 years besides high-dose inhaler corticosteroid/long-acting beta agonist. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) were positive in 2  patients, and 8 patients were diagnosed as having vasculitis by skin biopsy, one patient had polyneuropathy, and one patient had cardiac involvement.By considering the individual responses of patients and the level of improvement at the last evalulation, 10 (55.6%) patients responded completely, 1 responded partially, and 7 (38.9%) had no improvement. Omalizumab worked as a steroid-sparing agent in all patients and the daily OCS dose was reduced with a mean dosage of 6.28 mg/day at the end of the first year. The mean OCS reduction time for the whole group was 4 months. A reduction in asthma exacerbations/hospitalizations, improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and no decrease in the eosinophil count during treatment with omalizumab were also observed. CONCLUSIONS: Omalizumab improved asthma control in some patients with EGPA with uncontrolled asthma by reducing asthma exacerbations and oral steroid requirement. However, more data are needed before recommending widespread use of omalizumab in patients with EGPA.

Omalizumab in non-allergic Asthma: A report of 13 cases.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data regarding the effectiveness of omalizumab in patients with non-allergic asthma. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and functional effectiveness of omalizumab in patients with non-allergic asthma. METHODS: The study was a single-center, retrospective chart review of patients with non-allergic asthma who were treated with add-on omalizumab between February 2014 and March 2016. After omalizumab was started, data of the asthma control test (ACT), pulmonary function test, and daily oral corticosteroid (OCS) dosage were collected at baseline, 16 weeks, 1 year, 2 and 3 years (if available). The number of exacerbations/hospitalizations were collected 1 year prior to and 6 months/1 year after omalizumab. To calculate the total daily dosage of OCS in milligrams, data for 6 months/1 year prior and after omalizumab treatment were recorded. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were included. After omalizumab, the mean ACT was significantly increased at 16 weeks (n = 13, p = 0.002), 1 year (n = 7, p = 0.006), and 2 years (n = 5, p = 0.006). The mean daily OCS dose was significantly decreased at 16 weeks (n = 13, p = 0.001), 1 year (n = 7, p = 0.006), and 2 years (n = 5, p = 0.04). The mean number of exacerbations and hospitalizations were decreased at the 6th month (n = 13; p = 0.001, p = 0.005) and 1st year (n = 7; p = 0.01, p = 0.02). The mean total quantity of OCS decreased 42% from 1.4 to 0.8 g in the six-month period prior to and post-omalizumab treatment (n = 6, p = 0.02) and decreased 76% from 3.8 to 0.9 g at 1 year in the pre vs. post-omalizumab treatment comparison (n = 7, p = 0.01). Six (46.2%) patients responded perfectly and seven (53.8%) partially responded to treatment. CONCLUSION: Omalizumab can be effective in non-atopic severe asthma.

Erratum to: Allergen immunotherapy for insect venom allergy: protocol for a systematic review.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s13601-016-0095-x.].

Does the medical diagnosis of occupational asthma coincide with the legal diagnosis?

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of occupational asthma (OA) is increasing worldwide. In this study, we first aimed to document the rate of diagnosis of OA among patients who were referred to our clinic from the Social Security Institution and the factors that affected diagnosis; secondly, we aimed to assess the consistency of the medical and legal diagnoses. METHODS: The study involved 132 consecutive patients who were referred to our clinic for the evaluation of OA between 2010 and 2015. Detailed workplace history, the tools used in the diagnosis such as peak expiratory flow (PEF) monitoring and bronchial provocation tests, and the final medical diagnosis were recorded from case files. RESULTS: Asthma was diagnosed in 75% (n = 99) of the patients. Among them, 22.2% were diagnosed as having OA. The diagnosis was confirmed by serial PEF measurements, non-specific bronchial hyperreactivity assessment or both of the tests both at work and off-work periods. OA diagnosis was mostly established in active workers (72.7%). The legal diagnosis period was completed in 54.5% of these 22 patients, and 50% (n = 11) were officially diagnosed as having OA with a 91.6% concordance with medical diagnosis. CONCLUSION: This study verifies the importance of diagnosing asthma correctly as a first step in the evaluation of OA. Diagnostic tests other than specific provocation tests could be preferential in patients who still work in the same field. We believe that cooperation with the patient's occupational physician and adequate recognition of the work environment will improve the consistency of legal and medical diagnoses.

Quality-of-life in insect venom allergy: validation of the Turkish version of the "Vespid Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire" (VQLQ-T).

PURPOSE: "Vespid Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (VQLQ)" has been used to assess psychological burden of disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate validity, reliability and responsiveness to interventions of the Turkish version. METHODS: The Turkish language Questionnaire (VQLQ-T) was administered to 81 patients with bee allergy and 65 patients with vespid allergy from different groups to achieve cross-sectional validation. To establish longitudinal validity, the questionnaire was administered to 36 patients treated with venom immunotherapy. RESULTS: The cross-sectional validation in patients with vespid venom allergy showed a correlation coefficient of 0.97 (Cronbach α). Spearman's correlation coefficient of the pretreatment VQLQ-T score with Expectation of Outcome (EoO) questionnaire score was 0.55 (p < 0.001). After treatment, correlation between VQLQ-T score and EoO score was 0.64 (p = 0.003) in these patients. The cross-sectional instrument validation for non-beekeepers with bee venom allergy yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.96 (Cronbach α). Spearman's correlation coefficient between pretreatment VQLQ-T score and EoO score was 0.47 (p < 0.001) and after treatment, correlation between VQLQ-T score and EoO score was 0.78 (p = 0.008) in these patients. These findings indicate cross-sectional validity of VQLQ-T. In the longitudinal validation, there was a positive correlation between EoO and VQLQ-T with a correlation coefficient of 0.562 (p < 0.001). While mean (±SD) VQLQ-T score was 5.27 (±1.29) in pretreatment, it was 2.78 (±1.01) after treatment (p < 0.001). The correlation between the mean change in VQLQ-T score and the mean change in EoO score was 0.42 (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: The Turkish version of VQLQ-T enables measurement of Quality of Life (QoL) in patients with either vespid or bee venom allergy. Furthermore, responsiveness of this instrument demonstrates the questionnaire's ability to detect changes over time.

Immunologic alterations and efficacy of subcutaneous immunotherapy with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus in monosensitized and polysensitized patients.

BACKGROUND: There is a continuing debate about whether monoallergen subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is able to modulate immune and clinical responses toward main causal allergen in polysensitized patients. OBJECTIVE: To investigate short-term immunologic changes and clinical effectiveness of SCIT with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus in monosensitized and polysensitized patients who have rhinitis with or without asthma. METHODS: Nineteen monosensitized and 24 polysensitized patients participated in this prospective, self-placebo-controlled, interventional study. Cluster immunotherapy with D pteronyssinus was administered after 2 months of placebo in both groups. Immunologic parameters, including CD203c expression on basophils after allergen stimulation, total IgE, specific IgE, and specific IgG4, were evaluated at baseline, after placebo, and after immunotherapy. Clinical effectiveness was assessed using monthly symptom-medication scores, visual analog scale, quality-of-life questionnaire, and nasal allergen provocation test. RESULTS: At baseline, polysensitized patients had higher CD203c expression on basophils than monosensitized patients (P = .007). Activated basophils expressing CD203c, total IgE, and specific IgG4 were significantly increased after immunotherapy compared with baseline and placebo in the polysensitized group (P < .025). After immunotherapy, specific IgE and D pteronyssinus-induced CD203c expression were significantly higher in polysensitized than monosensitized patients (P < .05). The total symptom scores and the Mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire scores in polysensitized patients and the visual analog scale scores in both groups were lower after immunotherapy compared with baseline and placebo (P < .025). Titrated nasal allergen provocation test with D pteronyssinus increased after immunotherapy in the monosensitized group (P < .05). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that monosensitized and polysensitized patients have distinct humoral response and basophil behavior to SCIT. However, a single-allergen immunotherapy corresponding to the most clinically troublesome allergy in polysensitized patients can lead to early clinical efficacy comparable to that seen in monosensitized patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01795846.