Final 192-Week Efficacy and Safety Results of the ADVANCE Trial, Comparing 3 First-line Antiretroviral Regimens.

Background: ADVANCE compared 3 World Health Organization-recommended first-line regimens in participants with HIV who were antiretroviral naive. Methods: This randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial enrolled participants living with HIV with no antiretroviral exposure in the previous 6 months to 1 of the following arms: tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) / emtricitabine (FTC) + dolutegravir (DTG) (2 tablets), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) / FTC + DTG (2 tablets), or a fixed-dose combination of TDF / FTC / efavirenz (EFV) (1 tablet). We report the final safety and efficacy data up to 192 weeks. Results: Repeat consent from the original 351 participants randomized to each arm was obtained from 230 participants (66%) in the TAF/FTC + DTG arm, 209 (60%) in the TDF/FTC + DTG arm, and 183 (52%) in the TDF/FTC/EFV arm. At 192 weeks, 213 (61%) of the original 351 participants in the TAF/FTC + DTG arm, 195 (56%) in the TDF/FTC + DTG arm, and 172 (49%) in the TDF/FTC/EFV arm had confirmed RNA <50 copies/mL, with low virologic failure in all groups and no significant integrase inhibitor mutations in any arm. Mean weight gain was 8.9 kg (SD, 7.1) in the TAF/FTC + DTG arm, 5.9 kg (SD, 7.1) in the TDF/FTC + DTG arm, and 3.2 kg (SD, 8.1) in the TDF/FTC/EFV arm at 192 weeks from baseline and was greatest among women, those taking TAF, and those with lower baseline CD4 counts. The weight trajectory slowed after week 96. There were few clinical events and minor laboratory changes and differences among arms after 96 weeks. There were no significant differences in treatment-emergent hypertension or pregnancy outcomes by arm. Conclusions: High viral suppression was seen across arms, with no resistance to DTG. Weight gain continued but slowed after 96 weeks, with few clinical events or laboratory changes.

Determinants of early change in serum creatinine after initiation of dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy in South Africa.

AIMS: Dolutegravir increases serum creatinine by inhibiting its renal tubular secretion and elimination. We investigated determinants of early changes in serum creatinine in a southern African cohort starting first-line dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART). METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from participants in a randomized controlled trial of dolutegravir, emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) (ADVANCE, NCT03122262). We assessed clinical, pharmacokinetic and genetic factors associated with change in serum creatinine from baseline to Week 4 using linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, baseline serum creatinine, HIV-1 RNA concentration, CD4 T-cell count, total body weight and co-trimoxazole use. RESULTS: We included 689 participants, of whom 470 had pharmacokinetic data and 315 had genetic data. Mean change in serum creatinine was 11.3 (SD 9.9) µmol.L-1. Factors that were positively associated with change in serum creatinine at Week 4 were increased log dolutegravir area under the 24-h concentration-time curve (change in creatinine coefficient [ß] = 2.78 µmol.L-1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54, 5.01]), TDF use (ß = 2.30 [0.53, 4.06]), male sex (ß = 5.20 [2.92, 7.48]), baseline serum creatinine (ß = -0.22 [-0.31, -0.12]) and UGT1A1 rs929596 A→G polymorphism with a dominant model (ß = -2.33 [-4.49, -0.17]). The latter did not withstand correction for multiple testing. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple clinical and pharmacokinetic factors were associated with early change in serum creatinine in individuals initiating dolutegravir-based ART. UGT1A1 polymorphisms may play a role, but further research on genetic determinants is needed.

Pharmacokinetics of Single-Dose Versus Double-Dose Dolutegravir After Switching From a Failing Efavirenz-Based Regimen.

BACKGROUND: Dolutegravir exposure is reduced after switching from efavirenz, which could select for dolutegravir resistance if switching occurs during virologic failure. METHODS: We measured serial dolutegravir trough concentrations after switching from efavirenz in a clinical trial, which randomized some participants to a supplemental dolutegravir dose or placebo for the first 14 days. Changes in dolutegravir trough concentrations between days 3, 7, 14, and 28 were evaluated. The primary outcome was the geometric mean ratio of dolutegravir trough concentrations on day 7 versus day 28. RESULTS: Twenty-four participants received double-dose dolutegravir (50 mg twice daily) and 11 standard dose for the first 14 days. Baseline characteristics were 77% female, median age 36 years, CD4 cell count 254 cells/mm3, and HIV-1 RNA 4.0 log10 copies/mL. The geometric mean ratio (90% CI) of dolutegravir trough concentrations on day 7 versus day 28 was 0.637 (0.485 to 0.837) in the standard-dose group and 1.654 (1.404 to 1.948) in the double-dose group. There was a prolonged induction effect at day 28 in participants with efavirenz slow metaboliser genotypes. One participant in the double-dose group had a dolutegravir trough concentration below the protein-binding adjusted concentration needed to inhibit 90% of HIV-1 (PA-IC90) at day 3. CONCLUSIONS: No participants on standard-dose dolutegravir had dolutegravir trough concentrations below the PA-IC90. Slow efavirenz metaboliser genotypes had higher baseline efavirenz concentrations and more pronounced and longer period of induction postswitch. These findings suggest that a 14-day lead-in supplemental dolutegravir dose may not be necessary when switching from a failing efavirenz-based first-line regimen.

Lymphocyte Count Derived Polygenic Score and Interindividual Variability in CD4 T-cell Recovery in Response to Antiretroviral Therapy.

Access to safe and effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) is a cornerstone in the global response to the HIV pandemic. Among people living with HIV, there is considerable interindividual variability in absolute CD4 T-cell recovery following initiation of virally suppressive ART. The contribution of host genetics to this variability is not well understood. We explored the contribution of a polygenic score which was derived from large, publicly available summary statistics for absolute lymphocyte count from individuals in the general population (PGSlymph) due to a lack of publicly available summary statistics for CD4 T-cell count. We explored associations with baseline CD4 T-cell count prior to ART initiation (n=4959) and change from baseline to week 48 on ART (n=3274) among treatment-naïve participants in prospective, randomized ART studies of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group. We separately examined an African-ancestry-derived and a European-ancestry-derived PGSlymph, and evaluated their performance across all participants, and also in the African and European ancestral groups separately. Multivariate models that included PGSlymph, baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, age, sex, and 15 principal components (PCs) of genetic similarity explained ∼26-27% of variability in baseline CD4 T-cell count, but PGSlymph accounted for <1% of this variability. Models that also included baseline CD4 T-cell count explained ∼7-9% of variability in CD4 T-cell count increase on ART, but PGSlymph accounted for <1% of this variability. In univariate analyses, PGSlymph was not significantly associated with baseline or change in CD4 T-cell count. Among individuals of African ancestry, the African PGSlymph term in the multivariate model was significantly associated with change in CD4 T-cell count while not significant in the univariate model. When applied to lymphocyte count in a general medical biobank population (Penn Medicine BioBank), PGSlymph explained ∼6-10% of variability in multivariate models (including age, sex, and PCs) but only ∼1% in univariate models. In summary, a lymphocyte count PGS derived from the general population was not consistently associated with CD4 T-cell recovery on ART. Nonetheless, adjusting for clinical covariates is quite important when estimating such polygenic effects.

Major Genetic Drivers of Statin Treatment Response in African Populations and Pharmacogenetics of Dyslipidemia Through a One Health Lens.

A One Health lens is increasingly significant to address the intertwined challenges in planetary health concerned with the health of humans, nonhuman animals, plants, and ecosystems. A One Health approach can benefit the public health systems in Africa that are overburdened by noncommunicable, infectious, and environmental diseases. Notably, the COVID-19 pandemic revealed the previously overlooked two-fold importance of pharmacogenetics (PGx), for individually tailored treatment of noncommunicable diseases and environmental pathogens. For example, dyslipidemia, a common cardiometabolic risk factor, has been identified as an independent COVID-19 severity risk factor. Observational data suggest that patients with COVID-19 infection receiving lipid-lowering therapy may have better outcomes. However, among African patients, the response to these drugs varies from patient to patient, pointing to the possible contribution of genetic variation in important pharmacogenes. The PGx of lipid-lowering therapies may underlie differences in treatment responses observed among dyslipidemia patients as well as patients comorbid with COVID-19 and dyslipidemia. Genetic variations in APOE, ABCB1, CETP, CYP2C9, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, HMGCR, LDLR, NPC1L1, and SLCO1B1 genes affect the pharmacogenomics of statins, and they have individually been linked to differential responses to dyslipidemia and COVID-19 treatment. African populations are underrepresented in PGx research. This leads to poor accounting of additional diverse genetic variants that could be important in understanding interindividual and between-population variations in therapeutic responses to dyslipidemia and COVID-19. This expert review examines and synthesizes the salient and priority PGx variations, as seen through a One Health lens in Africa, to improve and inform personalized medicine in both dyslipidemia and COVID-19.

Objectively measured medication adherence using assays for carvedilol and enalaprilat in patients with heart failure in Mozambique and Nigeria.

Background: Poor medication adherence leads to poor health outcomes and increased healthcare costs among patients with heart failure (HF). This study aimed to objectively assess medication adherence by measuring carvedilol and enalaprilat plasma concentrations among patients with HF. Methods: The present sub-study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Rapid Optimization, helped by NT-proBNP testing, of Heart Failure therapies (STRONG-HF) study involved adult patients with acute HF admitted in two Mozambican and two Nigerian hospitals who were not optimally treated with oral enalapril and carvedilol. Patients in the high-intensity arm of the STRONG-HF study, and those not meeting the biomarker criteria for persistent congestion, were included in the "frequent visit" (FV) arm. In the FV arm, blood for bioanalysis of plasma enalaprilat or/and carvedilol was drawn at the 2,6,12th week post-discharge. Patients in the usual care arm of STRONG-HF were included in the "standard visit" (SV) arm, which followed the usual local practice with blood sampling in week 12. Results: The study involved 113 (79 FV and 34 SV) participants with a mean age of 48.6 years and a mean left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction of 33.1%. Theenalaprilat below the lower level of quantification (LLOQ) was documented in 7.7%, 11.9%, and 15.6% of participants in FV during the 2,6 and 12th weeks. Carvedilol concentration below LLOQ was documented in 37%, 30%, and 44.4% of participants in the FV arm during the 2,6 and 12th weeks, respectively. For the SV arm, enalaprilat and carvedilol concentrations below LLOQ in the twelfth week were documented in 37.3% and 42.9% of patients, respectively. Conclusion: Up to a third of patients using enalapril and carvedilol did not take any medication during the 12 weeks of follow-up. Non adherence was more common in patients who had less follow up, emphasizing the importance of close follow up to adherence. No adherence was also more common in medications know to have more side effects such as carvedilol.

Towards Evidence-Based Implementation of Pharmacogenomics in Southern Africa: Comorbidities and Polypharmacy Profiles across Diseases.

Pharmacogenomics may improve patient care by guiding drug selection and dosing; however, this requires prior knowledge of the pharmacogenomics of drugs commonly used in a specific setting. The aim of this study was to identify a preliminary set of pharmacogenetic variants important in Southern Africa. We describe comorbidities in 3997 patients from Malawi, South Africa, and Zimbabwe. These patient cohorts were included in pharmacogenomic studies of anticoagulation, dyslipidemia, hypertension, HIV and breast cancer. The 20 topmost prescribed drugs in this population were identified. Using the literature, a list of pharmacogenes vital in the response to the top 20 drugs was constructed leading to drug-gene pairs potentially informative in translation of pharmacogenomics. The most reported morbidity was hypertension (58.4%), making antihypertensives the most prescribed drugs, particularly amlodipine. Dyslipidemia occurred in 31.5% of the participants, and statins were the most frequently prescribed as cholesterol-lowering drugs. HIV was reported in 20.3% of the study participants, with lamivudine/stavudine/efavirenz being the most prescribed antiretroviral combination. Based on these data, pharmacogenes of immediate interest in Southern African populations include ABCB1, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, SLC22A1, SLCO1B1 and UGT1A1. Variants in these genes are a good starting point for pharmacogenomic translation programs in Southern Africa.

Pharmacogenetics of tenofovir clearance among Southern Africans living with HIV.

BACKGROUND: Tenofovir is a component of preferred combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens in Africa. Few pharmacogenetic studies have been conducted on tenofovir exposure in Africa, where genetic diversity is greatest. OBJECTIVE: We characterized the pharmacogenetics of plasma tenofovir clearance in Southern Africans receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or tenofovir alafenamide (TAF). METHODS: Adults randomized to TAF or TDF in dolutegravir-containing arms of the ADVANCE trial (NCT03122262) were studied. Linear regression models stratified by study arm examined associations with unexplained variability in tenofovir clearance. We investigated genetic associations with polymorphisms selected a priori followed by genome-wide associations. RESULTS: A total of 268 participants (138 and 130 in the TAF and TDF arm, respectively) were evaluable for associations. Among polymorphisms previously associated with any drug-related phenotype, IFNL4 rs12979860 was associated with more rapid tenofovir clearance in both arms (TAF: P = 0.003; TDF: P = 0.003). Genome-wide, the lowest P values for tenofovir clearance in TAF and TDF arms were LINC01684 rs9305223 (P = 3.0 × 10-8) and intergenic rs142693425 (P = 1.4 × 10-8), respectively. CONCLUSION: Among Southern Africans randomized to TAF or TDF in ADVANCE, unexplained variability in tenofovir clearance was associated with a polymorphism in IFNL4, an immune-response gene. It is unclear how this gene would affect tenofovir disposition.

Pharmacogenetics of tenofovir renal toxicity in HIV-positive Southern Africans.

OBJECTIVE: Renal toxicity is more common with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) than with tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF). We investigated whether polymorphisms in genes relevant to tenofovir disposition affect renal toxicity among HIV-positive Southern Africans. METHODS: Genetic sub-study of adults randomized to initiate TAF or TDF together with dolutegravir and emtricitabine was conducted. Outcomes were changes from week 4 to 48 in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and from baseline to week 48 in urine retinol-binding protein and urine ß2-microglobulin adjusted for urinary creatinine (uRBP/Cr and uB2M/Cr). Primary analyses prioritized 14 polymorphisms previously reported to be associated with tenofovir disposition or renal outcomes, and all polymorphisms in 14 selected genes. We also explored genome-wide associations. RESULTS: 336 participants were enrolled. Among 14 polymorphisms of primary interest, the lowest P values for change in eGFR, uRBP/Cr, and uB2M/Cr were ABCC4 rs899494 ( P  = 0.022), ABCC10 rs2125739 ( P  = 0.07), and ABCC4 rs1059751 ( P  = 0.0088); and in genes of interest, the lowest P values were ABCC4 rs4148481 ( P  = 0.0013), rs691857 ( P  = 0.00039), and PKD2 rs72659631 ( P  = 0.0011). However, none of these polymorphisms withstood correction for multiple testing. Genome-wide, the lowest P values were COL27A1 rs1687402 ( P  = 3.4 × 10 -9 ), CDH4 rs66494466 ( P  = 5.6 × 10 -8 ), and ITGA4 rs3770126 ( P  = 6.1 × 10 -7 ). CONCLUSION: Two ABCC4 polymorphisms, rs899494 and rs1059751, were nominally associated with change in eGFR and uB2M/Cr, respectively, albeit in the opposite direction of previous reports. COL27A1 polymorphism was genome-wide significantly associated with change in eGFR.

Population pharmacokinetics of tenofovir given as either tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or tenofovir alafenamide in an African population.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are prodrugs of the nucleotide analogue tenofovir, which acts intracellularly to inhibit HIV replication. Whereas TDF converts to tenofovir in plasma and may cause kidney and bone toxicity, TAF mostly converts to tenofovir intracellularly, so it can be administered at lower doses. TAF leads to lower tenofovir plasma concentrations and lower toxicity, but there are limited data on its use in Africa. We used data from 41 South African adults living with HIV from the ADVANCE trial and described, with a joint model, the population pharmacokinetics of tenofovir given as TAF or TDF. The TDF was modeled to appear in plasma as tenofovir with a simple first-order process. Instead, two parallel pathways were used for a TAF dose: an estimated 32.4% quickly appeared as tenofovir into the systemic circulation with first-order absorption, whereas the rest was sequestered intracellularly and released into the systemic circulation as tenofovir slowly. Once in plasma (from either TAF or TDF), tenofovir disposition followed two-compartment kinetics and had a clearance of 44.7 L/h (40.2-49.5), for a typical 70-kg individual. This semimechanistic model describes the population pharmacokinetics of tenofovir when dosed as either TDF or TAF in an African population living with HIV and can be used as a tool for exposure prediction in patients, and to simulate alternative regimes to inform further clinical trials.

Leveraging Multi-Ancestry Polygenic Risk Scores for Body Mass Index to Predict Antiretroviral Therapy-Induced Weight Gain.

Widespread availability of antiretroviral therapies (ART) for HIV-1 have generated considerable interest in understanding the pharmacogenomics of ART. In some individuals, ART has been associated with excessive weight gain, which disproportionately affects women of African ancestry. The underlying biology of ART-associated weight gain is poorly understood, but some genetic markers which modify weight gain risk have been suggested, with more genetic factors likely remaining undiscovered. To overcome limitations in available sample sizes for genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in people with HIV, we explored whether a multi-ancestry polygenic risk score (PRS) derived from large, publicly available non-HIV GWAS for body mass index (BMI) can achieve high cross-ancestry performance for predicting baseline BMI in diverse, prospective ART clinical trials datasets, and whether that PRSBMI is also associated with change in BMI over 48 weeks on ART. We show that PRSBMI explained ∼5-7% of variability in baseline (pre-ART) BMI, with high performance in both European and African genetic ancestry groups, but that PRSBMI was not associated with change in BMI on ART. This study argues against a shared genetic predisposition for baseline (pre-ART) BMI and ART-associated weight gain.

Validation of a quantitative multiplex LC-MS/MS assay of carvedilol, enalaprilat, and perindoprilat in dried blood spots from heart failure patients and its cross validation with a plasma assay.

Introduction: Adherence to medication is an important determinant of outcomes in chronic diseases like heart failure. Drug assays provide objective adherence biomarkers. Dried blood spots (DBS) are appealing samples for drug assays due to less demanding transportation and storage requirements. Objectives: To analytically validate a LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of carvedilol, enalaprilat, and perindoprilat in DBS and evaluate the feasibility of using the method as an adherence determining assay. To validate the assay further clinically by establishing correlation and agreement between plasma and DBS samples from a pharmacokinetic pilot study. Methods: The method was validated over a concentration range of 1.00-200 ng/mL according to FDA guidelines. Adherence tracking ability of the assay was evaluated using a pharmacokinetic pilot study. Correlation and agreement were evaluated through Deming regression and Bland-Altman analysis, respectively. Results: Accuracy, precision, selectivity, and sensitivity were proven with complete and reproducible extraction recovery at all concentrations tested. Stability of the analytes in the matrix and throughout sample processing was proven. The full range of concentrations of the pharmacokinetic pilot study could be quantified for enalaprilat, but not for carvedilol and perindoprilat. The difference between the observed and calculated plasma concentrations was less than 20 % of their mean for >67 % of samples for all analytes. Conclusions: The assay is suitable as a screening tool for carvedilol and perindoprilat, while suitable as an adherence determining assay for enalaprilat. Equivalence between observed and predicted plasma concentrations proves DBS and plasma concentrations can be used interchangeably.

Pharmacogenomics of Hypertension in Africa: Paving the Way for a Pharmacogenetic-Based Approach for the Treatment of Hypertension in Africans.

In Africa, the burden of hypertension has been rising at an alarming rate for the last two decades and is a major cause for cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality and morbidity. Hypertension is characterised by elevated blood pressure (BP) ≥ 140/90 mmHg. Current hypertension guidelines recommend the use of antihypertensives belonging to the following classes: calcium channel blockers (CCB), angiotensin converting inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), diuretics, ß-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), to manage hypertension. Still, a considerable number of hypertensives in Africa have their BP uncontrolled due to poor drug response and remain at the risk of CVD events. Genetic factors are a major contributing factor, accounting for 20% to 80% of individual variability in therapy and poor response. Poor response to antihypertensive drug therapy is characterised by elevated BPs and occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). As a result, there have been numerous studies which have examined the role of genetic variation and its influence on antihypertensive drug response. These studies are predominantly carried out in non-African populations, including Europeans and Asians, with few or no Africans participating. It is important to note that the greatest genetic diversity is observed in African populations as well as the highest prevalence of hypertension. As a result, this warrants a need to focus on how genetic variation affects response to therapeutic interventions used to manage hypertension in African populations. In this paper, we discuss the implications of genetic diversity in CYP11B2, GRK4, NEDD4L, NPPA, SCNN1B, UMOD, CYP411, WNK, CYP3A4/5, ACE, ADBR1/2, GNB3, NOS3, B2, BEST3, SLC25A31, LRRC15 genes, and chromosome 12q loci on hypertension susceptibility and response to antihypertensive therapy. We show that African populations are poorly explored genetically, and for the few characterised genes, they exhibit qualitative and quantitative differences in the profile of pharmacogene variants when compared to other ethnic groups. We conclude by proposing prioritization of pharmacogenetics research in Africa and possible adoption of pharmacogenetic-guided therapies for hypertension in African patients. Finally, we outline the implications, challenges, and opportunities these studies present for populations of non-European descent.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic associations with dolutegravir neuropsychiatric adverse events in an African population.

BACKGROUND: Dolutegravir has been associated with neuropsychiatric adverse events (NPAEs), but relationships between dolutegravir concentrations and NPAEs are unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determine in an African population whether a concentration-response relationship exists between dolutegravir and treatment-emergent NPAEs, and whether selected loss-of-function polymorphisms in genes encoding UDP-glucuronosyltransferase-1A1 (the major metabolizing enzyme for dolutegravir) and organic cation transporter-2 (involved in neurotransmitter transport and inhibited by dolutegravir) are associated with NPAEs. METHODS: Antiretroviral therapy-naive participants randomized to dolutegravir-based therapy in the ADVANCE study were enrolled into a pharmacokinetic sub-study. Primary outcome was change in mental health screening [modified mini screen (MMS)] and sleep quality from baseline to weeks 4, 12 and 24. Dolutegravir exposure was estimated using a population pharmacokinetic model. Polymorphisms analysed were UGT1A1 rs887829 and SLC22A2 rs316019. RESULTS: Data from 464 participants were available for pharmacokinetic analyses and 301 for genetic analyses. By multivariable linear regression, higher dolutegravir exposure was associated with worsening sleep quality only at week 12 [coefficient  = -0.854 (95% CI -1.703 to -0.005), P = 0.049], but with improved MMS score at weeks 12 and 24 [coefficient = -1.255 (95% CI -2.250 to -0.261), P = 0.013 and coefficient = -1.199 (95% CI -2.030 to -0.368), P = 0.005, respectively]. The UGT1A1 and SLC22A2 polymorphisms were not associated with change in MMS score or sleep quality. CONCLUSIONS: Only at week 12 did we find evidence of a relationship between dolutegravir exposure and worsening sleep quality. However, higher dolutegravir exposure was associated with improved MMS scores, suggesting a possible beneficial effect.

Pharmacogenetics of Dolutegravir Plasma Exposure Among Southern Africans With Human Immunodeficiency Virus.

BACKGROUND: Dolutegravir is a component of preferred antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens. We characterized the pharmacogenetics of dolutegravir exposure after ART initiation in the ADVANCE trial in South Africa. METHODS: Genome-wide genotyping followed by imputation was performed. We developed a population pharmacokinetic model for dolutegravir using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Linear regression models examined associations with unexplained variability in dolutegravir area under the concentration-time curve (AUCVAR). RESULTS: Genetic associations were evaluable in 284 individuals. Of 9 polymorphisms previously associated with dolutegravir pharmacokinetics, the lowest P value with AUCVAR was UGT1A1 rs887829 (P = 1.8 × 10-4), which was also associated with log10 bilirubin (P = 8.6 × 10-13). After adjusting for rs887829, AUCVAR was independently associated with rs28899168 in the UGT1A locus (P = .02), as were bilirubin concentrations (P = 7.7 × 10-8). In the population pharmacokinetic model, rs887829 T/T and C/T were associated with 25.9% and 10.8% decreases in dolutegravir clearance, respectively, compared with C/C. The lowest P value for AUCVAR genome-wide was CAMKMT rs343942 (P = 2.4 × 10-7). CONCLUSIONS: In South Africa, rs887829 and rs28899168 in the UGT1A locus were independently associated with dolutegravir AUCVAR. The novel rs28899168 association warrants replication. This study enhances understanding of dolutegravir pharmacogenetics in Africa.