RESUMEN
The clinical characteristics of three types of optic neuritis (double seronegative optic neuritis; DN-ON, Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder-related optic neuritis; NMOSD-ON, and multiple sclerosis-related optic neuritis; MS-ON) were examined in order to identify factors that may affect good visual recovery in Thai patients. The study included patients diagnosed with three types of optic neuritis at Rajavithi Hospital between 2011 and 2020. Visual acuity at the end of 12 months was used as the treatment outcome. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate potential predictors of good visual recovery. Of the 76 patients, 61 had optic neuritis, with DN-ON as the most common subtype (52.6%). MS-ON patients were significantly younger (28.3 ± 6.6 years, p = 0.002) and there was a female predominance in all subgroups (p = 0.076). NMOSD-ON patients had a significantly higher proportion of poor baseline VA (p < 0.001). None of the NMOSD-ON patients achieved 0.3 logMAR visual recovery in the 12-month period (p = 0.022). A delay in treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) for more than 7 days increased the risk of failure to gain 0.3 logMAR visual recovery by five times (OR 5.29, 95% CI 1.359-20.616, p = 0.016), with NMOSD-ON as the strongest predictor (OR 10.47, 95% CI; 1.095-99.993, p = 0.041). Early treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone may be important for achieving at least 0.3 logMAR visual recovery in Thai patients with optic neuritis.
RESUMEN
Background and objective Non-arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) is a common cause of optic neuropathy in elderly patients. Currently, there is no definitive treatment for this condition, and the factors influencing visual outcomes have not yet been conclusively identified. In this study, we aimed to evaluate factors that affect visual outcomes and those that are predictors of the development of NAION in a Thai population. Methods All patients diagnosed with NAION at the Rajavithi Hospital between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020, were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate the improvement in their best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and determine the factors that are predictive of visual outcomes. Results The 80 patients reviewed were predominantly male (55%) with a mean age of 55.8 ±9.89 years. Their most common comorbidities were dyslipidemia (DLP) (67.5%), diabetes mellitus (DM) (61.3%), and hypertension (HT) (48.8%). At the 12-week follow-up visit, there was a significant improvement of at least 0.2 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in BCVA (p=0.001). A significantly greater percentage of patients with higher age, DM, and HT was observed in the unfavorable visual recovery (UVR) group (p=0.002, p=0.001, and p=0.005 respectively). In contrast, neither baseline visual acuity nor cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) affected the result of visual recovery (p=0.275 and p=0.076, respectively). In multivariate logistic analysis, older age increased the odds of worse visual recovery [odds ratio (OR): 4.014; 95% CI: 1.038-15.515; p=0.044], as did having DM (OR: 3.809; 95% CI: 1.168-12.421; p=0.027), and HT (OR: 4.577; 95% CI: 1.491-14.049; p=0.008). Conclusions None of the baseline visual status parameters (visual acuity, CDR, or visual field defect) was able to determine the outcome of visual recovery at 12 weeks in our NAION patients. Regarding systemic vascular diseases, diabetes and HT are significant risk factors and also predictors of poor visual improvement in Thai populations. NAION patients who are elderly or have vascular diseases such as DM or HT should be closely followed up and advised about the likelihood of having inferior visual recovery.
