RESUMEN
Farmers constitute a large professional group worldwide. In developed countries farms tend to become larger, with a concentration of farm operations. Animal farming has been associated with negative respiratory effects such as work-related asthma and rhinitis. However, being born and raised or working on a farm reduces the risk of atopic asthma and rhinitis later in life. A risk of chronic bronchitis and bronchial obstruction/COPD has been reported in confinement buildings and livestock farmers. This position paper reviews the literature linking exposure information to intensive animal farming and the risk of work-related respiratory diseases and focuses on prevention. Animal farming is associated with exposure to organic dust containing allergens and microbial matter including alive microorganisms and viruses, endotoxins and other factors like irritant gases such as ammonia and disinfectants. These exposures have been identified as specific agents/risk factors of asthma, rhinitis, chronic bronchitis, COPD and reduced FEV1. Published studies on dust and endotoxin exposure in livestock farmers do not show a downward trend in exposure over the last 30 years, suggesting that the workforce in these industries is still overexposed and at risk of developing respiratory disease. In cases of occupational asthma and rhinitis, avoidance of further exposure to causal agents is recommended, but it may not be obtainable in agriculture, mainly due to socio-economic considerations. Hence, there is an urgent need for focus on farming exposure in order to protect farmers and others at work in these and related industries from developing respiratory diseases and allergy.
RESUMEN
The aim of this document was to provide a critical review of the current knowledge on hypersensitivity pneumonitis caused by the occupational environment and to propose practical guidance for the diagnosis and management of this condition. Occupational hypersensitivity pneumonitis (OHP) is an immunologic lung disease resulting from lymphocytic and frequently granulomatous inflammation of the peripheral airways, alveoli, and surrounding interstitial tissue which develops as the result of a non-IgE-mediated allergic reaction to a variety of organic materials or low molecular weight agents that are present in the workplace. The offending agents can be classified into six broad categories that include bacteria, fungi, animal proteins, plant proteins, low molecular weight chemicals, and metals. The diagnosis of OHP requires a multidisciplinary approach and relies on a combination of diagnostic tests to ascertain the work relatedness of the disease. Both the clinical and the occupational history are keys to the diagnosis and often will lead to the initial suspicion. Diagnostic criteria adapted to OHP are proposed. The cornerstone of treatment is early removal from exposure to the eliciting antigen, although the disease may show an adverse outcome even after avoidance of exposure to the causal agent.
Asunto(s)
Alveolitis Alérgica Extrínseca/diagnóstico , Alveolitis Alérgica Extrínseca/terapia , Enfermedades Profesionales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Profesionales/terapia , Alveolitis Alérgica Extrínseca/epidemiología , Alveolitis Alérgica Extrínseca/etiología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Anaphylaxis is a systemic allergic reaction, potentially life-threatening that can be due to nonoccupational or, less commonly, to occupational triggers. Occupational anaphylaxis (OcAn) could be defined as anaphylaxis arising out of triggers and conditions attributable to a particular work environment. Hymenoptera stings and natural rubber latex are the commonest triggers of OcAn. Other triggers include food, medications, insect/mammal/snake bites, and chemicals. The underlying mechanisms of anaphylactic reactions due to occupational exposure are usually IgE-mediated and less frequently non-IgE-mediated allergy or nonallergic. Some aspects of work-related allergen exposure, such as route and frequency of exposure, type of allergens, and cofactors may explain the variability of symptoms in contrast to the nonoccupational setting. When assessing OcAn, both confirmation of the diagnosis of anaphylactic reaction and identification of the trigger are required. Prevention of further episodes is important and is based on removal from further exposure. Workers with a history of OcAn should immediately be provided with a written emergency management plan and an adrenaline auto-injector and educated to its use. Immunotherapy is recommended only for OcAn due to Hymenoptera stings.
Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales , Anafilaxia/prevención & control , Animales , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como AsuntoRESUMEN
The term irritant-induced (occupational) asthma (IIA) has been used to denote various clinical forms of asthma related to irritant exposure at work. The causal relationship between irritant exposure(s) and the development of asthma can be substantiated by the temporal association between the onset of asthma symptoms and a single or multiple high-level exposure(s) to irritants, whereas this relationship can only be inferred from epidemiological data for workers chronically exposed to moderate levels of irritants. Accordingly, the following clinical phenotypes should be distinguished within the wide spectrum of irritant-related asthma: (i) definite IIA, that is acute-onset IIA characterized by the rapid onset of asthma within a few hours after a single exposure to very high levels of irritant substances; (ii) probable IIA, that is asthma that develops in workers with multiple symptomatic high-level exposures to irritants; and (iii) possible IIA, that is asthma occurring with a delayed-onset after chronic exposure to moderate levels of irritants. This document prepared by a panel of experts summarizes our current knowledge on the diagnostic approach, epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of the various phenotypes of IIA.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Asma Ocupacional/clasificación , Asma Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Humanos , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In this multicenter survey, we assessed the impact of sensitization to cypress in atopic patients in Italy and determined whether cypress pollen concentration changed over time. METHODS: Allergists were required to collect the results of 100-200 consecutive skin prick tests (SPTs) performed during 2012. Seasonal symptoms were also recorded, as were airborne cypress pollen concentrations (data from the Italian Aerobiology Association) in 1998-2000 and 2010-2012. RESULTS: We examined 2258 atopic outpatients (56% females; age, 2-84 years) sensitized to at least 1 of the aeroallergens tested (Dermatophagoides species, grass, pellitory, olive, cypress, birch, Alternaria tenuis, and dog and cat dander). We found that 62.9%, 16.1%, and 32.7% of patients living in central, northern, and southern Italy, respectively, were sensitized to cypress (P < .0001). The cypress pollen concentration peak was delayed from February to March in 1998-2000 and 2010-2012 in all 3 regions, with a shift in pollination towards spring. Patients who were monosensitized to cypress reported mainly rhinitis (90.7%-97.6%) and conjunctivitis (38.1%-100%). In polysensitized patients, the prevalence of rhinitis, conjunctivitis, and asthma increased progressively (P < .0001) from southern to northern Italy. The same trend was observed for the prevalence of reported winter symptoms typical of cypress allergy (28%-65%). CONCLUSIONS: Today, cypress pollen is the most frequent sensitizing aeroallergen (assessed by SPT) in several areas of central Italy. Variations in the timing of the cypress pollination period may have favored this increased sensitization. Rhinitis and conjunctivitis are the predominant symptoms. The clinical impact of this allergy was poor in southern Italy and increased in central areas before reaching its peak in northern regions.
Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/inmunología , Cupressus/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad/inmunología , Polen/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Objectives: In this multicenter survey, we assessed the impact of sensitization to cypress in atopic patients in Italy and determined whether cypress pollen concentration changed over time. Methods: Allergists were required to collect the results of 100-200 consecutive skin prick tests (SPTs) performed during 2012. Seasonal symptoms were also recorded, as were airborne cypress pollen concentrations (data from the Italian Aerobiology Association) in 1998- 2000 and 2010-2012. Results: We examined 2258 atopic outpatients (56% females; age, 2-84 years) sensitized to at least 1 of the aeroallergens tested (Dermatophagoides species, grass, pellitory, olive, cypress, birch, Alternaria tenuis, and dog and cat dander). We found that 62.9%, 16.1%, and 32.7% of patients living in central, northern, and southern Italy, respectively, were sensitized to cypress (P<.0001). The cypress pollen concentration peak was delayed from February to March in 1998-2000 and 2010-2012 in all 3 regions, with a shift in pollination towards spring. Patients who were monosensitized to cypress reported mainly rhinitis (90.7%-97.6%) and conjunctivitis (38.1%-100%). In polysensitized patients, the prevalence of rhinitis, conjunctivitis, and asthma increased progressively (P<.0001) from southern to northern Italy. The same trend was observed for the prevalence of reported winter symptoms typical of cypress allergy (28%-65%). Conclusions: Today, cypress pollen is the most frequent sensitizing aeroallergen (assessed by SPT) in several areas of central Italy. Variations in the timing of the cypress pollination period may have favored this increased sensitization. Rhinitis and conjunctivitis are the predominant symptoms. The clinical impact of this allergy was poor in southern Italy and increased in central areas before reaching its peak in northern regions (AU)
Antecedentes: Se trata de una encuesta multicéntrica realizada en Italia para evaluar el impacto de la sensibilización a polen de ciprés en sujetos atópicos y establecer si la concentración de este polen en el aire ha cambiado a lo largo del tiempo. Métodos: El estudio fue realizado por alergólogos que recopilaron 100-200 sujetos consecutivos con pruebas cutáneas positivas (Prick) realizadas en 2012. Se recogieron los síntomas estacionales, junto con la concentración de polen de ciprés (obtenida por la asociación italiana de aerobiología) en 1998-2000 y 2010-2012. Resultados: En cuanto a los resultados obtenidos fueron examinados 2258 pacientes atópicos (56% mujeres; edad 2-84), sensibilizados frente al menos uno de los aeroalérgenos testados (Dermatophagoides, gramíneas, parietaria, olivo, cipres, abedul, Alternaria tenuis y epitelio de gato). El 62.9%, 16.1% y 32.7% de los pacientes que vivían en el centro, norte y sur de Italia, respectivamente, mostraron sensibilización a polen de ciprés (p<0.0001). Observamos un pico de concentración de polen de ciprés de febrero a marzo en los años 1998-2000 y 2010-2012, en todas las áreas. Los pacientes monosensibilizados a ciprés mostraron de forma prevalente rinitis (90.7-97.6%) y conjuntivitis (38.1-100%). La prevalencia de rinitis, conjuntivitis y asma se incrementa progresivamente (p<0.0001) del sur hacia el norte de Italia en los sujetos polisensibilizados. La misma tendencia se observó en los síntomas invernales típicos de la alergia al ciprés. Conclusiones: En conclusión, actualmente el polen de ciprés es el aeroalérgeno sensibilizante más frecuente (según resultados de prueba cutánea) en varias áreas de Italia central. Las variaciones del periodo de polinización pueden favorecer el incremento observado en la sensibilización a este polen. Los síntomas predominantes son rinitis y conjuntivitis. El impacto clínico de esta alergia es pobre en áreas del sur de Italia, siendo alto en las áreas del norte (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Cupressus , Polen/efectos adversos , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/epidemiología , Antígenos de Plantas/aislamiento & purificación , Anafilaxia/epidemiología , Italia , Pruebas Cutáneas , Encuestas EpidemiológicasRESUMEN
Professional and domestic cleaning is associated with work-related asthma (WRA). This position paper reviews the literature linking exposure to cleaning products and the risk of asthma and focuses on prevention. Increased risk of asthma has been shown in many epidemiological and surveillance studies, and several case reports describe the relationship between exposure to one or more cleaning agents and WRA. Cleaning sprays, bleach, ammonia, disinfectants, mixing products, and specific job tasks have been identified as specific causes and/or triggers of asthma. Because research conclusions and policy suggestions have remained unheeded by manufactures, vendors, and commercial cleaning companies, it is time for a multifaceted intervention. Possible preventive measures encompass the following: substitution of cleaning sprays, bleach, and ammonia; minimizing the use of disinfectants; avoidance of mixing products; use of respiratory protective devices; and worker education. Moreover, we suggest the education of unions, consumer, and public interest groups to encourage safer products. In addition, information activities for the general population with the purpose of improving the knowledge of professional and domestic cleaners regarding risks and available preventive measures and to promote strict collaboration between scientific communities and safety and health agencies are urgently needed.
Asunto(s)
Asma/etiología , Asma/epidemiología , Asma/prevención & control , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Vigilancia en Salud PúblicaRESUMEN
Work-related asthma (WRA) is a relevant problem in several countries, is cause of disability and socioeconomic consequences for both the patient and the society and is probably still underdiagnosed. A correct diagnosis is extremely important to reduce or limit the consequences of the disease. This consensus document was prepared by a EAACI Task Force consisting of an expert panel of allergologists, pneumologists and occupational physicians from different European countries. This document is not intended to address in detail the full diagnostic work-up of WRA, nor to be a formal evidence-based guideline. It is written to provide an operative protocol to allergologists and physicians dealing with asthma useful for identifying the subjects suspected of having WRA to address them to in-depth investigations in a specialized centre. No evidence-based system could be used because of the low grade of evidence of published studies in this area, and instead, 'key messages' or 'suggestions' are provided based on consensus of the expert panel members.
Asunto(s)
Asma Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Comités Consultivos , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Pruebas de Función RespiratoriaRESUMEN
Apprenticeship is a period of increased risk of developing work-related respiratory allergic diseases. There is a need for documents to provide appropriate professional advice to young adults aiming to reduce unsuitable job choices and prevent impairment from their careers. The present document is the result of a consensus reached by a panel of experts from European and non-European countries addressed to allergologists, pneumologists, occupational physicians, primary care physicians, and other specialists interested in this field, which aims to reduce work-related respiratory allergies (rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma) among allergic or nonallergic apprentices and other young adults entering the workforce. The main objective of the document is to issue consensus suggestions for good clinical practice based on existing scientific evidence and the expertise of a panel of physicians.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Hipersensibilidad Respiratoria/prevención & control , Adolescente , Asma/epidemiología , Asma/etiología , Asma/prevención & control , Ambiente Controlado , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Inmunización/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Capacitación en Servicio , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Hipersensibilidad Respiratoria/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad Respiratoria/etiología , Rinitis/epidemiología , Rinitis/etiología , Rinitis/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Horses play a significant role in people's leisure time in Italy and other countries, but few data are available on IgE-mediated sensitization to horse allergens in patients without occupational exposure. We assessed, in a multicentric survey, the prevalence of horse sensitization in atopic subjects and its clinical characteristics. METHODS: Allergists from the whole Italian territory were required to collect the results of skin prick tests from at least 100 consecutive subjects. Those patients with a positive skin test to horse dander underwent a detailed interview concerning clinical history, pet ownership and possible exposure. RESULTS: Data from 3,235 outpatients were collected and 2,097 had at least 1 skin positivity. Among them, 113 (5.38%) were sensitized to horse dander (9 monosensitized). Thirty patients reported direct horse contact (4 owners and 26 for riding or occasional contact), 23 patients were sometimes in contact with horse owners and 60 subjects denied any direct or indirect exposure. Among 9 horse monosensitized patients, 6 had intermittent and mild rhinitis and 3 persistent moderate/severe rhinitis plus asthma. Three of them were horse owners or riders and the remaining had no contact with the animal. CONCLUSIONS: Our data evidence that the rate of sensitization to horse dander is not negligible and probably underestimated. In susceptible, not occupationally exposed individuals, horse contact, but also indirect or no apparent exposure, may induce sensitization. We recommend inclusion of horse allergen in the routine panel for the diagnosis of respiratory allergy.
Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/inmunología , Caballos/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional , Hipersensibilidad Respiratoria/epidemiología , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Animales , Asma/epidemiología , Asma/inmunología , Niño , Preescolar , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/etiología , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/inmunología , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hipersensibilidad Respiratoria/etiología , Hipersensibilidad Respiratoria/inmunología , Rinitis/epidemiología , Rinitis/inmunología , Pruebas Cutáneas , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The present document is the result of a consensus reached by a panel of experts from European and nonEuropean countries on Occupational Rhinitis (OR), a disease of emerging relevance, which has received little attention in comparison to occupational asthma. The document covers the main items of OR including epidemiology, diagnosis, management, socio-economic impact, preventive strategies and medicolegal issues. An operational definition and classification of OR tailored to that of occupational asthma, as well as a diagnostic algorithm based on steps allowing different levels of diagnostic evidence, are proposed. The needs for future research are pointed out. Key messages are issued for each item.
Asunto(s)
Asma/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Rinitis/epidemiología , Factores Socioeconómicos , Humanos , Enfermedades Profesionales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Profesionales/terapia , Prevalencia , Rinitis/diagnóstico , Rinitis/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Data for time trends in the prevalence of occupational asthma (OA) and rhinitis (OR) are not known. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and incidence of OA and OR over time. METHODS: We chose to review studies on the prevalence and incidence of OA and OR due to laboratory animals (LA) as a marker of changing OA and OR patterns over time and analysed 15 cross-sectional and 4 longitudinal studies published from 1980 to 2006. RESULTS: The estimated prevalence of OA, defined as work-related chest symptoms (WRCS), declined from 8.2% in 1976 to 4.2% in 2001 (P < 0.005). When defined by WRCS and positive skin prick test (SPT) to LA, the estimated prevalence of OA was 6.7% in 1977 and 2.9% in 1999 (P < 0.02). The prevalence of OR, defined by WRNS or WRNS and SPT to LA, was not related to study date but was inversely associated with mean exposure duration. In four longitudinal studies no clear trend emerged over time. CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests a trend toward a progressive decline in the prevalence of occupational asthma due to laboratory animals, which may be due to the reduction of exposure since the early 1980s. A further reduction of exposure is needed to prevent the onset of occupational rhinitis.
Asunto(s)
Animales de Laboratorio/inmunología , Asma/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/epidemiología , Adulto , Técnicos de Animales , Animales , Asma/inmunología , Estudios Transversales , Cobayas , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Estudios Longitudinales , Ratones , Enfermedades Profesionales/inmunología , Prevalencia , Conejos , Ratas , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/inmunología , Pruebas Cutáneas , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Data for time trends in the prevalence of occupational asthma (OA) and rhinitis (OR) are not known. To investigate trends in the prevalence and incidence of OA and OR over time, we reviewed the available literature. We analysed 15 cross-sectional and 4 longitudinal studies published from 1980 to 2006. In workers exposed to laboratory animals (LA) the prevalence of OA ranged from 2.2% to 11.7%; the prevalence of OR ranged from 6.7% to 41.7%. When we analysed prevalence by study date using a logistic model, the estimated prevalence of OA declined from 8.7% in 1976 to 4.2% in 2001 (p < 0.003), which is -1.8% every ten years. The prevalence of OR rose slightly from 18.5% in 1976 to 19.7% in 2001 (NS). In four longitudinal studies the incidence of OA ranged from 0.4 to 3.5/100 person years, while the incidence of OR ranged from 2.0 to 10.1/100 person years. No clear trend emerged over time. This review shows a trend toward a progressive decline in the prevalence of occupational asthma due to laboratory animals, which may be due to the reduction of exposure since the early 1980s. A further reduction of exposure is needed to prevent the onset of occupational rhinitis.
Asunto(s)
Animales de Laboratorio , Asma/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Rinitis/epidemiología , Animales , Asma/etiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Prevalencia , Rinitis/etiología , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Latex allergy may be manifested in a variety of clinical disturbances such as contact urticaria, angioedema, rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma, and anaphylactic reactions. The aim of this follow-up study was to determine whether a change in glove use from powdered to powder-free latex gloves at previously surveyed hospital workers reduced the work-related symptoms. 53 hospital workers with work-related symptoms where followed up 4,6 years after first investigation. On re-examination, 54.7% use both powdered and powder-free gloves, 37.7% used only latex free gloves and 7.6% stopped the glove use. At follow-up, in 68% of subjects there was the remission or the improvement of work-related symptoms. The improvement of symptoms was greater in workers using powder-free gloves than in others (p < 0.005). In conclusion our study shows that preventive measures, such as the use a powder-free latex gloves, are sufficient to induce a reduction of work-related symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Guantes Quirúrgicos , Hipersensibilidad al Látex/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Personal de Hospital , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , TalcoRESUMEN
Cigarette smoking is a known risk factor for many chronic illnesses such as coronary heart and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. Smoking is often described as a risk factor for occupational asthma even though its effect on the development of asthma is still under debate and the links between smoking and occupational asthma, occupational rhinitis or occupational sensitization are elusive, controversial and contradictory. This review describes these relationships in a wide range of occupations, from laboratory, farm, brewery and hospital workers, to bakers, printers, cleaners, fish processors and others as observed in cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies published over the past thirty-five years i.e. from 1970 to 2005. Surprisingly, the data show there is little to support the view that the risk of occupational asthma is increased in workers who are smokers. However, evidence emerges of an increased risk of occupational sensitization in smoking workers exposed to several high and low molecular weight agents. This in-depth review confirms the relationship between smoking and occupational asthma is complex and contradictory. It deserves more attention and further studies, which need to be conducted without being influenced by selection bias or by the justifiable prejudice against smoking.
Asunto(s)
Asma/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Fumar/efectos adversos , Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/efectos adversos , Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/inmunología , Alérgenos/inmunología , Animales , Animales de Laboratorio/inmunología , Polvo/inmunología , Humanos , Peso Molecular , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
This study evaluated the prevalence and determinants of low back pain (LBP) in Terni hospital workers. Each ward sister completed a questionnaire about potential determinants of LBP associated with physical loads. Moreover, a trained ward sister administered a questionnaire about the characteristics of low back pain to 512 subjects. In the previous year the prevalence of LBP was 58.8%. It was more common in subjects under 45 years of age. >3 LBP episodes annually were more frequent in operating rooms and medical wards. LBP lasted >1 week in 29% of females and in 23% of males. LBP caused change of duties or time off work in 11% of females and in 8% of males.
Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar/epidemiología , Personal de Hospital , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Until the late 1970's occupational asthma (OA) was considered reversible once patients were removed from exposure. Unfortunately, respiratory symptoms and non-specific bronchial hyper-responsiveness (NSBH) persist in about two-thirds of patients for years after removal from the offending agent. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: This review focuses on the role of airways inflammation and remodelling in persistent respiratory symptoms and NSBH after cessation of occupational exposure. RESULTS: Even though cessation of exposure does not always result in remission of OA, symptoms, airways calibre and NSBH do improve in many patients. Although improvements in FEV1 and NSBH tend to reach a plateau 1-2 years after workers leave exposure, reversing NSBH may take much longer and respiratory symptoms and NSBH can persist in subjects removed from exposurefor >10 yrs. Long-term treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) induces a small but significant improvement in respiratory symptoms and in quality of life and a decrease in NSBH. Prolonged exposure and respiratory symptoms, marked airway obstruction and NSBH, high total cell, eosinophil and neutrophil counts in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, a strong reaction during specific inhalation challenge, and delayed treatment with ICS have been identified as prognostic factors of unfavourable outcome. If exposure persists, OA tends to deteriorate in many patients but regular long-term treatment with ICS and long-acting beta2-agonists seems to stabilize the outcome. Soon after the last exposure inflammatory cell infiltrates, including eosinophils, and increased thickness of sub-epithelial collagen have been observed. When time since removal from exposure was longer, persistence of respiratory symptoms and NSBH was associated with airway inflammation, remodelling and hypersensitivity to the offending agent. Thickness of sub-epithelial collagen and specific airway sensitivity were reduced after prolonged non-exposure to isocyanates, although NSBH and airway inflammation persisted. CONCLUSIONS: Pathologic features are similar in OA and non-occupational asthma. The main factors of favourable outcome are early removal from exposure and a mild airway obstruction and NSBH at diagnosis. Persistence of airway inflammation years after removal from exposure suggests this process may become independent of the offending agent. The role of remodelling on persistence of OA needs to be clarified further.
Asunto(s)
Asma/inmunología , Enfermedades Profesionales/inmunología , Asma/patología , Asma/fisiopatología , Humanos , Enfermedades Profesionales/patología , Enfermedades Profesionales/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Larvae of insects and worms, used as live fish bait (LFB), are a common source of allergy in anglers and occupationally exposed workers, but the prevalence and predictors have not yet been investigated. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the prevalence and associated factors of occupational allergy in workers exposed to LFB. METHODS: We assessed the prevalence of sensitization to LFB and work-related symptoms (WRS) in 76 workers occupationally exposed to it. All workers completed a case history questionnaire and underwent skin prick tests (SPT) for common aeroallergens and bluebottle (Calliphora vomitoria), bee moth (Galleria mellonella), mealworm (Tenebrio molitor), and gusano rojo (Cilecomadia moorei). Specific IgE were tested in 64 subjects. Two-thirds of the workers had a high level of LFB exposure. RESULTS: Sensitization to LFB was found in 24 workers (31.6%). Seven subjects (9.2%) reported WRS (asthma in 3, rhinoconjunctivitis in 5, and contact urticaria in 1), and 5 were positive for SPT and serum IgE to one or more LFB extracts. One was also exposed to LFB while fishing. Sensitization to LFB extracts and WRS were strongly associated (Odds Ratio = 6.6, P < 0.05). The 7 subjects with WRS had been exposed longer than asymptomatic subjects with positive skin tests to LFB (P < 0.05). No differences in sex, age, smoking habit, duration or level of exposure, and atopy were detected in symptomatic or in sensitized subjects, compared with normal workers. CONCLUSION: Sensitization to LFB and WRS are relatively frequent in occupationally exposed workers. No associated factors of occupational allergy to LFB could be detected.
Asunto(s)
Explotaciones Pesqueras , Hipersensibilidad/inmunología , Insectos , Enfermedades Profesionales/inmunología , Adulto , Animales , Estudios Transversales , Dípteros , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Larva , Masculino , Mariposas Nocturnas , Prevalencia , TenebrioRESUMEN
According to act 626/1994, employers have the duty to inform and train workers and their representatives. The implementation of training activities requires the following points: planning the training progra according to the needs of the target population, use of the methods aimed at promoting learning and the adoption of safe behaviour, setting-up of evaluation tools. The disciplines of risk perception and communication and adult training may provide useful contribution in this frame. At the light of the preliminary experiences in this field, the importance of the following items for workers, workers representatives and employers is emphasized: probabilistic causality models, role of cognitive and emotional factors in the learning process, definition of carcinogenic according to national and internationals organisation, meaning of TLV with respect to carcinogenic exposure, interaction between carcinogens in the case of multiple exposition, risk evaluation, preventive measures, transfer of carcinogen risk from workplace to domestic environment, due to lack of compliance with basic hygienic rules such proper use of work clothes.