Osteoarthritis across Joint Sites in the Million Veteran Program Cohort: Insights from Electronic Health Records and Military Service History.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the relationship between frequency of idiopathic OA and characteristics including demographics, comorbidities, military service history, and physical health in a veteran population. METHODS: We performed a cohort study in the Million Veteran Program (MVP), using International Classification of Diseases 9 and 10 codes to define frequency of site-specific OA across three joints or unspecified OA in veterans with respect to demographics (age, sex, race/ethnicity, etc.), military service data, detailed electronic health records, military branch, and war era. RESULTS: We validated previous reports of sex- and age-dependent differences in OA frequency, and we identified that unspecified OA was associated with a higher frequency of sixteen Deyo-Charlson comorbidities. These associations generally persisted within each isolated joint site-specific OA. Depending on military branch, prior military engagement was differentially associated with frequency of OA. Prior Army and Navy service were associated with higher and lower risk, respectively of OA across all joint sites. However, multivariable-adjusted models adjusting for a range of covariates (including age, sex, and ancestry) reversed the apparent protective effect of prior Navy service. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the breadth of factors associated with OA in the MVP veteran population and suggest that physical status may be a modifiable risk factor for OA. This work may contribute to designing strategies to optimize appropriate detection, intervention, treatment, and even rehabilitation strategies for OA in veterans and the general population.

International consensus-based ranking of definitions for poor response to primary total knee arthroplasty: a Delphi study.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to rank definitions for measuring poor response one year after TKA, after assessing the face validity and feasibility of existing or newly proposed definitions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An international, three-round, online modified Delphi study was conducted with sixty-nine panelists from twenty-three countries. Definitions were derived from a literature review or were newly proposed by an expert group. Panelists rated the face validity and feasibility of definitions, and could propose additional new definitions in round 1. Panelists reconsidered their rating of existing definitions, and rated newly suggested definitions (round 2). Definitions with a median score for face validity < 6.5 were removed from the list, and panelists distributed 100 points among the remaining definitions for ranking (round 3). RESULTS: Fifty-one panelists completed all three rounds (response rate 74%), and the prioritized list of definitions in round 3 comprised seventeen definitions. The single-item definition of (dis)satisfaction with the outcome of TKA obtained the highest scores for face validity and feasibility (7.5, and 8.5 respectively), and the definition "No improvement in pain OR daily knee functioning compared to pre-operative status" was the highest prioritized. In general, definitions reflecting change from the perception of patients were higher ranked than definitions requiring both preoperative and postoperative assessment of validated questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified seventeen potential definitions of poor response to TKA, offering valuable options for integration into quality assessment investigations. Remarkably, all identified definitions were patient-centered and none were clinician-centered. Single-item questions, capturing change from the patient's viewpoint, appear to be the most practicable format to assess response.

Long-Term Mortality Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Rural Versus Urban Dwellers with Autoimmune or Inflammatory Rheumatic Disease (AIRD): A Retrospective Cohort Analysis from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C).

OBJECTIVE: Autoimmune or inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIRD) increase the risk for poor COVID-19 outcomes. While rurality is associated with higher post-COVID-19 mortality in the general population, whether rurality elevates this risk among people with AIRD is unknown. We assessed associations between rurality and post-COVID-19 all-cause mortality, up to 2 years post-infection, among people with AIRD using a large, nationally sampled U.S. METHODS: This retrospective study utilized the National COVID Cohort Collaborative, a medical-records repository containing COVID-19 patient data. We included adults with ≥2 AIRD diagnostic codes and a COVID-19 diagnosis documented between April 2020 and March 2023. Rural residency was categorized using patient residential ZIP Codes. We adjusted for AIRD medications and glucocorticoid usage, age, sex, race and ethnicity, tobacco/substance usage, comorbid burden, and SARS-CoV-2 variant-dominant periods. Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards with inverse probability treatment weighting assessed associations between rurality and 2-year, all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Among the 86,467 SARS-CoV-2-infected persons with AIRD, we observed a higher risk for 2-year post-COVID-19 mortality in rural versus urban dwellers. Rural-residing persons with AIRD had higher 2-year, all-cause mortality risk (aHR 1.24, 95% CI 1.19-1.29). Use of glucocorticoids, immunosuppressives, and rituximab was associated with a higher risk for 2-year post-COVID-19 mortality, while risk with non-biologic or biologic DMARDs was lower. CONCLUSION: Rural residence in people with AIRD was independently associated with higher post-COVID-19 2-year mortality in a large U.S. cohort after adjusting for background risk factors. Policymakers and healthcare providers should consider these findings when designing interventions to improve outcomes in people with AIRD following SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially among higher-risk rural residents.

Electrogram-guided Bachmann bundle area pacing to correct interatrial block: Initial experience, safety, and feasibility.

BACKGROUND: A lack of standard Bachmann bundle (BB) capture criteria has affected the clinical impact of Bachmann bundle area pacing (BBAP) in patients with interatrial block (IAB). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of electrogram-guided Bachmann bundle pacing (BBP) using sheath assisted, stylet-driven atrial lead implantation. METHODS: Patients with baseline IAB undergoing dual-chamber pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation were enrolled in a single-center prospective study. BBAP was attempted in all patients using a Selectra 3D S-40 delivery sheath and Solia S-60 pacing lead. BB capture was confirmed using a combination of fluoroscopy, P-wave morphology, and electrophysiological criteria. These included recording of a high-frequency BB potential and transition between nonselective and selective BB capture during threshold testing. Procedure-related complications, lead parameters, and P-wave morphology were assessed at implantation and follow-up. RESULTS: Permanent BBAP was successful in 32 of the 36 enrolled patients (88.9%). Baseline P-wave duration was 148.5 ± 16.1 ms. Among patients who underwent successful BBP, final paced P-wave duration was 117.8 ± 19.6ms. Correction of partial or complete IAB occurred in 22 patients (91.7%) and 6 patients (75.0%), respectively. BB potentials were recorded in 83.3% of all study patients. Transition from NS to S BB capture could be demonstrated during threshold testing in 22 patients (87.5%). The only major complications were 2 BBAP lead dislodgments within 24 hours and a rise in pacing impedance at 3 weeks in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: BBAP is feasible in a high percentage of patients and is associated with stable capture thresholds during follow-up.

Controversies and practical management of patients with gout and chronic kidney disease.

Uric acid is a toxin retained with advancing kidney disease. Clinical manifestations of hyperuricemia include gout and systemic inflammation that are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular mortality. As many as one-third of all patients with chronic kidney disease have a history of gout, yet <25% of these patients are effectively treated to target serum urate levels of ≤6 mg/dl. A major reason for ineffective management of gout and hyperuricemia is the complexity in managing these patients, with some medications contraindicated and others requiring special dosing, potential drug interactions, and other factors. Consequently, many nephrologists do not primarily manage gout despite it being a common complication of chronic kidney disease, leaving management to the primary physician or rheumatologist. We believe that kidney specialists should consider gout as a major complication of chronic kidney disease and actively manage it in their patients. Here, we present insights from nephrologists and rheumatologists for a team approach to gout management that includes the nephrologist.

Association between diabetes mellitus and total hip arthroplasty outcomes: an observational study using the US National Inpatient Sample.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association of diabetes with postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using data from the US National Inpatient Sample (NIS). SETTING: Study cohort was hospitalisations for primary THA in the USA, identified from the 2016-2020 NIS. PARTICIPANTS: We identified 2 467 215 adults in the 2016-2020 NIS who underwent primary THA using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes. Primary THA hospitlizations were analysed as the overall group and also stratified by the underlying primary diagnosis for THA. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures of interest were the length of hospital stay>the median, total hospital charges>the median, inpatient mortality, non-routine discharge, need for blood transfusion, prosthetic fracture, prosthetic dislocation and postprocedural infection, including periprosthetic joint infection, deep surgical site infection and postprocedural sepsis. RESULTS: Among 2 467 215 patients who underwent primary THA, the mean age was 68.7 years, 58.3% were female, 85.7% were white, 61.7% had Medicare payer and 20.4% had a Deyo-Charlson index (adjusted to exclude diabetes mellitus) of 2 or higher. 416 850 (17%) patients had diabetes. In multivariable-adjusted logistic regression in the overall cohort, diabetes was associated with higher odds of a longer hospital stay (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.38; 95% CI 1.35 to 1.41), higher total charges (aOR 1.11; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.13), non-routine discharge (aOR 1.18; 95% CI 1.15 to 1.20), the need for blood transfusion (aOR 1.19; 95% CI 1.15 to 1.23), postprocedural infection (aOR 1.62; 95% CI 1.10 to 2.40) and periprosthetic joint infection (aOR 1.91; 95% CI 1.12 to 3.24). We noted a lack of some associations in the avascular necrosis and inflammatory arthritis cohorts (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Diabetes was associated with increased healthcare utilisation, blood transfusion and postprocedural infection risk following primary THA. Optimisation of diabetes with preoperative medical management and/or institution of specific postoperative pathways may improve these outcomes. Larger studies are needed in avascular necrosis and inflammatory arthritis cohorts undergoing primary THA.

Assessment of Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiac Dysfunction in Breast Cancer Patients: A Prospective Study.

Background Advances in cancer treatment have markedly improved survival rates but have also heightened morbidity due to treatment-related side effects. Despite this, the literature remains scarce on predicting the incidence of acute cardiac toxicity resulting from chemotherapy. We conducted a prospective evaluation to assess the incidence, timing, clinical correlates, global longitudinal strain (GLS), and response to heart failure (HF) therapy in patients experiencing cardiotoxicity. Aims and objectives Our study aimed to assess the cardiovascular complications of cancer therapy in breast cancer patients, with particular emphasis on therapy-related cardiac dysfunction. Materials and methods We conducted a prospective observational study to detect chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) in breast cancer patients attending the outpatient department (OPD) or admitted to Dayanand Medical College and Hospital (DMCH), Ludhiana, Punjab, between March 1, 2020, and October 31, 2021. We assessed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at baseline, mid-chemotherapy, and post-chemotherapy. Patients who developed left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) had their chemotherapy regimen modified and were initiated on HF therapy. Results Ninety-seven patients (mean age: 50.74±10.30 years) were enrolled and categorized into the LVD group (n=13) and non-LVD group (n=84). CTRCD developed in 13 patients (13.4%). Patients with estrogen receptor (ER) positive, progesterone receptor (PR) positive, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive status, as well as those in cancer stages III and IV, are at higher risk of developing LV dysfunction. Among the 13 patients, 10 (77%) experienced complete recovery, while three (23%) had partial recovery. Markers for partial recovery included cancer stages III-IV, younger age, lower body mass index (BMI), lower radiotherapy dosage, lower mean chemotherapy dosage, and left breast involvement. Conclusion Our findings suggest that acute cardiotoxicity is not linked to the cumulative dose of anthracyclines. Early detection, modification of chemotherapy regimens, and prompt initiation of CTRCD therapy can lead to substantial recovery of cardiac dysfunction.

Loss of CELF2 promotes skin tumorigenesis and increases drug resistance.

BACKGROUND: CELF2 belongs to the CELF RNA-binding protein family and exhibits antitumor activity in various tumor models. Analysis of the pan-cancer TCGA database reveals that CELF2 expression strongly correlates with favorable prognosis among cancer patients. The function of CELF2 in nonmelanoma skin cancer has not been studied. METHODS: We used shRNA-mediated knockdown (KD) of CELF2 expression in human squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cells to investigate how CELF2 impacted SCC cell proliferation, survival, and xenograft tumor growth. We determined CELF2 expression in human SCC tissues and adjacent normal skin using immunofluorescence staining. Additionally, we investigated the changes in CELF2 and its target gene expression during UV-induced and chemical-induced skin tumorigenesis by western blotting. RESULTS: CELF2 KD significantly increased SCC cell proliferation, colony growth, and SCC xenograft tumor growth in immunodeficient mice. CELF2 KD in SCC cells led to activation of KRT80 and GDF15, which can potentially promote cell proliferation and tumor growth. While control SCC cells were sensitive to anticancer drugs such as doxorubicin, SCC cells with CELF2 KD became resistant to drug-induced tumor growth retardation. Finally, we found CELF2 expression diminished during both UV- and chemical-induced skin tumorigenesis in mice, consistent with reduced CELF2 expression in human SCC tumors compared to adjacent normal skin. CONCLUSION: This study shows for the first time that CELF2 loss occurs during skin tumorigenesis and increases drug resistance in SCC cells, highlighting the possibility of targeting CELF2-regulated pathways in skin cancer prevention and therapies.

A narrative review of the comparative safety of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

INTRODUCTION: Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have improved the outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). DMARDs are classified into three categories: conventional synthetic DMARDs, biological DMARDs (including biosimilars), and targeted synthetic DMARDs. DMARDs, by way of their effect on the immune system, are associated with increased risk of adverse events, including infections, malignancies, cardiovascular disease, gastrointestinal perforations, and other less common events. AREAS COVERED: In this narrative literature review performed with searches of the PubMed database from 1 January 2010 through 1 January 2023, we compare the risk of safety events between DMARDs using data from both randomized clinical trials and observational studies. EXPERT OPINION: DMARD use in RA is associated with higher rates of serious infections, tuberculosis reactivation, opportunistic infections, and possibly malignancies. Specific biologic DMARDs and higher doses are associated with elevated risks of various adverse events (gastrointestinal perforations, thromboembolism, serious infection). Shared decision-making is paramount when choosing a treatment regimen for patients based on their own comorbidities. JAKi are the newest class of medications used for RA with robust safety data provided in clinical trials. However, more real-world evidence and phase-IV pharmacovigilance data are needed to better understand comparative safety profile of DMARDs in RA.

Patient Perspectives on a Decision Aid for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Insights and Future Considerations.

OBJECTIVE: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease with a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations. A decision aid (DA) for SLE was developed and implemented in 15 rheumatology clinics throughout the United States. This study explored the experiences of patients who viewed the DA to understand how patients engage with and respond to the SLE DA. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative descriptive study using semistructured interviews with a convenience sample of 24 patients during May to July 2022. RESULTS: Patients recognized the value of the SLE DA in providing general knowledge about SLE and different treatment options. However, patients expressed a desire for more comprehensive lifestyle information to better manage their condition. Another theme was the importance of having multiple formats available to cater to their different needs, as well as tailoring the DA to different stages of SLE. CONCLUSION: This study contributes to a broader understanding of how to provide patient-centered care for patients with SLE by offering practical insights that can inform the development of more effective, patient-centric health information technologies for managing chronic diseases, ultimately improving patient outcomes. Overall, this study underscores the significance of optimizing both the information content and determining the appropriate delivery of the tool for its future sustainability.

Burden of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke Across the US From 1990 to 2019.

Importance: Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability in the US. Accurate and updated measures of stroke burden are needed to guide public health policies. Objective: To present burden estimates of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in the US in 2019 and describe trends from 1990 to 2019 by age, sex, and geographic location. Design, Setting, and Participants: An in-depth cross-sectional analysis of the 2019 Global Burden of Disease study was conducted. The setting included the time period of 1990 to 2019 in the US. The study encompassed estimates for various types of strokes, including all strokes, ischemic strokes, intracerebral hemorrhages (ICHs), and subarachnoid hemorrhages (SAHs). The 2019 Global Burden of Disease results were released on October 20, 2020. Exposures: In this study, no particular exposure was specifically targeted. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary focus of this analysis centered on both overall and age-standardized estimates, stroke incidence, prevalence, mortality, and DALYs per 100 000 individuals. Results: In 2019, the US recorded 7.09 million prevalent strokes (4.07 million women [57.4%]; 3.02 million men [42.6%]), with 5.87 million being ischemic strokes (82.7%). Prevalence also included 0.66 million ICHs and 0.85 million SAHs. Although the absolute numbers of stroke cases, mortality, and DALYs surged from 1990 to 2019, the age-standardized rates either declined or remained steady. Notably, hemorrhagic strokes manifested a substantial increase, especially in mortality, compared with ischemic strokes (incidence of ischemic stroke increased by 13% [95% uncertainty interval (UI), 14.2%-11.9%]; incidence of ICH increased by 39.8% [95% UI, 38.9%-39.7%]; incidence of SAH increased by 50.9% [95% UI, 49.2%-52.6%]). The downturn in stroke mortality plateaued in the recent decade. There was a discernible heterogeneity in stroke burden trends, with older adults (50-74 years) experiencing a decrease in incidence in coastal areas (decreases up to 3.9% in Vermont), in contrast to an uptick observed in younger demographics (15-49 years) in the South and Midwest US (with increases up to 8.4% in Minnesota). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, the declining age-standardized stroke rates over the past 3 decades suggest progress in managing stroke-related outcomes. However, the increasing absolute burden of stroke, coupled with a notable rise in hemorrhagic stroke, suggests an evolving and substantial public health challenge in the US. Moreover, the significant disparities in stroke burden trends across different age groups and geographic locations underscore the necessity for region- and demography-specific interventions and policies to effectively mitigate the multifaceted and escalating burden of stroke in the country.

Effectiveness of mRNA Booster Vaccine Against Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection and Severe Outcomes Among Persons With and Without Immune Dysfunction: A Retrospective Cohort Study of National Electronic Medical Record Data in the United States.

Background: Real-world evidence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) messenger RNA (mRNA) booster effectiveness among patients with immune dysfunction are limited. Methods: We included data from patients in the United States National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) who completed ≥2 doses of mRNA vaccination between 10 December 2020 and 27 May 2022. Immune dysfunction conditions included human immunodeficiency virus infection, solid organ or bone marrow transplant, autoimmune diseases, and cancer. We defined incident COVID-19 BTI as positive results from laboratory tests or diagnostic codes 14 days after at least 2 doses of mRNA vaccination; and severe COVID-19 BTI as hospitalization, invasive cardiopulmonary support, and/or death. We used propensity scores to match boosted versus nonboosted patients and evaluated hazards of incident and severe COVID-19 BTI using Cox regression after matching. Results: Among patients without immune dysfunction, the relative effectiveness of booster (3 doses) after 6 months from the primary (2 doses) vaccination against BTI ranged from 69% to 81% during the Delta-predominant period and from 33% to 39% during the Omicron-predominant period. Relative effectiveness against BTI was lower among patients with immune dysfunction but remained statistically significant in both periods. Boosted patients had lower risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization (hazard ratios [HR] ranged from 0.5 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .48-.53] to 0.63 [95% CI, .56-.70]), invasive cardiopulmonary support, or death (HRs ranged from 0.46 [95% CI, .41-.52] to 0.63 [95% CI, .50-.79]) during both periods. Conclusions: Booster vaccines remain effective against severe COVID-19 BTI throughout the Delta- and Omicron-predominant periods, regardless of patients' immune status.

Consensus on the definitions and descriptions of the domains of the OMERACT Core Outcome Set for shared decision making interventions in rheumatology trials.

OBJECTIVE: To gain consensus on the definitions and descriptions of the domains of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) core domain set for rheumatology trials evaluating shared decision making (SDM) interventions. METHODS: Following the OMERACT Handbook methods, our Working Group (WG), comprised of 90 members, including 17 patient research partners (PRPs) and 73 clinicians and researchers, had six virtual meetings in addition to email exchanges to develop draft definitions and descriptions. The WG then conducted an international survey of its members to gain consensus on the definitions and descriptions. Finally, the WG members had virtual meetings and e-mail exchanges to review survey results and finalize names, definitions and descriptions of the domains. RESULTS: WG members contributed to developing the definitions. Fifty-two members representing four continents and 13 countries completed the survey, including 15 PRPs, 33 clinicians and 37 researchers. PRPs and clinicians/researchers agreed with all definitions and descriptions with agreements ranging from 87% to 100%. Respondents suggested wording changes to the names, definitions and descriptions to better reflect the domains. Discussions led to further simplification and clarification to address common questions/concerns about the domains. CONCLUSION: Our WG reached consensus on the definitions and descriptions of the domains of the core domain set for rheumatology trials of SDM interventions. This step is crucial to understand each domain and provides the foundation to identify instruments to measure each domain for inclusion in the Core Outcome Measurement Set. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The current study provides consensus-based definitions and descriptions for the domains of the OMERACT core domain set for shared decision making interventions from patients/caregivers, clinicians and researchers. This is a crucial step to understand each domain and provides the foundation to identify instruments to measure each domain for inclusion in the Core Outcome Measurement Set for trials of SDM interventions.

OMERACT Core outcome measurement set for shared decision making in rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions: a scoping review to identify candidate instruments.

OBJECTIVES: Shared decision making (SDM) is a central tenet in rheumatic and musculoskeletal care. The lack of standardization regarding SDM instruments and outcomes in clinical trials threatens the comparative effectiveness of interventions. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) SDM Working Group is developing a Core Outcome Set for trials of SDM interventions in rheumatology and musculoskeletal health. The working group reached consensus on a Core Outcome Domain Set in 2020. The next step is to develop a Core Outcome Measurement Set through the OMERACT Filter 2.2. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) to identify candidate instruments for the OMERACT Filter 2.2 We systematically reviewed five databases (Ovid MEDLINE®, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and Web of Science). An information specialist designed search strategies to identify all measurement instruments used in SDM studies in adults or children living with rheumatic or musculoskeletal diseases or their important others. Paired reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full text articles. We extracted characteristics of all candidate instruments (e.g., measured construct, measurement properties). We classified candidate instruments and summarized evidence gaps with an adapted version of the Summary of Measurement Properties (SOMP) table. RESULTS: We found 14,464 citations, read 239 full text articles, and included 99 eligible studies. We identified 220 potential candidate instruments. The five most used measurement instruments were the Decisional Conflict Scale (traditional and low literacy versions) (n=38), the Hip/Knee-Decision Quality Instrument (n=20), the Decision Regret Scale (n=9), the Preparation for Decision Making Scale (n=8), and the CollaboRATE (n=8). Only 44 candidate instruments (20%) had any measurement properties reported by the included studies. Of these instruments, only 57% matched with at least one of the 7-criteria adapted SOMP table. CONCLUSION: We identified 220 candidate instruments used in the SDM literature amongst people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. Our classification of instruments showed evidence gaps and inconsistent reporting of measurement properties. The next steps for the OMERACT SDM Working Group are to match candidate instruments with Core Domains, assess feasibility and review validation studies of measurement instruments in rheumatic diseases or other conditions. Development and validation of new instruments may be required for some Core Domains.

Weight Loss for Patients With Gout and Concomitant Obesity: A Proof-of-Concept Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Despite scarce evidence, guidelines recommend weight loss as a management strategy for patients with gout. We investigated the effect of an intensive dietary intervention on body weight and clinical measures of gout severity in individuals with obesity and gout. METHODS: We conducted a 16-week randomized nonmasked parallel-group trial in Denmark, randomly assigning (one-to-one) individuals with obesity and gout to a low-energy diet or a control diet. The primary outcome was change in body weight. Key secondary outcomes were changes in serum urate (SU) level and visual analog scale-assessed pain and fatigue. RESULTS: Between December 1, 2018, and June 1, 2019, 61 participants were included in the intention-to-treat population and randomly assigned to the intensive diet group (n = 29) or control diet group (n = 32). Participants had a mean age of 60.3 (SD 9.9) years and mean body mass index of 35.6 (SD 5.0), and 59 (97%) were men. After 16 weeks, there was a significant difference in change in body weight between the diet and control groups (-15.4 vs -7.7 kg; difference -7.7 kg [95% confidence interval -10.7 to -4.7], P < 0.001). Despite results being potentially in favor of a low-energy diet, we could not confirm differences in SU level changes and fatigue between groups. No differences in pain and gout flares were observed between groups. No serious adverse events or deaths occurred during the trial. CONCLUSION: An intensive dietary intervention was safe and effectively lowered body weight in people with obesity and gout, but the weight loss did not directly translate into effects on SU level, fatigue, and pain.

Real-World Treatment and Care Patterns in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Initiating First-Line Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapy in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment guidelines for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) recommend targeting low disease activity or remission and switching therapies for patients not reaching those targets. We evaluated real-world use of disease activity measures, treatment discontinuation, and switching patterns among patients with RA initiating a first-line tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi). METHODS: Data from adult patients with RA initiating a first-line TNFi were collected from the American Rheumatology Network (January 2014-August 2021). The proportion of patients with recorded disease activity scores (Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI] or Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 [RAPID3]) at TNFi initiation was assessed. Among patients with moderate or severe RA at TNFi initiation, reasons for discontinuation and subsequent advanced therapy were evaluated. RESULTS: Among TNFi initiators (n = 15,182), 44.8% recorded a CDAI/RAPID3 score at treatment initiation; of those who did not, 47.0% had recorded a tender and/or swollen joint count or pain score. Among patients with moderate or severe RA (n = 1,651), 52% discontinued their initial TNFi during follow-up, of which 15%, 46%, 28%, and 12% initiated the same TNFi, another TNFi, a non-TNFi biologic, or a Janus kinase inhibitor, respectively. The proportion of patients restarting the same TNFi or initiating another TNFi varied according to TNFi discontinuation reason. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice, over half of patients with RA initiating a first-line TNFi did not have baseline disease activity assessments. Many patients cycled through TNFi despite citing lack of efficacy as the most common reason for discontinuation. Consistent, objective monitoring of treatment response and timely switch to effective therapy is needed in patients with RA.

Hearing Loss Prevalence, Years Lived With Disability, and Hearing Aid Use in the United States From 1990 to 2019: Findings From the Global Burden of Disease Study.

OBJECTIVES: This article describes key data sources and methods used to estimate hearing loss in the United States, in the Global Burden of Disease study. Then, trends in hearing loss are described for 2019, including temporal trends from 1990 to 2019, changing prevalence over age, severity patterns, and utilization of hearing aids. DESIGN: We utilized population-representative surveys from the United States to estimate hearing loss prevalence for the Global Burden of Disease study. A key input data source in modeled estimates are the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES), years 1988 to 2010. We ran hierarchical severity-specific models to estimate hearing loss prevalence. We then scaled severity-specific models to sum to total hearing impairment prevalence, adjusted estimates for hearing aid coverage, and split estimates by etiology and tinnitus status. We computed years lived with disability (YLDs), which quantifies the amount of health loss associated with a condition depending on severity and creates a common metric to compare the burden of disparate diseases. This was done by multiplying the prevalence of severity-specific hearing loss by corresponding disability weights, with additional weighting for tinnitus comorbidity. RESULTS: An estimated 72.88 million (95% uncertainty interval (UI) 68.53 to 77.30) people in the United States had hearing loss in 2019, accounting for 22.2% (20.9 to 23.6) of the total population. Hearing loss was responsible for 2.24 million (1.56 to 3.11) YLDs (3.6% (2.8 to 4.7) of total US YLDs). Age-standardized prevalence was higher in males (17.7% [16.7 to 18.8]) compared with females (11.9%, [11.2 to 12.5]). While most cases of hearing loss were mild (64.3%, 95% UI 61.0 to 67.6), disability was concentrated in cases that were moderate or more severe. The all-age prevalence of hearing loss in the United States was 28.1% (25.7 to 30.8) higher in 2019 than in 1990, despite stable age-standardized prevalence. An estimated 9.7% (8.6 to 11.0) of individuals with mild to profound hearing loss utilized a hearing aid, while 32.5% (31.9 to 33.2) of individuals with hearing loss experienced tinnitus. Occupational noise exposure was responsible for 11.2% (10.2 to 12.4) of hearing loss YLDs. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate large burden of hearing loss in the United States, with an estimated 1 in 5 people experiencing this condition. While many cases of hearing loss in the United States were mild, growing prevalence, low usage of hearing aids, and aging populations indicate the rising impact of this condition in future years and the increasing importance of domestic access to hearing healthcare services. Large-scale audiometric surveys such as NHANES are needed to regularly assess hearing loss burden and access to healthcare, improving our understanding of who is impacted by hearing loss and what groups are most amenable to intervention.